Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AGM vs PMT vs AGNC vs NLY vs PFSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
Financial - Mortgages
AGM vs PMT vs AGNC vs NLY vs PFSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | Financial - Mortgages |
| Market Cap | $1.97B | $957M | $9.75B | $16.24B | $4.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.32B | $957M | $3.46B | $6.70B | $4.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $210M | $132M | $838M | $2.03B | $507M |
| Gross Margin | 29.5% | 49.5% | 100.0% | 99.2% | 91.4% |
| Operating Margin | 19.4% | 35.7% | 107.1% | 102.6% | 34.6% |
| Forward P/E | 9.5x | 7.5x | 7.0x | 7.5x | 8.4x |
| Total Debt | $30.82B | $19.09B | $64M | $111.86B | $23.06B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $931M | $272M | $505M | $2.04B | $302M |
AGM vs PMT vs AGNC vs NLY vs PFSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Federal Agricultura… (AGM) | 100 | 282.2 | +182.2% |
| PennyMac Mortgage I… (PMT) | 100 | 99.9 | -0.1% |
| AGNC Investment Cor… (AGNC) | 100 | 83.9 | -16.1% |
| Annaly Capital Mana… (NLY) | 100 | 91.8 | -8.2% |
| PennyMac Financial … (PFSI) | 100 | 269.6 | +169.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AGM vs PMT vs AGNC vs NLY vs PFSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, AGM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 14.6%
- PEG 0.25 vs AGM's 0.63
- Beta 0.62, yield 14.6%, current ratio 0.03x
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 7.5x)
AGNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 384.7%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.4%
- 384.7% FFO/revenue growth vs AGM's -18.9%
- +38.5% vs PFSI's -6.7%
NLY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, current ratio 0.03x
- 30.3% margin vs PFSI's 11.5%
PFSI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 6.2% 10Y total return vs AGM's 419.1%
- 1.8% ROA vs AGM's 0.6%, ROIC 4.4% vs 0.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 384.7% FFO/revenue growth vs AGM's -18.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 7.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.3% margin vs PFSI's 11.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.62 vs PFSI's 0.90 | |
| Dividends | 14.6% yield, vs AGM's 4.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.5% vs PFSI's -6.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.8% ROA vs AGM's 0.6%, ROIC 4.4% vs 0.6% |
AGM vs PMT vs AGNC vs NLY vs PFSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AGM vs PMT vs AGNC vs NLY vs PFSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AGNC leads in 2 of 6 categories
PMT leads 1 • PFSI leads 1 • AGM leads 0 • NLY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGNC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NLY is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.7B annually — 7.0x PMT's $957M. NLY is the more profitable business, keeping 30.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PFSI's 11.5%. On growth, AGNC holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $957M | $3.5B | $6.7B | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $193M | $342M | $3.7B | $6.9B | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $210M | $132M | $838M | $2.0B | $507M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $222M | -$9.1B | $604M | -$222M | -$3.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.5% | +49.5% | +100.0% | +99.2% | +91.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +35.7% | +107.1% | +102.6% | +34.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +13.8% | +24.2% | +30.3% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | -9.6% | +17.5% | -3.3% | -32.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -98.2% | +2.5% | -8.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | — | +84.6% | +79.5% | +7.7% |
Valuation Metrics
PMT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.7x trailing earnings, NLY trades at a 34% valuation discount to AGNC's 11.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PMT offers better value at 0.37x vs AGM's 0.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $957M | $9.7B | $16.2B | $4.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $31.9B | $19.8B | $9.3B | $126.1B | $27.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.89x | 11.11x | 11.68x | 7.74x | 9.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.47x | 7.52x | 6.96x | 7.53x | 8.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.73x | 0.37x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 124.61x | 210.83x | 2.45x | 18.35x | 18.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.50x | 0.93x | 2.00x | 2.43x | 1.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.16x | 0.51x | 0.87x | 0.90x | 1.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.64x | — | 113.32x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AGNC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NLY delivers a 14.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $7 for PMT. AGNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AGM's 17.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGNC scores 5/9 vs PMT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.6% | +7.1% | +7.3% | +14.1% | +12.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +0.7% | +0.8% | +1.7% | +1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.6% | +0.4% | +34.0% | +6.4% | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.1% | +0.9% | +4.9% | +19.7% | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 17.93x | 10.12x | 0.01x | 6.92x | 5.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $29.9B | $18.8B | -$441M | $109.8B | $22.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $931M | $272M | $505M | $2.0B | $302M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30.8B | $19.1B | $64M | $111.9B | $23.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.17x | 0.11x | 1.32x | 1.42x | 1.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PFSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AGM five years ago would be worth $20,115 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,880 for AGNC. Over the past 12 months, AGNC leads with a +38.5% total return vs PFSI's -6.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PFSI at 17.6% vs PMT's 10.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.5% | -9.9% | +3.8% | +1.8% | -30.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.5% | -0.7% | +38.5% | +31.8% | -6.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.8% | +35.3% | +59.8% | +61.3% | +62.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +101.1% | -0.0% | -1.2% | +2.6% | +63.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +419.1% | +98.6% | +47.6% | +36.0% | +617.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.9% | +10.6% | +16.9% | +17.3% | +17.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PMT and NLY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PFSI's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NLY currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs PFSI's 56.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 0.62x | 0.76x | 0.65x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $210.64 | $13.81 | $12.19 | $24.52 | $160.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $136.57 | $10.86 | $8.65 | $18.43 | $82.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.9% | +79.7% | +89.1% | +92.2% | +56.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.6 | 34.2 | 49.8 | 50.0 | 45.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 102K | 1.1M | 18.0M | 7.0M | 598K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AGM and PMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AGM as "Buy", PMT as "Buy", AGNC as "Hold", NLY as "Buy", PFSI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.4% upside for PFSI (target: $138) vs 2.5% for AGNC (target: $11). For income investors, PMT offers the higher dividend yield at 14.56% vs PFSI's 1.28%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $233.00 | $12.00 | $11.13 | $24.50 | $138.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 26 | 35 | 28 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.5% | +14.6% | +14.5% | +13.0% | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $8.11 | $1.60 | $1.58 | $2.94 | $1.16 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.1% |
AGNC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PMT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
AGM vs PMT vs AGNC vs NLY vs PFSI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AGM or PMT or AGNC or NLY or PFSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AGNC Investment Corp.
(AGNC) is the stronger pick with 384. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 9% for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY) offers the better valuation at 7. 7x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AGM or PMT or AGNC or NLY or PFSI?
On trailing P/E, Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
(NLY) is the cheapest at 7. 7x versus AGNC Investment Corp. at 11. 7x. On forward P/E, AGNC Investment Corp. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust wins at 0. 25x versus Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation's 0. 63x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AGM or PMT or AGNC or NLY or PFSI?
Over the past 5 years, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) delivered a total return of +101.
1%, compared to -1. 2% for AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFSI returned +617. 5% versus NLY's +36. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AGM or PMT or AGNC or NLY or PFSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
62β versus PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. 's 0. 90β — meaning PFSI is approximately 45% more volatile than PMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 18% for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AGM or PMT or AGNC or NLY or PFSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AGNC Investment Corp.
(AGNC) is pulling ahead at 384. 7% versus -18. 9% for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AGNC Investment Corp. grew EPS 1760% year-over-year, compared to -27. 7% for PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust. Over a 3-year CAGR, AGNC leads at 26. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AGM or PMT or AGNC or NLY or PFSI?
Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
(NLY) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 3% net margin versus 11. 5% for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NLY leads at 102. 6% versus 9. 1% for PMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AGNC leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AGM or PMT or AGNC or NLY or PFSI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation's 0. 63x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 9. 5x for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PFSI: 52. 4% to $138. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AGM or PMT or AGNC or NLY or PFSI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT) offers the highest yield at 14. 6%, versus 1. 3% for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI).
09Is AGM or PMT or AGNC or NLY or PFSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), 1. 3% yield, +617. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFSI: +617. 5%, AGNC: +47. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AGM and PMT and AGNC and NLY and PFSI?
These companies operate in different sectors (AGM (Financial Services) and PMT (Real Estate) and AGNC (Real Estate) and NLY (Real Estate) and PFSI (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AGM is a small-cap deep-value stock; PMT is a small-cap high-growth stock; AGNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; NLY is a mid-cap deep-value stock; PFSI is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.