Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 316.6x · EV/EBITDA 25.5x · ROE 0.5%. (2009–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6.9B | $17.3B | $17.3B | $13.5B | $7.8B | $16.0B | $29.1B | $9.5B | $6.3B | $7.6B | $6.6B |
| Enterprise Value | $6.6B | $17.1B | $17.0B | $13.9B | $8.2B | $15.2B | $29.9B | $10.9B | $6.4B | $7.7B | $6.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | 316.57 | 753.81 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.67 | 6.71 | 7.75 | 6.95 | 3.98 | 7.49 | 17.89 | 3.46 | 4.69 | 7.09 | 7.76 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.49 | 3.55 | 3.58 | 2.99 | 1.74 | 2.99 | 6.13 | 2.76 | 1.91 | 2.87 | 2.59 |
| P/FCF | 29.30 | 73.77 | 60.82 | 71.51 | 1.79 | — | 92.04 | — | — | 42.49 | — |
| P/OCF | 18.71 | 47.11 | 40.50 | 38.18 | 1.73 | — | 68.50 | — | 1623.65 | 29.55 | 759.98 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 6.62 | 7.60 | 7.12 | 4.19 | 7.15 | 18.39 | 3.96 | 4.84 | 7.12 | 7.91 |
| EV / EBITDA | 25.47 | 65.51 | 320.59 | — | 94.27 | 38.90 | 120.94 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | 397.65 | — | — | — | 66.58 | 160.60 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 72.76 | 59.62 | 73.31 | 1.88 | — | 94.63 | — | — | 42.68 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 74.1% | 74.1% | 76.4% | 78.4% | 81.3% | 84.8% | 84.3% | 47.8% | 88.5% | 92.1% | 91.5% |
| Operating Margin | -1.2% | -1.2% | -8.8% | -13.9% | -4.7% | 11.2% | 9.9% | -9.0% | -9.7% | -15.0% | -22.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 0.9% | 0.9% | -5.0% | -8.1% | -5.2% | -24.8% | -10.0% | -11.1% | -9.0% | -8.8% | -26.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 0.5% | 0.5% | -2.4% | -3.5% | -2.1% | -10.5% | -4.0% | -9.1% | -4.0% | -3.6% | -8.5% |
| ROA | 0.4% | 0.4% | -1.8% | -2.4% | -1.2% | -5.8% | -2.4% | -5.9% | -3.2% | -3.0% | -7.0% |
| ROIC | -0.5% | -0.5% | -3.2% | -4.2% | -1.5% | 3.5% | 2.3% | -4.5% | -3.1% | -4.5% | -5.4% |
| ROCE | -0.6% | -0.6% | -3.7% | -4.5% | -1.4% | 3.6% | 2.7% | -5.4% | -3.6% | -5.3% | -6.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.40 | 0.42 | 0.30 | 0.53 | 0.73 | 0.26 | 0.14 | 0.15 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.05 | 2.05 | 14.02 | — | 21.46 | 4.09 | 10.20 | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.05 | -0.07 | 0.08 | 0.09 | -0.13 | 0.17 | 0.40 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.05 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.91 | -0.91 | -6.45 | — | 4.61 | -1.81 | 3.31 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -1.01 | -1.20 | 1.80 | 0.09 | — | 2.59 | — | — | 0.19 | — |
| Interest Coverage | 2.39 | 2.39 | -1.97 | -3.28 | -1.43 | 1.79 | 1.20 | -2.04 | -2.66 | -5.69 | -28.74 |
Net cash position: cash ($773M) exceeds total debt ($536M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.13 | 3.13 | 2.81 | 3.24 | 13.34 | 1.98 | 5.46 | 3.81 | 6.58 | 7.11 | 5.98 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.13 | 3.13 | 2.81 | 3.24 | 13.34 | 0.97 | 4.92 | 2.90 | 6.02 | 7.11 | 5.98 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.91 | 1.91 | 2.24 | 2.89 | 12.45 | 0.73 | 4.32 | 2.63 | 5.41 | 6.44 | 5.21 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.45 | 0.38 | 0.29 | 0.30 | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.45 | 0.31 | 0.33 | 0.27 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | 0.08 | 0.52 | 1.71 | 0.94 | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 24.87 | 16.98 | 18.02 | 13.42 | 13.18 | 15.72 | 8.92 | 18.09 | 18.44 | 17.47 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 0.3% | 0.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 3.4% | 1.4% | 1.6% | 1.4% | 55.9% | — | 1.1% | — | — | 2.4% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 9.7% | 3.9% | 1.7% | 3.1% | 12.1% | 1.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 9.7% | 3.9% | 1.7% | 3.1% | 12.1% | 1.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $254M | $234M | $234M | $242M | $250M | $224M | $206M | $198M | $186M | $180M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 17 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying Z stock.
Zillow Group, Inc. Class C's current P/E ratio is 316.6x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Zillow Group, Inc. Class C's current EV/EBITDA is 25.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 66.2x.
Zillow Group, Inc. Class C's return on equity (ROE) is 0.5%. The historical average is -9.3%.
Based on historical data, Zillow Group, Inc. Class C is trading at a P/E of 316.6x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Zillow Group, Inc. Class C has 74.1% gross margin and -1.2% operating margin.
Zillow Group, Inc. Class C's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.1x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent operating losses despite growth
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Compression Masks Underlying Stability
Gross margin slipped from 77.3% in 2024Q2 to 72.8% in 2026Q2, a 450 bps decline, while operating margin remained negative in most quarters, per reported financials, indicating pricing pressure and cost growth.
The 450 basis point gross margin erosion suggests a mix shift toward lower-margin offerings or rising cost of revenue, which may be structural rather than temporary. Operating margin has been negative in 8 of the last 10 quarters, with the latest at -1.3%, implying that revenue growth has not translated into operating leverage. Net margin swung from 6.5% in 2026Q1 to -0.5% in 2026Q2, highlighting earnings volatility driven by non-cash items like stock-based compensation, which totaled $169M in the latest quarter.
Returns on Capital Remain Subdued
ROIC has hovered near zero, ranging from -1.1% to 0.6% over the past ten quarters, as reported, indicating that the company is not yet generating meaningful returns on its invested capital.
Despite a capital-light model with modest capex, ROIC has failed to turn consistently positive, with the latest quarter at -0.2%. This suggests that the heavy investment in technology and brand has not yet produced a return above the cost of capital. The improvement in 2026Q1 to 0.6% was fleeting, and the trend remains flat, implying that the business is still in a build-out phase. Investors should monitor whether accelerating revenue growth can eventually lift ROIC above the cost of capital.
Working Capital Efficiency Shows Mixed Signals
DSO rose from 17 days in 2024Q1 to 48 days in 2026Q2, per balance sheet data, while DPO increased from 23 to 30 days, indicating a lengthening cash conversion cycle that may strain liquidity.
The sharp increase in DSO suggests that Zillow is extending payment terms to customers or facing slower collections, which could be a deliberate strategy to drive growth but also ties up cash. DPO also rose, but not enough to offset the DSO increase, leading to a potential cash conversion cycle that is becoming less favorable. This is consistent with the working capital drag seen in cash flow, where changes in working capital were negative in 8 of 10 quarters. The efficiency of asset turnover remains low at 0.15, reflecting the heavy intangible asset base.
Leverage Eases but Coverage Remains Thin
Debt-to-equity fell from 0.40 in 2024Q1 to 0.13 in 2026Q2, per balance sheet data, but interest coverage dropped to 0.50 in the latest quarter, indicating that operating income barely covers interest expense.
The deleveraging is notable, with total debt reduced from $1.9B to $558M, but the interest coverage ratio of 0.50 in 2026Q2 suggests that current operating losses are insufficient to service debt from earnings. This is a deterioration from the 13.0x coverage in 2026Q1, reflecting the volatile operating performance. While the absolute debt level is manageable, the thin coverage warrants monitoring, especially if interest rates rise or operating losses persist. The D/EBITDA of 10.53 in 2026Q2 is elevated, though this is distorted by negative EBITDA in some quarters.
Liquidity Buffer Thins but Remains Adequate
Current ratio declined from 3.32 in 2024Q1 to 1.92 in 2026Q2, per balance sheet data, while cash dropped from $1.4B to $572M, indicating a reduced but still sufficient short-term cushion.
The current ratio remains above 1.5, suggesting that Zillow can cover its short-term obligations, but the trend is concerning as cash has been drawn down to fund buybacks and operations. The quick ratio equals the current ratio, indicating no inventory dependence, which is typical for a digital platform. Under a severe stress scenario, the $572M cash plus short-term investments may be adequate given the capital-light model, but the declining trend warrants attention. The company's ability to generate positive FCF in some quarters provides a partial offset.
P/E Misleads Due to Earnings Volatility
The trailing P/E of 372.93 is distorted by near-zero net income, while forward P/E of 14.88 suggests market expectations of a sharp earnings recovery, per valuation data, making P/E an unreliable gauge.
The trailing P/E is meaningless given the volatile and often negative net income, which is heavily influenced by stock-based compensation and one-time items. The forward P/E of 14.88 implies that analysts expect a dramatic normalization of earnings, which may or may not materialize. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 30.16 reflects the market's valuation of operating cash flow, but even this is elevated relative to peers. Investors should focus on price-to-sales (3.14) and price-to-FCF (34.51) to gauge valuation, as these are less distorted by non-cash charges. The wide gap between trailing and forward multiples underscores the need to adjust for non-recurring items and stock-based compensation when assessing Zillow's true earning power.