Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CULP vs LEG vs MHK vs SNBR vs PRPL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CULP
Culp, Inc.

Apparel - Manufacturers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$46M
5Y Perf.-53.3%
LEG
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.41B
5Y Perf.-66.3%
MHK
Mohawk Industries, Inc.

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.29B
5Y Perf.+10.2%
SNBR
Sleep Number Corporation

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$69M
5Y Perf.-90.3%
PRPL
Purple Innovation, Inc.

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$56M
5Y Perf.-96.4%

CULP vs LEG vs MHK vs SNBR vs PRPL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CULP logoCULP
LEG logoLEG
MHK logoMHK
SNBR logoSNBR
PRPL logoPRPL
IndustryApparel - ManufacturersFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesFurnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Market Cap$46M$1.41B$6.29B$69M$56M
Revenue (TTM)$201M$3.03B$10.99B$1M$505M
Net Income (TTM)$-7M$225M$414M$-132K$-35M
Gross Margin13.0%23.7%24.3%59.0%40.9%
Operating Margin1.0%7.5%4.9%-3.3%-6.1%
Forward P/E9.6x11.2x
Total Debt$18M$1.66B$2.76B$354M$204M
Cash & Equiv.$6M$587M$856M$2M$24M

CULP vs LEG vs MHK vs SNBR vs PRPLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CULP
LEG
MHK
SNBR
PRPL
StockMay 20May 26Return
Culp, Inc. (CULP)10046.7-53.3%
Leggett & Platt, In… (LEG)10033.7-66.3%
Mohawk Industries, … (MHK)100110.2+10.2%
Sleep Number Corpor… (SNBR)1009.7-90.3%
Purple Innovation, … (PRPL)1003.6-96.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CULP vs LEG vs MHK vs SNBR vs PRPL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LEG leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Culp, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. MHK also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CULP
Culp, Inc.
The Income Pick

CULP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.71
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 30.6%, current ratio 1.78x
  • Beta 0.71, current ratio 1.78x
  • Beta 0.71 vs SNBR's 2.70
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
LEG
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated
The Value Play

LEG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Better valuation composite
  • 7.4% margin vs SNBR's -9.4%
  • 1.9% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • +15.3% vs SNBR's -56.8%
Best for: value and quality
MHK
Mohawk Industries, Inc.
The Growth Play

MHK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth -0.5%, EPS growth -27.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.8%
  • -47.6% 10Y total return vs LEG's -52.6%
  • -0.5% revenue growth vs SNBR's -99.9%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
SNBR
Sleep Number Corporation
The Consumer Cyclical Pick

SNBR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
PRPL
Purple Innovation, Inc.
The Consumer Cyclical Pick

Among these 5 stocks, PRPL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMHK logoMHK-0.5% revenue growth vs SNBR's -99.9%
ValueLEG logoLEGBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsLEG logoLEG7.4% margin vs SNBR's -9.4%
Stability / SafetyCULP logoCULPBeta 0.71 vs SNBR's 2.70
DividendsLEG logoLEG1.9% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)LEG logoLEG+15.3% vs SNBR's -56.8%
Efficiency (ROA)LEG logoLEG6.3% ROA vs PRPL's -12.1%, ROIC 8.0% vs -15.8%

CULP vs LEG vs MHK vs SNBR vs PRPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CULPCulp, Inc.
FY 2024
Mattress Fabrics
53.4%$114M
Upholstery Fabrics
46.6%$99M
LEGLeggett & Platt, Incorporated
FY 2025
Specialized Products
97.4%$1.1B
Intersegment Eliminations
2.6%$30M
MHKMohawk Industries, Inc.
FY 2025
Global Ceramic Segment
43.5%$4.2B
Carpet And Resilient
38.5%$3.7B
Laminate and Wood
18.1%$1.8B
SNBRSleep Number Corporation
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$1.4B
PRPLPurple Innovation, Inc.
FY 2023
Product
100.0%$511M

CULP vs LEG vs MHK vs SNBR vs PRPL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLEGLAGGINGPRPL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

LEG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

MHK is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.0B annually — 7784.8x SNBR's $1M. LEG is the more profitable business, keeping 7.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SNBR's -9.4%. On growth, PRPL holds the edge at +35.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCULP logoCULPCulp, Inc.LEG logoLEGLeggett & Platt, …MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…SNBR logoSNBRSleep Number Corp…PRPL logoPRPLPurple Innovation…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$201M$3.0B$11.0B$1M$505M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$3M$318M$1.2B$72M-$12M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$7M$225M$414M-$132,000-$35M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$11M$207M$709M-$21M-$15M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+13.0%+23.7%+24.3%+59.0%+40.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+1.0%+7.5%+4.9%-3.3%-6.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.6%+7.4%+3.8%-9.4%-7.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-5.7%+6.8%+6.5%-14.6%-3.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-8.2%-100.0%+8.0%-3.8%+35.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+18.2%-36.4%+65.2%-11.2%-55.6%
LEG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

LEG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 6.1x trailing earnings, LEG trades at a 65% valuation discount to MHK's 17.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LEG's 6.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MHK's 7.0x.

MetricCULP logoCULPCulp, Inc.LEG logoLEGLeggett & Platt, …MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…SNBR logoSNBRSleep Number Corp…PRPL logoPRPLPurple Innovation…
Market CapShares × price$46M$1.4B$6.3B$69M$56M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$58M$2.5B$8.2B$422M$236M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.35x6.10x17.33x-0.53x-1.07x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.56x11.23x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.83x7.05x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.21x0.35x0.58x49.07x0.12x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.78x1.41x0.77x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.00x10.20x
LEG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LEG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

LEG delivers a 23.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-13 for CULP. CULP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LEG's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LEG scores 7/9 vs SNBR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCULP logoCULPCulp, Inc.LEG logoLEGLeggett & Platt, …MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…SNBR logoSNBRSleep Number Corp…PRPL logoPRPLPurple Innovation…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-13.3%+23.1%+5.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-5.9%+6.3%+3.0%-0.0%-12.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-9.6%+8.0%+3.9%-0.0%-15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-10.6%+8.6%+4.8%-15.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–937624
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.31x1.62x0.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$12M$1.1B$1.9B$353M$180M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6M$587M$856M$2M$24M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$18M$1.7B$2.8B$354M$204M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-39.03x4.40x36.90x-780.16x-0.32x
LEG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MHK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MHK five years ago would be worth $4,472 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $169 for PRPL. Over the past 12 months, LEG leads with a +15.3% total return vs SNBR's -56.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MHK at 0.9% vs SNBR's -49.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCULP logoCULPCulp, Inc.LEG logoLEGLeggett & Platt, …MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…SNBR logoSNBRSleep Number Corp…PRPL logoPRPLPurple Innovation…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+2.6%-5.8%-6.2%-64.7%-28.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-9.1%+15.3%+1.9%-56.8%-37.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-30.4%-61.9%+2.9%-87.2%-82.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-72.6%-72.2%-55.3%-97.3%-98.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-76.0%-52.6%-47.6%-87.6%-94.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-11.4%-27.5%+0.9%-49.6%-44.4%
MHK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CULP and LEG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CULP is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNBR's 2.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LEG currently trades 79.3% from its 52-week high vs SNBR's 21.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCULP logoCULPCulp, Inc.LEG logoLEGLeggett & Platt, …MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…SNBR logoSNBRSleep Number Corp…PRPL logoPRPLPurple Innovation…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.71x1.55x1.34x2.70x1.08x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.80$13.00$143.13$13.94$1.26
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.93$7.86$93.60$1.07$0.47
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+75.0%+79.3%+71.8%+21.7%+40.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10066.856.950.653.436.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded29K2.5M1.1M2.8M322K
Evenly matched — CULP and LEG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CULP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: LEG as "Hold", MHK as "Hold", SNBR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 230.0% upside for SNBR (target: $10) vs 16.4% for LEG (target: $12). LEG is the only dividend payer here at 1.88% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricCULP logoCULPCulp, Inc.LEG logoLEGLeggett & Platt, …MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…SNBR logoSNBRSleep Number Corp…PRPL logoPRPLPurple Innovation…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$12.00$130.00$10.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts143211
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises3000
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.19
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%+0.2%+2.4%+1.8%0.0%
CULP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

LEG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MHK leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallLeggett & Platt, Incorporat… (LEG)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CULP vs LEG vs MHK vs SNBR vs PRPL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CULP or LEG or MHK or SNBR or PRPL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Mohawk Industries, Inc.

(MHK) is the stronger pick with -0. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -99. 9% for Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR). Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) a "Hold" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CULP or LEG or MHK or SNBR or PRPL?

On trailing P/E, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) is the cheapest at 6.

1x versus Mohawk Industries, Inc. at 17. 3x. On forward P/E, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated is actually cheaper at 9. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CULP or LEG or MHK or SNBR or PRPL?

Over the past 5 years, Mohawk Industries, Inc.

(MHK) delivered a total return of -55. 3%, compared to -98. 3% for Purple Innovation, Inc. (PRPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MHK returned -47. 6% versus PRPL's -94. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CULP or LEG or MHK or SNBR or PRPL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Culp, Inc.

(CULP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus Sleep Number Corporation's 2. 70β — meaning SNBR is approximately 278% more volatile than CULP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Culp, Inc. (CULP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 162% for Leggett & Platt, Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CULP or LEG or MHK or SNBR or PRPL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mohawk Industries, Inc.

(MHK) is pulling ahead at -0. 5% versus -99. 9% for Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Leggett & Platt, Incorporated grew EPS 145. 3% year-over-year, compared to -541. 1% for Sleep Number Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MHK leads at -2. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CULP or LEG or MHK or SNBR or PRPL?

Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) is the more profitable company, earning 5.

8% net margin versus -11. 0% for Purple Innovation, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LEG leads at 5. 9% versus -6. 8% for PRPL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SNBR leads at 59. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CULP or LEG or MHK or SNBR or PRPL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) trades at 9.

6x forward P/E versus 11. 2x for Mohawk Industries, Inc. — 1. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SNBR: 230. 0% to $10. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CULP or LEG or MHK or SNBR or PRPL?

In this comparison, LEG (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. CULP, MHK, SNBR, PRPL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CULP or LEG or MHK or SNBR or PRPL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Culp, Inc.

(CULP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71)). Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR) carries a higher beta of 2. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CULP: -76. 0%, SNBR: -87. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CULP and LEG and MHK and SNBR and PRPL?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CULP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LEG is a small-cap deep-value stock; MHK is a small-cap deep-value stock; SNBR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRPL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. LEG pays a dividend while CULP, MHK, SNBR, PRPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CULP

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LEG

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MHK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SNBR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 35%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRPL

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 17%
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CULP and LEG and MHK and SNBR and PRPL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CULP: -8.2% · LEG: -100.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.