Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 12.0x · EV/EBITDA 8.0x · ROE 9.5%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.7B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $1.4B | $1.7B | $1.3B | $1.0B | $1.3B | $1.0B | $880M | $789M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.6B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $2.1B | $2.0B | $700M | $519M | $1.1B | $889M | $871M | $575M |
| P/E Ratio → | 12.02 | 12.77 | 12.59 | 12.21 | 13.31 | 10.90 | 16.33 | 13.60 | 13.30 | 21.76 | 17.62 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.84 | 3.74 | 3.74 | 3.49 | 4.23 | 3.90 | 3.41 | 4.10 | 3.96 | 4.03 | 3.80 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.28 | 1.16 | 1.19 | 1.24 | 1.62 | 1.28 | 1.13 | 1.38 | 1.24 | 1.74 | 1.65 |
| P/FCF | 12.48 | 12.08 | 13.81 | 10.70 | 10.67 | 9.95 | 9.36 | 12.69 | 12.29 | 21.89 | 21.16 |
| P/OCF | 12.58 | 11.60 | 13.24 | 10.32 | 10.43 | 9.71 | 9.14 | 12.16 | 11.29 | 15.89 | 16.36 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.55 | 3.92 | 5.18 | 5.06 | 2.12 | 1.69 | 3.59 | 3.43 | 3.98 | 2.77 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.95 | 8.00 | 8.90 | 11.84 | 10.58 | 3.87 | 4.94 | 7.61 | 8.56 | 10.17 | 7.16 |
| EV / EBIT | 9.46 | 8.68 | 9.82 | 13.23 | 11.70 | 4.28 | 5.93 | 8.63 | 9.52 | 11.22 | 7.93 |
| EV / FCF | — | 11.48 | 14.49 | 15.89 | 12.78 | 5.42 | 4.63 | 11.12 | 10.63 | 21.66 | 15.42 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 97.8% | 97.8% | 98.3% | 94.2% | 95.5% | 102.1% | 86.2% | 100.6% | 99.0% | 100.6% | 102.9% |
| Operating Margin | 40.9% | 40.9% | 39.9% | 39.1% | 43.2% | 49.7% | 28.4% | 41.5% | 36.0% | 35.4% | 34.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 29.4% | 29.4% | 29.5% | 28.6% | 31.2% | 35.7% | 21.1% | 30.1% | 26.3% | 18.5% | 21.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 9.5% | 9.5% | 9.7% | 10.6% | 12.3% | 12.2% | 7.1% | 10.6% | 10.2% | 8.2% | 9.6% |
| ROA | 1.2% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 0.9% | 1.4% | 1.2% | 0.9% | 1.0% |
| ROIC | 8.9% | 8.9% | 6.9% | 7.0% | 9.8% | 10.9% | 6.3% | 9.8% | 8.7% | 9.1% | 10.0% |
| ROCE | 10.8% | 10.8% | 8.6% | 9.0% | 12.7% | 14.2% | 8.0% | 12.4% | 11.0% | 11.7% | 12.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.69 | 0.42 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.39 | 0.19 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.44 | 0.44 | 1.26 | 4.42 | 2.30 | 1.02 | 1.33 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 2.29 | 1.14 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.06 | 0.06 | 0.60 | 0.32 | -0.58 | -0.57 | -0.17 | -0.17 | -0.02 | -0.45 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.42 | -0.42 | 0.42 | 3.87 | 1.74 | -3.23 | -5.05 | -1.07 | -1.34 | -0.10 | -2.66 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.60 | 0.68 | 5.19 | 2.11 | -4.53 | -4.73 | -1.57 | -1.66 | -0.22 | -5.74 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.41 | 1.41 | 1.15 | 1.97 | 18.25 | 29.72 | 9.24 | 8.25 | 7.25 | 11.42 | 12.68 |
Net cash position: cash ($157M) exceeds total debt ($80M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.40 | 0.32 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.22 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.40 | 0.32 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.22 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.08 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.6% | 2.9% | 3.0% | 2.8% | 2.1% | 2.3% | 2.5% | 2.0% | 1.8% | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Payout Ratio | 37.0% | 37.0% | 38.0% | 34.0% | 28.5% | 25.3% | 40.6% | 27.2% | 27.5% | 37.3% | 30.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 8.3% | 7.8% | 7.9% | 8.2% | 7.5% | 9.2% | 6.1% | 7.4% | 7.5% | 4.6% | 5.7% |
| FCF Yield | 8.0% | 8.3% | 7.2% | 9.3% | 9.4% | 10.0% | 10.7% | 7.9% | 8.1% | 4.6% | 4.7% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.9% | 2.1% | 1.1% | 0.6% | 1.6% | 0.3% | 2.5% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.6% | 5.0% | 4.1% | 3.4% | 3.7% | 2.7% | 5.1% | 2.2% | 2.1% | 1.9% | 2.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $33M | $33M | $33M | $33M | $30M | $30M | $31M | $30M | $23M | $23M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TCBK stock.
TriCo Bancshares's current P/E ratio is 12.0x. The historical average is 20.2x. This places it at the 7th percentile of its historical range.
TriCo Bancshares's current EV/EBITDA is 8.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 8.8x.
TriCo Bancshares's return on equity (ROE) is 9.5%. The historical average is 11.2%.
Based on historical data, TriCo Bancshares is trading at a P/E of 12.0x. This is at the 7th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
TriCo Bancshares's current dividend yield is 2.65% with a payout ratio of 37.0%.
TriCo Bancshares has 97.8% gross margin and 40.9% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
TriCo Bancshares's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.4x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Concentrated California credit exposure
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiple Despite Thin Returns
Based on EDBL-style reported figures, TCBK trades at 1.28x book value and 14.06x trailing earnings, a multiple that appears to price in franchise durability rather than the 9.5% ROE currently reported. Investors should weigh whether the market is valuing deposit stickiness or a normalization of returns.
The 1.28x price-to-book ratio sits above the 0.78x WaFd multiple and below the 2.28x First Financial level, placing TCBK in the middle of the peer range. Given that reported ROE of 9.5% is below Columbia Banking's 11.1% and well below First Financial's 15.1%, the premium may imply the market expects margin recovery or treats the non-interest-bearing deposit base as a durable asset. The 11.84x forward P/E is below the trailing multiple, which suggests expected earnings growth, though the absence of reported EPS and guidance limits confidence in that estimate.
Spread-Driven Returns Under Pressure
As reported in quarterly figures, TCBK's ROE rose from 2.1% in 2025Q1 to 2.8% in 2026Q3 while net interest margin stayed near 0.9%, indicating that returns improved largely through balance sheet and expense dynamics rather than spread widening.
A DuPont view shows that with a roughly 0.13 equity-to-assets ratio and ROA near 0.3% to 0.4%, leverage contributes substantially to the reported ROE, which means returns remain structurally modest even though the bank is not highly levered. The fee share fell from 15.7% to 11.4% over the period, so a larger share of profitability now depends on net interest spread. This mix shift suggests the recent ROE gain may be less durable if the 2026Q3 provision benefit does not repeat.
Efficiency Gains Offset Flat Margin
According to the reported income statements, TCBK's efficiency ratio fell from 59.7% in 2025Q1 to 53.9% in 2026Q3, while its net interest margin remained between 0.8% and 1.0%, suggesting cost control is doing the work that spread expansion has not.
A 580 basis point improvement in efficiency over six quarters is meaningful for a regional bank and points to operating leverage as revenue grew faster than non-interest expense. However, a margin that barely moved implies that funding cost advantages are being preserved rather than expanded, and the fee compression reduces the diversification that would otherwise cushion a spread squeeze. Investors should monitor whether the efficiency trend holds as deposit betas rise.
Equity Base Limits Deployment Capacity
Based on reported figures, TCBK's equity-to-assets ratio sits near 0.13 with tangible book value per share rising from $25.93 to $31.78, which suggests capital has been accreting steadily though the cushion remains modest relative to the securities-heavy balance sheet.
Tangible book value growth of roughly 22% across the period indicates retained earnings are compounding capital, supporting capacity for buybacks and dividends. The securities-heavy asset mix, however, means that interest rate movements can affect tangible equity through unrealized positions, which warrants investigation alongside regulatory capital ratios that were not supplied in the data. Without CET1 figures, the true headroom above minimums cannot be confirmed from the data provided.
Efficiency Ratio Flatters Underlying Economics
The most commonly misapplied metric here is the price-to-book multiple, which as reported at 1.28x may appear cheap or expensive depending on whether tangible or total book value is used, and which obscures the impact of unrealized securities losses on equity.
Because TCBK's assets are dominated by investment securities of roughly $8.9B, the P/B ratio is sensitive to accumulated other comprehensive income that may not reflect realizable value if held-to-maturity classification applies. Using price to tangible book, the multiple reflects the same economic question but excludes acquisition intangibles from the Valley Republic deal. Investors should monitor the securities mark and the tangible book trajectory rather than treating a headline P/B as a stable anchor.