Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BAND vs RNG vs TWLO vs EGHT vs FIVN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Internet Content & Information
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
BAND vs RNG vs TWLO vs EGHT vs FIVN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Internet Content & Information | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $1.56B | $4.06B | $29.86B | $372M | $1.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $209.36B | $2.55B | $5.30B | $728M | $1.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4.11B | $84M | $104M | $-4M | $57M |
| Gross Margin | 37.3% | 71.6% | 48.8% | 65.7% | 55.1% |
| Operating Margin | -2.2% | 6.5% | 4.7% | 2.6% | 4.7% |
| Forward P/E | 27.4x | 9.4x | 36.3x | 7.3x | 7.0x |
| Total Debt | $701M | $1.48B | $1.08B | $410M | $847M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $103M | $133M | $682M | $88M | $232M |
BAND vs RNG vs TWLO vs EGHT vs FIVN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) | 100 | 43.9 | -56.1% |
| RingCentral, Inc. (RNG) | 100 | 16.6 | -83.4% |
| Twilio Inc. (TWLO) | 100 | 99.7 | -0.3% |
| 8x8, Inc. (EGHT) | 100 | 18.4 | -81.6% |
| Five9, Inc. (FIVN) | 100 | 21.3 | -78.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BAND vs RNG vs TWLO vs EGHT vs FIVN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BAND is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +253.6% vs FIVN's -11.9%
RNG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.
- 5.6% ROA vs EGHT's -0.6%, ROIC 12.2% vs 2.5%
TWLO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 5.8% 10Y total return vs RNG's 144.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.51, Low D/E 13.8%, current ratio 4.03x
- Beta 1.51, current ratio 4.03x
- 13.7% revenue growth vs EGHT's -1.9%
EGHT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- beta 1.49
- Beta 1.49 vs BAND's 1.86
FIVN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.3%, EPS growth 370.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.8%
- Lower P/E (7.0x vs 7.3x)
- 4.9% margin vs EGHT's -0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.7% revenue growth vs EGHT's -1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 7.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.9% margin vs EGHT's -0.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.49 vs BAND's 1.86 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +253.6% vs FIVN's -11.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.6% ROA vs EGHT's -0.6%, ROIC 12.2% vs 2.5% |
BAND vs RNG vs TWLO vs EGHT vs FIVN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BAND vs RNG vs TWLO vs EGHT vs FIVN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RNG leads in 1 of 6 categories
BAND leads 1 • TWLO leads 0 • EGHT leads 0 • FIVN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RNG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BAND is the larger business by revenue, generating $209.4B annually — 287.8x EGHT's $728M. FIVN is the more profitable business, keeping 4.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EGHT's -0.5%. On growth, BAND holds the edge at +1197.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $209.4B | $2.5B | $5.3B | $728M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4.6B | $376M | $415M | $48M | $140M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4.1B | $84M | $104M | -$4M | $57M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.8B | $664M | $1.0B | $62M | $206M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.3% | +71.6% | +48.8% | +65.7% | +55.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +6.5% | +4.7% | +2.6% | +4.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +3.3% | +2.0% | -0.5% | +4.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | +26.0% | +19.0% | +8.6% | +17.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1197.2% | +5.3% | +20.0% | +5.0% | +9.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.8% | +4.2% | +3.8% | +59.6% | +20.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BAND and EGHT and FIVN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 48.3x trailing earnings, FIVN trades at a 95% valuation discount to TWLO's 938.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EGHT's 12.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TWLO's 77.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $4.1B | $29.9B | $372M | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.2B | $5.4B | $30.3B | $694M | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -113.15x | 94.56x | 938.43x | -12.71x | 48.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.36x | 9.36x | 36.33x | 7.27x | 6.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 50.39x | 13.83x | 77.16x | 12.76x | 16.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.07x | 1.61x | 5.89x | 0.52x | 1.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.65x | — | 4.03x | 2.84x | 2.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.02x | 6.92x | 28.91x | 7.43x | 8.45x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — RNG and FIVN each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FIVN delivers a 7.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-3 for EGHT. TWLO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EGHT's 3.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FIVN scores 8/9 vs BAND's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.0% | — | +1.3% | -2.7% | +7.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +5.6% | +1.1% | -0.6% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.2% | +12.2% | +1.6% | +2.5% | +1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.6% | +19.5% | +1.9% | +2.8% | +2.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.75x | — | 0.14x | 3.36x | 1.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $598M | $1.3B | $399M | $322M | $615M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $103M | $133M | $682M | $88M | $232M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $701M | $1.5B | $1.1B | $410M | $847M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.30x | 3.57x | — | 0.69x | 7.94x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BAND leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TWLO five years ago would be worth $6,416 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $922 for EGHT. Over the past 12 months, BAND leads with a +253.6% total return vs FIVN's -11.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BAND at 62.7% vs FIVN's -27.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +242.2% | +64.8% | +42.4% | +41.3% | +18.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +253.6% | +74.3% | +90.3% | +51.7% | -11.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +330.6% | +70.3% | +259.4% | -8.2% | -61.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.3% | -82.3% | -35.8% | -90.8% | -87.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +143.3% | +144.3% | +584.5% | -77.0% | +125.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +62.7% | +19.4% | +53.2% | -2.8% | -27.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BAND and EGHT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EGHT is the less volatile stock with a 1.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BAND's 1.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAND currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs FIVN's 73.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.86x | 1.58x | 1.51x | 1.49x | 1.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.25 | $48.57 | $201.39 | $2.88 | $30.38 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.57 | $23.59 | $91.84 | $1.56 | $13.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.8% | +93.5% | +97.9% | +92.7% | +73.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 90.4 | 64.0 | 78.4 | 61.1 | 68.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 670K | 1.8M | 2.2M | 1.2M | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BAND as "Buy", RNG as "Buy", TWLO as "Buy", EGHT as "Hold", FIVN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 640.4% upside for EGHT (target: $20) vs -17.0% for RNG (target: $38).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $46.00 | $37.67 | $185.17 | $19.77 | $28.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 42 | 52 | 28 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +8.2% | +2.9% | 0.0% | +2.9% |
RNG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). BAND leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
BAND vs RNG vs TWLO vs EGHT vs FIVN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BAND or RNG or TWLO or EGHT or FIVN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Twilio Inc.
(TWLO) is the stronger pick with 13. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 9% for 8x8, Inc. (EGHT). Five9, Inc. (FIVN) offers the better valuation at 48. 3x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BAND or RNG or TWLO or EGHT or FIVN?
On trailing P/E, Five9, Inc.
(FIVN) is the cheapest at 48. 3x versus Twilio Inc. at 938. 4x. On forward P/E, Five9, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BAND or RNG or TWLO or EGHT or FIVN?
Over the past 5 years, Twilio Inc.
(TWLO) delivered a total return of -35. 8%, compared to -90. 8% for 8x8, Inc. (EGHT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TWLO returned +584. 5% versus EGHT's -77. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BAND or RNG or TWLO or EGHT or FIVN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), 8x8, Inc.
(EGHT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 49β versus Bandwidth Inc. 's 1. 86β — meaning BAND is approximately 25% more volatile than EGHT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Twilio Inc. (TWLO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 3% for 8x8, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BAND or RNG or TWLO or EGHT or FIVN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Twilio Inc.
(TWLO) is pulling ahead at 13. 7% versus -1. 9% for 8x8, Inc. (EGHT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Five9, Inc. grew EPS 370. 6% year-over-year, compared to -79. 2% for Bandwidth Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FIVN leads at 13. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BAND or RNG or TWLO or EGHT or FIVN?
Five9, Inc.
(FIVN) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 4% net margin versus -3. 8% for 8x8, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RNG leads at 5. 0% versus -1. 9% for BAND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RNG leads at 71. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BAND or RNG or TWLO or EGHT or FIVN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Five9, Inc.
(FIVN) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 36. 3x for Twilio Inc. — 29. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EGHT: 640. 4% to $19. 77.
08Which pays a better dividend — BAND or RNG or TWLO or EGHT or FIVN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BAND or RNG or TWLO or EGHT or FIVN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Twilio Inc.
(TWLO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+584. 5% 10Y return). Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) carries a higher beta of 1. 86 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TWLO: +584. 5%, BAND: +143. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BAND and RNG and TWLO and EGHT and FIVN?
These companies operate in different sectors (BAND (Technology) and RNG (Technology) and TWLO (Communication Services) and EGHT (Technology) and FIVN (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 9%
- Gross Margin > 29%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.