Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 14.6x · EV/EBITDA 9.3x · ROE 33.8%. (1998–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $81.4B | $84.3B | $107.9B | $135.2B | $151.4B | $188.2B | $146.7B | $101.7B | $84.9B | $104.3B | $101.7B |
| Enterprise Value | $107.8B | $110.7B | $127.5B | $158.8B | $169.3B | $203.5B | $168.5B | $124.7B | $103.4B | $125.7B | $114.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | 14.61 | 15.12 | 18.65 | 20.16 | 13.17 | 14.60 | 109.35 | 22.91 | 17.70 | 21.24 | 29.62 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.92 | 0.95 | 1.19 | 1.49 | 1.51 | 1.94 | 1.74 | 1.38 | 1.18 | 1.57 | 1.68 |
| P/B Ratio | 5.01 | 5.19 | 6.45 | 7.81 | 7.65 | 13.19 | 219.25 | 30.99 | 27.94 | 101.81 | 237.03 |
| P/FCF | 17.09 | 17.69 | 17.37 | 26.62 | 16.22 | 17.40 | 29.06 | 45.03 | 13.20 | — | 28.99 |
| P/OCF | 9.64 | 9.98 | 10.66 | 13.21 | 10.74 | 12.54 | 14.02 | 11.78 | 6.68 | 70.49 | 15.71 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.25 | 1.40 | 1.75 | 1.69 | 2.09 | 2.00 | 1.69 | 1.44 | 1.89 | 1.90 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.29 | 9.53 | 10.37 | 12.47 | 10.48 | 12.67 | 16.00 | 12.18 | 11.14 | 12.86 | 15.73 |
| EV / EBIT | 13.71 | 13.53 | 15.35 | 16.99 | 10.91 | 11.78 | 66.66 | 19.85 | 15.68 | 16.64 | 20.92 |
| EV / FCF | — | 23.23 | 20.52 | 31.26 | 18.14 | 18.82 | 33.39 | 55.18 | 16.08 | — | 32.71 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 18.1% | 18.1% | 18.8% | 19.5% | 20.1% | 17.9% | 25.8% | 21.8% | 19.7% | 20.1% | 20.4% |
| Operating Margin | 8.9% | 8.9% | 9.6% | 10.3% | 13.0% | 13.5% | 9.3% | 10.7% | 9.8% | 11.3% | 8.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 6.3% | 6.3% | 6.4% | 7.4% | 11.5% | 13.3% | 1.6% | 6.0% | 6.7% | 7.4% | 5.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 33.8% | 33.8% | 34.0% | 36.1% | 67.8% | 172.6% | 68.0% | 140.5% | 236.0% | 675.2% | 235.0% |
| ROA | 7.8% | 7.8% | 8.2% | 9.4% | 16.4% | 19.6% | 2.2% | 8.2% | 10.0% | 11.4% | 8.7% |
| ROIC | 14.9% | 14.9% | 16.9% | 17.9% | 28.9% | 37.8% | 24.1% | 24.7% | 24.1% | 31.3% | 27.1% |
| ROCE | 14.2% | 14.2% | 16.3% | 17.7% | 24.7% | 27.0% | 17.8% | 20.1% | 20.6% | 24.4% | 18.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.99 | 1.99 | 1.53 | 1.54 | 1.19 | 1.79 | 41.49 | 8.58 | 7.49 | 24.21 | 38.51 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.78 | 2.78 | 2.09 | 2.10 | 1.46 | 1.59 | 2.63 | 2.75 | 2.45 | 2.54 | 2.26 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.62 | 1.17 | 1.36 | 0.90 | 1.07 | 32.65 | 6.98 | 6.10 | 20.97 | 30.41 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.27 | 2.27 | 1.59 | 1.85 | 1.11 | 0.95 | 2.07 | 2.24 | 1.99 | 2.20 | 1.79 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 5.54 | 3.15 | 4.64 | 1.92 | 1.41 | 4.33 | 10.15 | 2.88 | — | 3.72 |
| Interest Coverage | 8.09 | 8.09 | 9.64 | 12.06 | 22.36 | 25.30 | 3.70 | 9.99 | 11.52 | 18.12 | 15.80 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.17 | 1.10 | 1.22 | 1.42 | 1.19 | 1.11 | 1.15 | 1.24 | 1.17 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.12 | 1.05 | 1.18 | 1.38 | 1.15 | 1.08 | 1.12 | 1.21 | 1.14 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.34 | 0.42 | 0.60 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.36 | 0.32 | 0.39 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.21 | 1.30 | 1.28 | 1.41 | 1.40 | 1.35 | 1.28 | 1.44 | 1.46 | 1.50 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | 89.39 | 78.12 | 89.94 | 111.26 | 101.05 | 113.16 | 137.16 | 131.69 | 140.83 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 46.15 | 43.65 | 45.11 | 45.91 | 47.09 | 46.47 | 47.17 | 50.24 | 56.74 | 50.24 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.6% | 6.4% | 5.0% | 4.0% | 3.4% | 1.8% | 2.3% | 3.1% | 3.5% | 2.7% | 2.6% |
| Payout Ratio | 96.9% | 96.9% | 93.4% | 80.1% | 44.3% | 26.7% | 251.2% | 71.9% | 62.8% | 56.5% | 77.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.8% | 6.6% | 5.4% | 5.0% | 7.6% | 6.8% | 0.9% | 4.4% | 5.6% | 4.7% | 3.4% |
| FCF Yield | 5.9% | 5.7% | 5.8% | 3.8% | 6.2% | 5.7% | 3.4% | 2.2% | 7.6% | — | 3.4% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.5% | 1.7% | 2.3% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 1.0% | 1.2% | 1.7% | 2.6% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 7.9% | 7.6% | 5.5% | 5.6% | 5.7% | 2.1% | 2.5% | 4.1% | 4.7% | 4.4% | 5.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $850M | $856M | $860M | $871M | $878M | $871M | $869M | $870M | $875M | $887M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 28 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying UPS stock.
United Parcel Service, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 14.6x. The historical average is 36.6x. This places it at the 7th percentile of its historical range.
United Parcel Service, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 9.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.4x.
United Parcel Service, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 33.8%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 65.0%.
Based on historical data, United Parcel Service, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 14.6x. This is at the 7th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
United Parcel Service, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 6.62% with a payout ratio of 96.9%.
United Parcel Service, Inc. has 18.1% gross margin and 8.9% operating margin.
United Parcel Service, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.8x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent revenue decline and margin compression
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Compression Signals Structural Shift
Gross margin fell to 13.3% in Q2 2026 from 17.8% a year earlier, as reported in financial statements, indicating a 450 bps contraction that may reflect a higher cost floor.
The sequential decline from Q1 2026's 15.8% gross margin suggests the erosion is not purely seasonal. Operating margin at 4.1% in Q2 2026 is less than half the 10.5% peak in Q4 2025, implying that fixed costs are not flexing with volume. This may indicate that the 2023 Teamsters contract has permanently raised labor costs, and the 'Better, Not Bigger' strategy has yet to offset it with yield improvements.
Return on Capital Decays from Peak
ROIC dropped to 1.8% in Q2 2026 from 6.1% in Q4 2024, based on reported figures, suggesting that capital deployed is generating significantly lower returns.
The decline in ROIC is driven by both margin compression and a rising capital base, as total assets grew to $71.3B. ROE at 3.9% in Q2 2026 is well below the 10-11% levels seen in late 2025, indicating that shareholder returns are deteriorating. This trend warrants monitoring as it may reflect a structural decline in the efficiency of UPS's asset-heavy model.
Working Capital Efficiency Holds Steady
DSO improved to 41 days in Q2 2026 from 44 days a year earlier, as per financial statements, while DPO remained stable at 27 days, indicating consistent cash collection.
The stable DSO and DPO suggest that UPS maintains disciplined working capital management despite revenue declines. However, the cash conversion cycle data is incomplete, with DIO unavailable for most quarters, limiting a full assessment. The slight improvement in DSO may indicate better receivables management, but the overall efficiency gains are modest and unlikely to offset margin pressures.
Leverage Creeps Higher as Coverage Slips
Debt-to-EBITDA rose to 14.97 in Q2 2026 from 9.10 in Q4 2025, as reported in financial statements, while interest coverage fell to 1.0x, signaling heightened financial risk.
The sharp increase in D/EBITDA is driven by both rising debt ($28.7B) and falling EBITDA, as operating income halved year-over-year. Interest coverage of 1.0x in Q2 2026 is critically low, suggesting that operating income barely covers interest expense. This may indicate that UPS's balance sheet is becoming strained, and the company may face challenges in funding its dividend and automation capex without further debt.
Liquidity Buffer Thins Amid Cash Decline
Current ratio improved slightly to 1.18 in Q2 2026, but cash dropped to $4.7B from $6.1B in Q4 2024, as per balance sheet data, indicating a thinner cushion.
The current ratio remains above 1.0, but the decline in cash reserves and the persistent revenue contraction suggest that liquidity could become a concern if the downturn deepens. The quick ratio of 1.18 indicates that inventory is not a significant factor, but the reliance on short-term debt to cover obligations may increase. Investors should monitor whether UPS can maintain its dividend and capex plans without further eroding its cash position.
Misapplied Metric: P/E Obscures Capital Intensity
The P/E ratio of 15.55 may understate UPS's true cost of capital, as it ignores the heavy capital expenditures and pension obligations that are central to its business model.
A common mistake is to compare UPS's P/E to asset-light logistics peers, but UPS's high fixed costs and pension mark-to-market swings make earnings volatile. EV/EBITDA at 9.74 is a more appropriate metric, as it captures the debt and cash positions. However, even EV/EBITDA may be distorted by the fuel surcharge revenue, which inflates EBITDA. Analysts should adjust for pension costs and use a normalized EBITDA to assess UPS's true earning power.