Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 14.9x · EV/EBITDA 32.1x · ROE 16.9%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $207.2B | $141.2B | $97.3B | $101.9B | $116.1B | $132.0B | $80.0B | $104.3B | $102.0B | $105.4B | $84.3B |
| Enterprise Value | $596.9B | $687.8B | $581.8B | $565.5B | $472.3B | $367.0B | $356.8B | $480.5B | $424.8B | $372.9B | $293.8B |
| P/E Ratio → | 14.88 | 7.10 | 11.71 | 10.12 | 6.76 | 9.39 | 6.88 | 9.13 | 9.23 | 10.34 | 9.72 |
| P/S Ratio | 4.74 | 2.30 | 1.73 | 1.98 | 2.54 | 3.12 | 1.85 | 2.56 | 2.65 | 2.94 | 2.48 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.31 | 1.10 | 0.84 | 0.91 | 1.04 | 1.32 | 0.84 | 1.19 | 1.27 | 1.40 | 1.14 |
| P/FCF | — | — | 1.84 | — | 3.10 | 2.69 | 0.35 | — | 19.98 | 4.10 | 2.30 |
| P/OCF | — | — | 1.77 | — | 2.98 | 2.63 | 0.35 | 125.64 | 17.92 | 4.04 | 2.25 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 11.22 | 10.34 | 10.97 | 10.32 | 8.68 | 8.24 | 11.80 | 11.02 | 10.40 | 8.64 |
| EV / EBITDA | 32.07 | 26.34 | 42.91 | 36.10 | 20.37 | 19.11 | 25.38 | 32.84 | 28.01 | 27.36 | 24.52 |
| EV / EBIT | 34.97 | 28.72 | 50.45 | 41.12 | 22.05 | 21.42 | 29.95 | 36.32 | 30.84 | 30.26 | 27.60 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 11.03 | — | 12.60 | 7.49 | 1.56 | — | 83.20 | 14.51 | 8.03 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 92.6% | 92.6% | 92.4% | 94.3% | 97.7% | 100.5% | 83.3% | 92.6% | 93.6% | 93.8% | 93.1% |
| Operating Margin | 39.1% | 39.1% | 20.5% | 26.7% | 46.8% | 40.5% | 27.5% | 32.5% | 35.7% | 34.4% | 31.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | 33.5% | 33.5% | 15.7% | 20.6% | 38.1% | 33.8% | 27.5% | 28.6% | 29.2% | 29.0% | 25.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 16.9% | 16.9% | 7.8% | 9.5% | 16.5% | 14.6% | 13.0% | 13.9% | 14.5% | 13.9% | 12.5% |
| ROA | 1.0% | 1.0% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 1.0% | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.9% | 0.8% | 0.8% |
| ROIC | 2.3% | 2.3% | 1.2% | 1.6% | 2.9% | 2.5% | 1.7% | 2.1% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 2.6% |
| ROCE | 5.4% | 5.4% | 2.7% | 3.4% | 5.9% | 5.1% | 3.4% | 4.0% | 4.4% | 4.0% | 5.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 5.19 | 5.19 | 5.75 | 5.07 | 4.51 | 4.02 | 4.68 | 4.64 | 4.48 | 4.29 | 3.60 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 25.41 | 25.41 | 48.86 | 36.31 | 21.66 | 20.88 | 31.83 | 27.79 | 23.62 | 23.67 | 22.30 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 4.28 | 4.21 | 4.14 | 3.20 | 2.35 | 2.90 | 4.29 | 4.03 | 3.56 | 2.82 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 20.93 | 20.93 | 35.73 | 29.60 | 15.37 | 12.24 | 19.69 | 25.71 | 21.29 | 19.62 | 17.49 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 9.18 | — | 9.50 | 4.80 | 1.21 | — | 63.22 | 10.41 | 5.73 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.18 | 0.27 | 1.57 | 3.14 | 1.05 | 0.73 | 0.97 | 1.37 | 1.60 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.25 | 0.22 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.25 | 0.22 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.07 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.6% | 5.4% | 7.4% | 5.7% | 5.7% | 4.2% | 4.6% | 4.9% | 4.5% | 4.0% | 4.5% |
| Payout Ratio | 37.3% | 37.3% | 81.0% | 54.8% | 38.2% | 38.9% | 30.8% | 44.2% | 41.1% | 40.5% | 43.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.7% | 14.1% | 8.5% | 9.9% | 14.8% | 10.6% | 14.5% | 11.0% | 10.8% | 9.7% | 10.3% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 54.2% | — | 32.3% | 37.1% | 285.4% | — | 5.0% | 24.4% | 43.4% |
| Buyback Yield | 7.2% | 14.8% | 17.6% | 13.0% | 12.3% | 8.4% | 12.3% | 11.7% | 10.2% | 10.6% | 7.6% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 9.8% | 20.2% | 25.0% | 18.7% | 18.1% | 12.6% | 16.9% | 16.6% | 14.8% | 14.6% | 12.1% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $1.7B | $1.8B | $1.8B | $1.8B | $1.8B | $1.8B | $1.8B | $1.8B | $1.9B | $1.9B |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
Bull/bear thesis, analyst target revisions, and earnings execution.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TD stock.
The Toronto-Dominion Bank's current P/E ratio is 14.9x. The historical average is 11.0x. This places it at the 90th percentile of its historical range.
The Toronto-Dominion Bank's current EV/EBITDA is 32.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 20.6x.
The Toronto-Dominion Bank's return on equity (ROE) is 16.9%. The historical average is 13.4%.
Based on historical data, The Toronto-Dominion Bank is trading at a P/E of 14.9x. This is at the 90th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
The Toronto-Dominion Bank's current dividend yield is 2.59% with a payout ratio of 37.3%.
The Toronto-Dominion Bank has 92.6% gross margin and 39.1% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
The Toronto-Dominion Bank's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 25.4x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Regulatory constraints on U.S. expansion
Premium Valuation Amidst Regulatory Overhang
TD trades at a P/B of 2.26, a premium to most Canadian peers except RY, suggesting the market prices in its strong franchise value despite the regulatory overhang on its U.S. operations.
The current P/B of 2.26 positions TD above peers like BMO (1.99) and BNS (1.83), but below the franchise premium commanded by RY (2.95). This valuation implies the market is balancing TD's structural advantages in retail deposits against the material uncertainty from U.S. regulatory probes. The forward P/E of 11.86, compared to the TTM P/E of 14.55, indicates an expectation of earnings acceleration, which aligns with the improving efficiency ratio trend.
ROE Recovery Driven by Operating Leverage
TD's ROE has recovered to 3.7% in Q3 2026 from a low of -0.2% in Q3 2024, a turnaround primarily fueled by a dramatic improvement in the efficiency ratio rather than net interest margin expansion.
The DuPont decomposition reveals that profitability improvement is not coming from leverage (Equity/Assets is stable at 0.06) or NIM (stable at 0.4%), but from the efficiency ratio's decline from 89.4% to 60.0%. This suggests strong operating leverage as revenue growth outpaces the bank's high fixed-cost structure. However, the absolute ROE level remains well below peers like RY (16.1%) and CM (15.4%), indicating that while the trajectory is positive, TD's profitability quality still lags the top-tier Canadian franchises.
Efficiency Gains Offset Static NIM
The efficiency ratio has improved by nearly 30 percentage points over eight quarters to 60.0%, demonstrating significant cost discipline, while the NIM has remained flat at 0.4%, indicating funding cost advantages are being fully offset by asset yield pressures.
The stable NIM suggests TD's low-cost deposit franchise is not translating into expanding margins in the current rate environment, possibly due to competitive pressures or a shift in the asset mix. The primary driver of improved profitability is therefore the bank's ability to scale revenue without a proportional increase in operating expenses. Investors should monitor whether this efficiency trend is sustainable or reflects one-time benefits, as the bank's high-touch retail model inherently carries a high fixed-cost base.
Robust Capital Buffers Constrained by Deployment
With an equity-to-assets ratio stable at 0.06 and total equity of $127.1 billion, TD maintains substantial capital buffers, yet the regulatory environment appears to be limiting its ability to deploy this capital through acquisitions or enhanced returns.
The consistent equity-to-assets ratio across ten quarters indicates disciplined capital management. However, the accumulation of excess capital, as highlighted in prior balance sheet analysis, suggests that regulatory constraints—particularly the U.S. AML probes—are likely preventing the bank from executing its preferred capital deployment strategy. This creates a scenario where strong capital adequacy may not translate into commensurate shareholder returns, warranting a focus on organic growth and buyback capacity.
Provisioning Stabilization Signals Cycle Trough
Provision for credit losses has moderated to $917.5 million in Q3 2026 from a peak of $1.3 billion in Q2 2025, suggesting the bank's credit cycle may be stabilizing after a period of elevated provisioning.
The decline in provisions, when viewed alongside the improving ROE, indicates that the worst of the credit cost cycle may be behind the bank. This trend aligns with the broader narrative of a resilient North American consumer. However, given TD's significant exposure to Canadian mortgages and U.S. consumer credit, investors should monitor whether this stabilization holds, particularly if unemployment rises or the Canadian housing market experiences a correction.
The Misleading Stability of Net Interest Margin
The most commonly misapplied metric for TD is its seemingly stable NIM of 0.4%, which obscures the underlying margin compression risk from its massive securities portfolio and the potential for deposit cost re-pricing.
A static NIM is often interpreted as a sign of strength, but for TD, it may mask a significant headwind. The bank's balance sheet has shifted dramatically, with investment securities ballooning to $2.0 trillion. In a rising rate environment, this portfolio generates unrealized losses and may require higher-yielding (and thus more expensive) assets to maintain the spread. Furthermore, the stable NIM does not reveal the composition of funding; if low-cost deposit growth slows, the bank could face margin pressure. Analysts should instead focus on the net interest income growth trajectory and the composition of earning assets to assess true margin health.