Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IOT vs DDOG vs ESTC vs ZS vs MSFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
IOT vs DDOG vs ESTC vs ZS vs MSFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $8.13B | $67.18B | $5.45B | $24.53B | $3.13T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.62B | $3.67B | $1.68B | $3.00B | $318.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $136M | $-85M | $-68M | $125.22B |
| Gross Margin | 76.7% | 79.9% | 76.0% | 76.6% | 68.3% |
| Operating Margin | -3.2% | -0.7% | -1.7% | -4.8% | 46.8% |
| Forward P/E | 59.3x | 88.0x | 20.4x | 38.1x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $73M | $1.54B | $595M | $1.80B | $112.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $319M | $401M | $728M | $2.39B | $30.24B |
IOT vs DDOG vs ESTC vs ZS vs MSFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Samsara Inc. (IOT) | 100 | 107.1 | +7.1% |
| Datadog, Inc. (DDOG) | 100 | 106.0 | +6.0% |
| Elastic N.V. (ESTC) | 100 | 41.9 | -58.1% |
| Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) | 100 | 47.5 | -52.5% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 125.2 | +25.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IOT vs DDOG vs ESTC vs ZS vs MSFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IOT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 29.6%, EPS growth 92.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.4%
- 29.6% revenue growth vs MSFT's 14.9%
DDOG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +78.0% vs ESTC's -38.9%
ESTC is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (20.4x vs 25.3x)
ZS is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.98, current ratio 2.01x
MSFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.8%
- 7.9% 10Y total return vs DDOG's 402.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 32.7%, current ratio 1.35x
- 39.3% margin vs ESTC's -5.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.6% revenue growth vs MSFT's 14.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.4x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs ESTC's -5.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs IOT's 1.46 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 19-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +78.0% vs ESTC's -38.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.2% ROA vs ESTC's -3.5%, ROIC 24.9% vs -5.2% |
IOT vs DDOG vs ESTC vs ZS vs MSFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IOT vs DDOG vs ESTC vs ZS vs MSFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ESTC leads in 1 of 6 categories
MSFT leads 1 • DDOG leads 1 • IOT leads 0 • ZS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — DDOG and MSFT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT is the larger business by revenue, generating $318.3B annually — 196.6x IOT's $1.6B. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ESTC's -5.0%. On growth, DDOG holds the edge at +32.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $3.7B | $1.7B | $3.0B | $318.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$47M | $73M | -$27M | -$52M | $192.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | $136M | -$85M | -$68M | $125.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $207M | $1.1B | $257M | $944M | $72.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +76.7% | +79.9% | +76.0% | +76.6% | +68.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | -0.7% | -1.7% | -4.8% | +46.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +3.7% | -5.0% | -2.3% | +39.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.8% | +29.4% | +15.3% | +31.4% | +22.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.3% | +32.2% | +17.7% | +25.9% | +18.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | +120.9% | +143.8% | -3.2% | +23.4% |
Valuation Metrics
ESTC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.9x trailing earnings, MSFT trades at a 95% valuation discount to DDOG's 629.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MSFT's 19.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DDOG's 874.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.1B | $67.2B | $5.4B | $24.5B | $3.13T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.9B | $68.3B | $5.3B | $23.9B | $3.21T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1505.50x | 629.10x | -49.63x | -565.89x | 30.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 59.34x | 87.97x | 20.44x | 38.08x | 25.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.64x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 874.03x | — | — | 19.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.02x | 19.60x | 3.67x | 9.18x | 11.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.16x | 18.38x | 5.77x | 13.11x | 9.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 39.17x | 67.14x | 20.81x | 33.76x | 43.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MSFT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSFT delivers a 33.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-11 for ESTC. IOT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ZS's 1.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IOT scores 7/9 vs ZS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.7% | +3.8% | -10.7% | -3.1% | +33.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.4% | +2.1% | -3.5% | -1.0% | +19.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.8% | -0.8% | -5.2% | -8.4% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.6% | -1.0% | -3.7% | -4.6% | +29.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.41x | 0.64x | 1.00x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$246M | $1.1B | -$133M | -$592M | $81.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $319M | $401M | $728M | $2.4B | $30.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $73M | $1.5B | $595M | $1.8B | $112.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 4.03x | -2.17x | 8.97x | 55.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DDOG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DDOG five years ago would be worth $24,418 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,772 for ESTC. Over the past 12 months, DDOG leads with a +78.0% total return vs ESTC's -38.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DDOG at 33.9% vs ESTC's -3.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.2% | +41.1% | -28.9% | -30.7% | -10.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.2% | +78.0% | -38.9% | -34.6% | -2.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.0% | +140.3% | -10.2% | +41.6% | +39.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.9% | +144.2% | -52.3% | -9.8% | +72.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.9% | +402.6% | -26.3% | +363.0% | +787.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.7% | +33.9% | -3.5% | +12.3% | +11.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DDOG and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IOT's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DDOG currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs ZS's 45.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.46x | 1.40x | 1.08x | 0.98x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.41 | $201.69 | $96.07 | $336.99 | $555.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.38 | $98.01 | $42.05 | $114.63 | $356.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.2% | +93.6% | +53.7% | +45.3% | +75.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.2 | 66.5 | 50.4 | 50.3 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.9M | 5.0M | 1.9M | 2.9M | 32.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IOT as "Buy", DDOG as "Buy", ESTC as "Buy", ZS as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 81.4% upside for ZS (target: $277) vs -7.5% for DDOG (target: $175). MSFT is the only dividend payer here at 0.77% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $45.82 | $174.63 | $84.38 | $277.18 | $551.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 47 | 34 | 52 | 81 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 19 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% |
ESTC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). MSFT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
IOT vs DDOG vs ESTC vs ZS vs MSFT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IOT or DDOG or ESTC or ZS or MSFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Samsara Inc.
(IOT) is the stronger pick with 29. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 9% for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) offers the better valuation at 30. 9x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Samsara Inc. (IOT) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IOT or DDOG or ESTC or ZS or MSFT?
On trailing P/E, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the cheapest at 30.
9x versus Datadog, Inc. at 629. 1x. On forward P/E, Elastic N. V. is actually cheaper at 20. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IOT or DDOG or ESTC or ZS or MSFT?
Over the past 5 years, Datadog, Inc.
(DDOG) delivered a total return of +144. 2%, compared to -52. 3% for Elastic N. V. (ESTC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSFT returned +787. 7% versus ESTC's -26. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IOT or DDOG or ESTC or ZS or MSFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
89β versus Samsara Inc. 's 1. 46β — meaning IOT is approximately 64% more volatile than MSFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Samsara Inc. (IOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 100% for Zscaler, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IOT or DDOG or ESTC or ZS or MSFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Samsara Inc.
(IOT) is pulling ahead at 29. 6% versus 14. 9% for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Samsara Inc. grew EPS 92. 9% year-over-year, compared to -276. 3% for Elastic N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IOT leads at 35. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IOT or DDOG or ESTC or ZS or MSFT?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus -7. 3% for Elastic N. V. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -4. 8% for ZS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DDOG leads at 80. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IOT or DDOG or ESTC or ZS or MSFT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Elastic N.
V. (ESTC) trades at 20. 4x forward P/E versus 88. 0x for Datadog, Inc. — 67. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ZS: 81. 4% to $277. 18.
08Which pays a better dividend — IOT or DDOG or ESTC or ZS or MSFT?
In this comparison, MSFT (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. IOT, DDOG, ESTC, ZS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IOT or DDOG or ESTC or ZS or MSFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
89), 0. 8% yield, +787. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +787. 7%, IOT: +21. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IOT and DDOG and ESTC and ZS and MSFT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IOT is a small-cap high-growth stock; DDOG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ESTC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ZS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. MSFT pays a dividend while IOT, DDOG, ESTC, ZS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.