Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 27.0x · EV/EBITDA 17.7x · ROE 28.4%. (2001–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $10.8B | $11.1B | $12.1B | $8.3B | $6.4B | $6.3B | $5.5B | $4.0B | $4.3B | $3.8B | $3.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $12.6B | $12.9B | $12.7B | $8.9B | $7.0B | $6.7B | $6.0B | $4.4B | $4.1B | $3.7B | $3.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | 27.02 | 27.44 | 27.89 | 27.13 | 23.72 | 25.61 | 175.47 | 22.89 | 27.14 | 28.63 | 29.60 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.84 | 1.89 | 2.25 | 1.79 | 1.59 | 1.81 | 2.30 | 1.45 | 1.75 | 1.70 | 1.72 |
| P/B Ratio | 7.40 | 7.51 | 8.80 | 7.14 | 6.22 | 5.85 | 5.85 | 4.29 | 4.47 | 4.43 | 4.52 |
| P/FCF | 31.67 | 32.55 | 30.28 | 37.94 | 24.08 | 23.43 | 72.58 | 24.97 | 21.82 | 30.21 | 37.12 |
| P/OCF | 14.84 | 15.25 | 16.04 | 14.64 | 12.50 | 13.40 | 23.95 | 10.67 | 12.18 | 13.16 | 13.33 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.19 | 2.36 | 1.93 | 1.74 | 1.93 | 2.50 | 1.61 | 1.66 | 1.65 | 1.69 |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.75 | 18.17 | 18.28 | 17.62 | 15.25 | 15.78 | 42.25 | 13.56 | 14.15 | 13.12 | 13.21 |
| EV / EBIT | 25.04 | 26.80 | 24.53 | 25.23 | 21.68 | 22.46 | 256.47 | 21.04 | 21.74 | 19.64 | 19.57 |
| EV / FCF | — | 37.67 | 31.81 | 41.00 | 26.26 | 24.96 | 78.74 | 27.77 | 20.76 | 29.41 | 36.47 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 12.4% | 12.4% | 17.6% | 15.9% | 16.3% | 17.5% | 11.8% | 18.0% | 18.1% | 19.1% | 19.4% |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | 8.6% | 9.6% | 7.6% | 8.0% | 8.6% | 1.0% | 7.7% | 7.6% | 8.4% | 8.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 6.9% | 6.9% | 8.1% | 6.6% | 6.7% | 7.1% | 1.3% | 6.3% | 6.4% | 5.9% | 5.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 28.4% | 28.4% | 34.3% | 27.9% | 25.7% | 24.3% | 3.3% | 18.4% | 17.5% | 16.3% | 16.1% |
| ROA | 12.0% | 12.0% | 14.5% | 11.5% | 10.7% | 10.1% | 1.5% | 10.1% | 11.3% | 10.5% | 10.4% |
| ROIC | 14.5% | 14.5% | 20.4% | 15.5% | 15.5% | 15.4% | 1.3% | 14.9% | 18.7% | 19.3% | 19.2% |
| ROCE | 20.1% | 20.1% | 23.4% | 18.1% | 16.9% | 15.9% | 1.4% | 16.0% | 18.0% | 19.6% | 20.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.27 | 1.27 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.88 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.07 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.66 | 2.66 | 1.23 | 1.52 | 1.65 | 1.76 | 5.87 | 1.70 | 0.01 | 0.19 | 0.21 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.18 | 0.44 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.38 | 0.50 | 0.48 | -0.22 | -0.12 | -0.08 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.47 | 2.47 | 0.88 | 1.31 | 1.27 | 0.97 | 3.30 | 1.37 | -0.72 | -0.35 | -0.24 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 5.12 | 1.53 | 3.06 | 2.18 | 1.53 | 6.16 | 2.80 | -1.06 | -0.79 | -0.65 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | 2595.14 | 81.33 | 5.71 | — | 318.22 | 118.49 | 137.11 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.62 | 0.48 | 0.61 | 0.94 | 1.01 | 0.59 | 0.90 | 0.78 | 0.72 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.57 | 0.43 | 0.55 | 0.88 | 0.96 | 0.55 | 0.85 | 0.73 | 0.66 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.14 | 0.27 | 0.56 | 0.72 | 0.26 | 0.55 | 0.46 | 0.40 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.66 | 1.68 | 1.66 | 1.59 | 1.38 | 1.03 | 1.39 | 1.67 | 1.67 | 1.69 |
| Inventory Turnover | 113.00 | 113.00 | 108.60 | 101.69 | 88.42 | 90.44 | 94.55 | 111.51 | 106.92 | 110.18 | 99.78 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 13.32 | 13.12 | 13.83 | 13.66 | 17.00 | 14.98 | 13.15 | 13.68 | 12.58 | 10.29 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.6% | 1.6% | 1.3% | 1.8% | 1.9% | 1.3% | 0.5% | 2.6% | 1.6% | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| Payout Ratio | 44.4% | 44.4% | 37.6% | 48.3% | 46.0% | 34.1% | 80.0% | 58.7% | 43.3% | 44.2% | 45.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.7% | 3.6% | 3.6% | 3.7% | 4.2% | 3.9% | 0.6% | 4.4% | 3.7% | 3.5% | 3.4% |
| FCF Yield | 3.2% | 3.1% | 3.3% | 2.6% | 4.2% | 4.3% | 1.4% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 3.3% | 2.7% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.4% | 1.4% | 0.7% | 0.6% | 3.5% | 1.1% | 0.4% | 3.8% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.4% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.0% | 3.0% | 2.0% | 2.4% | 5.5% | 2.4% | 0.9% | 6.4% | 1.9% | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $67M | $67M | $67M | $68M | $70M | $70M | $71M | $72M | $72M | $71M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 25 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TXRH stock.
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 27.0x. The historical average is 36.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 17.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.9x.
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 28.4%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 22.1%.
Based on historical data, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 27.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 1.64% with a payout ratio of 44.4%.
Texas Roadhouse, Inc. has 12.4% gross margin and 8.6% operating margin.
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.7x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Liquidity and debt spike
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Volatility Masks Underlying Stability
TXRH's gross margin swung from 10.7% in 2025Q4 to 22.0% in 2026Q2, per quarterly reports, while operating margin recovered to 8.5%, indicating commodity-driven volatility rather than structural deterioration.
The 2025Q4 trough in gross margin (10.7%) and operating margin (7.1%) appears to be a temporary low, as 2026Q2 shows a sharp rebound to 22.0% and 8.5%, respectively. This volatility likely stems from commodity cost fluctuations, as suggested by the prior income statement analysis. Net margin has remained relatively stable in the 5.7%-9.0% range over the past ten quarters, implying that the company's pricing power and cost controls are resilient despite quarterly swings. Investors should focus on the full-year trend rather than any single quarter, as the data suggests margins are mean-reverting.
Return on Capital Cyclicality
ROIC ranged from 2.8% in 2025Q4 to 5.8% in 2024Q2, per financial statements, with a recent recovery to 4.5% in 2026Q2, indicating a cyclical pattern tied to margin swings and capital intensity.
ROIC has been volatile, with a clear trough in 2025Q4 (2.8%) and a recovery to 4.5% in 2026Q2, mirroring the margin swings. The asset-heavy model, with net PPE at 76% of total assets, means returns are sensitive to both margins and asset turnover, which has remained stable around 0.46. The recent debt-funded expansion may temporarily depress ROIC until new units mature, but the long-term trend suggests a company that is still generating positive returns above its cost of capital, albeit with cyclicality. The improvement in ROIC from 2.8% to 4.5% in two quarters suggests the trough may be behind, but investors should monitor whether this recovery is sustainable.
Working Capital Efficiency with Negative CCC
TXRH's cash conversion cycle has been consistently negative, averaging -3 days over the last ten quarters, as per reported figures, indicating the company collects cash from customers before paying suppliers, a structural advantage.
The negative CCC, driven by a DPO of 11 days and DSO of 3-8 days, shows that TXRH operates with a float that funds its working capital needs. This is typical for casual dining, where customers pay at the point of sale, but it also reflects efficient supplier terms. Asset turnover has been stable at 0.43-0.47, indicating that the company's asset base is being used consistently to generate revenue. The efficiency is not improving, but it is stable, which is a positive sign given the heavy investment in new units. The negative CCC also contributes to the strong cash conversion, as noted in the cash flow analysis, where OCF/NI averaged 2.0x.
Leverage Spike and Refinancing Watch
Debt-to-equity spiked to 1.27 in 2025Q4 before settling at 0.67 in 2026Q2, per balance sheet data, while D/EBITDA rose to 11.86 then fell to 4.09, indicating a temporary leverage surge that warrants monitoring.
The 2025Q4 leverage spike appears to be a temporary event, as D/E and D/EBITDA returned to more normal levels by 2026Q2. However, the absolute debt level increased to $1.1B from $794M a year earlier, suggesting that the company is taking on more debt to fund expansion. Interest coverage data is unavailable, but the current D/EBITDA of 4.09 is manageable for a company with stable cash flows. The spike in 2025Q4 may have been related to seasonal working capital needs or a one-time acquisition, but investors should monitor refinancing risk if debt levels continue to rise. The balance sheet remains adequate, but the low current ratio of 0.26 in 2026Q2 indicates that liquidity is tight, relying on operating cash flow rather than current assets.
Liquidity Squeeze Despite Cash Generation
Current ratio fell to 0.26 in 2026Q2 from 0.50 a year earlier, as per balance sheet data, while cash dropped to $202M, indicating a tightening liquidity position that relies on ongoing cash flow.
The current ratio of 0.26 is extremely low, but this is common in the restaurant industry where current liabilities are paid from daily sales. However, the decline from 0.50 suggests that TXRH is either carrying more short-term debt or has reduced current assets. The quick ratio of 0.26 indicates that inventory is minimal, which is typical for a restaurant. The company's ability to weather a severe stress scenario depends on its operating cash flow, which has been robust, but the low liquidity buffer could be a concern if sales were to drop sharply. The prior balance sheet analysis noted a cash drop to $202M, which is thin relative to the $1.1B debt, but the negative CCC and strong FCF provide some cushion. Investors should monitor whether the current ratio stabilizes or continues to decline.
Misapplied P/E in Cyclical Margins
TXRH's trailing P/E of 34.01 appears rich, but the forward P/E of 32.22 and PEG of 0.50, based on reported estimates, suggest the market is pricing in earnings growth that may be overstated given margin volatility.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for TXRH is the P/E, because it fails to account for the cyclicality of margins driven by commodity costs. A trailing P/E of 34.01 may look expensive, but the PEG of 0.50 implies that the market expects significant earnings growth, which may not materialize if margins revert to the 2025Q4 trough. Instead, investors should use EV/EBITDA (21.70) or EV/Sales, which are less distorted by non-cash charges and one-time items. Additionally, the P/FCF of 39.86 is high, but FCF has been volatile due to capex swings. A better metric would be a normalized P/E based on mid-cycle margins, or a price-to-cash-earnings ratio that smooths out working capital fluctuations. The current valuation appears to price in a continuation of the recent margin recovery, which may be optimistic given the historical volatility.