Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ACIU vs PRAX vs IONS vs IQV vs MEDP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
ACIU vs PRAX vs IONS vs IQV vs MEDP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $298M | $9.63B | $12.56B | $30.32B | $12.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $-92K | $1.06B | $16.63B | $2.68B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-70M | $-327M | $-327M | $1.39B | $460M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | — | 98.3% | 26.1% | 29.1% |
| Operating Margin | -19.3% | — | -33.3% | 13.9% | 21.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 14.1x | 25.2x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $110K | $2.61B | $16.17B | $250M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27M | $357M | $372M | $1.98B | $497M |
ACIU vs PRAX vs IONS vs IQV vs MEDP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AC Immune S.A. (ACIU) | 100 | 60.8 | -39.2% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
| Ionis Pharmaceutica… (IONS) | 100 | 161.9 | +61.9% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 116.0 | +16.0% |
| Medpace Holdings, I… (MEDP) | 100 | 386.4 | +286.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ACIU vs PRAX vs IONS vs IQV vs MEDP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, ACIU doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PRAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +7.7% vs IQV's +16.5%
IONS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.55
- Rev growth 33.9%, EPS growth 21.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.55, current ratio 3.83x
- Beta 0.55, current ratio 3.83x
IQV is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.35 vs MEDP's 0.79
- Lower P/E (14.1x vs 25.2x), PEG 0.35 vs 0.79
MEDP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 14.4% 10Y total return vs IONS's 121.1%
- 17.2% margin vs ACIU's -19.7%
- 24.8% ROA vs PRAX's -40.2%, ROIC 154.9% vs -65.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 33.9% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.1x vs 25.2x), PEG 0.35 vs 0.79 | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.2% margin vs ACIU's -19.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs ACIU's 1.63 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs IQV's +16.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.8% ROA vs PRAX's -40.2%, ROIC 154.9% vs -65.0% |
ACIU vs PRAX vs IONS vs IQV vs MEDP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ACIU vs PRAX vs IONS vs IQV vs MEDP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MEDP leads in 2 of 6 categories
IQV leads 1 • PRAX leads 1 • ACIU leads 0 • IONS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MEDP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $16.6B and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. MEDP is the more profitable business, keeping 17.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACIU's -19.7%. On growth, IONS holds the edge at +87.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | -$92,000 | $1.1B | $16.6B | $2.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$67M | -$357M | $4.5B | $3.5B | $577M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$70M | -$327M | -$327M | $1.4B | $460M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$70M | -$283M | -$971M | $2.7B | $745M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | — | +98.3% | +26.1% | +29.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -19.3% | — | -33.3% | +13.9% | +21.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -19.7% | — | -30.9% | +8.3% | +17.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -19.6% | — | -91.8% | +16.1% | +27.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -70.3% | — | +87.0% | +8.4% | +26.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | +2.7% | +39.8% | +15.0% | +16.6% |
Valuation Metrics
IQV leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.8x trailing earnings, IQV trades at a 19% valuation discount to MEDP's 28.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IQV offers better value at 0.56x vs MEDP's 0.88x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $298M | $9.6B | $12.6B | $30.3B | $12.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $270M | $9.3B | $14.8B | $44.5B | $12.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.26x | -24.72x | -31.94x | 22.79x | 28.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 14.06x | 25.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.56x | 0.88x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 12.97x | 21.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 65.01x | — | 13.31x | 1.86x | 4.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.12x | 8.54x | 24.87x | 4.67x | 27.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 14.78x | 17.96x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP delivers a 120.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $121 in annual profit, vs $-102 for ACIU. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IONS's 5.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MEDP scores 6/9 vs ACIU's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -101.6% | -43.0% | -58.6% | +22.1% | +120.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -38.7% | -40.2% | -10.1% | +4.7% | +24.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -99.2% | -65.0% | -12.8% | +8.7% | +154.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -72.6% | -49.3% | -14.1% | +11.0% | +65.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.00x | 5.35x | 2.44x | 0.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$22M | -$357M | $2.2B | $14.2B | -$247M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $357M | $372M | $2.0B | $497M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $110,000 | $2.6B | $16.2B | $250M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -482.85x | — | -3.64x | 3.10x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MEDP five years ago would be worth $25,938 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,764 for ACIU. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs IQV's +16.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs IQV's -2.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.8% | +16.4% | -4.6% | -20.7% | -24.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +76.5% | +775.0% | +129.9% | +16.5% | +42.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.9% | +1976.5% | +116.1% | -5.9% | +104.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.4% | -20.8% | +108.0% | -23.8% | +159.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.3% | -20.1% | +121.1% | +166.5% | +1442.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.6% | +174.9% | +29.3% | -2.0% | +27.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PRAX and IONS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IONS is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACIU's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs MEDP's 68.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.63x | 1.55x | 0.55x | 1.33x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.00 | $356.00 | $86.74 | $247.05 | $628.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.51 | $35.18 | $31.66 | $134.65 | $284.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.3% | +93.6% | +87.6% | +72.3% | +68.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.1 | 55.6 | 58.8 | 58.5 | 40.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 265K | 378K | 2.0M | 1.6M | 371K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACIU as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", IONS as "Buy", IQV as "Buy", MEDP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 138.9% upside for ACIU (target: $7) vs 16.4% for MEDP (target: $499).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $544.40 | $107.27 | $225.63 | $498.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 16 | 32 | 44 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.1% | +7.5% |
MEDP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IQV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ACIU vs PRAX vs IONS vs IQV vs MEDP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ACIU or PRAX or IONS or IQV or MEDP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is the stronger pick with 33. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) offers the better valuation at 22. 8x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AC Immune S. A. (ACIU) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ACIU or PRAX or IONS or IQV or MEDP?
On trailing P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the cheapest at 22. 8x versus Medpace Holdings, Inc. at 28. 1x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IQVIA Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 35x versus Medpace Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 79x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ACIU or PRAX or IONS or IQV or MEDP?
Over the past 5 years, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) delivered a total return of +159. 4%, compared to -52. 4% for AC Immune S. A. (ACIU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MEDP returned +1443% versus ACIU's -81. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ACIU or PRAX or IONS or IQV or MEDP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 55β versus AC Immune S. A. 's 1. 63β — meaning ACIU is approximately 199% more volatile than IONS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 5% for Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ACIU or PRAX or IONS or IQV or MEDP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is pulling ahead at 33. 9% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 21. 7% year-over-year, compared to -37. 3% for AC Immune S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MEDP leads at 20. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ACIU or PRAX or IONS or IQV or MEDP?
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 8% net margin versus -1971. 6% for AC Immune S. A. — meaning it keeps 17. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MEDP leads at 21. 1% versus -1927. 3% for ACIU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACIU leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ACIU or PRAX or IONS or IQV or MEDP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus Medpace Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 79x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 25. 2x for Medpace Holdings, Inc. — 11. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACIU: 138. 9% to $7. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ACIU or PRAX or IONS or IQV or MEDP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ACIU or PRAX or IONS or IQV or MEDP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26), +1443% 10Y return). AC Immune S. A. (ACIU) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MEDP: +1443%, ACIU: -81. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ACIU and PRAX and IONS and IQV and MEDP?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ACIU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IONS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MEDP is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.