Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
EGAN vs FIVN vs NICE vs LPSN vs TWLO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Software - Application
Internet Content & Information
EGAN vs FIVN vs NICE vs LPSN vs TWLO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Software - Application | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $212M | $1.70B | $5.78B | $32M | $29.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $91M | $1.17B | $2.95B | $244M | $5.30B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $36M | $57M | $612M | $-67M | $104M |
| Gross Margin | 72.4% | 55.1% | 66.4% | 62.2% | 48.8% |
| Operating Margin | 9.0% | 4.7% | 21.9% | -9.6% | 4.7% |
| Forward P/E | 21.7x | 7.0x | 8.7x | — | 36.3x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $847M | $164M | $392M | $1.08B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $63M | $232M | $379M | $95M | $682M |
EGAN vs FIVN vs NICE vs LPSN vs TWLO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| eGain Corporation (EGAN) | 100 | 74.3 | -25.7% |
| Five9, Inc. (FIVN) | 100 | 21.3 | -78.7% |
| NICE Ltd. (NICE) | 100 | 51.4 | -48.6% |
| LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| Twilio Inc. (TWLO) | 100 | 99.7 | -0.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EGAN vs FIVN vs NICE vs LPSN vs TWLO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EGAN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 39.8% margin vs LPSN's -27.6%
- 24.6% ROA vs LPSN's -12.4%, ROIC 48.3% vs -6.6%
FIVN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.3%, EPS growth 370.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.8%
NICE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.72
- Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 4.2%, current ratio 1.55x
- PEG 0.33 vs EGAN's 0.58
- Lower P/E (8.7x vs 36.3x)
Among these 5 stocks, LPSN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TWLO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 5.8% 10Y total return vs EGAN's 126.7%
- Beta 1.51, current ratio 4.03x
- 13.7% revenue growth vs LPSN's -22.0%
- +90.3% vs LPSN's -77.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.7% revenue growth vs LPSN's -22.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 36.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.8% margin vs LPSN's -27.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs LPSN's 2.05 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +90.3% vs LPSN's -77.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.6% ROA vs LPSN's -12.4%, ROIC 48.3% vs -6.6% |
EGAN vs FIVN vs NICE vs LPSN vs TWLO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EGAN vs FIVN vs NICE vs LPSN vs TWLO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NICE leads in 1 of 6 categories
EGAN leads 1 • TWLO leads 1 • FIVN leads 0 • LPSN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — EGAN and NICE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TWLO is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.3B annually — 58.4x EGAN's $91M. EGAN is the more profitable business, keeping 39.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LPSN's -27.6%. On growth, TWLO holds the edge at +20.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $91M | $1.2B | $2.9B | $244M | $5.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10M | $140M | $845M | -$562,000 | $415M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $36M | $57M | $612M | -$67M | $104M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | $206M | $665M | -$43M | $1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.4% | +55.1% | +66.4% | +62.2% | +48.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +4.7% | +21.9% | -9.6% | +4.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +39.8% | +4.9% | +20.8% | -27.6% | +2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | +17.6% | +22.6% | -17.4% | +19.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.6% | +9.2% | +9.0% | -19.0% | +20.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +20.0% | +56.5% | +79.4% | +3.8% |
Valuation Metrics
NICE leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.8x trailing earnings, EGAN trades at a 99% valuation discount to TWLO's 938.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EGAN offers better value at 0.18x vs NICE's 0.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $212M | $1.7B | $5.8B | $32M | $29.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $152M | $2.3B | $5.6B | $329M | $30.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.84x | 48.26x | 9.89x | -0.22x | 938.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.67x | 6.96x | 8.74x | — | 36.33x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.18x | — | 0.37x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 31.93x | 16.84x | 6.59x | — | 77.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.39x | 1.48x | 1.96x | 0.13x | 5.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.74x | 2.46x | 1.56x | — | 4.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 45.05x | 8.45x | 8.22x | — | 28.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EGAN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EGAN delivers a 40.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $1 for TWLO. NICE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FIVN's 1.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FIVN scores 8/9 vs LPSN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +40.6% | +7.4% | +16.4% | — | +1.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +24.6% | +3.2% | +11.8% | -12.4% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +48.3% | +1.7% | +13.2% | -6.6% | +1.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.8% | +2.2% | +16.1% | -5.8% | +1.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 1.08x | 0.04x | — | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$59M | $615M | -$216M | $297M | $399M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $63M | $232M | $379M | $95M | $682M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $847M | $164M | $392M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 7.94x | — | 0.20x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TWLO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EGAN five years ago would be worth $8,276 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $35 for LPSN. Over the past 12 months, TWLO leads with a +90.3% total return vs LPSN's -77.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TWLO at 53.2% vs LPSN's -65.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.1% | +18.0% | -14.6% | -31.1% | +42.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.8% | -11.9% | -40.4% | -77.1% | +90.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.0% | -61.4% | -49.3% | -95.8% | +259.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.2% | -87.0% | -59.1% | -99.7% | -35.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +126.7% | +125.4% | +50.7% | -97.0% | +584.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.6% | -27.2% | -20.2% | -65.4% | +53.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NICE and TWLO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LPSN's 2.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TWLO currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs LPSN's 12.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.95x | 1.79x | 0.72x | 2.05x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.95 | $30.38 | $180.61 | $21.60 | $201.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.87 | $13.29 | $94.89 | $2.37 | $91.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.5% | +73.1% | +53.0% | +12.4% | +97.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.0 | 68.1 | 40.9 | 40.3 | 78.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 170K | 2.8M | 631K | 148K | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EGAN as "Buy", FIVN as "Buy", NICE as "Buy", TWLO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.8% upside for NICE (target: $151) vs -6.0% for TWLO (target: $185).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $28.40 | $150.88 | — | $185.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 41 | 23 | — | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.5% | +2.9% | +8.5% | 0.0% | +2.9% |
NICE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). EGAN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
EGAN vs FIVN vs NICE vs LPSN vs TWLO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EGAN or FIVN or NICE or LPSN or TWLO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Twilio Inc.
(TWLO) is the stronger pick with 13. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). eGain Corporation (EGAN) offers the better valuation at 6. 8x trailing P/E (21. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate eGain Corporation (EGAN) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EGAN or FIVN or NICE or LPSN or TWLO?
On trailing P/E, eGain Corporation (EGAN) is the cheapest at 6.
8x versus Twilio Inc. at 938. 4x. On forward P/E, Five9, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NICE Ltd. wins at 0. 33x versus eGain Corporation's 0. 58x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EGAN or FIVN or NICE or LPSN or TWLO?
Over the past 5 years, eGain Corporation (EGAN) delivered a total return of -17.
2%, compared to -99. 7% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TWLO returned +584. 5% versus LPSN's -97. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EGAN or FIVN or NICE or LPSN or TWLO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NICE Ltd.
(NICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 72β versus LivePerson, Inc. 's 2. 05β — meaning LPSN is approximately 183% more volatile than NICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NICE Ltd. (NICE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 108% for Five9, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EGAN or FIVN or NICE or LPSN or TWLO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Twilio Inc.
(TWLO) is pulling ahead at 13. 7% versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Five9, Inc. grew EPS 370. 6% year-over-year, compared to 43. 0% for NICE Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FIVN leads at 13. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EGAN or FIVN or NICE or LPSN or TWLO?
eGain Corporation (EGAN) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
5% net margin versus -27. 6% for LivePerson, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NICE leads at 21. 9% versus -9. 6% for LPSN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EGAN leads at 70. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EGAN or FIVN or NICE or LPSN or TWLO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NICE Ltd. (NICE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 33x versus eGain Corporation's 0. 58x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Five9, Inc. (FIVN) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 36. 3x for Twilio Inc. — 29. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NICE: 57. 8% to $150. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — EGAN or FIVN or NICE or LPSN or TWLO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is EGAN or FIVN or NICE or LPSN or TWLO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NICE Ltd.
(NICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 72)). LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NICE: +50. 7%, LPSN: -97. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EGAN and FIVN and NICE and LPSN and TWLO?
These companies operate in different sectors (EGAN (Technology) and FIVN (Technology) and NICE (Technology) and LPSN (Technology) and TWLO (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EGAN is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NICE is a small-cap deep-value stock; LPSN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TWLO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 9%
- Gross Margin > 29%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.