Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AFGB vs KMPR vs HCI vs ERIE vs ALL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Brokers
Insurance - Property & Casualty
AFGB vs KMPR vs HCI vs ERIE vs ALL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Brokers | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $1.78B | $1.73B | $1.99B | $10.01B | $55.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.03B | $4.71B | $927M | $4.33B | $67.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $879M | $39M | $314M | $571M | $12.14B |
| Gross Margin | 63.7% | 8.1% | 66.5% | 18.1% | 39.8% |
| Operating Margin | 57.0% | 0.7% | 47.9% | 17.0% | 23.3% |
| Forward P/E | 1.9x | 7.8x | 9.2x | 17.1x | 7.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.82B | $1.00B | $68M | $0.00 | $7.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17.18B | $126M | $1.21B | $346M | $678M |
AFGB vs KMPR vs HCI vs ERIE vs ALL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Financial … (AFGB) | 100 | 80.5 | -19.5% |
| Kemper Corporation (KMPR) | 100 | 46.3 | -53.7% |
| HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) | 100 | 340.8 | +240.8% |
| Erie Indemnity Comp… (ERIE) | 100 | 120.3 | +20.3% |
| The Allstate Corpor… (ALL) | 100 | 218.5 | +118.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AFGB vs KMPR vs HCI vs ERIE vs ALL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AFGB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (1.9x vs 7.9x)
- 34.0% yield, vs ALL's 1.8%
- +6.9% vs KMPR's -50.2%
Among these 5 stocks, KMPR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HCI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 20.2%, EPS growth 179.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.3%
- 436.8% 10Y total return vs ALL's 258.7%
- PEG 0.19 vs ERIE's 1.26
- 20.2% revenue growth vs AFGB's 1.3%
ERIE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 0.16, yield 2.2%, current ratio 1.27x
- 17.3% ROA vs KMPR's 0.4%, ROIC 29.5% vs 3.1%
ALL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 1.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 24.5%, current ratio 0.37x
- Beta 0.12 vs AFGB's 0.74, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.2% revenue growth vs AFGB's 1.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.9x vs 7.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.5 vs KMPR's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs AFGB's 0.74, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 34.0% yield, vs ALL's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.9% vs KMPR's -50.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.3% ROA vs KMPR's 0.4%, ROIC 29.5% vs 3.1% |
AFGB vs KMPR vs HCI vs ERIE vs ALL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AFGB vs KMPR vs HCI vs ERIE vs ALL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HCI leads in 3 of 6 categories
AFGB leads 1 • ALL leads 1 • KMPR leads 0 • ERIE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HCI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALL is the larger business by revenue, generating $67.1B annually — 72.4x HCI's $927M. HCI is the more profitable business, keeping 33.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KMPR's 0.8%. On growth, HCI holds the edge at +11.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.0B | $4.7B | $927M | $4.3B | $67.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.6B | $21M | $454M | $786M | $16.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $879M | $39M | $314M | $571M | $12.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.6B | $382M | $431M | $537M | $11.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.7% | +8.1% | +66.5% | +18.1% | +39.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +57.0% | +0.7% | +47.9% | +17.0% | +23.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +0.8% | +33.9% | +13.2% | +18.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +8.1% | +46.4% | +12.4% | +17.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.7% | -7.0% | +11.9% | +2.3% | +4.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.5% | -104.9% | +23.4% | +7.9% | +3.4% |
Valuation Metrics
AFGB leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.1x trailing earnings, AFGB trades at a 90% valuation discount to ERIE's 20.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HCI offers better value at 0.13x vs ERIE's 1.50x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $1.7B | $2.0B | $10.0B | $55.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$13.6B | $2.6B | $844M | $9.7B | $61.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.12x | 12.83x | 6.15x | 20.41x | 5.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.93x | 7.82x | 9.19x | 17.15x | 7.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.51x | — | 0.13x | 1.50x | 0.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -11.78x | 11.08x | 1.92x | 12.14x | 4.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.22x | 0.36x | 2.20x | 2.46x | 0.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.37x | 0.69x | 1.77x | 5.00x | 1.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.27x | 3.11x | 4.47x | 17.53x | 5.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HCI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALL delivers a 42.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $43 in annual profit, vs $1 for KMPR. HCI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AFGB's 0.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCI scores 8/9 vs ERIE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.0% | +1.4% | +32.0% | +25.0% | +42.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.7% | +0.4% | +13.2% | +17.3% | +10.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +3.1% | +6.8% | +29.5% | +29.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +25.0% | +1.3% | +40.6% | +32.0% | +29.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.38x | 0.38x | 0.06x | — | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15.4B | $879M | -$1.1B | -$346M | $6.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17.2B | $126M | $1.2B | $346M | $678M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $1.0B | $68M | $0 | $7.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.20x | 0.59x | 67.24x | — | 40.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HCI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HCI five years ago would be worth $20,530 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,483 for KMPR. Over the past 12 months, AFGB leads with a +6.9% total return vs KMPR's -50.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HCI at 45.7% vs KMPR's -10.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.0% | -24.9% | -16.7% | -20.9% | +5.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.9% | -50.2% | +2.4% | -38.7% | +6.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.6% | -29.0% | +209.6% | -0.2% | +93.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.4% | -55.2% | +105.3% | +14.8% | +75.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.5% | +31.6% | +436.8% | +171.6% | +258.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.2% | -10.8% | +45.7% | -0.1% | +24.7% |
Risk & Volatility
ALL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALL is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AFGB's 0.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALL currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs KMPR's 44.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 0.58x | 0.39x | 0.16x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.47 | $66.13 | $210.50 | $380.67 | $222.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.74 | $27.74 | $136.37 | $210.06 | $188.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.0% | +44.4% | +72.6% | +56.9% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.0 | 51.1 | 48.7 | 33.6 | 56.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 813K | 167K | 231K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AFGB and ALL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KMPR as "Buy", HCI as "Buy", ALL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.4% upside for KMPR (target: $48) vs -17.2% for HCI (target: $127). For income investors, AFGB offers the higher dividend yield at 33.99% vs HCI's 0.98%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $48.00 | $126.50 | — | $244.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 14 | — | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +34.0% | +4.3% | +1.0% | +2.2% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $7.26 | $1.27 | $1.50 | $4.83 | $3.91 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.6% | +17.5% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +2.2% |
HCI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AFGB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
AFGB vs KMPR vs HCI vs ERIE vs ALL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AFGB or KMPR or HCI or ERIE or ALL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the stronger pick with 20. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 3% for American Financial Group, Inc. (AFGB). American Financial Group, Inc. (AFGB) offers the better valuation at 2. 1x trailing P/E (1. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kemper Corporation (KMPR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AFGB or KMPR or HCI or ERIE or ALL?
On trailing P/E, American Financial Group, Inc.
(AFGB) is the cheapest at 2. 1x versus Erie Indemnity Company at 20. 4x. On forward P/E, American Financial Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: HCI Group, Inc. wins at 0. 19x versus Erie Indemnity Company's 1. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AFGB or KMPR or HCI or ERIE or ALL?
Over the past 5 years, HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) delivered a total return of +105. 3%, compared to -55. 2% for Kemper Corporation (KMPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HCI returned +436. 8% versus AFGB's +26. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AFGB or KMPR or HCI or ERIE or ALL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Allstate Corporation (ALL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
12β versus American Financial Group, Inc. 's 0. 74β — meaning AFGB is approximately 543% more volatile than ALL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 38% for American Financial Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AFGB or KMPR or HCI or ERIE or ALL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is pulling ahead at 20. 2% versus 1. 3% for American Financial Group, Inc. (AFGB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HCI Group, Inc. grew EPS 179. 8% year-over-year, compared to -53. 4% for Kemper Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, HCI leads at 22. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AFGB or KMPR or HCI or ERIE or ALL?
HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 2% net margin versus 3. 0% for Kemper Corporation — meaning it keeps 33. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AFGB leads at 97. 7% versus 3. 3% for KMPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HCI leads at 73. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AFGB or KMPR or HCI or ERIE or ALL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus Erie Indemnity Company's 1. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, American Financial Group, Inc. (AFGB) trades at 1. 9x forward P/E versus 17. 1x for Erie Indemnity Company — 15. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KMPR: 63. 4% to $48. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AFGB or KMPR or HCI or ERIE or ALL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
American Financial Group, Inc. (AFGB) offers the highest yield at 34. 0%, versus 1. 0% for HCI Group, Inc. (HCI).
09Is AFGB or KMPR or HCI or ERIE or ALL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Allstate Corporation (ALL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
12), 1. 8% yield, +258. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALL: +258. 7%, AFGB: +26. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AFGB and KMPR and HCI and ERIE and ALL?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AFGB is a small-cap deep-value stock; KMPR is a small-cap deep-value stock; HCI is a small-cap high-growth stock; ERIE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ALL is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.