DRH
DiamondRock Hospitality Company
REIT - Hotel & Motel
Market Cap$2.20B
5Y Perf.+80.1%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
DRH vs XHR vs PK vs RHP vs HST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
XHR
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
REIT - Hotel & Motel
Market Cap$1.57B
5Y Perf.+89.2%
PK
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.
REIT - Hotel & Motel
Market Cap$2.28B
5Y Perf.+15.2%
RHP
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
REIT - Hotel & Motel
Market Cap$6.98B
5Y Perf.+223.4%
HST
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
REIT - Hotel & Motel
Market Cap$15.31B
5Y Perf.+86.5%
DRH vs XHR vs PK vs RHP vs HST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | DRH | XHR | PK | RHP | HST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Hotel & Motel |
| Market Cap | $2.20B | $1.57B | $2.28B | $6.98B | $15.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.12B | $1.08B | $2.53B | $2.65B | $6.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $104M | $67M | $-215M | $264M | $1.01B |
| Gross Margin | 43.0% | -5.8% | -4.7% | 17.8% | 27.8% |
| Operating Margin | 12.2% | 10.4% | 11.1% | 19.2% | 14.3% |
| Forward P/E | 20.3x | 50.8x | 23.8x | 27.2x | 18.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.19B | $1.43B | $4.26B | $4.29B | $5.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $68M | $140M | $232M | $500M | $768M |
DRH vs XHR vs PK vs RHP vs HST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
DRH
XHR
PK
RHP
HST
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| DiamondRock Hospita… (DRH) | 100 | 180.1 | +80.1% |
| Xenia Hotels & Reso… (XHR) | 100 | 189.2 | +89.2% |
| Park Hotels & Resor… (PK) | 100 | 115.2 | +15.2% |
| Ryman Hospitality P… (RHP) | 100 | 323.4 | +223.4% |
| Host Hotels & Resor… (HST) | 100 | 186.5 | +86.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DRH vs XHR vs PK vs RHP vs HST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: HST leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. PK also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
DRH
DiamondRock Hospitality Company
The Real Estate Income Play
DRH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.96, yield 4.4%
Best for: income & stability
XHR
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
The REIT Holding
Among these 5 stocks, XHR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
Best for: real estate exposure
PK
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
PK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 12.4% yield, vs RHP's 3.9%
Best for: dividends
RHP
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
RHP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 10.2%, EPS growth -13.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- 162.0% 10Y total return vs HST's 78.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, current ratio 73.13x
- Beta 0.95, yield 3.9%, current ratio 73.13x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
HST
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
HST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (18.8x vs 27.2x)
- 16.4% margin vs PK's -8.5%
- +56.4% vs PK's +18.3%
- 7.7% ROA vs PK's -2.6%, ROIC 5.3% vs 2.2%
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | RHP | 10.2% FFO/revenue growth vs PK's -2.2% |
| Value | HST | Lower P/E (18.8x vs 27.2x) |
| Quality / Margins | HST | 16.4% margin vs PK's -8.5% |
| Stability / Safety | RHP | Beta 0.95 vs PK's 1.29 |
| Dividends | PK | 12.4% yield, vs RHP's 3.9% |
| Momentum (1Y) | HST | +56.4% vs PK's +18.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | HST | 7.7% ROA vs PK's -2.6%, ROIC 5.3% vs 2.2% |
DRH vs XHR vs PK vs RHP vs HST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
DRH vs XHR vs PK vs RHP vs HST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLPKLAGGINGHST
Who Leads Where
PK leads in 1 of 6 categories
DRH leads 0 • XHR leads 0 • RHP leads 0 • HST leads 0 • 5 tied
Explore the data ↓HSTHost Hotels & Resorts…
0leads
RHPRyman Hospitality Pro…
0leads
XHRXenia Hotels & Resort…
0leads
DRHDiamondRock Hospitali…
0leads
PKPark Hotels & Resorts…
1leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs DRHvs XHRMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
PK4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PK and RHP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HST is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.2B annually — 5.7x XHR's $1.1B. HST is the more profitable business, keeping 16.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PK's -8.5%. On growth, RHP holds the edge at +13.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | DRHDiamondRock Hospi… | XHRXenia Hotels & Re… | PKPark Hotels & Res… | RHPRyman Hospitality… | HSTHost Hotels & Res… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $1.1B | $2.5B | $2.7B | $6.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $280M | $243M | $612M | $799M | $1.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $104M | $67M | -$215M | $264M | $1.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $161M | $97M | $448M | $302M | $1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.0% | -5.8% | -4.7% | +17.8% | +27.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +10.4% | +11.1% | +19.2% | +14.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +6.2% | -8.5% | +9.9% | +16.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.3% | +9.0% | +17.7% | +11.4% | +17.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.3% | +2.2% | -1.3% | +13.2% | +3.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +56.6% | -100.0% | +117.2% | +3.0% | +102.9% |
Evenly matched — PK and RHP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
PK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.2x trailing earnings, HST trades at a 31% valuation discount to RHP's 29.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PK's 11.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RHP's 14.1x.
| Metric | DRHDiamondRock Hospi… | XHRXenia Hotels & Re… | PKPark Hotels & Res… | RHPRyman Hospitality… | HSTHost Hotels & Res… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $1.6B | $2.3B | $7.0B | $15.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.3B | $2.9B | $6.3B | $10.8B | $20.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.52x | 26.61x | -7.97x | 29.32x | 20.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.26x | 50.84x | 23.84x | 27.18x | 18.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.06x | 12.03x | 11.22x | 14.05x | 12.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.96x | 1.46x | 0.90x | 2.71x | 2.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.54x | 1.40x | 0.73x | 6.02x | 2.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.56x | 17.47x | 22.34x | 30.02x | 17.84x |
PK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — DRH and RHP and HST each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RHP delivers a 23.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-7 for PK. DRH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.81x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RHP's 3.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HST scores 8/9 vs RHP's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | DRHDiamondRock Hospi… | XHRXenia Hotels & Re… | PKPark Hotels & Res… | RHPRyman Hospitality… | HSTHost Hotels & Res… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.9% | +5.5% | -6.7% | +23.8% | +14.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.4% | +2.4% | -2.6% | +4.3% | +7.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.6% | +3.2% | +2.2% | +8.2% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.0% | +4.0% | +3.1% | +9.0% | +6.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.81x | 1.21x | 1.38x | 3.54x | 0.84x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $1.3B | $4.0B | $3.8B | $4.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $68M | $140M | $232M | $500M | $768M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $1.4B | $4.3B | $4.3B | $5.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.57x | 1.79x | -0.01x | 2.06x | 4.48x |
Evenly matched — DRH and RHP and HST each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — XHR and RHP and HST each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RHP five years ago would be worth $16,319 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,431 for PK. Over the past 12 months, HST leads with a +56.4% total return vs PK's +18.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XHR at 13.3% vs PK's 7.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | DRHDiamondRock Hospi… | XHRXenia Hotels & Re… | PKPark Hotels & Res… | RHPRyman Hospitality… | HSTHost Hotels & Res… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.3% | +19.7% | +7.4% | +17.0% | +23.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +49.3% | +52.7% | +18.3% | +19.0% | +56.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.2% | +45.6% | +24.4% | +31.9% | +44.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.0% | -0.2% | -25.7% | +63.2% | +51.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.5% | +46.1% | -11.0% | +162.0% | +78.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.4% | +13.3% | +7.5% | +9.7% | +13.1% |
Evenly matched — XHR and RHP and HST each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RHP and HST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RHP is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PK's 1.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HST currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs PK's 91.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | DRHDiamondRock Hospi… | XHRXenia Hotels & Re… | PKPark Hotels & Res… | RHPRyman Hospitality… | HSTHost Hotels & Res… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.96x | 1.02x | 1.29x | 0.95x | 1.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.98 | $17.23 | $12.39 | $112.47 | $22.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.31 | $11.34 | $9.84 | $83.82 | $14.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.3% | +98.8% | +91.4% | +98.3% | +99.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.4 | 62.9 | 51.3 | 72.3 | 68.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 633K | 4.0M | 501K | 8.2M |
Evenly matched — RHP and HST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — XHR and PK and RHP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DRH as "Hold", XHR as "Hold", PK as "Hold", RHP as "Buy", HST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.7% upside for XHR (target: $18) vs -9.3% for HST (target: $20). For income investors, PK offers the higher dividend yield at 12.43% vs XHR's 3.28%.
| Metric | DRHDiamondRock Hospi… | XHRXenia Hotels & Re… | PKPark Hotels & Res… | RHPRyman Hospitality… | HSTHost Hotels & Res… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.39 | $18.00 | $11.50 | $116.20 | $20.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 10 | 25 | 19 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.4% | +3.3% | +12.4% | +3.9% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.47 | $0.56 | $1.41 | $4.33 | $0.90 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.1% | +7.7% | +2.0% | 0.0% | +1.3% |
Evenly matched — XHR and PK and RHP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
PK leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics. 5 categories are tied.
Best OverallPark Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
DRH vs XHR vs PK vs RHP vs HST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DRH or XHR or PK or RHP or HST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
(RHP) is the stronger pick with 10. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (HST) offers the better valuation at 20. 2x trailing P/E (18. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. (RHP) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DRH or XHR or PK or RHP or HST?
On trailing P/E, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(HST) is the cheapest at 20. 2x versus Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. at 29. 3x. On forward P/E, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DRH or XHR or PK or RHP or HST?
Over the past 5 years, Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
(RHP) delivered a total return of +63. 2%, compared to -25. 7% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RHP returned +162. 0% versus PK's -11. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DRH or XHR or PK or RHP or HST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
(RHP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. 's 1. 29β — meaning PK is approximately 35% more volatile than RHP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DiamondRock Hospitality Company (DRH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 81% versus 4% for Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DRH or XHR or PK or RHP or HST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
(RHP) is pulling ahead at 10. 2% versus -2. 2% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. grew EPS 326. 7% year-over-year, compared to -240. 6% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RHP leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DRH or XHR or PK or RHP or HST?
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(HST) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 5% net margin versus -11. 1% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RHP leads at 18. 9% versus 8. 9% for PK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DRH leads at 55. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DRH or XHR or PK or RHP or HST more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(HST) trades at 18. 8x forward P/E versus 50. 8x for Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. — 32. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XHR: 5. 7% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DRH or XHR or PK or RHP or HST?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) offers the highest yield at 12. 4%, versus 3. 3% for Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR).
09Is DRH or XHR or PK or RHP or HST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
(RHP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 3. 9% yield, +162. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RHP: +162. 0%, PK: -11. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DRH and XHR and PK and RHP and HST?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(DRH: 1.3% · XHR: 2.2%)Net Margin>
%
(DRH: 9.3% · XHR: 6.2%)P/E Ratio<
x
(DRH: 24.5x · XHR: 26.6x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.