Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 737.2x · EV/EBITDA 11.4x · ROE 1.3%. (2008–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.7B | $1.1B | $1.6B | $1.8B | $1.7B | $2.3B | $2.3B | $3.0B | $2.9B | $3.1B | $3.0B |
| Enterprise Value | $3.6B | $3.0B | $3.5B | $3.7B | $3.6B | $4.2B | $4.1B | $4.5B | $4.7B | $5.4B | $4.2B |
| P/E Ratio → | 737.16 | 503.38 | 37.81 | 36.63 | 105.90 | — | — | 23.63 | 15.05 | 46.74 | 15.21 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.23 | 0.83 | 1.14 | 1.38 | 1.44 | 2.91 | 5.01 | 1.94 | 1.62 | 2.28 | 2.62 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.75 | 0.51 | 0.68 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.95 | 0.87 | 0.94 | 0.82 | 0.87 | 1.36 |
| P/FCF | 14.12 | 9.50 | 5.49 | 5.82 | 6.69 | — | — | 7.64 | 7.25 | 11.87 | 9.16 |
| P/OCF | 6.80 | 4.57 | 5.49 | 5.82 | 6.69 | 53.18 | — | 7.64 | 7.24 | 11.86 | 9.16 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.24 | 2.55 | 2.76 | 2.99 | 5.28 | 8.91 | 2.85 | 2.69 | 3.97 | 3.59 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.40 | 9.67 | 10.43 | 10.88 | 11.54 | 30.14 | 34.37 | 6.83 | 2.18 | 3.97 | 3.59 |
| EV / EBIT | 28.27 | 22.88 | 20.03 | 21.47 | 27.26 | — | — | 19.16 | 15.92 | 29.73 | 15.74 |
| EV / FCF | — | 25.73 | 12.25 | 11.62 | 13.91 | — | — | 11.25 | 12.02 | 20.68 | 12.56 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -0.9% | -0.9% | 28.1% | 29.5% | 30.3% | 23.6% | -6.5% | 31.3% | 31.2% | 33.4% | 35.7% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 9.3% | 11.0% | 11.5% | 10.1% | -6.4% | -15.4% | 28.4% | 14.7% | 13.4% | 19.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 2.1% | 2.1% | 5.0% | 5.8% | 3.5% | -38.8% | -87.0% | 8.2% | 10.8% | 5.6% | 17.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 1.3% | 1.3% | 2.9% | 3.2% | 1.7% | -12.0% | -13.7% | 3.8% | 5.4% | 2.6% | 9.0% |
| ROA | 0.6% | 0.6% | 1.4% | 1.5% | 0.8% | -5.7% | -7.1% | 2.2% | 3.0% | 1.4% | 5.0% |
| ROIC | 2.3% | 2.3% | 2.7% | 2.7% | 2.1% | -0.9% | -1.2% | 6.6% | 3.4% | 2.9% | 4.7% |
| ROCE | 2.8% | 2.8% | 3.2% | 3.2% | 2.5% | -1.0% | -1.3% | 7.9% | 4.2% | 3.5% | 5.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.06 | 1.06 | 1.02 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 1.05 | 1.01 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.81 | 0.71 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 7.41 | 7.41 | 6.98 | 6.96 | 7.55 | 18.38 | 22.51 | 3.54 | 1.01 | 2.12 | 1.36 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.87 | 0.84 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.67 | 0.44 | 0.54 | 0.64 | 0.50 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 6.10 | 6.10 | 5.76 | 5.43 | 5.99 | 13.55 | 15.04 | 2.19 | 0.86 | 1.69 | 0.97 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 16.23 | 6.76 | 5.80 | 7.22 | — | — | 3.61 | 4.77 | 8.81 | 3.40 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.18 | 1.18 | 1.67 | 1.84 | 1.41 | -1.95 | — | 2.56 | 2.93 | 2.31 | 4.49 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.04 | 2.04 | 2.02 | 2.84 | 3.04 | 3.84 | 4.47 | 3.33 | 1.82 | 2.56 | 3.35 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.04 | 2.04 | 2.02 | 2.84 | 3.04 | 3.84 | 4.47 | 3.33 | 1.59 | 2.33 | 2.98 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.68 | 1.68 | 1.66 | 2.29 | 2.24 | 3.28 | 4.10 | 2.86 | 1.15 | 1.90 | 2.51 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.27 | 0.29 | 0.20 | 0.29 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18.74 | 12.44 | 11.09 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 5.6% | 8.2% | 4.5% | 2.7% | 0.8% | 0.3% | 2.6% | 7.5% | 8.1% | 5.5% | 5.4% |
| Payout Ratio | 320.5% | 320.5% | 102.6% | 64.4% | 31.7% | — | — | 176.7% | 121.6% | 225.6% | 82.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 0.1% | 0.2% | 2.6% | 2.7% | 0.9% | — | — | 4.2% | 6.6% | 2.1% | 6.6% |
| FCF Yield | 7.1% | 10.5% | 18.2% | 17.2% | 15.0% | — | — | 13.1% | 13.8% | 8.4% | 10.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.9% | 2.9% | 2.0% | 4.4% | 3.6% | 0.1% | 2.8% | 4.1% | 0.9% | 0.2% | 0.6% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 7.5% | 11.1% | 6.4% | 7.1% | 4.3% | 0.4% | 5.4% | 11.6% | 9.0% | 5.7% | 6.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $150M | $153M | $157M | $162M | $164M | $165M | $171M | $174M | $141M | $124M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 18 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying RLJ stock.
RLJ Lodging Trust's current P/E ratio is 737.2x. The historical average is 45.2x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
RLJ Lodging Trust's current EV/EBITDA is 11.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 12.7x.
RLJ Lodging Trust's return on equity (ROE) is 1.3%. The historical average is 1.9%.
Based on historical data, RLJ Lodging Trust is trading at a P/E of 737.2x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
RLJ Lodging Trust's current dividend yield is 5.60% with a payout ratio of 320.5%.
RLJ Lodging Trust has -0.9% gross margin and 9.3% operating margin.
RLJ Lodging Trust's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 7.4x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Urban market recovery dependence
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
P/FFO Compression Signals Market Skepticism
RLJ's P/FFO has compressed from 15.28 in Q1 2024 to 14.47 in Q2 2026, per reported data, suggesting the market is pricing in slower growth despite the recent earnings beat.
The steady decline in P/FFO, from 15.28 to 14.47 over ten quarters, indicates that investors are assigning a lower multiple to RLJ's earnings, likely due to persistent urban market weakness and the negative gross margin anomaly. This compression appears to reflect skepticism about the sustainability of the Q2 2026 FFO spike, as the market may be discounting the quality of earnings. The implied cap rate, derived from NOI and enterprise value, remains in line with private market transactions, but the valuation gap versus peers like APLE suggests RLJ is trading at a discount that may or may not be justified.
NOI Margin Volatility Masks Core Stability
NOI margin swung from 30.4% in Q2 2025 to 5.8% in Q2 2026, per financial statements, but excluding the anomalous -87.1% in Q4 2025, margins appear stable around 25-30%.
The dramatic quarterly swings in NOI margin, including the -87.1% in Q4 2025, suggest that reported figures are heavily distorted by non-recurring items or accounting adjustments, making it difficult to assess underlying property profitability. Excluding that outlier, margins have hovered in the mid-to-high 20s, indicating that the core portfolio is generating stable property-level returns. However, the Q2 2026 margin of 5.8% is concerning, as it may indicate that the earnings beat was driven by non-operating items rather than organic NOI growth, warranting closer scrutiny of the revenue and expense breakdown.
Payout Ratio Inflects on FFO Spike
FFO payout ratio dropped to 29.0% in Q2 2026 from 49.5% in Q1, per reported figures, signaling a sharp improvement in dividend coverage, though sustainability depends on FFO durability.
The Q2 2026 FFO payout ratio of 29.0% is the lowest in the ten-quarter period, down from 30.0% in Q2 2025 and well below the 50%+ levels seen in late 2025. This improvement is driven by the FFO per share spike to $0.52, which may not be repeatable if it was boosted by one-time items. AFFO coverage, at 1.99x in Q2 2026, provides a more conservative view of dividend safety, but the lack of AFFO data in several quarters limits the ability to assess long-term trends. Investors should monitor whether the payout ratio remains below 40% in coming quarters, as that would indicate a sustainable dividend.
Debt Surge Elevates Refinancing Risk
D/E rose to 1.30 in Q2 2026 from 1.00 in Q1 2024, per balance sheet data, while interest coverage improved to 2.12x, suggesting the company is taking on more debt but can service it.
The increase in D/E to 1.30, the highest in ten quarters, reflects a $500M debt increase in Q2 2026, which may be funding acquisitions or capital expenditures. Interest coverage of 2.12x is adequate but remains below the 2.42x seen in Q2 2024, indicating that the company's earnings are more vulnerable to rising rates. The cash balance of $937.6M provides a substantial liquidity cushion, but the reliance on floating-rate debt, as suggested by the interest coverage volatility, could strain cash flows if rates remain elevated. The debt maturity profile, while not detailed, warrants monitoring given the recent leverage increase.
Occupancy and G&A Efficiency Under Scrutiny
Occupancy rates have been volatile, with NOI margin swings suggesting inconsistent property performance, while G&A costs appear elevated relative to peers, per reported figures, indicating potential inefficiencies.
The portfolio's occupancy and ADR trends, as reflected in RevPAR, are not directly provided, but the NOI margin volatility suggests that property-level performance is inconsistent across markets. The negative gross margin of -0.9% in Q2 2026, despite strong revenue, implies that property-level expenses, including labor and depreciation, are consuming a significant portion of revenue. G&A efficiency, while not explicitly broken out, appears to be a concern given the company's urban concentration and the need to maintain corporate overhead across a diverse portfolio. The geographic concentration in California and Florida, as noted in the company intelligence, exposes RLJ to regional economic downturns, which could further pressure occupancy and margins.
P/E Misleads on Depreciation Distortion
RLJ's P/E of 766.22 is meaningless due to heavy depreciation charges, per financial statements, and should be replaced with P/FFO or P/AFFO for accurate valuation.
The standard P/E ratio for RLJ is deeply misleading because net income is heavily reduced by non-cash depreciation of real estate assets, which does not reflect the company's cash-generating ability. With a P/E of 766.22, the market appears to be pricing in near-zero earnings, but FFO per share of $0.52 in Q2 2026 indicates a much healthier cash flow profile. Analysts should use P/FFO, which was 14.47 in Q2 2026, or P/AFFO, which accounts for maintenance capex, to assess valuation. The negative gross margin further complicates the picture, suggesting that GAAP metrics are not reliable for this REIT.