Nomad Foods' revenue has contracted for eight consecutive quarters, with TTM revenue declining -2.2% YoY, while gross margin has eroded from a peak of 32.3% in 2024Q3 to 28.9% in 2026Q2, indicating significant pricing pressure and input cost inflation.
Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) annual income statement — 12-year revenue, gross profit & net income history
| Metric | TTM | Dec'25 | Dec'24 | Dec'23 | Dec'22 | Dec'21 | Dec'20 | Dec'19 | Dec'18 | Dec'17 | Dec'16 | Dec'15 | Dec'14 |
|---|
| Sales/Revenue | 2.98B | 3.03B | 3.1B | 3.04B | 2.94B | 2.61B | 2.52B | 2.32B | 2.17B | 1.96B | 1.93B | 1.21B | 0 |
| Revenue Growth % | -3.06% | -2.17% | 1.82% | 3.56% | 12.78% | 3.61% | 8.24% | 6.97% | 11.05% | 1.5% | 58.87% | - | - |
| Cost of Goods Sold | 2.18B | 2.21B | 2.18B | 2.19B | 2.12B | 1.86B | 1.75B | 1.63B | 1.52B | 1.36B | 1.36B | 901.72M | 0 |
| COGS % of Revenue | - | 72.86% | 70.39% | 71.8% | 72.27% | 71.45% | 69.69% | 69.97% | 69.92% | 69.37% | 70.38% | 74.31% | - |
| Gross Profit | 800.92M | 823M | 917.8M | 858.7M | 815.3M | 744.3M | 762.5M | 697.9M | 653.5M | 599.4M | 571M | 311.7M | 0 |
| Gross Margin % | 26.91% | 27.14% | 29.61% | 28.21% | 27.73% | 28.55% | 30.31% | 30.03% | 30.08% | 30.63% | 29.62% | 25.69% | - |
| Gross Profit Growth % | - | -10.33% | 6.88% | 5.32% | 9.54% | -2.39% | 9.26% | 6.79% | 9.03% | 4.97% | 83.19% | - | - |
| Operating Expenses | 480.52M | 497.6M | 530.8M | 518.3M | 439.9M | 401.6M | 403.3M | 414.4M | 370.4M | 356.5M | 432.9M | 61.74M | 31.86M |
| OpEx % of Revenue | - | 16.41% | 17.12% | 17.02% | 14.96% | 15.41% | 16.03% | 17.83% | 17.05% | 18.22% | 22.46% | 5.09% | - |
| Selling, General & Admin | 236.92M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.6M | 0 | 38M | 551K |
| SG&A % of Revenue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.29% | - | 3.13% | - |
| Research & Development | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16.42M | 0 |
| R&D % of Revenue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.35% | - |
| Other Operating Expenses | 3M | 497.6M | 530.8M | 518.3M | 439.9M | 401.6M | 403.3M | 414.4M | 370.4M | 350.9M | 432.9M | -7.33M | 31.3M |
| Operating Income | 320.4M | 325.4M | 387M | 340.4M | 375.4M | 342.7M | 359.2M | 283.5M | 283.1M | 242.9M | 138.1M | 249.96M | -31.86M |
| Operating Margin % | 10.77% | 10.73% | 12.48% | 11.18% | 12.77% | 13.15% | 14.28% | 12.2% | 13.03% | 12.41% | 7.16% | 20.6% | - |
| Operating Income Growth % | - | -15.92% | 13.69% | -9.32% | 9.54% | -4.59% | 26.7% | 0.14% | 16.55% | 75.89% | -44.75% | 884.67% | - |
| EBITDA | 430.52M | 434.8M | 483.9M | 435.4M | 464M | 414.3M | 426.8M | 351.8M | 329.4M | 285.3M | 189.2M | 279.54M | -1.46M |
| EBITDA Margin % | 14.47% | 14.34% | 15.61% | 14.3% | 15.78% | 15.89% | 16.96% | 15.14% | 15.16% | 14.58% | 9.81% | 23.04% | - |
| EBITDA Growth % | -9.57% | -10.15% | 11.14% | -6.16% | 12% | -2.93% | 21.32% | 6.8% | 15.46% | 50.79% | -32.32% | 19312.27% | - |
| D&A (Non-Cash Add-back) | 110.13M | 109.4M | 96.9M | 95M | 88.6M | 71.6M | 67.6M | 68.3M | 46.3M | 42.4M | 51.1M | 29.58M | 30.4M |
| EBIT | 217.74M | 145.3M | 408.2M | 385.5M | 403.6M | 298.2M | 362.2M | 293.1M | 296.4M | 227.3M | 153M | -418.9M | -31.86M |
| Net Interest Income | -198.05M | -196.3M | -132.62M | -138.27M | -86.07M | -82.96M | -60.68M | -82.3M | -71.7M | -81.4M | -78.1M | 36.5M | 91K |
| Interest Income | 1.81M | 0 | 10.82M | 6.27M | 630.58K | 121.3K | 732.73K | 2.5M | 200K | 200K | 6.53M | 36.5M | 4K |
| Interest Expense | 86.76M | 0 | 143.43M | 144.55M | 86.71M | 83.08M | 61.42M | 82.8M | 69.3M | 58.8M | 84.62M | 0 | -87K |
| Other Income/Expense | -189.41M | -180.1M | -109.1M | -86.8M | -54.4M | -106M | -63.7M | -73.2M | -56M | -74.4M | -62.1M | -724.36M | 87K |
| Pretax Income | 130.98M | 145.3M | 277.9M | 253.6M | 321M | 236.7M | 295.5M | 210.3M | 227.1M | 168.5M | 76M | -474.4M | -31.77M |
| Pretax Margin % | 4.4% | 4.79% | 8.97% | 8.33% | 10.92% | 9.08% | 11.75% | 9.05% | 10.45% | 8.61% | 3.94% | -39.1% | - |
| Income Tax | 6.21M | 8.6M | 50.8M | 60.9M | 71.2M | 55.7M | 70.4M | 56.7M | 56.6M | 32M | 39.6M | -16.69M | 0 |
| Effective Tax Rate % | 4.74% | 5.92% | 18.28% | 24.01% | 22.18% | 23.53% | 23.82% | 26.96% | 24.92% | 18.99% | 52.11% | 3.52% | 0% |
| Net Income | 124.78M | 136.7M | 227.1M | 192.7M | 249.8M | 181M | 225.2M | 154M | 171.2M | 136.5M | 36.4M | -457.71M | -31.77M |
| Net Margin % | 4.19% | 4.51% | 7.33% | 6.33% | 8.5% | 6.94% | 8.95% | 6.63% | 7.88% | 6.98% | 1.89% | -37.72% | - |
| Net Income Growth % | -41% | -39.81% | 17.85% | -22.86% | 38.01% | -19.63% | 46.23% | -10.05% | 25.42% | 275% | 107.95% | -1340.79% | - |
| Net Income (Continuing) | 124.78M | 136.7M | 227.1M | 192.7M | 249.8M | 181M | 225.1M | 153.6M | 170.5M | 136.5M | 36.4M | -457.71M | -31.77M |
| Discontinued Operations | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Minority Interest | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.2M | -800K | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EPS (Diluted) | 0.89 | 0.91 | 1.40 | 1.13 | 1.41 | 1.06 | 1.06 | 0.77 | 0.97 | 0.74 | 0.20 | -3.77 | -0.22 |
| EPS Growth % | -34.12% | -35% | 23.89% | -19.86% | 33.02% | 0% | 37.66% | -20.62% | 31.08% | 270% | 105.31% | -1613.64% | - |
| EPS (Basic) | - | 0.91 | 1.41 | 1.13 | 1.41 | 1.06 | 1.08 | 0.80 | 0.97 | 0.78 | 0.20 | -3.77 | -0.22 |
| Diluted Shares Outstanding | 140.1M | 150.22M | 163.1M | 171.2M | 174.28M | 178.07M | 197.89M | 198.43M | 175.8M | 184.8M | 183.53M | 121.7M | 146.03M |
| Basic Shares Outstanding | 139.8M | 150.22M | 164.88M | 170.57M | 174.28M | 178.07M | 197.54M | 192M | 175.6M | 176.1M | 183.52M | 121.54M | 145.95M |
| Dividend Payout Ratio | - | 66.79% | 39.28% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying NOMD stock.
For fiscal year 2025, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) reported total revenue of $3.03B.
Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) is profitable, generating $136.7M in net income for the fiscal year ending 2025 with a net profit margin of 4.5%.
Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) reported an operating income of $325.4M, resulting in an operating profit margin of 10.7%. This margin reflects the operational efficiency of the business before interest and taxes.
Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) generated $823.0M in gross profit for the year, representing a gross profit margin of 27.1%. This demonstrates the company's core pricing power and production efficiency.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Margin compression amid revenue decline
Persistent Top-Line Contraction
Nomad Foods' revenue has contracted for eight consecutive quarters, with the most recent TTM revenue of $3.03 billion reflecting a -2.2% year-over-year decline, suggesting the company's price-over-volume strategy may be reaching consumer resistance in its core European markets.
The consistent negative growth trajectory, accelerating from -0.8% in 2025Q2 to -4.4% in 2026Q1, indicates a fundamental challenge in the business model rather than a temporary blip. This pattern suggests that price increases implemented to offset input inflation are now eroding volume, a critical inflection point for a packaged foods company. The lack of any positive growth quarter in the provided history implies the company is losing market share or facing category-wide headwinds that require a strategic pivot.
Gross Margin Erosion Under Pressure
Gross margin has compressed from a peak of 32.3% in 2024Q3 to 28.9% in 2026Q2, a significant structural deterioration that appears to be driven by a combination of input cost inflation and competitive promotional activity to defend shelf space.
The margin trajectory reveals a company struggling to pass through cost increases, with the 340 basis point decline over eight quarters indicating a loss of pricing power. This compression is particularly concerning given the concurrent revenue decline, as it suggests the company is absorbing higher costs while simultaneously losing volume. The current 28.9% gross margin sits below peers like McCormick (37.9%) and Smucker (33.5%), indicating a structural disadvantage in the frozen food category.
Operating Leverage Fails to Materialize
Despite maintaining a relatively stable operating margin around 10-12%, the company has failed to generate meaningful operating leverage, with operating income declining from $122.4M in 2024Q3 to $88.6M in 2026Q2 even as revenue contracted.
The operating margin resilience appears to be a function of cost-cutting rather than true leverage, as SG&A expenses have been volatile and inconsistent across quarters. The inability to scale operating income faster than gross profit during a period of revenue decline suggests the cost structure is more fixed than management's commentary implies. This lack of leverage amplifies the impact of top-line weakness on profitability.
Net Income Volatility Raises Concerns
Net income has swung from a loss of $10.7M in 2025Q4 to a profit of $48.5M in 2026Q2, with net margin consistently below operating margin by 4-6 percentage points, indicating significant non-operating expenses that obscure underlying operational performance.
The persistent gap between operating and net margins suggests substantial interest expenses or tax burdens that are eroding shareholder returns. The negative net income in 2025Q4 despite positive operating income indicates potential write-downs or exceptional items that warrant investigation. This volatility makes it difficult to assess the true earnings power of the business and raises questions about the sustainability of the current profitability level.
Cost Discipline Masks Structural Weakness
While management has demonstrated cost discipline with operating margins holding near 10-12%, the primary cost drivers—COGS representing 71% of revenue—appear to be structurally high and resistant to improvement without fundamental changes to the product mix.
The cost structure reveals a company heavily exposed to commodity inputs, with COGS consistently consuming over 70% of revenue. The recent improvement in gross margin from 25.6% to 28.9% suggests some success in cost management, but this appears to be offset by rising SG&A expenses in recent quarters. The lack of R&D investment ($0 across all periods) indicates a potential underinvestment in innovation that could limit future margin expansion opportunities.
Sustainable Margin Recovery Appears Unlikely
The combination of persistent revenue contraction, gross margin compression, and limited pricing power suggests that Nomad Foods' current profitability levels may be unsustainable without a significant strategic shift or market recovery.
Short-sellers would focus on the deteriorating revenue trajectory as evidence of market share loss to private label competitors, particularly given the company's position in the value-conscious frozen food segment. The margin compression despite cost-cutting efforts indicates that the competitive dynamics in European frozen food may be permanently shifting against branded players. Furthermore, the elevated leverage (Debt/Equity of 0.92) combined with weak returns (ROE of 5.3%) suggests the balance sheet may not provide sufficient flexibility to invest in the brand revitalization needed to reverse these trends.