Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AAOI vs LITE vs OESX vs COHR vs VIAV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Communication Equipment
AAOI vs LITE vs OESX vs COHR vs VIAV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Communication Equipment | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $12.44B | $63.74B | $33M | $50.62B | $11.81B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $507M | $2.49B | $81M | $1.81T | $1.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-43M | $440M | $-5M | $191.68B | $-55M |
| Gross Margin | 29.6% | 37.7% | 29.9% | 0.1% | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | -11.6% | 9.5% | -4.3% | 0.0% | 8.2% |
| Forward P/E | 167.2x | 114.4x | — | 59.5x | 55.2x |
| Total Debt | $167M | $2.61B | $10M | $3.89B | $692M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $216M | $521M | $6M | $909M | $424M |
AAOI vs LITE vs OESX vs COHR vs VIAV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Applied Optoelectro… (AAOI) | 100 | 1784.3 | +1684.3% |
| Lumentum Holdings I… (LITE) | 100 | 1217.7 | +1117.7% |
| Orion Energy System… (OESX) | 100 | 20.6 | -79.4% |
| Coherent, Inc. (COHR) | 100 | 671.6 | +571.6% |
| Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAV) | 100 | 440.5 | +340.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AAOI vs LITE vs OESX vs COHR vs VIAV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AAOI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 82.8%, EPS growth 85.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.9%
- 82.8% revenue growth vs OESX's -12.0%
LITE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 36.4% 10Y total return vs AAOI's 14.4%
- Beta 2.69, current ratio 4.37x
- 17.7% margin vs AAOI's -8.5%
- +12.5% vs OESX's +31.2%
OESX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.10
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 86.9%, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 1.10 vs AAOI's 4.13
COHR is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 0.0% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
VIAV is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (55.2x vs 59.5x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 82.8% revenue growth vs OESX's -12.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (55.2x vs 59.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.7% margin vs AAOI's -8.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs AAOI's 4.13 | |
| Dividends | 0.0% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.5% vs OESX's +31.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.5% ROA vs AAOI's -3.8%, ROIC -4.3% vs -7.9% |
AAOI vs LITE vs OESX vs COHR vs VIAV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AAOI vs LITE vs OESX vs COHR vs VIAV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OESX leads in 1 of 6 categories
LITE leads 1 • AAOI leads 1 • COHR leads 0 • VIAV leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LITE and COHR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COHR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.81T annually — 22227.1x OESX's $81M. LITE is the more profitable business, keeping 17.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AAOI's -8.5%. On growth, COHR holds the edge at +1204.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $507M | $2.5B | $81M | $1.81T | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$37M | $425M | -$1M | $913M | $207M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$43M | $440M | -$5M | $191.7B | -$55M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$239M | $399M | $348M | -$537.2B | $46M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.6% | +37.7% | +29.9% | +0.1% | +55.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.6% | +9.5% | -4.3% | +0.0% | +8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.5% | +17.7% | -5.6% | +10.6% | -4.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -47.1% | +16.0% | +4.3% | -29.7% | +3.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +51.4% | +90.1% | +7.7% | +1204.5% | +42.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.6% | +3.3% | +109.6% | +11190.8% | -70.2% |
Valuation Metrics
OESX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 340.3x trailing earnings, VIAV trades at a 86% valuation discount to LITE's 2412.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, COHR's 48.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LITE's 859.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.4B | $63.7B | $33M | $50.6B | $11.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.4B | $65.8B | $37M | $53.6B | $12.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -246.17x | 2412.94x | -2.57x | -613.83x | 340.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 167.16x | 114.43x | — | 59.48x | 55.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 74.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 859.43x | — | 48.61x | 90.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 27.29x | 38.75x | 0.41x | 8.71x | 10.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.92x | 54.76x | 2.56x | 5.83x | 14.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 66.51x | 262.58x | 190.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LITE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LITE delivers a 30.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-7 for VIAV. AAOI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LITE's 2.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LITE scores 7/9 vs OESX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.1% | +30.7% | -0.0% | +6.9% | -6.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.8% | +8.5% | -0.0% | +4.4% | -2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.9% | -4.3% | -34.8% | +3.6% | +5.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.5% | -4.8% | -34.9% | +4.2% | +4.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 2.30x | 0.87x | 0.46x | 0.89x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$49M | $2.1B | $4M | $3.0B | $269M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $216M | $521M | $6M | $909M | $424M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $167M | $2.6B | $10M | $3.9B | $692M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -28.36x | 9.62x | -3.29x | 0.01x | 2.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AAOI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AAOI five years ago would be worth $207,850 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,637 for OESX. Over the past 12 months, LITE leads with a +1247.8% total return vs OESX's +31.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AAOI at 3.5% vs OESX's -15.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +297.9% | +131.2% | -38.0% | +64.3% | +181.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1027.0% | +1247.8% | +31.2% | +358.5% | +466.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8801.1% | +1764.2% | -38.7% | +892.8% | +461.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1978.5% | +976.6% | -83.6% | +401.6% | +212.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1435.6% | +3635.5% | -32.5% | +1467.0% | +715.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.5% | +165.2% | -15.1% | +114.9% | +77.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OESX and COHR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OESX is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AAOI's 4.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. COHR currently trades 87.5% from its 52-week high vs OESX's 49.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 4.13x | 2.69x | 1.10x | 2.79x | 1.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $191.87 | $1021.00 | $18.64 | $364.80 | $60.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.56 | $60.38 | $5.50 | $67.30 | $8.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.1% | +87.4% | +49.6% | +87.5% | +84.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.9 | 58.8 | 41.8 | 64.4 | 66.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12.4M | 6.4M | 39K | 6.8M | 6.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — OESX and VIAV each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AAOI as "Buy", LITE as "Buy", COHR as "Buy", VIAV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -20.9% upside for COHR (target: $253) vs -70.8% for AAOI (target: $46).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $46.00 | $643.18 | — | $252.50 | $32.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 24 | — | 29 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.07 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.0% | +0.1% | +0.1% |
OESX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). LITE leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
AAOI vs LITE vs OESX vs COHR vs VIAV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AAOI or LITE or OESX or COHR or VIAV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
(AAOI) is the stronger pick with 82. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 0% for Orion Energy Systems, Inc. (OESX). Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAV) offers the better valuation at 340. 3x trailing P/E (55. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. (AAOI) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AAOI or LITE or OESX or COHR or VIAV?
On trailing P/E, Viavi Solutions Inc.
(VIAV) is the cheapest at 340. 3x versus Lumentum Holdings Inc. at 2412. 9x. On forward P/E, Viavi Solutions Inc. is actually cheaper at 55. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AAOI or LITE or OESX or COHR or VIAV?
Over the past 5 years, Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
(AAOI) delivered a total return of +1978%, compared to -83. 6% for Orion Energy Systems, Inc. (OESX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LITE returned +36. 4% versus OESX's -32. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AAOI or LITE or OESX or COHR or VIAV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Orion Energy Systems, Inc.
(OESX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 10β versus Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. 's 4. 13β — meaning AAOI is approximately 277% more volatile than OESX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. (AAOI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 2% for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AAOI or LITE or OESX or COHR or VIAV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
(AAOI) is pulling ahead at 82. 8% versus -12. 0% for Orion Energy Systems, Inc. (OESX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Viavi Solutions Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Orion Energy Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AAOI leads at 26. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AAOI or LITE or OESX or COHR or VIAV?
Viavi Solutions Inc.
(VIAV) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 2% net margin versus -14. 8% for Orion Energy Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COHR leads at 9. 4% versus -13. 3% for OESX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VIAV leads at 56. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AAOI or LITE or OESX or COHR or VIAV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Viavi Solutions Inc.
(VIAV) trades at 55. 2x forward P/E versus 167. 2x for Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. — 112. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COHR: -20. 9% to $252. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — AAOI or LITE or OESX or COHR or VIAV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is AAOI or LITE or OESX or COHR or VIAV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Coherent, Inc.
(COHR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1467% 10Y return). Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) carries a higher beta of 2. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (COHR: +1467%, LITE: +36. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AAOI and LITE and OESX and COHR and VIAV?
These companies operate in different sectors (AAOI (Technology) and LITE (Technology) and OESX (Industrials) and COHR (Technology) and VIAV (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AAOI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LITE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; OESX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COHR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VIAV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.