Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AX vs ALLY vs NAVI vs TREE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Conglomerates
AX vs ALLY vs NAVI vs TREE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Conglomerates |
| Market Cap | $4.96B | $13.51B | $826M | $552M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.93B | $12.15B | $3.23B | $1.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $476M | $852M | $-60M | $181M |
| Gross Margin | 61.5% | 52.0% | 87.0% | 94.3% |
| Operating Margin | 31.8% | 8.6% | 77.1% | 7.3% |
| Forward P/E | 10.2x | 8.3x | 11.9x | 7.0x |
| Total Debt | $373M | $21.77B | $45.71B | $435M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.93B | $10.03B | $2.10B | $81M |
AX vs ALLY vs NAVI vs TREE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Axos Financial, Inc. (AX) | 100 | 399.0 | +299.0% |
| Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) | 100 | 253.7 | +153.7% |
| Navient Corporation (NAVI) | 100 | 114.8 | +14.8% |
| LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) | 100 | 15.0 | -85.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AX vs ALLY vs NAVI vs TREE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 372.6% 10Y total return vs ALLY's 209.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.28, Low D/E 13.9%, current ratio 0.11x
- NIM 4.6% vs NAVI's 1.1%
ALLY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +38.4% vs NAVI's -25.1%
NAVI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 7.2%
- Beta 0.92, yield 7.2%, current ratio 0.41x
- Better valuation composite
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs TREE's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
TREE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 24.1%, EPS growth 443.3%
- 24.1% NII/revenue growth vs ALLY's -25.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.1% NII/revenue growth vs ALLY's -25.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs TREE's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.92 vs TREE's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | 7.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.4% vs NAVI's -25.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs TREE's 0.9% |
AX vs ALLY vs NAVI vs TREE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AX vs ALLY vs NAVI vs TREE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NAVI leads in 2 of 6 categories
AX leads 2 • ALLY leads 0 • TREE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AX and NAVI each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALLY is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.2B annually — 10.9x TREE's $1.1B. AX is the more profitable business, keeping 22.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NAVI's -2.5%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $12.2B | $3.2B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $217M | $2.0B | $544M | $120M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $476M | $852M | -$60M | $181M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $426M | -$295M | $323M | $73M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.5% | +52.0% | +87.0% | +94.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.8% | +8.6% | +77.1% | +7.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.4% | +7.0% | -2.5% | +13.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.6% | — | +13.7% | +5.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | +2.7% | +9.7% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
NAVI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.7x trailing earnings, TREE trades at a 80% valuation discount to ALLY's 18.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AX's 5.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NAVI's 17.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.0B | $13.5B | $826M | $552M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $25.2B | $44.4B | $906M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.79x | 18.48x | -10.85x | 3.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.22x | 8.29x | 11.89x | 6.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.59x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.30x | 12.84x | 17.81x | 8.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.57x | 1.11x | 0.26x | 0.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.90x | 0.89x | 0.36x | 1.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.38x | — | 1.87x | 9.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TREE delivers a 86.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $86 in annual profit, vs $-2 for NAVI. AX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NAVI's 19.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AX scores 7/9 vs ALLY's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.6% | +5.5% | -2.5% | +86.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +0.4% | -0.1% | +21.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.0% | +2.2% | +3.8% | +9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.1% | +3.0% | +5.5% | +13.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | 1.40x | 19.05x | 1.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.6B | $11.7B | $43.6B | $354M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.9B | $10.0B | $2.1B | $81M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $373M | $21.8B | $45.7B | $435M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.70x | 0.22x | 0.21x | 4.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AX five years ago would be worth $18,926 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,126 for TREE. Over the past 12 months, ALLY leads with a +38.4% total return vs NAVI's -25.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AX at 31.1% vs NAVI's -10.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.2% | -3.0% | -30.0% | -22.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.5% | +38.4% | -25.1% | +6.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +125.5% | +89.1% | -27.8% | +112.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +89.3% | -8.1% | -30.9% | -78.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +372.6% | +209.6% | +15.3% | -45.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.1% | +23.7% | -10.3% | +28.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALLY and NAVI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NAVI is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TREE's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALLY currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs TREE's 51.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.25x | 1.41x | 0.87x | 1.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $101.92 | $47.27 | $16.07 | $77.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $66.82 | $32.28 | $7.80 | $32.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.9% | +92.6% | +54.7% | +51.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.5 | 58.6 | 48.5 | 39.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 388K | 3.5M | 923K | 326K |
Analyst Outlook
NAVI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AX as "Buy", ALLY as "Buy", NAVI as "Hold", TREE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 73.2% upside for TREE (target: $69) vs -1.4% for NAVI (target: $9). NAVI is the only dividend payer here at 7.24% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $111.00 | $53.33 | $8.67 | $69.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 38 | 24 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +7.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.64 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | 0.0% | +13.4% | 0.0% |
NAVI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). AX leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
AX vs ALLY vs NAVI vs TREE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AX or ALLY or NAVI or TREE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LendingTree, Inc.
(TREE) is the stronger pick with 24. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 7% for Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY). LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) offers the better valuation at 3. 7x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Axos Financial, Inc. (AX) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AX or ALLY or NAVI or TREE?
On trailing P/E, LendingTree, Inc.
(TREE) is the cheapest at 3. 7x versus Ally Financial Inc. at 18. 5x. On forward P/E, LendingTree, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AX or ALLY or NAVI or TREE?
Over the past 5 years, Axos Financial, Inc.
(AX) delivered a total return of +89. 3%, compared to -78. 7% for LendingTree, Inc. (TREE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AX returned +369. 4% versus TREE's -46. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AX or ALLY or NAVI or TREE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Navient Corporation (NAVI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
87β versus LendingTree, Inc. 's 1. 63β — meaning TREE is approximately 87% more volatile than NAVI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Axos Financial, Inc. (AX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 19% for Navient Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AX or ALLY or NAVI or TREE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LendingTree, Inc.
(TREE) is pulling ahead at 24. 1% versus -25. 7% for Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LendingTree, Inc. grew EPS 443. 3% year-over-year, compared to -168. 6% for Navient Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AX or ALLY or NAVI or TREE?
Axos Financial, Inc.
(AX) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 4% net margin versus -2. 5% for Navient Corporation — meaning it keeps 22. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NAVI leads at 77. 1% versus 7. 3% for TREE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TREE leads at 94. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AX or ALLY or NAVI or TREE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, LendingTree, Inc.
(TREE) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 11. 9x for Navient Corporation — 4. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TREE: 73. 2% to $69. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AX or ALLY or NAVI or TREE?
In this comparison, NAVI (7.
2% yield) pays a dividend. AX, ALLY, TREE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AX or ALLY or NAVI or TREE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Navient Corporation (NAVI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
87), 7. 2% yield). LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NAVI: +13. 4%, TREE: -46. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AX and ALLY and NAVI and TREE?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AX is a small-cap deep-value stock; ALLY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NAVI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TREE is a small-cap high-growth stock. NAVI pays a dividend while AX, ALLY, TREE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.