Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 11.0x · EV/EBITDA 22.5x · ROE 12.8%. (1991–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $172.3B | $186.8B | $71.0B | $67.3B | $49.9B | $57.0B | $52.8B | $67.9B | $72.5B | $101.1B | $76.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $526.1B | $504.2B | $336.5B | $131.3B | $216.6B | $156.6B | $202.0B | $315.1B | $205.4B | $208.0B | $228.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | 10.99 | 13.48 | 5.92 | 6.37 | 5.46 | 7.48 | — | 11.34 | 9.98 | 16.08 | 12.72 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.38 | 3.09 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 0.92 | 1.18 | 1.13 | 1.33 | 1.46 | 2.04 | 1.67 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.49 | 1.66 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.51 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.95 | 0.74 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | 2.96 | 1.26 | 0.92 | — | — | 3.24 | 5.64 |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | 13.41 | 1.80 | 1.01 | 0.80 | 20.03 | 21.22 | 2.51 | 3.49 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 8.33 | 5.27 | 2.19 | 4.00 | 3.23 | 4.32 | 6.17 | 4.14 | 4.19 | 5.00 |
| EV / EBITDA | 22.54 | 23.06 | 15.07 | 6.69 | 11.88 | 9.05 | 275.15 | 20.27 | 12.36 | 14.17 | 17.40 |
| EV / EBIT | 25.26 | 26.99 | 17.68 | 7.98 | 14.20 | 10.76 | — | 25.12 | 14.47 | 17.20 | 21.22 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | 12.84 | 3.46 | 3.50 | — | — | 6.67 | 16.95 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 79.3% | 79.3% | 80.2% | 78.4% | 80.0% | 84.7% | 73.6% | 81.7% | 81.9% | 81.4% | 79.1% |
| Operating Margin | 30.9% | 30.9% | 29.8% | 27.5% | 28.1% | 30.1% | -4.4% | 24.6% | 28.6% | 24.4% | 23.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 23.3% | 23.3% | 19.7% | 18.5% | 17.7% | 16.8% | -18.8% | 12.8% | 15.7% | 13.3% | 13.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 12.8% | 12.8% | 11.9% | 11.0% | 9.9% | 8.6% | -8.7% | 6.0% | 7.3% | 6.3% | 6.2% |
| ROA | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.7% | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.5% | -0.6% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.5% |
| ROIC | 2.3% | 2.3% | 2.8% | 2.6% | 2.4% | 2.6% | -0.3% | 2.2% | 3.1% | 2.8% | 2.5% |
| ROCE | 1.6% | 1.6% | 1.1% | 1.5% | 2.8% | 2.7% | -0.4% | 1.4% | 1.0% | 0.9% | 0.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 4.40 | 4.40 | 4.50 | 2.98 | 4.36 | 3.45 | 3.53 | 3.39 | 2.30 | 2.04 | 2.23 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 22.72 | 22.72 | 21.66 | 15.83 | 23.35 | 19.33 | 438.93 | 24.17 | 14.83 | 14.84 | 17.43 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 2.81 | 2.47 | 0.61 | 1.71 | 1.03 | 1.63 | 2.23 | 1.24 | 1.00 | 1.48 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 14.52 | 14.52 | 11.89 | 3.26 | 9.14 | 5.76 | 203.20 | 15.90 | 8.00 | 7.28 | 11.61 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | 9.89 | 2.20 | 2.59 | — | — | 3.43 | 11.30 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.29 | 0.27 | 0.46 | 1.11 | -0.15 | 0.58 | 0.71 | 0.56 | 0.45 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.25 | 0.25 | 21.49 | 5.89 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.34 | 0.93 | 7.22 | 5.44 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.25 | 0.25 | 21.49 | 5.89 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.34 | 0.93 | 7.22 | 5.44 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.14 | 0.14 | 18.59 | 3.49 | 0.21 | 0.23 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.93 | 7.22 | 5.44 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.0% | 1.8% | 4.3% | 3.4% | 3.7% | 2.3% | — | 5.6% | 4.3% | 2.6% | 3.0% |
| Payout Ratio | 23.7% | 23.7% | 24.0% | 20.4% | 19.2% | 16.2% | — | 57.9% | 39.9% | 40.3% | 37.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 9.1% | 7.4% | 16.9% | 15.7% | 18.3% | 13.4% | — | 8.8% | 10.0% | 6.2% | 7.9% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | 33.8% | 79.5% | 109.1% | — | — | 30.9% | 17.7% |
| Buyback Yield | 2.6% | 2.2% | 6.7% | 4.6% | 4.1% | 2.9% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 1.3% | 1.8% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.6% | 4.0% | 11.0% | 8.0% | 7.8% | 5.2% | 1.4% | 6.9% | 5.7% | 3.9% | 4.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $15.9B | $15.6B | $16.2B | $16.9B | $17.3B | $17.3B | $17.1B | $16.9B | $16.1B | $15.3B |
Includes 30+ ratios · 28 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
Bull/bear thesis, analyst target revisions, and earnings execution.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SAN stock.
Banco Santander, S.A.'s current P/E ratio is 11.0x. The historical average is 17.8x. This places it at the 26th percentile of its historical range.
Banco Santander, S.A.'s current EV/EBITDA is 22.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 21.5x.
Banco Santander, S.A.'s return on equity (ROE) is 12.8%. The historical average is 10.5%.
Based on historical data, Banco Santander, S.A. is trading at a P/E of 11.0x. This is at the 26th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Banco Santander, S.A.'s current dividend yield is 1.99% with a payout ratio of 23.7%.
Banco Santander, S.A. has 79.3% gross margin and 30.9% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Banco Santander, S.A.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 22.7x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Thin equity cushion and rising provisions
Discount to Peers Reflects Complexity Premium
Based on reported figures, Santander trades at a P/B of 1.49 and P/E of 10.99, below BBVA's 2.17 P/B and Itaú's 2.11, a gap that suggests investors price in structural complexity and emerging-market currency exposure rather than the bank's franchise scale alone.
The P/B multiple of 1.49 sits meaningfully below the 2.0 to 2.2 range held by BBVA and Itaú, which implies the market is capitalizing Santander's return on equity at a lower rate than its closest Iberian peer. Given that Santander's reported ROE clusters near 3% on a quarterly basis, the discount appears consistent with weak current returns rather than an obvious mispricing. Investors should monitor whether the multiple re-rates as provisions normalize and the cost-to-income ratio holds below 50%.
ROE Depressed by Thin Leverage Denominator
As reported in quarterly statements, Santander's ROE has held between 2.9% and 4.8% over ten quarters, well below BBVA's 18.6% and Itaú's 21.2%, a gap that the DuPont structure suggests is driven more by low net interest margin and asset utilization than by leverage alone.
With NIM stable near 0.6% and equity-to-assets near 0.06, the return on equity is constrained at the spread level and the leverage multiplier is modest relative to the asset base. The fee share rising to 30.3% in 2026Q2 provides some offset, but the reported ROA of roughly 0.2% indicates that fee income is not yet large enough to lift overall returns materially. The profitability picture therefore hinges on whether non-interest income can scale faster than the loan-loss charge.
Efficiency Gains Offset by Flat Spreads
According to reported quarterly data, Santander's efficiency ratio improved from 51.2% in 2024Q4 to 46.0% in 2025Q4 while NIM held near 0.6%, suggesting cost discipline is doing the heavy lifting on profitability rather than any widening of lending spreads.
A flat NIM across ten quarters indicates that funding-cost advantages in the corridor footprint are being offset by asset-yield compression, leaving little room for margin-led earnings growth. The efficiency improvement of roughly five percentage points is meaningful, but it does not isolate whether headcount reduction, branch consolidation, or revenue recovery was the dominant driver. Investors should monitor whether the efficiency ratio can hold below 48% if revenue growth turns negative, as the recent quarters show the operating leverage cuts both ways.
Equity Buffer Narrowing Against Asset Growth
Based on the supplied figures, equity rose from $86.3B to $113.4B while total assets expanded from roughly $1.6T to $2.1T over the same period, leaving the equity-to-assets ratio near 6% and the reported Debt/Equity of 4.40 elevated against typical banking norms.
Because regulatory CET1 and Tier 1 ratios are not included in the dataset, capital adequacy cannot be assessed directly against minimums, and this analysis treats those specific ratios as data unavailable. The leverage picture nonetheless suggests that balance sheet growth has outpaced capital accumulation, which may constrain future buyback capacity if provisions continue rising. Warrants further investigation of regulatory capital disclosures before drawing firm conclusions about headroom.
Provisions Climbing Faster Than Margin Growth
As reported in the quarterly data, loan-loss provisions rose roughly 83% from $2.4B in 2025Q3 to $4.4B in 2026Q2 while NIM stayed flat, a divergence that suggests credit costs are absorbing a growing share of pre-provision earnings.
Non-performing loan ratios, coverage ratios, and charge-off rates are not provided in the supplied data, so reserve adequacy cannot be confirmed and is treated as data unavailable. The sharp provision increase alongside flat spreads implies either deteriorating credit or forward-looking IFRS 9 overlays, and the two explanations carry very different implications for future earnings. Investors should monitor the next several quarters of provision expense relative to pre-provision profit.
Valuation Gap Versus Profitability Gap
Based on reported peer figures, Santander's ROE of roughly 3% trails BBVA's 18.6% and Itaú's 21.2%, yet its P/B of 1.49 sits between the lower-multiple group of Barclays and Deutsche Bank and the premium group of BBVA and Itaú, suggesting the market partially prices in franchise value beyond current returns.
The gap between Santander's P/B and its ROE relative to peers is wider than the gap in P/E, which suggests investors are capitalizing earnings at a similar multiple despite the return differential. Barclays and Deutsche Bank trade below 1.0x book with ROEs near 9% to 11%, which implies the market is not simply rewarding returns in this sector. Whether the discount narrows depends on whether Santander can convert its footprint into sustained ROE above 10%, a threshold it has not reached in the reported window.
Debt-to-Equity Misapplied to Banking Leverage
Debt/Equity of 4.40 is frequently cited as a leverage warning for Santander, but for a deposit-funded bank this ratio overstates risk because deposits are operating liabilities, and the more relevant measures are CET1 and the equity-to-assets ratio of roughly 6%.
Applying a corporate debt framework to a bank treats customer deposits as borrowings, which inflates the apparent leverage and may mislead investors toward a solvency concern that the regulatory capital framework does not necessarily support. The metric obscures the quality of the deposit franchise and the risk-weighted asset composition, both of which determine real loss-absorbing capacity. A more appropriate adjustment would be to anchor the analysis on CET1 ratio trajectory, risk-weighted asset density, and provision coverage, while treating the reported Debt/Equity as a contextual rather than decision-driving figure.