Asset Management
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BUR vs PRAA vs ECPG vs TRU vs EFX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Mortgages
Consulting Services
Consulting Services
BUR vs PRAA vs ECPG vs TRU vs EFX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Mortgages | Consulting Services | Consulting Services |
| Market Cap | $1.13B | $803M | $1.76B | $14.07B | $21.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $472M | $1.24B | $1.76B | $4.73B | $6.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $86M | $-305M | $296M | $705M | $699M |
| Gross Margin | 72.3% | 99.2% | 69.0% | 52.7% | 44.7% |
| Operating Margin | 53.7% | 33.9% | 35.4% | 18.1% | 18.3% |
| Forward P/E | 6.1x | 25.9x | 6.9x | 15.3x | 20.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.78B | $32M | $4.13B | $5.16B | $5.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $470M | $104M | $157M | $854M | $181M |
BUR vs PRAA vs ECPG vs TRU vs EFX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burford Capital Lim… (BUR) | 100 | 92.4 | -7.6% |
| PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) | 100 | 61.2 | -38.8% |
| Encore Capital Grou… (ECPG) | 100 | 258.8 | +158.8% |
| TransUnion (TRU) | 100 | 82.3 | -17.7% |
| Equifax Inc. (EFX) | 100 | 113.3 | +13.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BUR vs PRAA vs ECPG vs TRU vs EFX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BUR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.36, yield 2.4%
- Lower P/E (6.1x vs 20.4x)
- 31.0% margin vs PRAA's -24.6%
- 2.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs TRU's 0.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, PRAA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ECPG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 33.9%, EPS growth 287.1%
- 214.3% 10Y total return vs TRU's 142.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.07, current ratio 595.09x
- PEG 0.67 vs EFX's 4.39
TRU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.
- 6.2% ROA vs PRAA's -5.9%, ROIC 7.3% vs 11.2%
EFX is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.87, yield 1.1%, current ratio 0.60x
- Beta 0.87 vs BUR's 2.36
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 33.9% NII/revenue growth vs BUR's -56.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 20.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.0% margin vs PRAA's -24.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs BUR's 2.36 | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs TRU's 0.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +149.8% vs BUR's -62.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.2% ROA vs PRAA's -5.9%, ROIC 7.3% vs 11.2% |
BUR vs PRAA vs ECPG vs TRU vs EFX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BUR vs PRAA vs ECPG vs TRU vs EFX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BUR leads in 1 of 6 categories
PRAA leads 1 • ECPG leads 1 • TRU leads 0 • EFX leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BUR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EFX is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.3B annually — 13.3x BUR's $472M. BUR is the more profitable business, keeping 31.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRAA's -24.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $472M | $1.2B | $1.8B | $4.7B | $6.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $154M | $431M | $710M | $1.4B | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $86M | -$305M | $296M | $705M | $699M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $206M | -$90M | $166M | $697M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.3% | +99.2% | +69.0% | +52.7% | +44.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +53.7% | +33.9% | +35.4% | +18.1% | +18.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +31.0% | -24.6% | +14.6% | +14.9% | +11.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +45.8% | -7.3% | +7.2% | +14.7% | +18.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +13.7% | +14.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -114.8% | +2.1% | +100.0% | +172.0% | +34.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BUR and PRAA each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.5x trailing earnings, ECPG trades at a 77% valuation discount to EFX's 33.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ECPG offers better value at 0.73x vs EFX's 7.11x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $803M | $1.8B | $14.1B | $21.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.4B | $731M | $5.7B | $18.4B | $26.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.83x | -2.68x | 7.54x | 31.44x | 33.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.08x | 25.94x | 6.86x | 15.28x | 20.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.73x | 5.91x | 7.11x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.62x | 1.69x | 8.79x | 12.83x | 14.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.39x | 0.65x | 1.00x | 3.08x | 3.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.35x | 0.79x | 1.98x | 3.16x | 4.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.23x | — | 13.87x | 21.27x | 18.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRAA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ECPG delivers a 30.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-26 for PRAA. PRAA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ECPG's 4.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRU scores 8/9 vs PRAA's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.7% | -26.0% | +30.7% | +15.1% | +14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | -5.9% | +5.6% | +6.2% | +5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.9% | +11.2% | +9.8% | +7.3% | +8.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.2% | +8.7% | +12.6% | +8.6% | +11.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.55x | 0.03x | 4.23x | 1.13x | 1.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | -$72M | $4.0B | $4.3B | $4.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $470M | $104M | $157M | $854M | $181M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $32M | $4.1B | $5.2B | $5.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.58x | 0.06x | 3.45x | 3.61x | 5.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ECPG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ECPG five years ago would be worth $19,077 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,318 for BUR. Over the past 12 months, ECPG leads with a +149.8% total return vs BUR's -62.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ECPG at 20.1% vs BUR's -25.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -41.0% | +19.5% | +47.1% | -12.3% | -17.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -62.3% | +57.2% | +149.8% | -13.9% | -33.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.2% | -39.3% | +73.1% | +13.9% | -9.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.8% | -46.8% | +90.8% | -29.3% | -23.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.1% | -32.2% | +214.3% | +142.0% | +58.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.8% | -15.3% | +20.1% | +4.4% | -3.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PRAA and EFX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EFX is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BUR's 2.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAA currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs BUR's 34.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.36x | 1.82x | 1.07x | 1.36x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.10 | $22.55 | $92.64 | $99.39 | $281.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.59 | $10.25 | $32.66 | $65.23 | $166.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.2% | +92.6% | +88.8% | +73.4% | +62.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.5 | 61.2 | 70.6 | 47.2 | 42.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.1M | 449K | 327K | 2.3M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BUR and PRAA and ECPG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BUR as "Buy", PRAA as "Hold", ECPG as "Buy", TRU as "Buy", EFX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 103.3% upside for BUR (target: $11) vs 3.4% for ECPG (target: $85). For income investors, BUR offers the higher dividend yield at 2.41% vs TRU's 0.63%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.50 | $26.00 | $85.00 | $94.88 | $227.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 13 | 15 | 26 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | — | — | +0.6% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.12 | — | — | $0.46 | $1.88 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +2.5% | +5.1% | +2.4% | +4.4% |
BUR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). PRAA leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
BUR vs PRAA vs ECPG vs TRU vs EFX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BUR or PRAA or ECPG or TRU or EFX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Encore Capital Group, Inc.
(ECPG) is the stronger pick with 33. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 2% for Burford Capital Limited (BUR). Encore Capital Group, Inc. (ECPG) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (6. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Burford Capital Limited (BUR) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BUR or PRAA or ECPG or TRU or EFX?
On trailing P/E, Encore Capital Group, Inc.
(ECPG) is the cheapest at 7. 5x versus Equifax Inc. at 33. 0x. On forward P/E, Burford Capital Limited is actually cheaper at 6. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Encore Capital Group, Inc. wins at 0. 67x versus Equifax Inc. 's 4. 39x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BUR or PRAA or ECPG or TRU or EFX?
Over the past 5 years, Encore Capital Group, Inc.
(ECPG) delivered a total return of +90. 8%, compared to -56. 8% for Burford Capital Limited (BUR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ECPG returned +214. 3% versus PRAA's -32. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BUR or PRAA or ECPG or TRU or EFX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Equifax Inc.
(EFX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Burford Capital Limited's 2. 36β — meaning BUR is approximately 171% more volatile than EFX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 4% for Encore Capital Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BUR or PRAA or ECPG or TRU or EFX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Encore Capital Group, Inc.
(ECPG) is pulling ahead at 33. 9% versus -56. 2% for Burford Capital Limited (BUR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Encore Capital Group, Inc. grew EPS 287. 1% year-over-year, compared to -535. 2% for PRA Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRU leads at 7. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BUR or PRAA or ECPG or TRU or EFX?
Burford Capital Limited (BUR) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
0% net margin versus -24. 6% for PRA Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BUR leads at 53. 7% versus 18. 0% for EFX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRAA leads at 99. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BUR or PRAA or ECPG or TRU or EFX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Encore Capital Group, Inc. (ECPG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 67x versus Equifax Inc. 's 4. 39x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Burford Capital Limited (BUR) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 25. 9x for PRA Group, Inc. — 19. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BUR: 103. 3% to $10. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — BUR or PRAA or ECPG or TRU or EFX?
In this comparison, BUR (2.
4% yield), EFX (1. 1% yield), TRU (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. PRAA, ECPG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BUR or PRAA or ECPG or TRU or EFX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Equifax Inc.
(EFX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 1. 1% yield). PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EFX: +58. 3%, PRAA: -32. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BUR and PRAA and ECPG and TRU and EFX?
These companies operate in different sectors (BUR (Financial Services) and PRAA (Financial Services) and ECPG (Financial Services) and TRU (Industrials) and EFX (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BUR is a small-cap deep-value stock; PRAA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ECPG is a small-cap high-growth stock; TRU is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EFX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. BUR, TRU, EFX pay a dividend while PRAA, ECPG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.