Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 28.1x · EV/EBITDA 17.4x · ROE 34.5%. (2015–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.1B | $5.7B | $8.1B | $6.8B | $6.5B | $8.4B | $5.6B | $6.1B | $4.5B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $8.1B | $8.7B | $10.4B | $9.0B | $8.4B | $10.3B | $7.7B | $8.1B | $6.3B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 28.06 | 30.59 | 27.92 | 23.65 | 18.24 | 34.48 | — | 38.53 | 28.01 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 3.60 | 4.00 | 5.73 | 4.89 | 4.32 | 5.38 | 4.27 | 2.96 | 2.42 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 11.21 | 12.22 | 12.42 | 9.15 | 6.73 | 7.73 | 5.77 | 5.01 | 1.42 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 16.02 | 17.82 | 33.50 | 20.14 | 17.99 | 21.64 | 163.29 | 121.35 | 28.66 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 14.02 | 15.59 | 27.84 | 18.16 | 16.23 | 19.76 | 82.86 | 60.67 | 19.60 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 6.10 | 7.41 | 6.42 | 5.60 | 6.60 | 5.89 | 3.95 | 3.37 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.39 | 18.62 | 18.44 | 15.48 | 13.22 | 19.10 | 147.30 | 19.47 | 3.47 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 20.04 | 21.57 | 21.00 | 17.72 | 14.96 | 24.09 | — | 26.05 | 22.27 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 27.14 | 43.30 | 26.45 | 23.32 | 26.57 | 225.29 | 162.01 | 39.89 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 58.9% | 58.9% | 100.0% | 58.3% | 55.4% | 50.8% | 40.8% | 42.2% | 42.6% | 50.3% | 49.0% |
| Operating Margin | 28.4% | 28.4% | 35.2% | 36.0% | 37.2% | 28.5% | -3.5% | 15.0% | 18.0% | 19.4% | 23.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 13.5% | 13.5% | 20.5% | 20.7% | 23.7% | 15.6% | -10.2% | 7.6% | 8.7% | 18.0% | 13.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 34.5% | 34.5% | 41.4% | 33.8% | 34.6% | 23.8% | -12.1% | 7.1% | 7.0% | 18.1% | 14.4% |
| ROA | 4.6% | 4.6% | 7.0% | 7.1% | 8.5% | 5.5% | -2.9% | 3.3% | 4.6% | 11.8% | 8.9% |
| ROIC | 9.4% | 9.4% | 12.6% | 13.1% | 14.2% | 11.0% | -1.1% | 5.6% | 7.7% | 13.2% | 16.8% |
| ROCE | 10.9% | 10.9% | 13.5% | 13.8% | 14.7% | 10.9% | -1.1% | 7.3% | 11.2% | 15.7% | 18.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 6.53 | 6.53 | 3.79 | 2.96 | 2.16 | 1.92 | 2.70 | 1.75 | 0.67 | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 6.53 | 6.53 | 4.36 | 3.81 | 3.28 | 3.86 | 50.02 | 5.11 | 1.18 | 0.15 | 0.13 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 6.40 | 3.64 | 2.87 | 2.00 | 1.76 | 2.19 | 1.68 | 0.56 | 0.09 | 0.12 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 6.40 | 6.40 | 4.17 | 3.69 | 3.02 | 3.54 | 40.54 | 4.89 | 0.98 | 0.10 | 0.11 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 9.32 | 9.80 | 6.31 | 5.33 | 4.93 | 62.00 | 40.66 | 11.23 | 0.55 | 0.66 |
| Interest Coverage | 2.91 | 2.91 | 3.85 | 4.69 | 6.60 | 4.56 | -0.39 | 2.99 | 4.72 | 41.50 | 295.00 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.71 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 1.34 | 1.81 | 2.60 | 1.08 | 1.23 | 0.81 | 0.69 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.71 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 1.34 | 1.81 | 2.60 | 1.08 | 1.17 | 0.74 | 0.62 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.22 | 0.14 | 0.40 | 0.43 | 1.42 | 0.20 | 0.53 | 0.14 | 0.08 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.34 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.37 | 0.28 | 0.45 | 0.38 | 0.63 | 0.64 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 26.80 | 23.10 | 26.96 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 74.33 | 70.25 | 62.97 | 57.02 | 57.37 | 82.83 | 54.05 | 57.25 | 52.57 | 52.92 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.4% | 2.2% | 1.5% | 1.7% | 1.8% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 1.8% | 4.1% | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 65.8% | 65.8% | 42.2% | 40.8% | 32.7% | 33.6% | — | 71.3% | 114.8% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.6% | 3.3% | 3.6% | 4.2% | 5.5% | 2.9% | — | 2.6% | 3.6% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 6.2% | 5.6% | 3.0% | 5.0% | 5.6% | 4.6% | 0.6% | 0.8% | 3.5% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 5.6% | 5.1% | 3.8% | 5.8% | 6.9% | 1.3% | 0.9% | 4.0% | 2.6% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 8.0% | 7.3% | 5.4% | 7.5% | 8.7% | 2.2% | 1.9% | 5.8% | 6.7% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $76M | $80M | $85M | $91M | $94M | $93M | $97M | $100M | $100M | $100M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 11 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying WH stock.
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 28.1x. The historical average is 28.8x. This places it at the 57th percentile of its historical range.
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 17.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 15.4x.
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 34.5%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 19.6%.
Based on historical data, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 28.1x. This is at the 57th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 2.42% with a payout ratio of 65.8%.
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. has 58.9% gross margin and 28.4% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 6.5x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
High leverage and low liquidity
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Volatility Masks Franchise Strength
Gross margin swung from 91.5% in 2026Q2 to 42.5% in 2026Q1, reflecting marketing fund pass-throughs. According to the latest quarterly report, operating margin of 46.4% in 2026Q2 underscores the high-margin franchise model.
The extreme quarterly swings in gross margin are largely attributable to the timing of marketing and reservation fund pass-throughs, which inflate both revenue and costs without affecting underlying profitability. Excluding these effects, the core franchise royalty stream appears to support structurally high operating margins, as evidenced by the 46.4% operating margin in 2026Q2. Investors should focus on adjusted EBITDA margins, which smooth out these timing distortions, rather than reported gross margin.
ROIC Recovery After Q4 Setback
ROIC rebounded to 3.6% in 2026Q2 from -0.8% in 2025Q4, according to the latest quarterly data. This recovery suggests the non-recurring SG&A charge in Q4 was transient, but ROIC remains below the 4.3% peak seen in 2025Q3.
The sharp drop in ROIC in 2025Q4 was driven by a one-time SG&A charge that depressed operating income, but the subsequent recovery in 2026Q1 and Q2 indicates the underlying business is generating returns consistent with its asset-light model. However, ROIC of 3.6% is modest relative to the company's cost of capital, and the trend over the past year shows no clear improvement. The high level of goodwill and intangibles on the balance sheet, representing roughly 35% of total assets, dilutes the return on invested capital, making the metric less meaningful for a franchise business.
Working Capital Swings Reflect Fund Timing
DSO rose to 77 days in 2026Q2 from 65 days a year earlier, while DPO jumped to 138 days, per the latest balance sheet. These swings appear tied to marketing fund timing, not operational deterioration.
The cash conversion cycle is not calculable due to missing inventory data, which is consistent with a service-oriented franchise model. The volatility in DSO and DPO is likely driven by the timing of marketing and reservation fund collections and payments, which are designed to be break-even. Asset turnover remains low at 0.09, reflecting the asset-light nature of the business where revenue is generated from a relatively small asset base. Investors should monitor DSO trends for signs of franchisee payment stress, but the current level appears manageable.
Leverage Creeps Higher as Equity Erodes
Debt-to-equity climbed to 5.57 in 2026Q2 from 3.32 in 2024Q1, while interest coverage fell to 4.83 from 5.15 a year earlier. According to recent filings, total debt reached $2.7 billion against just $480 million in equity.
The rising leverage is a direct consequence of aggressive share buybacks that have reduced equity, rather than a surge in absolute debt. Interest coverage of 4.83 remains adequate but has deteriorated from the 5.15 seen in 2025Q3, and the D/EBITDA ratio of 14.15 in 2026Q2 is elevated, though this may be distorted by the timing of EBITDA. The company's ability to service debt appears comfortable for now, but the thin equity cushion leaves little room for error if earnings were to decline. Investors should monitor whether management moderates buybacks to preserve balance sheet flexibility.
Liquidity Cushion Thin and Volatile
Current ratio fell to 0.99 in 2026Q2 from 1.16 in 2025Q3, with cash of only $69 million against $2.7 billion in debt. Based on the latest balance sheet, the quick ratio mirrors the current ratio, indicating minimal inventory.
The current ratio hovering around 1.0 suggests that current assets barely cover current liabilities, leaving little buffer for unexpected cash needs. The volatility in the ratio, swinging from 0.33 in 2026Q1 to 0.99 in 2026Q2, is likely due to the timing of marketing fund liabilities and deferred revenue. While the asset-light model generates strong cash flow, the low cash balance and high debt load imply that a severe downturn could strain liquidity. Investors should watch for any deterioration in the current ratio below 1.0, which could signal increased reliance on external financing.
Misapplied ROIC in Franchise Model
ROIC is often misapplied to Wyndham because its asset-light model and large intangible base distort the metric. According to the latest data, ROIC of 3.6% understates the true return on franchise investments, which is better measured by ROE or cash-on-cash returns.
ROIC is commonly used to assess capital efficiency, but for a franchisor like Wyndham, the invested capital base is heavily weighted toward goodwill and intangibles from acquisitions, which do not generate incremental revenue. This depresses ROIC and makes it appear less attractive than the underlying economics suggest. A more appropriate metric is the return on tangible invested capital or the ratio of adjusted EBITDA to net debt, which better captures the cash-generating power of the franchise network. Investors should also consider the high ROE of 22.0% in 2026Q2, which reflects the benefits of financial leverage and share buybacks, but must be interpreted with caution given the thin equity base.