Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 13.0x · EV/EBITDA 7.9x · ROE 14.9%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8.1B | $8.1B | $6.2B | $7.1B | $5.8B | $7.8B | $5.9B | $5.3B | $5.3B | $6.3B | $4.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $9.2B | $9.2B | $7.0B | $7.8B | $5.6B | $7.6B | $6.2B | $5.7B | $5.7B | $6.6B | $4.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | 12.99 | 12.54 | 9.16 | 11.94 | 33.53 | 15.33 | 18.24 | 9.23 | 11.33 | 21.89 | 19.24 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.58 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 1.01 | 0.86 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.92 | 0.66 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.85 | 1.79 | 1.50 | 1.93 | 1.83 | 2.43 | 2.08 | 2.06 | 2.13 | 2.71 | 2.11 |
| P/FCF | 13.13 | 13.12 | 23.20 | 26.03 | 17.58 | 7.05 | 30.04 | 13.57 | 15.89 | 46.93 | 9.13 |
| P/OCF | 10.36 | 10.35 | 11.35 | 11.91 | 9.70 | 6.39 | 18.09 | 9.41 | 12.24 | 25.38 | 7.22 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.88 | 0.65 | 0.81 | 0.68 | 0.99 | 0.90 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.97 | 0.75 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.85 | 7.85 | 5.78 | 7.81 | 11.73 | 10.95 | 10.46 | 6.27 | 7.35 | 11.05 | 9.52 |
| EV / EBIT | 9.71 | 9.56 | 6.85 | 8.99 | 17.12 | 12.85 | 12.46 | 7.10 | 8.57 | 14.09 | 12.77 |
| EV / FCF | — | 14.85 | 26.01 | 28.39 | 16.97 | 6.89 | 31.26 | 14.51 | 16.97 | 49.81 | 10.28 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 17.5% | 17.5% | 18.4% | 17.4% | 12.7% | 16.4% | 16.3% | 18.1% | 17.6% | 17.3% | 16.8% |
| Operating Margin | 9.1% | 9.1% | 9.4% | 8.7% | 4.5% | 7.7% | 7.1% | 9.5% | 8.5% | 6.9% | 5.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 6.2% | 6.2% | 6.4% | 6.2% | 2.1% | 6.6% | 4.7% | 6.9% | 6.1% | 4.2% | 3.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 14.9% | 14.9% | 17.3% | 17.4% | 5.4% | 16.8% | 11.8% | 22.7% | 19.6% | 13.3% | 11.1% |
| ROA | 6.6% | 6.6% | 7.3% | 7.1% | 2.4% | 8.0% | 5.6% | 10.7% | 9.1% | 5.9% | 4.7% |
| ROIC | 13.5% | 13.5% | 16.4% | 17.1% | 9.3% | 14.5% | 12.0% | 20.4% | 17.7% | 13.6% | 10.3% |
| ROCE | 13.7% | 13.7% | 16.2% | 14.8% | 7.4% | 13.2% | 12.0% | 21.5% | 18.7% | 14.3% | 11.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.23 | 0.21 | 0.19 | 0.26 | 0.29 | 0.32 | 0.33 | 0.36 | 0.43 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.32 | 1.32 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 1.26 | 1.18 | 1.40 | 0.90 | 1.05 | 1.38 | 1.72 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.24 | 0.18 | 0.17 | -0.06 | -0.06 | 0.08 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.27 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.63 | 0.65 | -0.42 | -0.25 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.47 | 0.64 | 1.06 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.72 | 2.81 | 2.36 | -0.61 | -0.16 | 1.22 | 0.94 | 1.08 | 2.88 | 1.15 |
| Interest Coverage | 8.16 | 8.16 | 8.56 | 12.63 | 6.16 | 12.31 | 8.34 | 14.80 | 9.39 | 7.88 | 6.08 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.94 | 1.94 | 1.52 | 1.45 | 1.87 | 2.00 | 2.23 | 1.96 | 1.93 | 1.81 | 1.77 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.05 | 1.05 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 1.10 | 1.27 | 1.28 | 1.24 | 1.21 | 1.09 | 1.05 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.33 | 0.46 | 0.37 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.24 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.03 | 1.14 | 1.06 | 1.07 | 1.13 | 1.18 | 1.51 | 1.46 | 1.34 | 1.39 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.62 | 3.62 | 3.87 | 3.74 | 3.87 | 4.17 | 3.81 | 5.50 | 5.17 | 4.71 | 5.33 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 77.44 | 66.07 | 80.51 | 78.00 | 78.52 | 71.39 | 71.06 | 72.08 | 69.81 | 59.40 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.6% | 1.6% | 1.9% | 1.5% | 1.7% | 1.2% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 1.3% | 1.0% | 1.3% |
| Payout Ratio | 20.2% | 20.2% | 17.6% | 17.9% | 56.0% | 17.8% | 25.4% | 13.0% | 15.1% | 22.0% | 25.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 7.7% | 8.0% | 10.9% | 8.4% | 3.0% | 6.5% | 5.5% | 10.8% | 8.8% | 4.6% | 5.2% |
| FCF Yield | 7.6% | 7.6% | 4.3% | 3.8% | 5.7% | 14.2% | 3.3% | 7.4% | 6.3% | 2.1% | 11.0% |
| Buyback Yield | 3.4% | 3.4% | 1.9% | 0.3% | 2.7% | 1.6% | 0.9% | 6.7% | 4.8% | 0.1% | 2.4% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.0% | 5.0% | 3.8% | 1.8% | 4.3% | 2.7% | 2.3% | 8.1% | 6.1% | 1.1% | 3.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $65M | $66M | $66M | $66M | $69M | $69M | $71M | $75M | $76M | $74M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying OSK stock.
Oshkosh Corp's current P/E ratio is 13.0x. The historical average is 14.6x. This places it at the 46th percentile of its historical range.
Oshkosh Corp's current EV/EBITDA is 7.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.2x.
Oshkosh Corp's return on equity (ROE) is 14.9%. The historical average is 13.1%.
Based on historical data, Oshkosh Corp is trading at a P/E of 13.0x. This is at the 46th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Oshkosh Corp's current dividend yield is 1.55% with a payout ratio of 20.2%.
Oshkosh Corp has 17.5% gross margin and 9.1% operating margin.
Oshkosh Corp's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.3x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Defense revenue cliff and margin compression
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Compression Signals Structural Shift
Gross margin fell 270 bps from 19.2% in 2025Q2 to 16.5% in 2026Q2, while operating margin dropped to 8.3%, indicating cost pressures outpacing pricing, per reported financials.
The sequential deterioration in gross margin from 19.2% to 16.5% over four quarters suggests that input cost inflation and mix shifts are not being fully offset by price increases. Operating margin at 8.3% in 2026Q2 is below the 10.9% peak in 2025Q2, implying negative operating leverage as SG&A costs remain sticky. This margin compression appears structural rather than temporary, given the persistence across multiple quarters and the guidance cut, warranting close monitoring of cost pass-through ability.
Return on Capital Decays from Peak
ROIC declined from 4.2% in 2024Q1 to 3.4% in 2026Q2, while ROE fell from 4.8% to 4.1%, indicating diminishing returns on invested capital, based on quarterly data.
The downward trend in ROIC and ROE, despite stable leverage, suggests that profitability is eroding faster than capital efficiency improvements. The 2025Q2 peak of 4.0% ROIC and 4.7% ROE marked the high point, after which both metrics have declined, reflecting margin compression and possibly higher working capital intensity. This decay in returns may indicate that the company is not compounding capital effectively, and investors should assess whether the EV transition and defense contract losses will further pressure returns.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthens
Cash conversion cycle expanded from 125 days in 2024Q1 to 126 days in 2026Q2, with DSO rising to 73 days and DIO at 90 days, indicating slower cash conversion, per financial statements.
The CCC has remained elevated around 126-150 days over the past year, with DSO and DIO both increasing, suggesting that receivables and inventory are tying up more cash. The DPO of 37 days in 2026Q2 is lower than the 50 days seen in 2025Q1, indicating that Oshkosh is paying suppliers faster, which may strain liquidity. This lengthening cycle, combined with negative FCF in some quarters, highlights working capital management as a key area to watch, especially given the lumpy government contracts.
Leverage Moderate but Coverage Thins
Debt-to-EBITDA rose to 3.61x in 2026Q2 from 3.46x in 2024Q4, while interest coverage fell to 8.16x from 11.58x, indicating reduced debt service comfort, as per reported figures.
Although D/E remains low at 0.24, the increase in D/EBITDA to 3.61x and the decline in interest coverage to 8.16x suggest that EBITDA is shrinking relative to debt, reducing the cushion for interest payments. The 2026Q1 spike in D/EBITDA to 8.04x and interest coverage of only 2.84x highlights the volatility in earnings, which could strain debt service if the trend persists. The balance sheet appears adequate, but the declining coverage warrants monitoring, especially if the defense revenue cliff materializes.
Liquidity Buffer Improves but Quick Ratio Lags
Current ratio improved to 1.72 in 2026Q2 from 1.43 in 2024Q1, but quick ratio remains below 1.0 at 0.96, indicating inventory dependence, based on balance sheet data.
The current ratio has strengthened over the past year, reaching 1.72, suggesting improved short-term solvency, but the quick ratio of 0.96 indicates that a significant portion of current assets is tied up in inventory. This inventory dependence could be problematic if demand softens or if there are supply chain disruptions, as converting inventory to cash may take longer. The liquidity position appears adequate under normal conditions, but stress scenarios involving a sharp downturn in Access Equipment could test the buffer.
Misapplied P/E Overlooks Cyclicality
The trailing P/E of 15.68 appears reasonable, but it fails to capture the cyclicality of Access Equipment and the lumpy defense revenue, which may distort earnings, per valuation data.
The P/E ratio is commonly used for Oshkosh, but it is misleading because earnings are highly cyclical and subject to one-time items and contract timing. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 9.29x (or 5.75x forward) better normalizes for capital structure and non-cash charges, and it is more comparable to peers like Terex and CNH. Additionally, the P/E does not account for the potential earnings cliff from the JLTV loss, so investors should use a mid-cycle earnings estimate or EV/EBITDA to assess valuation.