REIT - Industrial
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
COLD vs NSA vs EXR vs CUBE vs PLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
COLD vs NSA vs EXR vs CUBE vs PLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $4.27B | $3.34B | $30.26B | $9.18B | $132.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.60B | $750M | $3.38B | $1.13B | $8.74B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-112M | $89M | $974M | $327M | $3.21B |
| Gross Margin | -3.9% | 28.4% | 28.4% | 5.8% | 67.7% |
| Operating Margin | 3.5% | 31.9% | 44.1% | 29.5% | 47.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 82.3x | 30.8x | 28.4x | 41.4x |
| Total Debt | $4.50B | $3.43B | $14.97B | $3.53B | $31.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $137M | $24M | $139M | $6M | $1.32B |
COLD vs NSA vs EXR vs CUBE vs PLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Americold Realty Tr… (COLD) | 100 | 41.9 | -58.1% |
| National Storage Af… (NSA) | 100 | 144.4 | +44.4% |
| Extra Space Storage… (EXR) | 100 | 148.1 | +48.1% |
| CubeSmart (CUBE) | 100 | 141.4 | +41.4% |
| Prologis, Inc. (PLD) | 100 | 155.5 | +55.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: COLD vs NSA vs EXR vs CUBE vs PLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
COLD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 6.1% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CUBE's 5.2%
Among these 5 stocks, NSA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
EXR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, current ratio 1.28x
- Beta 0.52, yield 4.5%, current ratio 1.28x
- Beta 0.52 vs NSA's 0.81, lower leverage
CUBE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 5.2%
- PEG 2.49 vs NSA's 14.39
- 5.3% FFO/revenue growth vs COLD's -2.4%
- Lower P/E (28.4x vs 41.4x), PEG 2.49 vs 3.83
PLD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 2.2%, EPS growth 21.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.9%
- 259.1% 10Y total return vs EXR's 104.4%
- 36.7% margin vs COLD's -4.3%
- +39.4% vs COLD's -13.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.3% FFO/revenue growth vs COLD's -2.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (28.4x vs 41.4x), PEG 2.49 vs 3.83 | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.7% margin vs COLD's -4.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs NSA's 0.81, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.1% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CUBE's 5.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.4% vs COLD's -13.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.9% ROA vs COLD's -1.4%, ROIC 5.5% vs 1.0% |
COLD vs NSA vs EXR vs CUBE vs PLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
COLD vs NSA vs EXR vs CUBE vs PLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PLD leads in 1 of 6 categories
COLD leads 1 • CUBE leads 1 • NSA leads 0 • EXR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLD is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.7B annually — 11.7x NSA's $750M. PLD is the more profitable business, keeping 36.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COLD's -4.3%. On growth, EXR holds the edge at +9.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.6B | $750M | $3.4B | $1.1B | $8.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $461M | $427M | $2.2B | $597M | $6.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$112M | $89M | $974M | $327M | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$205M | $297M | $1.8B | $611M | $5.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -3.9% | +28.4% | +28.4% | +5.8% | +67.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +31.9% | +44.1% | +29.5% | +47.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | +11.9% | +28.8% | +28.9% | +36.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.9% | +39.6% | +54.6% | +54.0% | +59.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.1% | -1.6% | +9.3% | +3.3% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.9% | +60.0% | +4.8% | -7.7% | -24.1% |
Valuation Metrics
COLD leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.6x trailing earnings, CUBE trades at a 55% valuation discount to NSA's 61.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CUBE offers better value at 2.41x vs NSA's 10.82x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.3B | $3.3B | $30.3B | $9.2B | $132.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.6B | $6.7B | $45.1B | $12.7B | $162.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -37.45x | 61.89x | 31.21x | 27.57x | 35.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 82.33x | 30.82x | 28.42x | 41.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 10.82x | 7.18x | 2.41x | 3.28x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.53x | 14.41x | 20.46x | 17.97x | 23.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.64x | 4.44x | 8.96x | 8.17x | 16.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.46x | 2.16x | 2.12x | 3.32x | 2.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.14x | 16.54x | 16.19x | 26.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CUBE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CUBE delivers a 11.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-4 for COLD. PLD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NSA's 2.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NSA scores 5/9 vs COLD's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.7% | +5.7% | +6.7% | +11.7% | +5.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.4% | +1.8% | +3.3% | +4.9% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.0% | +4.1% | +3.9% | +5.5% | +3.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.4% | +5.9% | +5.4% | +7.3% | +4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.54x | 2.23x | 1.05x | 1.27x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.4B | $3.4B | $14.8B | $3.5B | $30.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $137M | $24M | $139M | $6M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.5B | $3.4B | $15.0B | $3.5B | $31.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.08x | 1.73x | 2.68x | 3.90x | 5.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — NSA and PLD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PLD five years ago would be worth $13,773 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,064 for COLD. Over the past 12 months, PLD leads with a +39.4% total return vs COLD's -13.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NSA at 9.7% vs COLD's -16.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.5% | +57.4% | +10.6% | +16.7% | +11.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.6% | +26.3% | +1.7% | +0.4% | +39.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.1% | +31.9% | +3.7% | +0.0% | +20.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.4% | +18.0% | +18.1% | +18.0% | +37.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.8% | +182.1% | +104.4% | +74.2% | +259.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.7% | +9.7% | +1.2% | 0.0% | +6.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NSA and EXR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EXR is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NSA's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NSA currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs COLD's 80.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.81x | 0.81x | 0.52x | 0.53x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.56 | $44.02 | $155.19 | $44.13 | $145.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.10 | $27.43 | $125.71 | $35.09 | $103.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.7% | +98.4% | +92.3% | +91.2% | +97.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.8 | 62.0 | 57.1 | 58.3 | 58.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.0M | 1.8M | 1.1M | 2.2M | 3.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — COLD and CUBE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: COLD as "Buy", NSA as "Hold", EXR as "Hold", CUBE as "Hold", PLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.1% upside for EXR (target: $149) vs -23.1% for NSA (target: $33). For income investors, COLD offers the higher dividend yield at 6.11% vs PLD's 2.63%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.25 | $33.33 | $149.13 | $41.50 | $144.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 19 | 28 | 29 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.1% | +5.3% | +4.5% | +5.2% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.91 | $2.28 | $6.49 | $2.08 | $3.74 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% | +0.4% | +0.0% |
PLD leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). COLD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
COLD vs NSA vs EXR vs CUBE vs PLD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is COLD or NSA or EXR or CUBE or PLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CubeSmart (CUBE) is the stronger pick with 5.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 4% for Americold Realty Trust, Inc. (COLD). CubeSmart (CUBE) offers the better valuation at 27. 6x trailing P/E (28. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Americold Realty Trust, Inc. (COLD) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — COLD or NSA or EXR or CUBE or PLD?
On trailing P/E, CubeSmart (CUBE) is the cheapest at 27.
6x versus National Storage Affiliates Trust at 61. 9x. On forward P/E, CubeSmart is actually cheaper at 28. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: CubeSmart wins at 2. 49x versus National Storage Affiliates Trust's 14. 39x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — COLD or NSA or EXR or CUBE or PLD?
Over the past 5 years, Prologis, Inc.
(PLD) delivered a total return of +37. 7%, compared to -49. 4% for Americold Realty Trust, Inc. (COLD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLD returned +259. 1% versus COLD's +23. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — COLD or NSA or EXR or CUBE or PLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Extra Space Storage Inc.
(EXR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus National Storage Affiliates Trust's 0. 81β — meaning NSA is approximately 57% more volatile than EXR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Prologis, Inc. (PLD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 2% for National Storage Affiliates Trust — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — COLD or NSA or EXR or CUBE or PLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CubeSmart (CUBE) is pulling ahead at 5.
3% versus -2. 4% for Americold Realty Trust, Inc. (COLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Prologis, Inc. grew EPS 21. 9% year-over-year, compared to -40. 7% for National Storage Affiliates Trust. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLD leads at 19. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — COLD or NSA or EXR or CUBE or PLD?
Prologis, Inc.
(PLD) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 5% net margin versus -4. 4% for Americold Realty Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLD leads at 53. 8% versus 3. 8% for COLD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLD leads at 74. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is COLD or NSA or EXR or CUBE or PLD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, CubeSmart (CUBE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 49x versus National Storage Affiliates Trust's 14. 39x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, CubeSmart (CUBE) trades at 28. 4x forward P/E versus 82. 3x for National Storage Affiliates Trust — 53. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EXR: 4. 1% to $149. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — COLD or NSA or EXR or CUBE or PLD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Americold Realty Trust, Inc. (COLD) offers the highest yield at 6. 1%, versus 2. 6% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD).
09Is COLD or NSA or EXR or CUBE or PLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Extra Space Storage Inc.
(EXR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52), 4. 5% yield, +104. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXR: +104. 4%, COLD: +23. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between COLD and NSA and EXR and CUBE and PLD?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: COLD is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NSA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; EXR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CUBE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PLD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.