Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 59.3x · EV/EBITDA 30.5x · ROE 12.8%. (2003–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.9B | $4.1B | $4.2B | $2.2B | $978M | $4.2B | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $3.6B | $3.8B | $4.0B | $2.1B | $843M | $4.0B | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 59.29 | 60.75 | 93.34 | 99.28 | — | 583.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 3.24 | 3.42 | 4.79 | 3.64 | 1.97 | 10.51 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 7.12 | 7.29 | 8.59 | 5.20 | 2.46 | 10.76 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 23.94 | 25.26 | 66.04 | 64.73 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 23.88 | 25.21 | 65.57 | 32.47 | 49.23 | 213.22 | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.15 | 4.56 | 3.36 | 1.70 | 10.11 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 30.52 | 32.37 | 48.87 | 42.43 | 132.04 | 168.97 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 47.12 | 44.25 | 73.69 | 82.24 | — | 385.58 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 23.33 | 62.92 | 59.84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 24.8% | 24.8% | 27.3% | 29.7% | 30.1% | 30.7% | 30.7% | 31.6% | 38.1% | 39.9% | 41.3% |
| Operating Margin | 6.3% | 6.3% | 5.1% | 2.9% | -0.6% | 2.6% | 6.1% | 7.8% | 2.6% | 3.7% | 5.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 5.6% | 5.6% | 5.1% | 3.6% | -0.1% | 2.4% | 4.5% | 5.8% | -9.3% | -0.5% | 4.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 12.8% | 12.8% | 9.7% | 5.4% | -0.1% | 4.0% | 17.9% | 3.3% | -22.2% | -1.1% | 8.2% |
| ROA | 10.8% | 10.8% | 8.2% | 4.6% | -0.1% | 3.1% | 13.4% | 1.1% | -7.2% | -0.4% | 3.1% |
| ROIC | 21.2% | 21.2% | 12.3% | 5.2% | -0.9% | 5.6% | 30.9% | 1.8% | 2.4% | 3.6% | 5.1% |
| ROCE | 14.2% | 14.2% | 9.6% | 4.2% | -0.7% | 4.2% | 22.4% | 2.0% | 2.6% | 3.8% | 5.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.01 | 1.10 | 1.14 | 0.89 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.22 | 1.98 | 0.47 | 0.38 | 0.03 | 4.40 | 3.65 | 2.88 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.56 | -0.41 | -0.39 | -0.34 | -0.41 | -0.43 | -0.39 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.66 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -2.69 | -2.69 | -2.43 | -3.47 | -21.09 | -6.64 | -1.38 | -1.10 | 3.70 | 3.06 | 2.13 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -1.94 | -3.13 | -4.89 | — | — | -1.76 | -5.38 | 7.10 | 8.80 | 4.13 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | 1728.67 | — | — | -3.30 | 1.05 | 3.31 |
Net cash position: cash ($325M) exceeds total debt ($11M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.46 | 4.46 | 4.24 | 4.31 | 4.45 | 3.45 | 2.57 | 5.18 | 1.33 | 1.41 | 1.45 |
| Quick Ratio | 4.46 | 4.46 | 4.24 | 4.31 | 4.45 | 3.45 | 2.57 | 5.18 | 1.09 | 1.08 | 1.21 |
| Cash Ratio | 3.28 | 3.28 | 2.52 | 2.86 | 2.86 | 2.26 | 1.50 | 2.76 | 0.24 | 0.28 | 0.39 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.79 | 1.51 | 1.22 | 1.08 | 0.84 | 2.42 | 2.93 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.81 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9.15 | 6.84 | 9.06 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 31.59 | 51.57 | 45.53 | 50.88 | 42.84 | 36.58 | 33.07 | 62.95 | 59.25 | 66.05 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 0.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.7% | 1.6% | 1.1% | 1.0% | — | 0.2% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 4.2% | 4.0% | 1.5% | 1.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $129M | $128M | $125M | $122M | $119M | $116M | $117M | $112M | $111M | $116M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 22 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PAY stock.
Paymentus Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 59.3x. The historical average is 84.5x.
Paymentus Holdings, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 30.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 41.2x.
Paymentus Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 12.8%. The historical average is 3.6%.
Based on historical data, Paymentus Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 59.3x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Paymentus Holdings, Inc. has 24.8% gross margin and 6.3% operating margin.
Paymentus Holdings, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.1x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Payment mix margin dilution
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion Tempered by Mix Shift
Operating margin improved to 9.0% in 2026Q2 from 4.5% in 2024Q1, as per quarterly filings, while gross margin contracted 370 basis points, indicating operating leverage is offsetting payment mix dilution.
The 450 basis point expansion in operating margin over ten quarters suggests that SG&A and R&D are scaling slower than gross profit, a sign of emerging operating leverage. However, the gross margin decline from 29.8% to 26.1% over the same period, as reported in financial statements, implies that the shift toward higher-cost payment methods is eroding the core take-rate. Investors should monitor whether the contribution profit margin, which strips out pass-through costs, is expanding at a similar pace, as that would confirm the underlying economics are improving.
ROIC Quadruples on Asset-Light Model
ROIC rose to 10.0% in 2026Q2 from 2.4% in 2024Q1, according to reported figures, driven by margin expansion and minimal capital intensity, indicating the company is compounding returns on invested capital.
The fourfold increase in ROIC over ten quarters is notable, especially given the asset-light nature of the business, with PP&E representing just 1.5% of total assets. This suggests that the company is generating higher returns from its intangible assets and working capital, rather than from heavy fixed investment. The trend indicates that the scale-up phase is translating into more efficient capital deployment, though the absolute ROIC remains modest relative to high-quality SaaS peers, reflecting the pass-through revenue model that inflates the capital base.
Working Capital Efficiency Improves
DSO improved to 28 days in 2026Q2 from 40 days in 2024Q1, as per financial statements, while DPO remained stable, indicating tighter receivables management and a shorter cash conversion cycle.
The 12-day reduction in DSO over ten quarters suggests that Paymentus is collecting payments from billers more quickly, which is a sign of improving customer credit quality or more efficient billing processes. The stable DPO around 24 days indicates that the company is not stretching its payables, which is consistent with its fortress balance sheet and minimal leverage. The absence of inventory data is typical for a services business, and the cash conversion cycle is effectively driven by receivables and payables, both of which appear well-managed.
Fortress Balance Sheet with Minimal Debt
Debt-to-equity stands at 0.01 with D/EBITDA of 0.25, as reported in filings, and interest coverage is not a concern given the negligible debt, indicating a fortress balance sheet.
The company's total debt of $8.8 million against $379.7 million in cash, as per the balance sheet, suggests that leverage is essentially non-existent and refinancing risk is minimal. The D/EBITDA of 0.25 is well below the typical covenant threshold, and the absence of interest coverage data is consistent with the low debt levels. This conservative capital structure provides significant strategic flexibility, allowing the company to invest in growth or weather economic downturns without the burden of debt service.
Ample Liquidity Provides Shock Absorption
Current ratio improved to 4.89 in 2026Q2 from 4.55 in 2024Q2, with cash covering over 3x total liabilities, as per financial statements, indicating a robust buffer against operational shocks.
The current ratio of 4.89 is exceptionally high, reflecting the company's large cash position and minimal current liabilities. This liquidity cushion suggests that Paymentus can easily absorb short-term disruptions, such as a spike in consumer delinquencies or a temporary slowdown in transaction volumes. The quick ratio is identical to the current ratio, indicating that inventory is not a factor, which is typical for a services business. This level of liquidity is a key differentiator versus peers like Repay Holdings, which carries a D/E of 0.91 and faces higher financial risk.
Gross Margin Misleads on True Economics
The 26.1% gross margin, as reported in filings, understates the platform's earning power because it includes pass-through interchange fees; contribution profit is the more accurate measure of value retained.
Analysts often compare Paymentus's gross margin to pure SaaS peers, but this is misleading because the company's revenue includes pass-through card network fees that are not retained. The gross margin of 26.1% in 2026Q2, while lower than typical software companies, does not reflect the actual take-rate on each transaction. Instead, investors should focus on contribution profit, which strips out these pass-through costs and better represents the company's economic value creation. The recent improvement in operating margin suggests that contribution profit is expanding, but the gross margin trend warrants monitoring for mix shift dilution.