Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DLO vs FLYW vs RELY vs PAYO vs EVTC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
DLO vs FLYW vs RELY vs PAYO vs EVTC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $2.28B | $2.12B | $4.80B | $1.74B | $1.44B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $960M | $188.60B | $1.73B | $1.07B | $951M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $171M | $12.54B | $106M | $72M | $133M |
| Gross Margin | 38.6% | 0.2% | 43.6% | 61.9% | 46.4% |
| Operating Margin | 20.8% | 5.7% | 6.9% | 11.7% | 19.1% |
| Forward P/E | 16.2x | 49.5x | 44.1x | 20.4x | 6.0x |
| Total Debt | $54M | $0.00 | $220M | $72M | $1.13B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $189M | $330M | $542M | $416M | $306M |
DLO vs FLYW vs RELY vs PAYO vs EVTC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| DLocal Limited (DLO) | 100 | 25.2 | -74.8% |
| Flywire Corporation (FLYW) | 100 | 40.4 | -59.6% |
| Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY) | 100 | 62.1 | -37.9% |
| Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) | 100 | 59.2 | -40.8% |
| EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) | 100 | 51.1 | -48.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DLO vs FLYW vs RELY vs PAYO vs EVTC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DLO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.33 vs EVTC's 0.66
- Lower P/E (16.2x vs 44.1x)
- 17.8% margin vs RELY's 6.1%
- 13.6% ROA vs PAYO's 0.9%, ROIC 35.7% vs 30.7%
FLYW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +62.7% vs EVTC's -31.9%
RELY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 29.4%, EPS growth 263.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.19, Low D/E 25.4%, current ratio 3.30x
- 29.4% revenue growth vs PAYO's 7.7%
Among these 5 stocks, PAYO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
EVTC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 0.8%
- 89.5% 10Y total return vs PAYO's -47.7%
- Beta 0.76, yield 0.8%, current ratio 2.07x
- Beta 0.76 vs DLO's 1.74
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.4% revenue growth vs PAYO's 7.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.2x vs 44.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.8% margin vs RELY's 6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs DLO's 1.74 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.7% vs EVTC's -31.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.6% ROA vs PAYO's 0.9%, ROIC 35.7% vs 30.7% |
DLO vs FLYW vs RELY vs PAYO vs EVTC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
DLO vs FLYW vs RELY vs PAYO vs EVTC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DLO leads in 2 of 6 categories
EVTC leads 1 • RELY leads 1 • FLYW leads 0 • PAYO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — DLO and FLYW and PAYO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 198.3x EVTC's $951M. DLO is the more profitable business, keeping 17.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RELY's 6.1%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $960M | $188.6B | $1.7B | $1.1B | $951M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $223M | $10.8B | $149M | $208M | $316M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $171M | $12.5B | $106M | $72M | $133M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $152M | -$15.8B | $256M | $215M | $145M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.6% | +0.2% | +43.6% | +61.9% | +46.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.8% | +5.7% | +6.9% | +11.7% | +19.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.8% | +6.6% | +6.1% | +6.8% | +13.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | -8.4% | +14.8% | +20.2% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.1% | +1408.6% | +25.2% | +6.1% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +88.1% | +4.0% | +3.6% | +20.0% | -24.0% |
Valuation Metrics
EVTC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.6x trailing earnings, EVTC trades at a 93% valuation discount to FLYW's 161.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DLO offers better value at 0.72x vs EVTC's 1.18x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $2.1B | $4.8B | $1.7B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $1.8B | $4.5B | $1.4B | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 35.26x | 161.18x | 73.52x | 26.63x | 10.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.18x | 49.50x | 44.06x | 20.42x | 5.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.72x | — | — | — | 1.18x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.58x | 47.80x | 41.98x | 7.36x | 7.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.05x | 3.40x | 2.94x | 1.66x | 1.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.58x | 2.71x | 5.71x | 2.71x | 2.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.41x | 16.24x | 8.44x | 10.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DLO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DLO delivers a 34.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $6 for FLYW. PAYO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EVTC's 1.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EVTC scores 7/9 vs DLO's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +34.4% | +5.9% | +12.7% | +10.0% | +18.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.6% | +4.3% | +8.1% | +0.9% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +35.7% | +2.1% | +14.2% | +30.7% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +29.5% | +1.3% | +9.4% | +14.9% | +10.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | — | 0.25x | 0.10x | 1.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$135M | -$330M | -$322M | -$343M | $824M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $189M | $330M | $542M | $416M | $306M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $54M | $0 | $220M | $72M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.06x | 1.84x | 16.25x | 17.23x | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RELY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EVTC five years ago would be worth $5,669 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,403 for DLO. Over the past 12 months, FLYW leads with a +62.7% total return vs EVTC's -31.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RELY at 7.8% vs FLYW's -15.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.3% | +27.6% | +72.4% | -7.0% | -18.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +60.6% | +62.7% | +8.1% | -17.9% | -31.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.7% | -40.1% | +25.4% | -9.0% | -31.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.0% | -49.5% | -53.0% | -49.8% | -43.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.0% | -49.5% | -53.0% | -47.7% | +89.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.6% | -15.7% | +7.8% | -3.1% | -11.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLYW and EVTC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EVTC is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DLO's 1.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLYW currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs EVTC's 60.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.74x | 1.32x | 1.19x | 1.65x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.78 | $18.05 | $24.71 | $7.67 | $38.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.70 | $9.79 | $12.08 | $4.08 | $22.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.9% | +98.2% | +92.2% | +66.0% | +60.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.4 | 83.0 | 85.3 | 45.1 | 40.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 1.9M | 3.4M | 3.5M | 431K |
Analyst Outlook
DLO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DLO as "Buy", FLYW as "Buy", RELY as "Buy", PAYO as "Buy", EVTC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.4% upside for EVTC (target: $37) vs -7.9% for RELY (target: $21). EVTC is the only dividend payer here at 0.85% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $17.50 | $21.00 | $7.50 | $37.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 19 | 13 | 10 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.20 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.4% | +3.7% | +1.1% | +10.0% | +4.8% |
DLO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). EVTC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
DLO vs FLYW vs RELY vs PAYO vs EVTC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DLO or FLYW or RELY or PAYO or EVTC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Remitly Global, Inc.
(RELY) is the stronger pick with 29. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 7% for Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO). EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DLocal Limited (DLO) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DLO or FLYW or RELY or PAYO or EVTC?
On trailing P/E, EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the cheapest at 10. 6x versus Flywire Corporation at 161. 2x. On forward P/E, EVERTEC, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: DLocal Limited wins at 0. 33x versus EVERTEC, Inc. 's 0. 66x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DLO or FLYW or RELY or PAYO or EVTC?
Over the past 5 years, EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) delivered a total return of -43. 3%, compared to -56. 0% for DLocal Limited (DLO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EVTC returned +89. 5% versus DLO's -56. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DLO or FLYW or RELY or PAYO or EVTC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus DLocal Limited's 1. 74β — meaning DLO is approximately 128% more volatile than EVTC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 158% for EVERTEC, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DLO or FLYW or RELY or PAYO or EVTC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Remitly Global, Inc.
(RELY) is pulling ahead at 29. 4% versus 7. 7% for Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to -38. 7% for Payoneer Global Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DLO leads at 45. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DLO or FLYW or RELY or PAYO or EVTC?
DLocal Limited (DLO) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
1% net margin versus 2. 2% for Flywire Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EVTC leads at 20. 0% versus 1. 8% for FLYW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PAYO leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DLO or FLYW or RELY or PAYO or EVTC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, DLocal Limited (DLO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 33x versus EVERTEC, Inc. 's 0. 66x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for Flywire Corporation — 43. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EVTC: 58. 4% to $37. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DLO or FLYW or RELY or PAYO or EVTC?
In this comparison, EVTC (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. DLO, FLYW, RELY, PAYO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DLO or FLYW or RELY or PAYO or EVTC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 0. 8% yield). DLocal Limited (DLO) carries a higher beta of 1. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EVTC: +89. 5%, DLO: -56. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DLO and FLYW and RELY and PAYO and EVTC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DLO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; RELY is a small-cap high-growth stock; PAYO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EVTC is a small-cap deep-value stock. EVTC pays a dividend while DLO, FLYW, RELY, PAYO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.