Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -190.0x · EV/EBITDA 2594.7x · ROE -8.6%. (2018–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.4B | $4.0B | $2.0B | $1.2B | $663M | $484M | $441M | $564M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $5.5B | $4.0B | $2.1B | $1.2B | $637M | $455M | $302M | $555M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -190.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 10.45 | 7.61 | 5.83 | 6.48 | 8.60 | 25.27 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 14.25 | 12.60 | 8.71 | 4.85 | 4.67 | 4.02 | 2.56 | 4.32 | — |
| P/FCF | 99.26 | 72.26 | 210.57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 97.57 | 71.03 | 190.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 7.65 | 6.12 | 6.59 | 8.26 | 23.77 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 2594.69 | 1891.81 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 72.68 | 220.78 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 80.7% | 80.7% | 75.8% | 74.8% | 83.9% | 90.1% | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -4.2% | -4.2% | -26.0% | -58.6% | -170.3% | -906.1% | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -4.5% | -4.5% | -26.1% | -87.7% | -176.0% | -438.9% | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -8.6% | -8.6% | -37.1% | -83.7% | -103.5% | -57.5% | -68.3% | -87.6% | — |
| ROA | -3.1% | -3.1% | -13.4% | -32.7% | -41.9% | -31.4% | -53.3% | -52.9% | -33.4% |
| ROIC | -5.0% | -5.0% | -22.2% | -42.3% | -94.8% | -208.5% | -100.7% | -137.5% | — |
| ROCE | -3.7% | -3.7% | -15.9% | -25.8% | -48.6% | -73.1% | -58.6% | -59.8% | -5.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.41 | 1.24 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 151.54 | 151.54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.07 | 0.42 | 0.09 | -0.18 | -0.24 | -0.81 | -0.06 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 10.80 | 10.80 | — | — | — | — | — | — | -35.64 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.41 | 10.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -0.49 | -0.49 | -5.07 | -9.75 | -7.89 | -3.77 | -307.25 | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.67 | 2.67 | 3.10 | 4.45 | 2.94 | 3.91 | 12.80 | 9.13 | 21.22 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.55 | 2.55 | 2.93 | 4.19 | 2.85 | 3.88 | 12.80 | 9.13 | 21.22 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.86 | 1.86 | 2.22 | 3.29 | 2.34 | 3.68 | 12.56 | 8.92 | 21.22 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.62 | 0.50 | 0.29 | 0.22 | 0.06 | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.04 | 4.04 | 3.64 | 2.11 | 2.22 | 1.26 | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 86.35 | 84.82 | 133.11 | 113.65 | 83.29 | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 1.0% | 1.4% | 0.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $50M | $48M | $41M | $34M | $30M | $25M | $23M | $23M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 8 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MIRM stock.
Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -190.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 2594.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA.
Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -8.6%. The historical average is -63.7%.
Based on historical data, Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -190.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has 80.7% gross margin and -4.2% operating margin.
Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 151.5x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
SBC dilution and cash burn
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion Masked by SBC
Gross margin improved from 74.2% in 2024Q1 to 82.8% in 2026Q2, per financial statements, yet operating margin remains deeply negative at -24.1%, suggesting scale benefits are offset by heavy stock-based compensation.
The gross margin trajectory indicates strong product economics and manufacturing efficiencies as volumes scale, but the operating margin of -24.1% in 2026Q2, as reported, reveals that commercial and R&D investments are still outpacing revenue. The gap between gross and operating margins is widening, implying that the company is reinvesting heavily in growth, which may be appropriate for a commercial-stage biotech but pressures near-term profitability. Investors should monitor whether operating leverage can eventually translate gross margin gains into positive operating income, especially given the elevated SBC expense.
Negative Returns Reflect Heavy Investment
ROIC deteriorated to -9.7% in 2026Q2 from -7.8% in 2024Q1, per reported figures, indicating that the company is not yet generating returns on its invested capital, consistent with its early commercialization phase.
The negative ROIC across all quarters, with a low of -16.4% in 2026Q1, suggests that Mirum is in a heavy investment phase, deploying capital into R&D and commercial infrastructure ahead of revenue scale. The asset-light model, with minimal PPE, means returns are driven by intangible assets and working capital, but the current negative returns are typical for a biotech scaling up. The improvement from -16.4% to -9.7% in the latest quarter may indicate early signs of efficiency, but sustained positive ROIC is likely several years away.
Working Capital Efficiency Improves
Cash conversion cycle shortened from 133 days in 2024Q1 to 25 days in 2026Q2, per the ratio data, driven by a sharp increase in days payable outstanding to 124, reflecting improved supplier terms.
The dramatic reduction in CCC is primarily due to DPO rising from 60 to 124 days, which suggests Mirum is leveraging its supplier relationships to preserve cash, a common strategy for cash-burning companies. DSO has remained stable around 70 days, indicating consistent collection practices, while DIO has declined from 112 to 77 days, possibly reflecting better inventory management. However, the negative FCF margin of -155.3% in 2026Q2 indicates that despite working capital improvements, the company is still burning cash heavily, and the reliance on extended payables may not be sustainable long-term.
Leverage Rises as Equity Turns Negative
Debt-to-equity became undefined as equity fell to -$10.4M in 2026Q2, per the balance sheet, while total debt jumped to $760.5M, indicating increased reliance on debt financing to fund operations.
The negative equity position, combined with rising debt, suggests that Mirum is funding its growth through borrowings, which raises financial risk. Interest coverage is negative at -6.99 in 2026Q2, meaning operating income is insufficient to cover interest expenses, a concern for debt sustainability. The company's cash balance of $330.7M provides a near-term cushion, but the rapid debt accumulation and negative equity warrant close monitoring of refinancing risk and covenant compliance.
Liquidity Cushion Remains Adequate
Current ratio stood at 2.86 in 2026Q2, per the latest quarterly data, with quick ratio at 2.74, indicating ample short-term liquidity despite negative cash flow from operations.
The current and quick ratios are healthy, suggesting that Mirum can meet its near-term obligations even as it burns cash. However, the negative FCF margin of -155.3% in 2026Q2 implies that the cash balance could deplete quickly if the burn rate persists. The company's ability to raise additional capital, either through debt or equity, will be critical to maintaining liquidity, but the negative equity position may limit future borrowing capacity.
EV/EBITDA Misleads for Mirum
EV/EBITDA of 2866x is meaningless for a company with negative EBITDA, as reported, and obscures the true valuation picture; P/S of 11.55x is more informative for a high-growth biotech.
The EV/EBITDA multiple is commonly misapplied to companies with negative EBITDA, as it becomes a large negative or undefined number, providing no insight into valuation. For Mirum, the P/S ratio of 11.55x, based on trailing revenue, is a more relevant metric, but it must be compared to peers like ALNY (P/S ~9x) and FOLD (P/S ~5x) to assess relative value. Given the accelerating revenue growth of 37.9% YoY, the P/S multiple may be justified if the company can achieve profitability, but investors should focus on revenue growth and margin expansion rather than EBITDA-based multiples.