Integrated Freight & Logistics
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BTOC vs XPO vs ODFL vs SAIA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Trucking
Trucking
BTOC vs XPO vs ODFL vs SAIA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Trucking | Trucking |
| Market Cap | $13M | $24.28B | $41.28B | $11.97B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $197M | $8.30B | $5.50B | $3.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $348M | $1.02B | $255M |
| Gross Margin | -1.0% | 12.2% | 32.2% | 18.4% |
| Operating Margin | -8.7% | 9.1% | 24.8% | 10.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 43.9x | 37.7x | 42.3x |
| Total Debt | $134M | $4.70B | $141M | $418M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $310M | $120M | $20M |
BTOC vs XPO vs ODFL vs SAIA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Armlogi Holding Cor… (BTOC) | 100 | 5.7 | -94.3% |
| XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) | 100 | 193.3 | +93.3% |
| Old Dominion Freigh… (ODFL) | 100 | 113.0 | +13.0% |
| Saia, Inc. (SAIA) | 100 | 109.6 | +9.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BTOC vs XPO vs ODFL vs SAIA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BTOC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 14.0%, EPS growth -294.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 50.3%
- 14.0% revenue growth vs ODFL's -5.5%
- Beta 1.09 vs SAIA's 1.90
XPO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 21.5% 10Y total return vs SAIA's 15.7%
- PEG 1.59 vs ODFL's 3.36
- +88.9% vs BTOC's -74.8%
ODFL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.38, yield 0.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.38, Low D/E 3.3%, current ratio 1.44x
- Beta 1.38, yield 0.6%, current ratio 1.44x
- Lower P/E (37.7x vs 42.3x)
SAIA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.0% revenue growth vs ODFL's -5.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (37.7x vs 42.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.6% margin vs BTOC's -8.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs SAIA's 1.90 | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +88.9% vs BTOC's -74.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.5% ROA vs BTOC's -11.0%, ROIC 23.6% vs -8.9% |
BTOC vs XPO vs ODFL vs SAIA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BTOC vs XPO vs ODFL vs SAIA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ODFL leads in 3 of 6 categories
BTOC leads 1 • XPO leads 1 • SAIA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ODFL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XPO is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.3B annually — 42.0x BTOC's $197M. ODFL is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BTOC's -8.7%. On growth, BTOC holds the edge at +16.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $197M | $8.3B | $5.5B | $3.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$14M | $1.3B | $1.7B | $602M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | $348M | $1.0B | $255M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $457M | $955M | $261M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -1.0% | +12.2% | +32.2% | +18.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.7% | +9.1% | +24.8% | +10.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.7% | +4.2% | +18.6% | +7.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | +5.5% | +17.4% | +8.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.5% | +7.3% | -5.7% | +2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.4% | +49.1% | -11.4% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BTOC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 41.0x trailing earnings, ODFL trades at a 48% valuation discount to XPO's 78.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), XPO offers better value at 2.84x vs SAIA's 3.67x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13M | $24.3B | $41.3B | $12.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $138M | $28.7B | $41.3B | $12.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.78x | 78.34x | 41.01x | 47.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 43.91x | 37.69x | 42.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.84x | 3.66x | 3.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 22.94x | 23.93x | 20.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.07x | 2.98x | 7.51x | 3.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.48x | 13.22x | 9.64x | 4.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 73.80x | 43.22x | 438.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ODFL leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ODFL delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-77 for BTOC. ODFL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BTOC's 5.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ODFL scores 6/9 vs BTOC's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -76.9% | +19.0% | +24.0% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.0% | +4.3% | +18.5% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.9% | +9.3% | +23.6% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -13.7% | +11.3% | +27.1% | +11.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.35x | 2.53x | 0.03x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $125M | $4.4B | $21M | $398M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $310M | $120M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $134M | $4.7B | $141M | $418M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.83x | 3.21x | 4601.85x | 23.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XPO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XPO five years ago would be worth $40,679 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $622 for BTOC. Over the past 12 months, XPO leads with a +88.9% total return vs BTOC's -74.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XPO at 62.2% vs BTOC's -60.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -47.6% | +49.0% | +24.6% | +33.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -74.8% | +88.9% | +28.0% | +72.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.8% | +326.9% | +29.1% | +56.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.8% | +306.8% | +50.0% | +83.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.8% | +2145.5% | +841.8% | +1567.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -60.4% | +62.2% | +8.9% | +16.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BTOC and SAIA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BTOC is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SAIA's 1.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SAIA currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs BTOC's 15.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 1.73x | 1.38x | 1.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.91 | $231.46 | $233.79 | $457.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.23 | $108.58 | $126.01 | $248.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.1% | +89.4% | +84.7% | +98.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.1 | 50.2 | 45.2 | 60.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.4M | 2.1M | 523K |
Analyst Outlook
ODFL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: XPO as "Buy", ODFL as "Hold", SAIA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.1% upside for ODFL (target: $208) vs -5.9% for SAIA (target: $423). ODFL is the only dividend payer here at 0.57% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $209.07 | $208.19 | $422.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 32 | 36 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 10 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.12 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% | +1.8% | +0.1% |
ODFL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BTOC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BTOC vs XPO vs ODFL vs SAIA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BTOC or XPO or ODFL or SAIA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Armlogi Holding Corp.
common stock (BTOC) is the stronger pick with 14. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 5% for Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL). Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL) offers the better valuation at 41. 0x trailing P/E (37. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BTOC or XPO or ODFL or SAIA?
On trailing P/E, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
(ODFL) is the cheapest at 41. 0x versus XPO Logistics, Inc. at 78. 3x. On forward P/E, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. is actually cheaper at 37. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: XPO Logistics, Inc. wins at 1. 59x versus Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. 's 3. 36x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BTOC or XPO or ODFL or SAIA?
Over the past 5 years, XPO Logistics, Inc.
(XPO) delivered a total return of +306. 8%, compared to -93. 8% for Armlogi Holding Corp. common stock (BTOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XPO returned +21. 5% versus BTOC's -93. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BTOC or XPO or ODFL or SAIA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Armlogi Holding Corp.
common stock (BTOC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus Saia, Inc. 's 1. 90β — meaning SAIA is approximately 75% more volatile than BTOC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 5% for Armlogi Holding Corp. common stock — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BTOC or XPO or ODFL or SAIA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Armlogi Holding Corp.
common stock (BTOC) is pulling ahead at 14. 0% versus -5. 5% for Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. grew EPS -11. 9% year-over-year, compared to -294. 7% for Armlogi Holding Corp. common stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, BTOC leads at 50. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BTOC or XPO or ODFL or SAIA?
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
(ODFL) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 6% net margin versus -8. 1% for Armlogi Holding Corp. common stock — meaning it keeps 18. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ODFL leads at 24. 8% versus -9. 3% for BTOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ODFL leads at 32. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BTOC or XPO or ODFL or SAIA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 59x versus Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. 's 3. 36x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL) trades at 37. 7x forward P/E versus 43. 9x for XPO Logistics, Inc. — 6. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ODFL: 5. 1% to $208. 19.
08Which pays a better dividend — BTOC or XPO or ODFL or SAIA?
In this comparison, ODFL (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. BTOC, XPO, SAIA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BTOC or XPO or ODFL or SAIA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
(ODFL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 6% yield, +841. 8% 10Y return). XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ODFL: +841. 8%, XPO: +21. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BTOC and XPO and ODFL and SAIA?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
ODFL pays a dividend while BTOC, XPO, SAIA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.