Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BAND vs RNG vs TWLO vs EGHT vs FIVN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BAND
Bandwidth Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.56B
5Y Perf.-56.1%
RNG
RingCentral, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.06B
5Y Perf.-83.4%
TWLO
Twilio Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$29.86B
5Y Perf.-0.3%
EGHT
8x8, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$372M
5Y Perf.-81.6%
FIVN
Five9, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.70B
5Y Perf.-78.7%

BAND vs RNG vs TWLO vs EGHT vs FIVN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BAND logoBAND
RNG logoRNG
TWLO logoTWLO
EGHT logoEGHT
FIVN logoFIVN
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - ApplicationInternet Content & InformationSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - Infrastructure
Market Cap$1.56B$4.06B$29.86B$372M$1.70B
Revenue (TTM)$209.36B$2.55B$5.30B$728M$1.17B
Net Income (TTM)$4.11B$84M$104M$-4M$57M
Gross Margin37.3%71.6%48.8%65.7%55.1%
Operating Margin-2.2%6.5%4.7%2.6%4.7%
Forward P/E27.4x9.4x36.3x7.3x7.0x
Total Debt$701M$1.48B$1.08B$410M$847M
Cash & Equiv.$103M$133M$682M$88M$232M

BAND vs RNG vs TWLO vs EGHT vs FIVNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BAND
RNG
TWLO
EGHT
FIVN
StockMay 20May 26Return
Bandwidth Inc. (BAND)10043.9-56.1%
RingCentral, Inc. (RNG)10016.6-83.4%
Twilio Inc. (TWLO)10099.7-0.3%
8x8, Inc. (EGHT)10018.4-81.6%
Five9, Inc. (FIVN)10021.3-78.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BAND vs RNG vs TWLO vs EGHT vs FIVN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FIVN leads in 2 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Bandwidth Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. RNG, TWLO, and EGHT also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BAND
Bandwidth Inc.
The Momentum Pick

BAND is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +253.6% vs FIVN's -11.9%
Best for: momentum
RNG
RingCentral, Inc.
The Niche Pick

RNG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.

  • 5.6% ROA vs EGHT's -0.6%, ROIC 12.2% vs 2.5%
Best for: efficiency
TWLO
Twilio Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

TWLO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 5.8% 10Y total return vs RNG's 144.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.51, Low D/E 13.8%, current ratio 4.03x
  • Beta 1.51, current ratio 4.03x
  • 13.7% revenue growth vs EGHT's -1.9%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
EGHT
8x8, Inc.
The Income Pick

EGHT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • beta 1.49
  • Beta 1.49 vs BAND's 1.86
Best for: income & stability
FIVN
Five9, Inc.
The Growth Play

FIVN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 10.3%, EPS growth 370.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.8%
  • Lower P/E (7.0x vs 7.3x)
  • 4.9% margin vs EGHT's -0.5%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTWLO logoTWLO13.7% revenue growth vs EGHT's -1.9%
ValueFIVN logoFIVNLower P/E (7.0x vs 7.3x)
Quality / MarginsFIVN logoFIVN4.9% margin vs EGHT's -0.5%
Stability / SafetyEGHT logoEGHTBeta 1.49 vs BAND's 1.86
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BAND logoBAND+253.6% vs FIVN's -11.9%
Efficiency (ROA)RNG logoRNG5.6% ROA vs EGHT's -0.6%, ROIC 12.2% vs 2.5%

BAND vs RNG vs TWLO vs EGHT vs FIVN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BANDBandwidth Inc.
FY 2025
CPaaS, Usage-Based Fees
73.8%$415M
CPaaS, Service Fees
26.2%$147M
RNGRingCentral, Inc.
FY 2025
License and Service
96.5%$2.4B
Product and Service, Other
3.5%$88M
TWLOTwilio Inc.
FY 2025
Messaging
73.3%$2.9B
Other Communications
19.0%$747M
Segment
7.7%$303M
EGHT8x8, Inc.
FY 2025
Service
96.9%$693M
Product and Service, Other
3.1%$22M
FIVNFive9, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$1.1B

BAND vs RNG vs TWLO vs EGHT vs FIVN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBANDLAGGINGFIVN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

RNG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

BAND is the larger business by revenue, generating $209.4B annually — 287.8x EGHT's $728M. FIVN is the more profitable business, keeping 4.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EGHT's -0.5%. On growth, BAND holds the edge at +1197.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.RNG logoRNGRingCentral, Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.EGHT logoEGHT8x8, Inc.FIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$209.4B$2.5B$5.3B$728M$1.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$4.6B$376M$415M$48M$140M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$4.1B$84M$104M-$4M$57M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.8B$664M$1.0B$62M$206M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+37.3%+71.6%+48.8%+65.7%+55.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.2%+6.5%+4.7%+2.6%+4.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.0%+3.3%+2.0%-0.5%+4.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+0.8%+26.0%+19.0%+8.6%+17.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+1197.2%+5.3%+20.0%+5.0%+9.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+39.8%+4.2%+3.8%+59.6%+20.0%
RNG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — BAND and EGHT and FIVN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 48.3x trailing earnings, FIVN trades at a 95% valuation discount to TWLO's 938.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EGHT's 12.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TWLO's 77.2x.

MetricBAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.RNG logoRNGRingCentral, Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.EGHT logoEGHT8x8, Inc.FIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$1.6B$4.1B$29.9B$372M$1.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.2B$5.4B$30.3B$694M$2.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-113.15x94.56x938.43x-12.71x48.26x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.27.36x9.36x36.33x7.27x6.96x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple50.39x13.83x77.16x12.76x16.84x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.07x1.61x5.89x0.52x1.48x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.65x4.03x2.84x2.46x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF0.02x6.92x28.91x7.43x8.45x
Evenly matched — BAND and EGHT and FIVN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — RNG and FIVN each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

FIVN delivers a 7.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-3 for EGHT. TWLO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EGHT's 3.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FIVN scores 8/9 vs BAND's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.RNG logoRNGRingCentral, Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.EGHT logoEGHT8x8, Inc.FIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+4.0%+1.3%-2.7%+7.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.7%+5.6%+1.1%-0.6%+3.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-1.2%+12.2%+1.6%+2.5%+1.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-1.6%+19.5%+1.9%+2.8%+2.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–937758
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.75x0.14x3.36x1.08x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$598M$1.3B$399M$322M$615M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$103M$133M$682M$88M$232M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$701M$1.5B$1.1B$410M$847M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-10.30x3.57x0.69x7.94x
Evenly matched — RNG and FIVN each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BAND leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TWLO five years ago would be worth $6,416 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $922 for EGHT. Over the past 12 months, BAND leads with a +253.6% total return vs FIVN's -11.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BAND at 62.7% vs FIVN's -27.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.RNG logoRNGRingCentral, Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.EGHT logoEGHT8x8, Inc.FIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+242.2%+64.8%+42.4%+41.3%+18.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+253.6%+74.3%+90.3%+51.7%-11.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+330.6%+70.3%+259.4%-8.2%-61.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-61.3%-82.3%-35.8%-90.8%-87.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+143.3%+144.3%+584.5%-77.0%+125.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+62.7%+19.4%+53.2%-2.8%-27.2%
BAND leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BAND and EGHT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

EGHT is the less volatile stock with a 1.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BAND's 1.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAND currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs FIVN's 73.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.RNG logoRNGRingCentral, Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.EGHT logoEGHT8x8, Inc.FIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.86x1.58x1.51x1.49x1.79x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$49.25$48.57$201.39$2.88$30.38
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$12.57$23.59$91.84$1.56$13.29
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.8%+93.5%+97.9%+92.7%+73.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10090.464.078.461.168.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded670K1.8M2.2M1.2M2.8M
Evenly matched — BAND and EGHT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: BAND as "Buy", RNG as "Buy", TWLO as "Buy", EGHT as "Hold", FIVN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 640.4% upside for EGHT (target: $20) vs -17.0% for RNG (target: $38).

MetricBAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.RNG logoRNGRingCentral, Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.EGHT logoEGHT8x8, Inc.FIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$46.00$37.67$185.17$19.77$28.40
# AnalystsCovering analysts1542522841
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+8.2%+2.9%0.0%+2.9%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

RNG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). BAND leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallBandwidth Inc. (BAND)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BAND vs RNG vs TWLO vs EGHT vs FIVN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BAND or RNG or TWLO or EGHT or FIVN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Twilio Inc.

(TWLO) is the stronger pick with 13. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 9% for 8x8, Inc. (EGHT). Five9, Inc. (FIVN) offers the better valuation at 48. 3x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BAND or RNG or TWLO or EGHT or FIVN?

On trailing P/E, Five9, Inc.

(FIVN) is the cheapest at 48. 3x versus Twilio Inc. at 938. 4x. On forward P/E, Five9, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BAND or RNG or TWLO or EGHT or FIVN?

Over the past 5 years, Twilio Inc.

(TWLO) delivered a total return of -35. 8%, compared to -90. 8% for 8x8, Inc. (EGHT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TWLO returned +584. 5% versus EGHT's -77. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BAND or RNG or TWLO or EGHT or FIVN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), 8x8, Inc.

(EGHT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 49β versus Bandwidth Inc. 's 1. 86β — meaning BAND is approximately 25% more volatile than EGHT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Twilio Inc. (TWLO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 3% for 8x8, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BAND or RNG or TWLO or EGHT or FIVN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Twilio Inc.

(TWLO) is pulling ahead at 13. 7% versus -1. 9% for 8x8, Inc. (EGHT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Five9, Inc. grew EPS 370. 6% year-over-year, compared to -79. 2% for Bandwidth Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FIVN leads at 13. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BAND or RNG or TWLO or EGHT or FIVN?

Five9, Inc.

(FIVN) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 4% net margin versus -3. 8% for 8x8, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RNG leads at 5. 0% versus -1. 9% for BAND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RNG leads at 71. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BAND or RNG or TWLO or EGHT or FIVN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Five9, Inc.

(FIVN) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 36. 3x for Twilio Inc. — 29. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EGHT: 640. 4% to $19. 77.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BAND or RNG or TWLO or EGHT or FIVN?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is BAND or RNG or TWLO or EGHT or FIVN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Twilio Inc.

(TWLO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+584. 5% 10Y return). Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) carries a higher beta of 1. 86 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TWLO: +584. 5%, BAND: +143. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BAND and RNG and TWLO and EGHT and FIVN?

These companies operate in different sectors (BAND (Technology) and RNG (Technology) and TWLO (Communication Services) and EGHT (Technology) and FIVN (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BAND

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 59862%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RNG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 42%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TWLO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 29%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EGHT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 39%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FIVN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BAND and RNG and TWLO and EGHT and FIVN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BAND: 119724.8% · RNG: 5.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.