Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GLPG vs IONS vs LLY vs ALNY vs REGN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
GLPG vs IONS vs LLY vs ALNY vs REGN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.83B | $12.56B | $921.16B | $39.48B | $73.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.11B | $1.06B | $72.25B | $4.29B | $14.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $321M | $-327M | $25.27B | $577M | $4.42B |
| Gross Margin | 56.0% | 98.3% | 83.5% | 80.9% | 84.5% |
| Operating Margin | 26.7% | -33.3% | 45.9% | 17.5% | 24.3% |
| Forward P/E | 4.9x | — | 26.3x | 39.9x | 15.3x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $2.61B | $42.50B | $1.28B | $2.71B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $88M | $372M | $7.16B | $1.66B | $3.12B |
GLPG vs IONS vs LLY vs ALNY vs REGN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Galapagos N.V. (GLPG) | 100 | 14.1 | -85.9% |
| Ionis Pharmaceutica… (IONS) | 100 | 134.7 | +34.7% |
| Eli Lilly and Compa… (LLY) | 100 | 620.1 | +520.1% |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuti… (ALNY) | 100 | 218.1 | +118.1% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 116.7 | +16.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GLPG vs IONS vs LLY vs ALNY vs REGN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GLPG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 303.5%, EPS growth 333.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 66.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 20.15x
- 303.5% revenue growth vs REGN's 1.0%
- Lower P/E (4.9x vs 39.9x)
IONS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability and momentum.
- Beta 0.55 vs REGN's 0.81
- +129.9% vs ALNY's +7.0%
LLY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.71, yield 0.6%
- 12.4% 10Y total return vs ALNY's 411.9%
- PEG 0.91 vs REGN's 2.43
- Beta 0.71, yield 0.6%, current ratio 1.58x
ALNY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, REGN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 303.5% revenue growth vs REGN's 1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.9x vs 39.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.0% margin vs IONS's -30.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs REGN's 0.81 | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs REGN's 0.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +129.9% vs ALNY's +7.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.7% ROA vs IONS's -10.1%, ROIC 41.8% vs -12.8% |
GLPG vs IONS vs LLY vs ALNY vs REGN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GLPG vs IONS vs LLY vs ALNY vs REGN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LLY leads in 3 of 6 categories
GLPG leads 1 • IONS leads 1 • ALNY leads 0 • REGN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GLPG and LLY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LLY is the larger business by revenue, generating $72.2B annually — 68.3x IONS's $1.1B. LLY is the more profitable business, keeping 35.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IONS's -30.9%. On growth, GLPG holds the edge at +10.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $1.1B | $72.2B | $4.3B | $14.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $244M | $4.5B | $34.7B | $677M | $4.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $321M | -$327M | $25.3B | $577M | $4.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$266M | -$971M | $13.6B | $641M | $4.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.0% | +98.3% | +83.5% | +80.9% | +84.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.7% | -33.3% | +45.9% | +17.5% | +24.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +28.9% | -30.9% | +35.0% | +13.5% | +29.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -23.9% | -91.8% | +18.8% | +15.0% | +27.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.9% | +87.0% | +55.5% | +96.4% | +19.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +40.0% | +39.8% | +169.9% | +4.4% | -7.2% |
Valuation Metrics
GLPG leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, GLPG trades at a 96% valuation discount to ALNY's 127.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LLY offers better value at 1.47x vs REGN's 2.70x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $12.6B | $921.2B | $39.5B | $73.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $14.8B | $956.5B | $39.1B | $73.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.87x | -31.94x | 42.48x | 127.00x | 17.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 26.30x | 39.92x | 15.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.47x | — | 2.70x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.75x | — | 30.60x | 70.17x | 17.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.40x | 13.31x | 14.13x | 10.63x | 5.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.48x | 24.87x | 32.99x | 50.50x | 2.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 102.67x | 84.84x | 18.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LLY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LLY delivers a 101.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $101 in annual profit, vs $-59 for IONS. GLPG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IONS's 5.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LLY scores 8/9 vs IONS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.2% | -58.6% | +101.2% | +98.3% | +14.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.3% | -10.1% | +22.7% | +11.8% | +11.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.5% | -12.8% | +41.8% | +33.4% | +8.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.2% | -14.1% | +46.6% | +15.3% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 5.35x | 1.60x | 1.62x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$81M | $2.2B | $35.3B | -$379M | -$412M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $88M | $372M | $7.2B | $1.7B | $3.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $2.6B | $42.5B | $1.3B | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.29x | -3.64x | 35.68x | 2.02x | 108.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LLY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LLY five years ago would be worth $51,115 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,695 for GLPG. Over the past 12 months, IONS leads with a +129.9% total return vs ALNY's +7.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LLY at 31.8% vs GLPG's -12.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.9% | -4.6% | -9.6% | -26.1% | -8.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.5% | +129.9% | +26.3% | +7.0% | +27.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.0% | +116.1% | +129.1% | +40.9% | -5.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.0% | +108.0% | +411.1% | +125.4% | +43.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.9% | +121.1% | +1237.7% | +411.9% | +90.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.9% | +29.3% | +31.8% | +12.1% | -1.7% |
Risk & Volatility
IONS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IONS is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than REGN's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IONS currently trades 87.6% from its 52-week high vs ALNY's 59.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 0.51x | 0.65x | 0.74x | 0.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.78 | $86.74 | $1133.95 | $495.55 | $821.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.74 | $31.66 | $623.78 | $245.96 | $476.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.4% | +87.6% | +86.0% | +59.7% | +86.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.3 | 58.8 | 61.4 | 43.8 | 44.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 165K | 2.0M | 2.6M | 1.1M | 631K |
Analyst Outlook
LLY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GLPG as "Hold", IONS as "Buy", LLY as "Buy", ALNY as "Buy", REGN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 50.6% upside for ALNY (target: $446) vs 19.0% for GLPG (target: $33). For income investors, LLY offers the higher dividend yield at 0.61% vs REGN's 0.48%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $33.00 | $107.27 | $1261.11 | $445.67 | $865.68 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 32 | 45 | 52 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.6% | — | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 11 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $6.00 | — | $3.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% | 0.0% | +5.4% |
LLY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). GLPG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
GLPG vs IONS vs LLY vs ALNY vs REGN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GLPG or IONS or LLY or ALNY or REGN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Galapagos N.
V. (GLPG) is the stronger pick with 303. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). Galapagos N. V. (GLPG) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (IONS) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GLPG or IONS or LLY or ALNY or REGN?
On trailing P/E, Galapagos N.
V. (GLPG) is the cheapest at 4. 9x versus Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 127. 0x. On forward P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Eli Lilly and Company wins at 0. 91x versus Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 43x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GLPG or IONS or LLY or ALNY or REGN?
Over the past 5 years, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) delivered a total return of +411.
1%, compared to -63. 0% for Galapagos N. V. (GLPG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LLY returned +1203% versus GLPG's -40. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GLPG or IONS or LLY or ALNY or REGN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 51β versus Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 0. 77β — meaning REGN is approximately 51% more volatile than IONS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Galapagos N. V. (GLPG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 5% for Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GLPG or IONS or LLY or ALNY or REGN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Galapagos N.
V. (GLPG) is pulling ahead at 303. 5% versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Galapagos N. V. grew EPS 333. 0% year-over-year, compared to 8. 2% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GLPG leads at 66. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GLPG or IONS or LLY or ALNY or REGN?
Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
7% net margin versus -40. 4% for Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LLY leads at 45. 6% versus -40. 5% for IONS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IONS leads at 98. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GLPG or IONS or LLY or ALNY or REGN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 91x versus Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 43x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) trades at 15. 3x forward P/E versus 39. 9x for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 24. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALNY: 50. 6% to $445. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — GLPG or IONS or LLY or ALNY or REGN?
In this comparison, LLY (0.
6% yield), REGN (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. GLPG, IONS, ALNY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GLPG or IONS or LLY or ALNY or REGN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
65), 0. 6% yield, +1203% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LLY: +1203%, GLPG: -40. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GLPG and IONS and LLY and ALNY and REGN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GLPG is a small-cap high-growth stock; IONS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LLY is a large-cap high-growth stock; ALNY is a mid-cap high-growth stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock. LLY pays a dividend while GLPG, IONS, ALNY, REGN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.