Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 18.8x · EV/EBITDA 7.6x · ROE 27.5%. (2013–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.2B | $2.9B | $2.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $9.1B | $6.8B | $5.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 18.80 | 9.91 | 11.46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.82 | 1.02 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 4.38 | 2.31 | 2.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 8.00 | 4.46 | 2.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 7.84 | 4.37 | 2.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.36 | 2.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.59 | 5.66 | 6.85 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 7.83 | 5.78 | 7.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 10.36 | 5.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 94.5% | 94.5% | 54.6% | 89.9% | 85.7% | 103.3% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 98.1% | 98.7% | 99.4% |
| Operating Margin | 40.5% | 40.5% | 35.5% | 36.3% | 26.9% | 8.6% | 7.5% | 2.2% | 11.5% | 7.8% | 8.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 10.7% | 10.7% | 9.3% | 6.8% | 9.1% | 7.1% | 5.8% | 6.6% | 2.6% | 5.4% | 6.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 27.5% | 27.5% | 24.9% | 17.6% | 15.9% | 12.3% | 10.2% | 9.1% | 2.7% | 4.7% | 5.5% |
| ROA | 1.0% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | 1.3% | 1.4% | 1.8% | 0.8% | 1.6% | 1.8% |
| ROIC | 9.4% | 9.4% | 9.4% | 8.2% | 5.0% | 4.2% | 7.6% | 2.3% | 9.0% | 5.1% | 5.3% |
| ROCE | 7.9% | 7.9% | 39.3% | 47.0% | 29.8% | 3.2% | 1.8% | 0.6% | 3.6% | 2.3% | 2.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 8.10 | 8.10 | 6.28 | 6.94 | 8.45 | 2.70 | 0.56 | 0.03 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 8.55 | 8.55 | 7.10 | 7.64 | 20.15 | 16.35 | 3.79 | 0.65 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 3.05 | 3.67 | 5.03 | 7.11 | 1.21 | -0.10 | -0.49 | -0.42 | -0.24 | -0.50 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.22 | 3.22 | 4.14 | 5.53 | 16.95 | 7.33 | -0.69 | -10.30 | -3.44 | -3.32 | -6.43 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 5.89 | 3.13 | 5.40 | 22.29 | 1.25 | — | — | -1.24 | — | -6.52 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.54 | 1.54 | 1.55 | 1.45 | 1.64 | 3.65 | — | — | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.16 | 3.16 | 1.09 | 1.07 | 1.05 | 0.89 | 2.38 | 2.58 | — | — | — |
| Quick Ratio | 3.16 | 3.16 | 1.09 | 1.07 | 1.05 | 0.89 | 2.38 | 2.58 | — | — | — |
| Cash Ratio | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.15 | 2.38 | 2.58 | — | — | — |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.15 | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.29 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.0% | 1.9% | 3.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 18.0% | 18.0% | 35.4% | 45.5% | 7.2% | 35.4% | 41.5% | — | — | 114.3% | 97.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.3% | 10.1% | 8.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 12.5% | 22.4% | 48.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.8% | 1.5% | 0.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.8% | 3.4% | 4.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $76M | $75M | $72M | $71M | $71M | $61M | $61M | $61M | $61M | $61M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 13 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MRX stock.
Marex Group Limited's current P/E ratio is 18.8x. The historical average is 10.7x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Marex Group Limited's current EV/EBITDA is 7.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 6.3x.
Marex Group Limited's return on equity (ROE) is 27.5%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 10.7%.
Based on historical data, Marex Group Limited is trading at a P/E of 18.8x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Marex Group Limited's current dividend yield is 1.00% with a payout ratio of 18.0%.
Marex Group Limited has 94.5% gross margin and 40.5% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Marex Group Limited's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 8.6x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
High leverage and provision volatility
Elevated P/B Pricing Implies Sustained ROTCE
Marex trades at a P/B of 4.36, a significant premium to peers like Virtu (2.48) and Interactive Brokers (1.90), suggesting the market prices in its high 17.1% ROE as reported in the most recent quarter.
The current P/B multiple has expanded dramatically from 6.51 in 2021Q2 to 24.71 in 2026Q2, far outpacing the growth in tangible book value per share from $3.41 to $20.02. This implies that investors are not just pricing asset growth, but are projecting a durable, above-average return on tangible equity. However, the extreme leverage required to generate this ROE means the multiple is highly sensitive to any deterioration in the return on assets or a rise in funding costs.
ROE Powered by Extreme Balance Sheet Leverage
A DuPont decomposition reveals that Marex's 17.1% ROE is driven almost entirely by extreme leverage of approximately 25x assets-to-equity, as the 0.7% ROA is modest and the net interest margin is structurally negative.
The equity-to-assets ratio of 0.04 translates to massive leverage that magnifies the modest ROA into a high ROE, a structure consistent with a high-volume, low-margin clearing model. However, the persistent negative NIM, which was -0.6% in 2026Q2, indicates that the balance sheet is generating net interest losses, meaning profitability is almost entirely dependent on strong fee generation (128.5% of revenue) and effective cost management (14.9% efficiency ratio).
Leverage Ratios Leave Minimal Absorption Capacity
An equity-to-assets ratio of 0.04 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 8.10, per the latest 2026Q2 data, suggest capital levels are minimally sized to absorb potential losses on the $42.1 billion balance sheet.
This capital structure appears far thinner than that of more conservatively capitalized peers like Piper Sandler (D/E 0.07) or even the industry average. While regulatory capital ratios (e.g., CET1) are not provided, the reported equity ratio implies little buffer to absorb operational shocks or credit losses, such as the $362.4 million provision in 2026Q2. The continued high leverage, despite strong profitability, may indicate that retained earnings are being deployed or distributed faster than capital is being built.
Provision Swings Indicate Unpredictable Credit Costs
Loan loss provisions exhibited extreme volatility, surging to $362.4 million in 2026Q2 from a negative $148.4 million in 2025Q4, as reported in the financial statements, highlighting the unpredictable nature of credit costs within the business model.
This erratic provisioning pattern makes earnings quality difficult to assess and suggests underlying exposures to volatile counterparties or positions. The swings appear driven by mark-to-market movements or specific event risk rather than a steady state of credit losses, which warrants investigation into the composition of the balance sheet and the nature of the client exposures that require such provisions.
P/B Multiple Misapplied to Capital-Intensive Model
The P/B ratio of 4.36 is the most commonly misapplied metric for Marex, as it fails to account for the low tangible equity base, the substantial client funds inflating assets, and the structural net interest deficit.
Using P/B to value Marex can be misleading because the book value of equity is very small relative to assets, making the multiple highly volatile and potentially overstating value relative to normalized earnings. A more appropriate metric might be a price-to-tangible-book-value (P/TBV) ratio, but even this requires adjustment to exclude client segregated balances. Alternatively, focusing on a P/E ratio relative to a normalized earnings power that excludes volatile provisions and marks to market may provide a clearer valuation signal.