Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 13.1x · EV/EBITDA 10.5x · ROE N/A. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9.1B | $8.5B | $9.1B | $10.7B | $12.2B | $40.3B | $38.7B | $17.0B | $8.8B | $5.8B | $3.0B |
| Enterprise Value | $12.0B | $11.4B | $12.0B | $13.7B | $15.5B | $43.4B | $41.8B | $19.4B | $8.9B | $6.1B | $3.2B |
| P/E Ratio → | 13.09 | 13.57 | 16.19 | 16.15 | 33.46 | 142.20 | 229.08 | 43.22 | 14.02 | 21.30 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.61 | 2.43 | 2.62 | 3.18 | 3.84 | 13.51 | 16.19 | 8.28 | 2.06 | 1.74 | 0.94 |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4.31 | 2.43 | 1.93 | 1.45 |
| P/FCF | 7.99 | 8.28 | 10.35 | 12.91 | 25.70 | 48.42 | 50.94 | 21.19 | 9.73 | 16.90 | 13.78 |
| P/OCF | 8.43 | 7.84 | 9.79 | 11.94 | 23.30 | 44.18 | 48.25 | 18.10 | 8.89 | 13.84 | 10.10 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.27 | 3.45 | 4.07 | 4.86 | 14.56 | 17.48 | 9.47 | 2.09 | 1.85 | 1.03 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.50 | 11.67 | 13.19 | 13.33 | 27.77 | 48.63 | 53.13 | 23.49 | 11.90 | 20.10 | 27.24 |
| EV / EBIT | 13.81 | 12.78 | 13.90 | 14.61 | 29.66 | 112.32 | 54.90 | 30.18 | 16.00 | 35.57 | 115.17 |
| EV / FCF | — | 11.16 | 13.62 | 16.50 | 32.55 | 52.17 | 55.03 | 24.23 | 9.87 | 17.96 | 15.06 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 72.8% | 72.8% | 71.5% | 71.6% | 69.9% | 71.9% | 73.4% | 74.3% | 78.6% | 80.3% | 75.9% |
| Operating Margin | 25.0% | 25.0% | 23.7% | 27.3% | 16.2% | 28.5% | 31.2% | 31.5% | 13.3% | 5.7% | -1.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 17.6% | 17.6% | 15.8% | 19.4% | 11.4% | 9.3% | 6.8% | 21.0% | 14.7% | 9.2% | -1.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12.8% | 11.4% | 19.0% | 12.1% | -1.9% |
| ROA | 13.7% | 13.7% | 12.3% | 15.0% | 7.8% | 6.8% | 2.8% | 5.7% | 9.8% | 5.8% | -0.8% |
| ROIC | 23.7% | 23.7% | 21.4% | 23.4% | 13.3% | 27.7% | 13.9% | 9.6% | 11.9% | 5.0% | -1.0% |
| ROCE | 23.7% | 23.7% | 20.9% | 24.1% | 13.7% | 26.4% | 15.1% | 9.7% | 10.2% | 4.2% | -0.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.74 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.78 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.06 | 4.06 | 4.23 | 3.74 | 6.87 | 4.40 | 4.88 | 3.51 | 3.02 | 6.54 | 13.53 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.62 | 0.04 | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.01 | 3.01 | 3.17 | 2.90 | 5.84 | 3.49 | 3.94 | 2.95 | 0.17 | 1.19 | 2.31 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.88 | 3.27 | 3.59 | 6.85 | 3.74 | 4.08 | 3.04 | 0.14 | 1.06 | 1.28 |
| Interest Coverage | 6.06 | 6.06 | 5.40 | 5.86 | 3.59 | 2.96 | 5.83 | 4.58 | 5.09 | 1.64 | 0.26 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.42 | 1.42 | 2.54 | 2.39 | 1.59 | 1.04 | 2.04 | 3.67 | 3.13 | 2.66 | 2.58 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.42 | 1.42 | 2.54 | 2.39 | 1.59 | 1.04 | 2.04 | 3.67 | 3.13 | 2.66 | 2.58 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.77 | 1.63 | 1.04 | 0.71 | 1.48 | 0.46 | 2.55 | 2.05 | 1.99 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.59 | 0.78 | 0.25 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 0.68 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 31.77 | 34.09 | 32.40 | 21.97 | 23.06 | 20.91 | 20.72 | 30.75 | 37.22 | 30.40 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.8% | 2.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.2% | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 30.4% | 30.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16.8% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 7.6% | 7.4% | 6.2% | 6.2% | 3.0% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 2.3% | 7.1% | 4.7% | — |
| FCF Yield | 12.5% | 12.1% | 9.7% | 7.7% | 3.9% | 2.1% | 2.0% | 4.7% | 10.3% | 5.9% | 7.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 8.7% | 9.3% | 8.2% | 5.1% | 3.9% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 1.3% | 1.5% | 1.0% | 10.5% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 10.5% | 11.5% | 8.2% | 5.1% | 3.9% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 1.3% | 2.7% | 1.0% | 10.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $262M | $279M | $293M | $295M | $305M | $256M | $207M | $205M | $184M | $173M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MTCH stock.
Match Group, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 13.1x. The historical average is 24.1x. This places it at the 27th percentile of its historical range.
Match Group, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 10.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 12.6x.
Based on historical data, Match Group, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 13.1x. This is at the 27th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Match Group, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 1.82% with a payout ratio of 30.4%.
Match Group, Inc. has 72.8% gross margin and 25.0% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Match Group, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Tinder payer erosion persists
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Discount Multiples Reflect Maturity Pricing
Based on reported figures, MTCH trades at a trailing P/E of 16.45 and forward P/E of 14.03, with EV/EBITDA of 12.35 and a PEG of 0.56, suggesting the market prices the company as a mature cash generator rather than a growth story.
The compression between trailing and forward P/E implies consensus expects earnings to rise modestly, though the Q2 2026 EPS miss against consensus introduces doubt about that trajectory. A PEG below 1.0 would ordinarily signal undervaluation, but this reading may instead reflect that near-zero revenue growth is not being credited with durable expansion. Investors should monitor whether forward estimates are revised down, since the low multiple offers limited cushion if payer trends deteriorate further.
Margin Expansion Driven by Mix and Pricing
As reported in quarterly statements, gross margin widened from 71.6% in Q2 2024 to 76.8% in Q3 2026, while operating margin ranged from 20.8% to 32.4%, indicating earnings power has improved on a structural rather than purely cyclical basis.
The gross margin gain of roughly 520 basis points appears tied to pricing optimization and a shift toward higher-yield subscription tiers, rather than to any change in the fixed app store fee burden. Operating margin volatility, however, is wider than gross margin movement, suggesting marketing spend timing is driving much of the quarterly variance. Net margin of 19.6% in the latest quarter is the more conservative measure of earning power, but it still contains non-operating and tax effects that warrant adjustment before being treated as recurring.
Return on Capital Thin But Stabilizing
Based on EDBL's reported figures, ROIC has moved between 4.6% and 7.8% over the period, with the latest quarter at 7.4%, a level that remains modest relative to the cost of capital for a company carrying roughly $3.6B of debt.
Because stockholders' equity is in deficit, ROE is not meaningful and ROIC plus ROA are the more reliable return measures. The improvement from the 2025 trough suggests margin gains are flowing through to invested capital, though the gains are not yet large enough to clearly exceed the implied cost of debt. Investors should treat the recent uptick as encouraging but not yet proof of sustained compounding.
Interest Coverage Stays Comfortable Despite Debt
According to reported quarterly figures, interest coverage has held between 4.97x and 6.91x and debt-to-EBITDA near 12.35x, suggesting debt service is currently manageable while the leverage burden remains high in absolute terms.
Coverage in the mid-to-high single digits indicates operating earnings comfortably absorb interest expense, but debt-to-EBITDA above 12x is elevated for a business with flat revenue. The negative equity base means traditional equity-based leverage ratios understate balance sheet pressure. Refinancing risk and the pace of deleveraging deserve closer scrutiny than the current coverage ratio alone conveys.
Trailing Multiples Mask Payer Deterioration
The P/E of 16.45 and PEG of 0.56 may look inexpensive, but these multiples are built on EPS that has swung from $0.44 to $0.83 across recent quarters, suggesting the headline earnings base is less stable than the multiple implies.
The most commonly misapplied ratio here is the PEG, which assumes the growth input is reliable; with revenue growth oscillating near zero, the implied growth rate is largely a function of estimate assumptions rather than observed trend. A more appropriate lens is EV/Free Cash Flow or P/FCF of 8.92, which reflects cash actually retained after reinvestment and buybacks. Adjusting for stock-based compensation would also lower the apparent earning power, which may tighten the valuation gap considerably.