FTHM vs EXPI vs COMP vs HOUS

For growth investors, Compass, Inc.

(COMP) is the stronger pick with 23. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM). Analysts rate eXp World Holdings, Inc. (EXPI) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Anywhere Real Estate Inc.

(HOUS) delivered a total return of -1. 3%, compared to -97. 4% for Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXPI returned +688. 3% versus FTHM's -91. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), eXp World Holdings, Inc.

(EXPI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 57β versus Fathom Holdings Inc. 's 2. 42β — meaning FTHM is approximately 54% more volatile than EXPI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 42% versus 195% for Anywhere Real Estate Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Compass, Inc.

(COMP) is pulling ahead at 23. 7% versus -2. 9% for Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Compass, Inc. grew EPS 67. 7% year-over-year, compared to -30. 7% for Anywhere Real Estate Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, COMP leads at 5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

eXp World Holdings, Inc.

(EXPI) is the more profitable company, earning -0. 5% net margin versus -6. 4% for Fathom Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps -0. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOUS leads at 1. 1% versus -7. 0% for FTHM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOUS leads at 34. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Compass, Inc.

(COMP) trades at 56. 5x forward P/E versus 93. 1x for eXp World Holdings, Inc. — 36. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EXPI: 68. 7% to $11. 00.

In this comparison, EXPI (3.

0% yield), HOUS (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. FTHM, COMP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, eXp World Holdings, Inc.

(EXPI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (3. 0% yield, +688. 3% 10Y return). Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM) carries a higher beta of 2. 42 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXPI: +688. 3%, FTHM: -91. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (FTHM (Real Estate) and EXPI (Real Estate) and COMP (Technology) and HOUS (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FTHM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EXPI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COMP is a small-cap high-growth stock; HOUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. EXPI pays a dividend while FTHM, COMP, HOUS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.