Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.8x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -352.3%. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8M | $29M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $-1968648 | $20M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.78 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 13.98 | 54.37 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.92 | 3.58 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 36.74 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 33.4% | 33.4% | 65.5% | 60.6% | 54.5% | 58.7% |
| Operating Margin | -529.3% | -529.3% | -266.4% | -270.6% | -530.3% | -383.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | -1788.1% | -1788.1% | -245.7% | -261.5% | -505.6% | -376.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -352.3% | -352.3% | — | — | -151.6% | -55.0% |
| ROA | -164.4% | -164.4% | -129.8% | -115.7% | -106.2% | -45.7% |
| ROIC | — | — | — | — | -1912.9% | — |
| ROCE | -102.1% | -102.1% | — | — | -153.9% | -53.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.05 | 0.05 | — | — | 0.17 | 0.09 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -1.16 | — | — | -1.77 | -0.84 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($10M) exceeds total debt ($400361)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.10 | 4.10 | 0.10 | 0.33 | 1.33 | 6.62 |
| Quick Ratio | 4.10 | 4.10 | 0.10 | 0.33 | 1.33 | 6.62 |
| Cash Ratio | 3.88 | 3.88 | 0.01 | 0.17 | 0.86 | 5.59 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.05 | 0.54 | 0.88 | 0.42 | 0.12 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 156.47 | 123.67 | 95.11 | 95.25 | 115.90 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $9M | $391695 | $352557 | $324143 | $390625 |
Unsustainable cash burn rate
According to recent market data, YAAS trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 13.98, which appears significantly detached from the company's contracting revenue base and the lack of a clear path toward achieving positive earnings or sustainable cash flow generation in the near-term future.
The elevated P/S ratio suggests that investors may be pricing the company as a high-growth software entity rather than a struggling service-oriented business. This valuation warrants caution, as the current revenue trajectory does not justify such a premium compared to peers with more established market positions.
Based on reported figures, the company's ROIC has plummeted to -2.6% in 2025Q4, reflecting a persistent inability to generate returns on invested capital that exceed the cost of funding, as the business continues to prioritize high-touch implementation over scalable, high-margin software product development.
The decay in return metrics indicates that capital allocation has failed to drive meaningful operational leverage. Investors should monitor whether future investments are directed toward product standardization, which is essential for reversing this trend of value destruction.
As reported in financial statements, the company's DSO has reached 104 days in 2025Q4, suggesting that the firm faces significant challenges in collecting payments from its fragmented client base, which further strains the liquidity position and complicates the management of its cash conversion cycle.
The extended collection period implies that the company lacks sufficient leverage over its customers to enforce timely payments. This inefficiency is a structural concern that likely contributes to the ongoing cash burn and limits the company's ability to reinvest in its core PaaS architecture.
Based on the 2025Q4 balance sheet, the company maintains a current ratio of 4.10, which provides a temporary liquidity buffer, yet this figure is heavily skewed by a cash-rich position that is being steadily eroded by persistent operating losses and negative free cash flow.
While the current ratio appears healthy, it does not reflect the underlying operational weakness or the lack of recurring revenue to sustain the business long-term. The liquidity position should be viewed as a finite runway rather than a sign of financial stability.
Investors frequently misapply standard SaaS valuation multiples to YAAS, failing to recognize that the company's 33.36% gross margin profile is more characteristic of a professional services firm than a scalable software provider, which fundamentally alters the appropriate valuation framework for this specific business model.
By ignoring the service-heavy nature of the revenue, the market likely overestimates the company's potential for margin expansion. Analysts should instead focus on cash runway and the cost of customer acquisition relative to the lifetime value of bespoke PaaS contracts.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying YAAS stock.
Youxin Technology Ltd's current P/E ratio is -0.8x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Youxin Technology Ltd's return on equity (ROE) is -352.3%. The historical average is -186.3%.
Based on historical data, Youxin Technology Ltd is trading at a P/E of -0.8x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Youxin Technology Ltd has 33.4% gross margin and -529.3% operating margin.