Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 324.3x · EV/EBITDA 26.1x · ROE 0.5%. (2008–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $7.1B | $17.3B | $16.6B | $13.2B | $7.6B | $15.6B | $30.4B | $9.4B | $6.2B | $7.6B | $6.6B |
| Enterprise Value | $6.8B | $17.1B | $16.2B | $13.6B | $8.0B | $14.8B | $31.2B | $10.8B | $6.4B | $7.6B | $6.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | 324.31 | 753.92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.73 | 6.71 | 7.42 | 6.81 | 3.86 | 7.29 | 18.74 | 3.44 | 4.67 | 7.05 | 7.76 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.53 | 3.55 | 3.42 | 2.93 | 1.69 | 2.91 | 6.42 | 2.75 | 1.90 | 2.85 | 2.59 |
| P/FCF | 30.01 | 73.78 | 58.19 | 70.10 | 1.73 | — | 96.39 | — | — | 42.30 | — |
| P/OCF | 19.16 | 47.12 | 38.75 | 37.42 | 1.68 | — | 71.74 | — | 1615.94 | 29.42 | 759.56 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 6.62 | 7.23 | 6.98 | 4.06 | 6.96 | 19.24 | 3.94 | 4.81 | 7.09 | 7.90 |
| EV / EBITDA | 26.11 | 65.52 | 304.95 | — | 91.48 | 37.86 | 126.50 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | 397.71 | — | — | — | 64.80 | 167.99 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 72.77 | 56.71 | 71.88 | 1.82 | — | 98.98 | — | — | 42.49 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 74.1% | 74.1% | 76.4% | 78.4% | 81.3% | 84.8% | 84.3% | 47.8% | 88.5% | 92.1% | 91.5% |
| Operating Margin | -1.2% | -1.2% | -8.8% | -13.9% | -4.7% | 11.2% | 9.9% | -9.0% | -9.7% | -15.0% | -22.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 0.9% | 0.9% | -5.0% | -8.1% | -5.2% | -24.8% | -10.0% | -11.1% | -9.0% | -8.8% | -26.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 0.5% | 0.5% | -2.4% | -3.5% | -2.1% | -10.5% | -4.0% | -9.1% | -4.0% | -3.6% | -8.5% |
| ROA | 0.4% | 0.4% | -1.8% | -2.4% | -1.2% | -5.8% | -2.4% | -5.9% | -3.2% | -3.0% | -7.0% |
| ROIC | -0.5% | -0.5% | -3.2% | -4.2% | -1.5% | 3.5% | 2.3% | -4.5% | -3.1% | -4.5% | -5.4% |
| ROCE | -0.6% | -0.6% | -3.7% | -4.5% | -1.4% | 3.6% | 2.7% | -5.4% | -3.6% | -5.3% | -6.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.40 | 0.42 | 0.30 | 0.53 | 0.73 | 0.26 | 0.14 | 0.15 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.05 | 2.05 | 12.45 | — | 21.46 | 4.09 | 10.20 | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.05 | -0.09 | 0.07 | 0.09 | -0.13 | 0.17 | 0.40 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.05 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.91 | -0.91 | -7.96 | — | 4.61 | -1.81 | 3.31 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -1.01 | -1.48 | 1.78 | 0.09 | — | 2.59 | — | — | 0.19 | — |
| Interest Coverage | 2.39 | 2.39 | -1.97 | -3.28 | -1.43 | 1.79 | 1.20 | -2.04 | -2.66 | -5.69 | -28.74 |
Net cash position: cash ($773M) exceeds total debt ($536M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.13 | 3.13 | 2.81 | 3.24 | 13.34 | 1.98 | 5.46 | 3.81 | 6.58 | 7.11 | 5.98 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.13 | 3.13 | 2.81 | 3.25 | 13.19 | 0.97 | 4.92 | 2.90 | 6.02 | 7.11 | 5.98 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.91 | 1.91 | 2.24 | 2.90 | 12.45 | 0.73 | 4.32 | 2.63 | 5.41 | 6.44 | 5.21 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.45 | 0.38 | 0.29 | 0.30 | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.45 | 0.31 | 0.33 | 0.27 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | 8.53 | 0.08 | 0.52 | 1.71 | 0.94 | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 24.87 | 16.98 | 18.02 | 13.42 | 13.18 | 15.72 | 8.92 | 18.09 | 18.44 | 17.47 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 0.3% | 0.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 3.3% | 1.4% | 1.7% | 1.4% | 57.7% | — | 1.0% | — | — | 2.4% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 9.5% | 3.9% | 1.8% | 3.2% | 12.5% | 1.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 9.5% | 3.9% | 1.8% | 3.2% | 12.5% | 1.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $254M | $234M | $234M | $242M | $250M | $224M | $206M | $198M | $186M | $180M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 18 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ZG stock.
Zillow Group, Inc. Class A's current P/E ratio is 324.3x. The historical average is 140.9x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Zillow Group, Inc. Class A's current EV/EBITDA is 26.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 56.3x.
Zillow Group, Inc. Class A's return on equity (ROE) is 0.5%. The historical average is -7.8%.
Based on historical data, Zillow Group, Inc. Class A is trading at a P/E of 324.3x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Zillow Group, Inc. Class A has 74.1% gross margin and -1.2% operating margin.
Zillow Group, Inc. Class A's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.1x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
SBC dilution and margin volatility
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Pricing on Turnaround Hopes
Zillow trades at 376x trailing earnings but only 15x forward earnings, implying the market expects a dramatic earnings recovery. According to recent SEC filings, EV/EBITDA of 30x remains well above the peer median.
The gap between trailing and forward multiples is extreme, suggesting investors are pricing in a return to normalized profitability rather than current results. With P/S at 3.17x and P/FCF at 34.8x, the market is paying up for future cash generation, which appears plausible given the recent FCF margin expansion to 18.3% in 2026Q2. However, the forward P/E of 14.98x implies a level of earnings power that has not yet materialized, as operating margins remain negative in the latest quarter.
Margin Compression Masks Underlying Stability
Gross margin fell from 77.3% in 2024Q2 to 72.8% in 2026Q2, a 450 basis point decline, while operating margin swung to -1.3%. As reported in financial statements, net margin turned positive in 2026Q1 but slipped back to -0.5%.
The gross margin erosion suggests a mix shift toward lower-margin offerings or increased costs, which may be a strategic choice to drive growth. Operating margin volatility is pronounced, with swings from -12.5% to +5.1% over the past ten quarters, indicating that the company has not yet achieved consistent operating leverage. The positive net margin in 2026Q1 was likely aided by non-operating items, as operating income was negative in the following quarter, so investors should focus on gross margin trends as the core profitability driver.
Returns Trapped Near Zero
ROIC has hovered between -1.1% and +0.6% over the past ten quarters, with 2026Q2 at -0.2%. Based on reported figures, ROE and ROA remain similarly subdued, indicating that the company is not yet generating returns above its cost of capital.
The near-zero returns reflect a business that is investing heavily in growth and technology while margins remain thin. The slight improvement in 2026Q1 (ROIC of 0.6%) suggests that the company can generate positive returns when revenue growth outpaces costs, but this has not been sustained. The asset-light model, with goodwill representing over half of total assets, means that returns on tangible capital may be understated, but the overall trend indicates that value creation is still elusive.
Working Capital Efficiency Improves
DSO improved from 50 days in 2026Q2 to 23 days in 2026Q1, while DPO rose from 19 to 30 days over the same period. According to recent financial statements, the cash conversion cycle remains negative, indicating that Zillow collects cash before paying suppliers.
The negative CCC is a sign of strong working capital management, as the company is effectively using supplier financing to fund operations. The improvement in DSO suggests that the company is collecting receivables more quickly, which is positive for cash flow. However, the lack of inventory (DIO is not reported) is typical for a digital platform, and the efficiency gains appear to be contributing to the strong FCF margin of 18.3% in 2026Q2.
Deleveraging Reduces Refinancing Risk
Debt-to-equity fell from 0.40 in 2024Q1 to 0.13 in 2026Q2, while total debt dropped from $1.9B to $558M. As per financial statements, interest coverage turned positive in 2026Q1 at 11.0x, but slipped to 0.5x in 2026Q2.
The significant reduction in debt has lowered the company's financial risk, and the current D/E of 0.13 is conservative relative to peers like Compass (0.60) and Anywhere (1.95). However, the volatility in interest coverage, which was negative in 2024 and positive only in 2026Q1, indicates that the company's ability to service debt is highly dependent on quarterly earnings. The low absolute debt level provides a cushion, but the negative coverage in some quarters suggests that the company is not yet generating stable operating income to comfortably cover interest expenses.
Liquidity Cushion Thins
The current ratio declined from 3.32 in 2024Q1 to 1.92 in 2026Q2, while cash dropped from $1.4B to $572M. Based on reported figures, the quick ratio remains identical to the current ratio, indicating no inventory dependence.
The declining current ratio and cash balance suggest that the company is deploying its cash reserves, likely toward buybacks and investments, which reduces the liquidity buffer. A current ratio of 1.92 is still adequate, but the trend is concerning if cash continues to decline. The company's ability to withstand a severe downturn may be tested, especially if revenue growth slows and operating losses persist. However, the strong FCF generation in recent quarters could replenish cash if management moderates buyback activity.
Relative Strength in a Weak Field
Zillow's ROE of -0.1% in 2026Q2 is far superior to Opendoor's -165.1% and eXp's -7.1%, while its net margin of -0.5% compares favorably to the peer group's negative margins. According to recent data, Zillow's D/E of 0.13 is the lowest among peers.
Zillow's financial metrics are significantly better than its direct peers, which are mostly loss-making and highly leveraged. The company's ability to generate positive FCF and maintain a conservative balance sheet gives it a competitive advantage. However, the peer group is not a strong benchmark, as many are struggling with profitability, so Zillow's relative strength may not indicate absolute financial health. The market cap of Zillow is also much larger than its peers, suggesting that it is the dominant player in the space.
SBC Distorts True Earnings Power
The most misapplied ratio for Zillow is P/E, as stock-based compensation of $169M in 2026Q2 exceeds net income, making GAAP earnings unreliable. As reported in financial statements, SBC inflates cash flow and understates true dilution.
Investors often use P/E to value Zillow, but the company's heavy use of SBC means that reported earnings are not a true reflection of economic profitability. Adding back SBC to calculate adjusted earnings overstates cash generation, as the dilution to shareholders is real. A better metric is price-to-sales or EV/EBITDA, but even EV/EBITDA can be distorted by SBC. Investors should focus on FCF per share after accounting for SBC dilution, or use a multiple on forward revenue to assess valuation.