Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -51.7x · EV/EBITDA 13.2x · ROE -3.2%. (2009–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.9B | $2.3B | $1.4B | $431M | $838M | $1.4B | $4.1B | $808M | $972M | $895M | $721M |
| Enterprise Value | $5.3B | $24.9B | $17.8B | $12.8B | $12.4B | $11.0B | $9.4B | $3.9B | $1.6B | $1.8B | $651M |
| P/E Ratio → | -51.65 | — | 7.18 | — | — | 2.74 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.34 | 0.23 | 0.17 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.22 | 0.86 | 0.21 | 0.29 | 0.26 | 0.20 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.46 | 0.27 | 0.20 | 0.07 | 0.12 | 0.18 | 0.60 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.11 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3.86 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 6.77 | 1.18 | 0.69 | 0.21 | 0.32 | 0.99 | 5.80 | 1.14 | 1.38 | 2.22 | 8.62 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.57 | 2.15 | 1.73 | 1.73 | 1.78 | 1.95 | 1.04 | 0.47 | 0.54 | 0.18 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.19 | 9.22 | 8.03 | — | 7.43 | 8.53 | 8.50 | 4.14 | 1.85 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 48.69 | 25.05 | 20.13 | — | — | 11.00 | — | 16.85 | 6.20 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6.41 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 22.0% | 22.0% | 22.2% | 17.4% | 18.2% | 23.2% | 22.3% | 24.8% | 27.8% | 22.4% | 19.6% |
| Operating Margin | 7.6% | 7.6% | 8.1% | -26.6% | 0.9% | 0.3% | 2.4% | 4.8% | 7.0% | -40.3% | -23.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -2.6% | -2.6% | 2.2% | -35.7% | -11.0% | 8.1% | -56.1% | -4.8% | -6.0% | -22.8% | -17.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -3.2% | -3.2% | 2.7% | -39.5% | -10.9% | 6.9% | -44.9% | -3.5% | -3.9% | -12.8% | -10.9% |
| ROA | -0.6% | -0.6% | 0.6% | -9.3% | -3.2% | 2.4% | -16.2% | -1.4% | -1.9% | -6.9% | -5.4% |
| ROIC | 2.0% | 2.0% | 2.4% | -7.9% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.9% | 1.9% | 2.9% | -15.8% | -9.5% |
| ROCE | 2.7% | 2.7% | 3.2% | -10.0% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 1.0% | 2.0% | 2.8% | -16.8% | -10.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 3.29 | 3.29 | 2.67 | 2.69 | 2.11 | 1.49 | 1.20 | 1.04 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.47 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 10.43 | 10.43 | 8.33 | — | 8.69 | 8.79 | 7.44 | 5.66 | 3.75 | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 2.64 | 2.37 | 1.91 | 1.69 | 1.27 | 0.76 | 0.61 | 0.12 | 0.18 | -0.01 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 8.38 | 8.38 | 7.41 | — | 6.93 | 7.47 | 4.75 | 3.29 | 0.74 | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.55 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 1.71 | 1.71 | 2.20 | -6.96 | -1.34 | 2.99 | -5.78 | 0.68 | 1.10 | -4.73 | -3.93 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.73 | 0.86 | 1.11 | 1.03 | 0.99 | 1.17 | 2.13 | 2.39 | 1.19 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.73 | 0.86 | 1.11 | 1.03 | 0.99 | 1.17 | 2.13 | 2.39 | 1.19 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.22 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.33 | 0.53 | 0.59 | 1.31 | 1.54 | 0.81 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.24 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.30 | 0.34 | 0.29 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1337.41 | 3667.36 | 661.19 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 144.42 | 148.56 | 143.10 | 145.97 | 150.66 | 137.53 | 160.24 | 129.16 | 122.82 | 141.29 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 13.9% | — | — | 36.5% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.9% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.1% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 3.1% | 2.7% | 0.0% | 15.3% | 11.3% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.1% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 3.1% | 2.7% | 0.0% | 15.3% | 11.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $269M | $290M | $150M | $148M | $152M | $119M | $111M | $112M | $112M | $103M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 17 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying VNET stock.
VNET Group, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -51.7x. The historical average is 11.3x.
VNET Group, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 13.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 7.4x.
VNET Group, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -3.2%. The historical average is -11.4%.
Based on historical data, VNET Group, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -51.7x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
VNET Group, Inc. has 22.0% gross margin and 7.6% operating margin.
VNET Group, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 10.4x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
High leverage and persistent net losses
Margin Erosion Masks Operating Progress
Gross margin fell to 18.2% in 2026Q2 from 25.2% in 2025Q1, per reported financials, signaling structural cost pressures from power and wholesale mix that outweigh revenue growth.
The gross margin decline of 700 basis points over five quarters indicates that the Dual-Core strategy's wholesale expansion is diluting unit economics, as power costs and lower-margin contracts dominate. Operating margin also contracted to 6.8% from 11.1% in the same period, suggesting that SG&A and depreciation are outpacing gross profit gains. This implies that despite accelerating top-line growth, the company has not yet achieved the scale to convert revenue into sustainable operating profit, and investors should monitor whether margin stabilization occurs as utilization rates improve.
ROIC Stagnant Despite Heavy Investment
ROIC has hovered between 0.2% and 0.8% over the last ten quarters, per reported data, indicating that massive capital deployment is not yet generating meaningful returns above the cost of capital.
With ROIC consistently below 1% and a debt-to-equity ratio above 3, the company appears to be destroying value on an economic basis, as the returns on invested capital are far below the likely weighted average cost of capital. The asset turnover ratio has remained flat at 0.06, implying that the expanding asset base is not translating into proportional revenue growth, a sign of inefficiency in monetizing new capacity. This suggests that the aggressive build-out may be yielding diminishing returns, and investors should assess whether future utilization gains can lift ROIC toward a level that justifies the leverage.
Working Capital Drag Intensifies
DSO rose to 103 days in 2026Q2 from 94 days a year earlier, per financial statements, while DPO fell to 32 days, indicating deteriorating receivables collection and tighter supplier terms.
The widening gap between DSO and DPO suggests that VNET is extending credit to customers while paying suppliers faster, which strains cash flow and increases the need for external financing. The cash conversion cycle could not be computed due to missing DIO data, but the trend in receivables and payables alone points to reduced working capital efficiency. This may indicate weaker customer payment discipline or a shift toward larger wholesale clients with longer payment terms, and investors should monitor whether this trend reverses as the company scales.
Debt Burden Deepens with Rising D/E
Debt-to-equity climbed to 3.06 in 2026Q2 from 2.28 in 2024Q1, per reported figures, while interest coverage fell to 0.93, indicating that earnings are insufficient to cover interest obligations.
The rising leverage, coupled with a D/EBITDA of 35.18, suggests that the company's debt load is becoming increasingly uncomfortable relative to its cash generation. Interest coverage below 1.0 implies that operating income does not fully cover interest expense, a situation that may force reliance on cash reserves or additional borrowing. The recent increase in D/E from 3.14 to 3.29 in 2025Q4, as noted in recent context, underscores the vulnerability to refinancing risk in a volatile credit environment, and investors should monitor upcoming debt maturities and the company's ability to secure favorable terms.
Liquidity Buffer Thin Despite Cash Rise
Current ratio fell to 0.97 in 2026Q2, per financial statements, indicating that short-term liabilities exceed liquid assets, despite cash increasing to $7.2B.
The sub-1.0 current ratio suggests that VNET may struggle to meet near-term obligations without relying on additional financing or asset sales. The quick ratio is identical to the current ratio, implying that inventory is not a significant factor, but the thin buffer leaves little room for error if cash flows deteriorate. Given the negative free cash flow margins, the company appears dependent on external capital to bridge the gap, and investors should assess whether the cash position is sufficient to cover upcoming debt maturities and capex commitments.
EV/EBITDA Misleads on True Leverage
EV/EBITDA of 13.12 appears moderate, but adjusted EBITDA may exclude capitalized interest and share-based compensation, per accounting practices, understating the true cash burden.
The commonly used EV/EBITDA multiple can be misleading for VNET because the company capitalizes a portion of interest expense into asset costs, which reduces reported interest expense and inflates EBITDA. Additionally, adjusted EBITDA often excludes share-based compensation, which is a real economic cost. A more appropriate metric would be EV/EBIT or EV/EBITDA after adjusting for capitalized interest and stock compensation, as this would provide a clearer picture of the company's cash-generating ability relative to its debt load. Investors should also consider EV/Unlevered Free Cash Flow, which reflects the actual cash available to service debt after capex, given the capital-intensive nature of the business.