Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FRSH vs DDOG vs HUBS vs NOW vs GOOGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
Internet Content & Information
FRSH vs DDOG vs HUBS vs NOW vs GOOGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $2.50B | $67.18B | $12.58B | $96.96B | $4.81T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $871M | $3.67B | $3.30B | $13.96B | $422.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $180M | $136M | $100M | $1.76B | $160.21B |
| Gross Margin | 85.0% | 79.9% | 83.7% | 76.6% | 60.4% |
| Operating Margin | 1.8% | -0.7% | 1.9% | 13.4% | 32.7% |
| Forward P/E | 15.9x | 88.0x | 19.6x | 22.5x | 29.6x |
| Total Debt | $67M | $1.54B | $485M | $3.20B | $59.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $632M | $401M | $882M | $3.73B | $30.71B |
FRSH vs DDOG vs HUBS vs NOW vs GOOGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) | 100 | 21.2 | -78.8% |
| Datadog, Inc. (DDOG) | 100 | 133.5 | +33.5% |
| HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) | 100 | 36.1 | -63.9% |
| ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) | 100 | 15.0 | -85.0% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 297.7 | +197.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FRSH vs DDOG vs HUBS vs NOW vs GOOGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FRSH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 1.15
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 6.4%, current ratio 2.14x
- Beta 1.15, current ratio 2.14x
- Lower P/E (15.9x vs 29.6x)
DDOG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 27.7%, EPS growth -41.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.9%
- 27.7% revenue growth vs GOOGL's 15.1%
HUBS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NOW is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.32 vs GOOGL's 0.99
GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs HUBS's 469.1%
- 37.9% margin vs HUBS's 3.0%
- 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +163.5% vs NOW's -90.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.7% revenue growth vs GOOGL's 15.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.9x vs 29.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs HUBS's 3.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.15 vs NOW's 1.46, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +163.5% vs NOW's -90.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs DDOG's 2.1%, ROIC 25.1% vs -0.8% |
FRSH vs DDOG vs HUBS vs NOW vs GOOGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FRSH vs DDOG vs HUBS vs NOW vs GOOGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOGL leads in 3 of 6 categories
FRSH leads 1 • DDOG leads 0 • HUBS leads 0 • NOW leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 485.1x FRSH's $871M. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HUBS's 3.0%. On growth, DDOG holds the edge at +32.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $871M | $3.7B | $3.3B | $14.0B | $422.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $41M | $73M | $166M | $2.7B | $161.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $180M | $136M | $100M | $1.8B | $160.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $254M | $1.1B | $712M | $4.6B | $73.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +85.0% | +79.9% | +83.7% | +76.6% | +60.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | -0.7% | +1.9% | +13.4% | +32.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | +3.7% | +3.0% | +12.6% | +37.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.2% | +29.4% | +21.6% | +33.2% | +17.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.5% | +32.2% | +23.4% | +22.1% | +21.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +120.9% | +2.5% | +2.3% | +81.9% |
Valuation Metrics
FRSH leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.3x trailing earnings, FRSH trades at a 98% valuation discount to DDOG's 629.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NOW offers better value at 0.81x vs GOOGL's 1.23x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $67.2B | $12.6B | $97.0B | $4.81T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $68.3B | $12.2B | $96.4B | $4.84T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.33x | 629.10x | 284.08x | 56.04x | 36.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.87x | 87.97x | 19.61x | 22.51x | 29.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.81x | 1.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 27.13x | 874.03x | 69.24x | 37.64x | 32.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.98x | 19.60x | 4.02x | 7.30x | 11.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.57x | 18.38x | 6.29x | 7.56x | 11.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.18x | 67.14x | 17.77x | 21.19x | 65.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $4 for DDOG. FRSH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DDOG's 0.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FRSH scores 7/9 vs NOW's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.5% | +3.8% | +5.0% | +15.0% | +39.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.9% | +2.1% | +2.7% | +7.5% | +27.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.0% | -0.8% | +0.4% | +12.4% | +25.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.2% | -1.0% | +0.5% | +13.2% | +30.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.41x | 0.23x | 0.25x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$566M | $1.1B | -$397M | -$523M | $28.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $632M | $401M | $882M | $3.7B | $30.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $67M | $1.5B | $485M | $3.2B | $59.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 4.03x | 4753.07x | 185.08x | 392.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,899 for FRSH. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +163.5% total return vs NOW's -90.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs NOW's -40.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.2% | +41.1% | -36.1% | -36.5% | +26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -36.5% | +78.0% | -62.0% | -90.5% | +163.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.0% | +140.3% | -45.1% | -78.7% | +270.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.0% | +144.2% | -52.1% | -80.6% | +239.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.0% | +402.6% | +469.1% | +38.8% | +996.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.5% | +33.9% | -18.1% | -40.3% | +54.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FRSH and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FRSH is the less volatile stock with a 1.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NOW's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs NOW's 8.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.15x | 1.40x | 1.18x | 1.46x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.14 | $201.69 | $682.57 | $1057.39 | $400.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.79 | $98.01 | $187.45 | $81.24 | $147.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.9% | +93.6% | +35.8% | +8.9% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.4 | 66.5 | 51.1 | 41.5 | 83.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.8M | 5.0M | 1.5M | 21.2M | 28.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FRSH as "Buy", DDOG as "Buy", HUBS as "Buy", NOW as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.9% upside for NOW (target: $152) vs -7.5% for DDOG (target: $175). GOOGL is the only dividend payer here at 0.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.43 | $174.63 | $360.89 | $151.52 | $406.28 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 47 | 47 | 68 | 82 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +15.5% | 0.0% | +4.0% | +1.9% | +0.9% |
GOOGL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FRSH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
FRSH vs DDOG vs HUBS vs NOW vs GOOGL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FRSH or DDOG or HUBS or NOW or GOOGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Datadog, Inc.
(DDOG) is the stronger pick with 27. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 1% for Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL). Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) offers the better valuation at 14. 3x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FRSH or DDOG or HUBS or NOW or GOOGL?
On trailing P/E, Freshworks Inc.
(FRSH) is the cheapest at 14. 3x versus Datadog, Inc. at 629. 1x. On forward P/E, Freshworks Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ServiceNow, Inc. wins at 0. 32x versus Alphabet Inc. 's 0. 99x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FRSH or DDOG or HUBS or NOW or GOOGL?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to -81. 0% for Freshworks Inc. (FRSH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +996. 1% versus FRSH's -81. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FRSH or DDOG or HUBS or NOW or GOOGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Freshworks Inc.
(FRSH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 15β versus ServiceNow, Inc. 's 1. 46β — meaning NOW is approximately 27% more volatile than FRSH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 41% for Datadog, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FRSH or DDOG or HUBS or NOW or GOOGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Datadog, Inc.
(DDOG) is pulling ahead at 27. 7% versus 15. 1% for Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HubSpot, Inc. grew EPS 863. 0% year-over-year, compared to -41. 2% for Datadog, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DDOG leads at 26. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FRSH or DDOG or HUBS or NOW or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus 1. 5% for HubSpot, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus -1. 3% for DDOG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FRSH leads at 85. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FRSH or DDOG or HUBS or NOW or GOOGL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus Alphabet Inc. 's 0. 99x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) trades at 15. 9x forward P/E versus 88. 0x for Datadog, Inc. — 72. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NOW: 61. 9% to $151. 52.
08Which pays a better dividend — FRSH or DDOG or HUBS or NOW or GOOGL?
In this comparison, GOOGL (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. FRSH, DDOG, HUBS, NOW do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FRSH or DDOG or HUBS or NOW or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26), +996. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOGL: +996. 1%, NOW: +38. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FRSH and DDOG and HUBS and NOW and GOOGL?
These companies operate in different sectors (FRSH (Technology) and DDOG (Technology) and HUBS (Technology) and NOW (Technology) and GOOGL (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.