FNGR vs QFIN vs TIGR vs BIDU vs FUTU

For growth investors, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.

Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is the stronger pick with 43. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 1% for Baidu, Inc. (BIDU). Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) offers the better valuation at 2. 1x trailing P/E (0. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Qfin Holdings, Inc.

(QFIN) is the cheapest at 2. 1x versus Futu Holdings Limited at 29. 2x. On forward P/E, Qfin Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 0. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Futu Holdings Limited wins at 0. 02x versus Baidu, Inc. 's 0. 04x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) delivered a total return of +15.

0%, compared to -88. 9% for FingerMotion, Inc. (FNGR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUTU returned +873. 5% versus FNGR's -64. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Qfin Holdings, Inc.

(QFIN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 20β versus Futu Holdings Limited's 2. 11β — meaning FUTU is approximately 76% more volatile than QFIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 31% for Futu Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), UP Fintech Holding Ltd.

Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is pulling ahead at 43. 7% versus -1. 1% for Baidu, Inc. (BIDU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A grew EPS 71. 4% year-over-year, compared to -33. 2% for FingerMotion, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FNGR leads at 15. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) is the more profitable company, earning 40.

1% net margin versus -14. 4% for FingerMotion, Inc. — meaning it keeps 40. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUTU leads at 48. 7% versus -16. 7% for FNGR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUTU leads at 82. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 02x versus Baidu, Inc. 's 0. 04x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) trades at 0. 5x forward P/E versus 6. 8x for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QFIN: 113. 1% to $28. 15.

In this comparison, QFIN (9.

3% yield) pays a dividend. FNGR, TIGR, BIDU, FUTU do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Qfin Holdings, Inc.

(QFIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 20), 9. 3% yield). UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) carries a higher beta of 2. 06 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (QFIN: +15. 7%, TIGR: -39. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (FNGR (Communication Services) and QFIN (Financial Services) and TIGR (Financial Services) and BIDU (Communication Services) and FUTU (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FNGR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QFIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; TIGR is a small-cap high-growth stock; BIDU is a mid-cap deep-value stock; FUTU is a mid-cap high-growth stock. QFIN pays a dividend while FNGR, TIGR, BIDU, FUTU do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.