Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DSGX vs SAIA vs XPO vs FWRD vs UPS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Trucking
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Integrated Freight & Logistics
DSGX vs SAIA vs XPO vs FWRD vs UPS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Trucking | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $6.31B | $11.97B | $24.28B | $547M | $85.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $731M | $3.25B | $8.30B | $2.46B | $88.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $164M | $255M | $348M | $-91M | $5.25B |
| Gross Margin | 71.4% | 18.4% | 12.2% | 23.1% | 18.1% |
| Operating Margin | 30.4% | 10.8% | 9.1% | 2.1% | 8.6% |
| Forward P/E | 39.3x | 42.3x | 43.9x | — | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $418M | $4.70B | $2.16B | $32.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $354M | $20M | $310M | $106M | $5.89B |
DSGX vs SAIA vs XPO vs FWRD vs UPS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Descartes Syste… (DSGX) | 100 | 154.2 | +54.2% |
| Saia, Inc. (SAIA) | 100 | 414.0 | +314.0% |
| XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) | 100 | 758.7 | +658.7% |
| Forward Air Corpora… (FWRD) | 100 | 34.9 | -65.1% |
| United Parcel Servi… (UPS) | 100 | 100.4 | +0.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DSGX vs SAIA vs XPO vs FWRD vs UPS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DSGX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 14.4%, EPS growth 16.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 0.5%, current ratio 2.16x
- Beta 0.71, current ratio 2.16x
- 14.4% revenue growth vs UPS's -2.5%
SAIA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
XPO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 21.5% 10Y total return vs SAIA's 15.7%
- +88.9% vs DSGX's -31.7%
Among these 5 stocks, FWRD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
UPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 6.3%
- PEG 0.42 vs SAIA's 3.29
- Better valuation composite
- 6.3% yield; 16-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.4% revenue growth vs UPS's -2.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.5% margin vs FWRD's -3.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs FWRD's 2.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.3% yield; 16-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +88.9% vs DSGX's -31.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs FWRD's -3.3%, ROIC 14.9% vs 1.2% |
DSGX vs SAIA vs XPO vs FWRD vs UPS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
DSGX vs SAIA vs XPO vs FWRD vs UPS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DSGX leads in 2 of 6 categories
UPS leads 2 • XPO leads 1 • SAIA leads 0 • FWRD leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DSGX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $88.3B annually — 120.9x DSGX's $731M. DSGX is the more profitable business, keeping 22.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FWRD's -3.7%. On growth, DSGX holds the edge at +17.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $731M | $3.3B | $8.3B | $2.5B | $88.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $310M | $602M | $1.3B | $206M | $10.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $164M | $255M | $348M | -$91M | $5.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $261M | $261M | $457M | $38M | $4.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.4% | +18.4% | +12.2% | +23.1% | +18.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.4% | +10.8% | +9.1% | +2.1% | +8.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | +7.8% | +4.2% | -3.7% | +5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.8% | +8.0% | +5.5% | +1.6% | +5.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.2% | +2.4% | +7.3% | -5.1% | -1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.3% | 0.0% | +49.1% | +35.1% | -27.1% |
Valuation Metrics
UPS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.3x trailing earnings, UPS trades at a 81% valuation discount to XPO's 78.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UPS offers better value at 0.45x vs SAIA's 3.67x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.3B | $12.0B | $24.3B | $547M | $85.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.0B | $12.4B | $28.7B | $2.6B | $111.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 38.42x | 47.16x | 78.34x | -4.98x | 15.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 39.34x | 42.28x | 43.91x | — | 14.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.50x | 3.67x | 2.84x | — | 0.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.10x | 20.59x | 22.94x | 13.75x | 9.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.47x | 3.70x | 2.98x | 0.22x | 0.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.99x | 4.67x | 13.22x | 3.32x | 5.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 23.71x | 438.03x | 73.80x | 35.82x | 17.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DSGX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UPS delivers a 33.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-53 for FWRD. DSGX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FWRD's 13.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DSGX scores 7/9 vs UPS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.7% | +10.0% | +19.0% | -52.6% | +33.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.2% | +7.3% | +4.3% | -3.3% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.9% | +9.4% | +9.3% | +1.2% | +16.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.6% | +11.5% | +11.3% | +1.5% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.16x | 2.53x | 13.36x | 1.99x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$346M | $398M | $4.4B | $2.1B | $26.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $354M | $20M | $310M | $106M | $5.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $418M | $4.7B | $2.2B | $32.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 229.22x | 23.88x | 3.21x | 0.32x | 7.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XPO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XPO five years ago would be worth $40,679 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,978 for FWRD. Over the past 12 months, XPO leads with a +88.9% total return vs DSGX's -31.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XPO at 62.2% vs FWRD's -42.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.8% | +33.1% | +49.0% | -31.0% | +0.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -31.7% | +72.7% | +88.9% | +0.6% | +13.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.1% | +56.0% | +326.9% | -81.3% | -31.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.7% | +83.3% | +306.8% | -80.2% | -40.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +295.4% | +1567.7% | +2145.5% | -47.3% | +44.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.7% | +16.0% | +62.2% | -42.8% | -11.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DSGX and SAIA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DSGX is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FWRD's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SAIA currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs FWRD's 53.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 1.90x | 1.73x | 2.28x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $117.35 | $457.99 | $231.46 | $32.47 | $122.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $62.56 | $248.37 | $108.58 | $14.81 | $82.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.5% | +98.0% | +89.4% | +53.4% | +81.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.7 | 60.4 | 50.2 | 42.4 | 44.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 583K | 523K | 1.4M | 733K | 5.8M |
Analyst Outlook
UPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DSGX as "Buy", SAIA as "Buy", XPO as "Buy", FWRD as "Hold", UPS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 113.5% upside for FWRD (target: $37) vs -5.9% for SAIA (target: $423). UPS is the only dividend payer here at 6.34% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $103.50 | $422.67 | $209.07 | $37.00 | $115.23 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 32 | 32 | 21 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +6.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | 8 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $6.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.1% | +0.5% | +0.2% | +1.2% |
DSGX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UPS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
DSGX vs SAIA vs XPO vs FWRD vs UPS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DSGX or SAIA or XPO or FWRD or UPS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Descartes Systems Group Inc.
(DSGX) is the stronger pick with 14. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 5% for United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS). United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) offers the better valuation at 15. 3x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Descartes Systems Group Inc. (DSGX) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DSGX or SAIA or XPO or FWRD or UPS?
On trailing P/E, United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) is the cheapest at 15. 3x versus XPO Logistics, Inc. at 78. 3x. On forward P/E, United Parcel Service, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: United Parcel Service, Inc. wins at 0. 42x versus Saia, Inc. 's 3. 29x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DSGX or SAIA or XPO or FWRD or UPS?
Over the past 5 years, XPO Logistics, Inc.
(XPO) delivered a total return of +306. 8%, compared to -80. 2% for Forward Air Corporation (FWRD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XPO returned +21. 5% versus FWRD's -47. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DSGX or SAIA or XPO or FWRD or UPS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Descartes Systems Group Inc.
(DSGX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus Forward Air Corporation's 2. 28β — meaning FWRD is approximately 222% more volatile than DSGX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Descartes Systems Group Inc. (DSGX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 13% for Forward Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DSGX or SAIA or XPO or FWRD or UPS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Descartes Systems Group Inc.
(DSGX) is pulling ahead at 14. 4% versus -2. 5% for United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Forward Air Corporation grew EPS 88. 3% year-over-year, compared to -29. 6% for Saia, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DSGX leads at 15. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DSGX or SAIA or XPO or FWRD or UPS?
The Descartes Systems Group Inc.
(DSGX) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 5% net margin versus -4. 3% for Forward Air Corporation — meaning it keeps 22. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DSGX leads at 32. 3% versus 1. 5% for FWRD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DSGX leads at 65. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DSGX or SAIA or XPO or FWRD or UPS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 42x versus Saia, Inc. 's 3. 29x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 43. 9x for XPO Logistics, Inc. — 29. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FWRD: 113. 5% to $37. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DSGX or SAIA or XPO or FWRD or UPS?
In this comparison, UPS (6.
3% yield) pays a dividend. DSGX, SAIA, XPO, FWRD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DSGX or SAIA or XPO or FWRD or UPS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), 6. 3% yield). Forward Air Corporation (FWRD) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UPS: +44. 7%, FWRD: -47. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DSGX and SAIA and XPO and FWRD and UPS?
These companies operate in different sectors (DSGX (Technology) and SAIA (Industrials) and XPO (Industrials) and FWRD (Industrials) and UPS (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DSGX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SAIA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; XPO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FWRD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UPS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. UPS pays a dividend while DSGX, SAIA, XPO, FWRD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.