Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IMRN vs NVAX vs PFE vs VXRT vs MRK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
IMRN vs NVAX vs PFE vs VXRT vs MRK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $7M | $1.50B | $150.63B | $178M | $277.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11M | $596M | $63.31B | $237M | $64.93B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $-88M | $7.49B | $16M | $18.25B |
| Gross Margin | 65.4% | 84.6% | 69.3% | 90.4% | 74.2% |
| Operating Margin | -73.7% | -11.2% | 23.4% | 7.6% | 41.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 3.6x | 8.7x | 10.6x | 21.9x |
| Total Debt | $117K | $249M | $67.42B | $9M | $50.53B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $241M | $1.14B | $54M | $14.56B |
IMRN vs NVAX vs PFE vs VXRT vs MRK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immuron Limited (IMRN) | 100 | 39.6 | -60.4% |
| Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) | 100 | 22.0 | -78.0% |
| Pfizer Inc. (PFE) | 100 | 70.9 | -29.1% |
| Vaxart, Inc. (VXRT) | 100 | 25.8 | -74.2% |
| Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) | 100 | 144.7 | +44.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMRN vs NVAX vs PFE vs VXRT vs MRK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, IMRN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NVAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (3.6x vs 21.9x)
PFE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 6.5%
- Beta 0.54, yield 6.5%, current ratio 1.16x
- 6.5% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs MRK's 2.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
VXRT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 7.3%, EPS growth 150.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, Low D/E 10.2%, current ratio 5.34x
- 7.3% revenue growth vs PFE's -1.6%
- +90.4% vs IMRN's -55.4%
MRK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 166.5% 10Y total return vs PFE's 29.6%
- 28.1% margin vs IMRN's -71.9%
- Beta 0.48 vs NVAX's 2.11
- 14.6% ROA vs IMRN's -77.9%, ROIC 22.0% vs -122.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.3% revenue growth vs PFE's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.6x vs 21.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.1% margin vs IMRN's -71.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.48 vs NVAX's 2.11 | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs MRK's 2.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +90.4% vs IMRN's -55.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.6% ROA vs IMRN's -77.9%, ROIC 22.0% vs -122.5% |
IMRN vs NVAX vs PFE vs VXRT vs MRK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IMRN vs NVAX vs PFE vs VXRT vs MRK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PFE leads in 1 of 6 categories
IMRN leads 0 • NVAX leads 0 • VXRT leads 0 • MRK leads 0 • 5 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — VXRT and MRK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MRK is the larger business by revenue, generating $64.9B annually — 5939.9x IMRN's $11M. MRK is the more profitable business, keeping 28.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IMRN's -71.9%. On growth, VXRT holds the edge at +5.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11M | $596M | $63.3B | $237M | $64.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | -$47M | $21.0B | $31M | $32.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | -$88M | $7.5B | $16M | $18.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | -$96M | $9.5B | $8M | $12.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.4% | +84.6% | +69.3% | +90.4% | +74.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -73.7% | -11.2% | +23.4% | +7.6% | +41.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -71.9% | -14.7% | +11.8% | +6.9% | +28.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -84.2% | -16.1% | +15.0% | +3.2% | +19.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.3% | -79.1% | +5.4% | +5.9% | +4.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +45.3% | -102.0% | -9.5% | +5.4% | -19.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — IMRN and PFE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.6x trailing earnings, NVAX trades at a 81% valuation discount to PFE's 19.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NVAX's 2.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MRK's 10.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $1.5B | $150.6B | $178M | $277.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5M | $1.5B | $216.9B | $133M | $313.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.27x | 3.63x | 19.47x | 10.57x | 15.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 8.66x | — | 21.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.73x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 2.56x | 10.66x | 7.37x | 10.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.27x | 1.34x | 2.41x | 0.75x | 4.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.82x | — | 1.74x | 1.94x | 5.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 16.60x | 23.51x | 22.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — VXRT and MRK each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MRK delivers a 36.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-98 for IMRN. IMRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MRK's 0.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PFE scores 7/9 vs IMRN's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -97.9% | — | +8.3% | +33.8% | +36.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -77.9% | -7.4% | +3.6% | +9.1% | +14.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -122.5% | — | +7.5% | +27.1% | +22.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -51.0% | +100.4% | +9.0% | +15.1% | +23.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | — | 0.78x | 0.10x | 0.96x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $8M | $66.3B | -$45M | $36.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $241M | $1.1B | $54M | $14.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $117,127 | $249M | $67.4B | $9M | $50.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -731.63x | -5.10x | 4.02x | — | 19.68x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — NVAX and VXRT and MRK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MRK five years ago would be worth $17,024 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $524 for NVAX. Over the past 12 months, VXRT leads with a +90.4% total return vs IMRN's -55.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVAX at 7.4% vs IMRN's -32.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.4% | +29.5% | +6.9% | +105.6% | +6.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -55.4% | +55.1% | +23.7% | +90.4% | +46.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.0% | +23.9% | -18.4% | -14.0% | +2.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.2% | -94.8% | -13.3% | -89.7% | +70.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.1% | -90.4% | +29.6% | -95.8% | +166.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -32.3% | +7.4% | -6.6% | -4.9% | +0.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PFE and MRK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MRK is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVAX's 2.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PFE currently trades 92.1% from its 52-week high vs IMRN's 34.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 2.22x | 0.49x | 0.57x | 0.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.39 | $11.97 | $28.75 | $0.84 | $125.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.68 | $5.80 | $21.97 | $0.26 | $73.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.7% | +77.1% | +92.1% | +88.1% | +89.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.6 | 64.4 | 44.2 | 55.1 | 46.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 27K | 4.4M | 33.3M | 259K | 7.3M |
Analyst Outlook
PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NVAX as "Buy", PFE as "Hold", VXRT as "Buy", MRK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 170.3% upside for VXRT (target: $2) vs 3.5% for PFE (target: $27). For income investors, PFE offers the higher dividend yield at 6.49% vs MRK's 2.90%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.00 | $27.40 | $2.00 | $129.31 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 23 | 39 | 3 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +6.5% | — | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 15 | — | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.72 | — | $3.26 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.8% |
PFE leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Analyst Outlook. 5 categories are tied.
IMRN vs NVAX vs PFE vs VXRT vs MRK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMRN or NVAX or PFE or VXRT or MRK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Vaxart, Inc.
(VXRT) is the stronger pick with 726. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) offers the better valuation at 3. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IMRN or NVAX or PFE or VXRT or MRK?
On trailing P/E, Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the cheapest at 3. 6x versus Pfizer Inc. at 19. 5x. On forward P/E, Pfizer Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IMRN or NVAX or PFE or VXRT or MRK?
Over the past 5 years, Merck & Co.
, Inc. (MRK) delivered a total return of +70. 2%, compared to -94. 8% for Novavax, Inc. (NVAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MRK returned +164. 7% versus VXRT's -96. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IMRN or NVAX or PFE or VXRT or MRK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Merck & Co.
, Inc. (MRK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus Novavax, Inc. 's 2. 22β — meaning NVAX is approximately 389% more volatile than MRK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immuron Limited (IMRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 96% for Merck & Co. , Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IMRN or NVAX or PFE or VXRT or MRK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vaxart, Inc.
(VXRT) is pulling ahead at 726. 7% versus -1. 6% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Novavax, Inc. grew EPS 306. 5% year-over-year, compared to -3. 5% for Pfizer Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VXRT leads at 1204% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IMRN or NVAX or PFE or VXRT or MRK?
Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 2% net margin versus -71. 6% for Immuron Limited — meaning it keeps 39. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVAX leads at 50. 1% versus -73. 3% for IMRN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVAX leads at 93. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IMRN or NVAX or PFE or VXRT or MRK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 21. 9x for Merck & Co. , Inc. — 13. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VXRT: 170. 3% to $2. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — IMRN or NVAX or PFE or VXRT or MRK?
In this comparison, PFE (6.
5% yield), MRK (2. 9% yield) pay a dividend. IMRN, NVAX, VXRT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IMRN or NVAX or PFE or VXRT or MRK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Merck & Co.
, Inc. (MRK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45), 2. 9% yield, +164. 7% 10Y return). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) carries a higher beta of 2. 22 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MRK: +164. 7%, NVAX: -89. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IMRN and NVAX and PFE and VXRT and MRK?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IMRN is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVAX is a small-cap high-growth stock; PFE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; VXRT is a small-cap high-growth stock; MRK is a large-cap deep-value stock. PFE, MRK pay a dividend while IMRN, NVAX, VXRT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.