Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HFBL vs LADR vs BXMT vs HFWA vs KREF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
Banks - Regional
REIT - Mortgage
HFBL vs LADR vs BXMT vs HFWA vs KREF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | Banks - Regional | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $60M | $1.31B | $3.23B | $936M | $425M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $32M | $388M | $1.54B | $336M | $442M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $64M | $104M | $68M | $-104M |
| Gross Margin | 63.9% | 71.5% | 62.6% | 72.4% | 87.1% |
| Operating Margin | 14.4% | 61.7% | 58.3% | 23.2% | 48.0% |
| Forward P/E | 15.6x | 10.2x | 12.3x | 13.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $4M | $3.51B | $16.16B | $42M | $4.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $38M | $453M | $53M | $85M |
HFBL vs LADR vs BXMT vs HFWA vs KREF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home Federal Bancor… (HFBL) | 100 | 163.9 | +63.9% |
| Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) | 100 | 129.1 | +29.1% |
| Blackstone Mortgage… (BXMT) | 100 | 81.1 | -18.9% |
| Heritage Financial … (HFWA) | 100 | 144.8 | +44.8% |
| KKR Real Estate Fin… (KREF) | 100 | 40.8 | -59.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HFBL vs LADR vs BXMT vs HFWA vs KREF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HFBL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.24, yield 2.7%
- 110.4% 10Y total return vs HFWA's 110.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.24, Low D/E 7.2%, current ratio 0.10x
- Beta 0.24 vs HFWA's 0.96
LADR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 0.64, yield 9.1%, current ratio 0.50x
- 1.4% ROA vs KREF's -1.6%, ROIC 4.4% vs 3.4%
BXMT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -14.0%, EPS growth 154.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.9%
HFWA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency and bank quality is your priority.
- PEG 1.53 vs HFBL's 4.70
- NIM 3.2% vs HFBL's 3.1%
- 5.9% NII/revenue growth vs LADR's -23.3%
- Better valuation composite
Among these 5 stocks, KREF doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.9% NII/revenue growth vs LADR's -23.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.1% margin vs KREF's -23.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.24 vs HFWA's 0.96 | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs KREF's 15.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.4% vs KREF's -17.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.4% ROA vs KREF's -1.6%, ROIC 4.4% vs 3.4% |
HFBL vs LADR vs BXMT vs HFWA vs KREF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
HFBL vs LADR vs BXMT vs HFWA vs KREF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HFWA leads in 1 of 6 categories
KREF leads 1 • HFBL leads 1 • LADR leads 0 • BXMT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HFWA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BXMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 47.5x HFBL's $32M. HFWA is the more profitable business, keeping 20.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KREF's -23.6%. On growth, BXMT holds the edge at +4.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $32M | $388M | $1.5B | $336M | $442M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8M | $273M | $948M | $80M | $140M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | $64M | $104M | $68M | -$104M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | $87M | $335M | $86M | $65M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.9% | +71.5% | +62.6% | +72.4% | +87.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +61.7% | +58.3% | +23.2% | +48.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | +16.5% | +6.7% | +20.1% | -23.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | +22.4% | +21.8% | +25.5% | +14.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -20.5% | +4.0% | — | -13.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +63.6% | -48.0% | — | +85.7% | -5.4% |
Valuation Metrics
KREF leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.0x trailing earnings, HFWA trades at a 53% valuation discount to BXMT's 29.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HFWA offers better value at 1.61x vs HFBL's 4.70x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $60M | $1.3B | $3.2B | $936M | $425M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $48M | $4.8B | $18.9B | $925M | $5.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.61x | 20.12x | 29.89x | 14.04x | -6.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.19x | 12.28x | 13.38x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.70x | — | — | 1.61x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.02x | 17.27x | 16.35x | 11.62x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.87x | 3.33x | 2.12x | 2.78x | 0.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.10x | 0.87x | 0.93x | 1.03x | 0.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.15x | 15.00x | 11.70x | 10.92x | 6.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HFBL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HFBL delivers a 9.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-8 for KREF. HFWA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BXMT's 4.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HFWA scores 9/9 vs KREF's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.3% | +4.3% | +2.9% | +7.5% | -8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +1.4% | +0.5% | +1.0% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.9% | +4.4% | +4.3% | +5.2% | +3.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.0% | +5.0% | +11.3% | +4.1% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 9 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 2.37x | 4.61x | 0.05x | 3.83x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12M | $3.5B | $15.7B | -$10M | $4.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $38M | $453M | $53M | $85M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $3.5B | $16.2B | $42M | $4.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.61x | 1.38x | 1.11x | 0.87x | 0.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — HFBL and HFWA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HFBL five years ago would be worth $13,400 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,432 for KREF. Over the past 12 months, HFBL leads with a +58.4% total return vs KREF's -17.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HFWA at 24.5% vs KREF's -0.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.0% | -5.5% | +0.6% | +18.1% | -17.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +58.4% | +7.1% | +10.5% | +20.9% | -17.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.6% | +41.2% | +48.0% | +93.0% | -0.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.0% | +27.3% | -2.3% | +12.8% | -35.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.4% | +77.4% | +50.4% | +110.3% | -9.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.6% | +12.2% | +14.0% | +24.5% | -0.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HFBL and HFWA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HFBL is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HFWA's 0.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HFWA currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs KREF's 66.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.24x | 0.64x | 0.74x | 0.96x | 0.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.71 | $11.92 | $20.67 | $28.90 | $9.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.32 | $9.61 | $17.67 | $21.32 | $5.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.0% | +86.1% | +92.5% | +95.2% | +66.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.8 | 51.3 | 45.2 | 54.1 | 54.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2K | 846K | 1.4M | 287K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HFBL and KREF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LADR as "Buy", BXMT as "Hold", HFWA as "Buy", KREF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.7% upside for LADR (target: $13) vs 5.9% for KREF (target: $7). For income investors, KREF offers the higher dividend yield at 15.14% vs HFBL's 2.68%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $13.00 | — | $31.33 | $7.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 17 | 18 | 14 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +9.1% | +9.9% | +3.4% | +15.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.53 | $0.93 | $1.89 | $0.95 | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.8% | +0.9% | +3.4% | +0.6% | +10.2% |
HFWA leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). KREF leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
HFBL vs LADR vs BXMT vs HFWA vs KREF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HFBL or LADR or BXMT or HFWA or KREF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) is the stronger pick with 5.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 3% for Ladder Capital Corp (LADR). Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HFBL or LADR or BXMT or HFWA or KREF?
On trailing P/E, Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) is the cheapest at 14.
0x versus Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. at 29. 9x. On forward P/E, Ladder Capital Corp is actually cheaper at 10. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HFBL or LADR or BXMT or HFWA or KREF?
Over the past 5 years, Home Federal Bancorp, Inc.
of Louisiana (HFBL) delivered a total return of +34. 0%, compared to -35. 7% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HFBL returned +110. 4% versus KREF's -9. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HFBL or LADR or BXMT or HFWA or KREF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Federal Bancorp, Inc.
of Louisiana (HFBL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 24β versus Heritage Financial Corporation's 0. 96β — meaning HFWA is approximately 305% more volatile than HFBL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 5% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HFBL or LADR or BXMT or HFWA or KREF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) is pulling ahead at 5.
9% versus -23. 3% for Ladder Capital Corp (LADR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. grew EPS 154. 7% year-over-year, compared to -652. 6% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BXMT leads at 4. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HFBL or LADR or BXMT or HFWA or KREF?
Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
1% net margin versus -10. 3% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BXMT leads at 71. 6% versus 14. 4% for HFBL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KREF leads at 88. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HFBL or LADR or BXMT or HFWA or KREF more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) trades at 10.
2x forward P/E versus 13. 4x for Heritage Financial Corporation — 3. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LADR: 26. 7% to $13. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HFBL or LADR or BXMT or HFWA or KREF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF) offers the highest yield at 15. 1%, versus 2. 7% for Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana (HFBL).
09Is HFBL or LADR or BXMT or HFWA or KREF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Home Federal Bancorp, Inc.
of Louisiana (HFBL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 24), 2. 7% yield, +110. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HFBL: +110. 4%, HFWA: +110. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HFBL and LADR and BXMT and HFWA and KREF?
These companies operate in different sectors (HFBL (Financial Services) and LADR (Real Estate) and BXMT (Real Estate) and HFWA (Financial Services) and KREF (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HFBL is a small-cap deep-value stock; LADR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BXMT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HFWA is a small-cap deep-value stock; KREF is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.