Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IPG vs TRUE vs OMC vs CARS vs WPP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Advertising Agencies
Auto - Dealerships
Advertising Agencies
IPG vs TRUE vs OMC vs CARS vs WPP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Internet Content & Information | Advertising Agencies | Auto - Dealerships | Advertising Agencies |
| Market Cap | $8.93B | $226M | $23.91B | $666M | $4.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.21B | $181M | $19.82B | $724M | $29.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $552M | $-19M | $63M | $27M | $584M |
| Gross Margin | 18.2% | 79.2% | 16.8% | 82.9% | 16.3% |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | -18.9% | 13.7% | 9.7% | 6.7% |
| Forward P/E | 7.8x | — | 7.2x | 5.5x | 7.6x |
| Total Debt | $4.25B | $11M | $12.78B | $468M | $6.35B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.19B | $112M | $6.88B | $56M | $2.64B |
IPG vs TRUE vs OMC vs CARS vs WPP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Nov 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Interpublic Gro… (IPG) | 100 | 143.6 | +43.6% |
| TrueCar, Inc. (TRUE) | 100 | 81.5 | -18.5% |
| Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC) | 100 | 136.9 | +36.9% |
| Cars.com Inc. (CARS) | 100 | 174.1 | +74.1% |
| WPP plc (WPP) | 100 | 50.1 | -49.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IPG vs TRUE vs OMC vs CARS vs WPP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IPG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 5.4%
- 45.7% 10Y total return vs OMC's 23.7%
- Beta 0.63, yield 5.4%, current ratio 1.09x
- 5.4% margin vs TRUE's -10.3%
TRUE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 10.6%, EPS growth 38.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -8.8%
- 10.6% revenue growth vs IPG's -1.8%
- +75.2% vs WPP's -45.7%
OMC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.58, Low D/E 97.9%, current ratio 0.93x
- Beta 0.58 vs TRUE's 2.20
CARS is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (5.5x vs 7.2x)
Among these 5 stocks, WPP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.6% revenue growth vs IPG's -1.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.5x vs 7.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.4% margin vs TRUE's -10.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.58 vs TRUE's 2.20 | |
| Dividends | 5.4% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs WPP's 13.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +75.2% vs WPP's -45.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.2% ROA vs TRUE's -12.5%, ROIC 14.7% vs -97.7% |
IPG vs TRUE vs OMC vs CARS vs WPP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IPG vs TRUE vs OMC vs CARS vs WPP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WPP leads in 1 of 6 categories
IPG leads 1 • TRUE leads 1 • OMC leads 0 • CARS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — IPG and OMC and CARS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WPP is the larger business by revenue, generating $29.0B annually — 160.2x TRUE's $181M. IPG is the more profitable business, keeping 5.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TRUE's -10.3%. On growth, OMC holds the edge at +69.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10.2B | $181M | $19.8B | $724M | $29.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | -$19M | $3.1B | $152M | $2.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $552M | -$19M | $63M | $27M | $584M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $807M | -$19,000 | $3.0B | $158M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.2% | +79.2% | +16.8% | +82.9% | +16.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | -18.9% | +13.7% | +9.7% | +6.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | -10.3% | +0.3% | +3.7% | +2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | -0.0% | +15.1% | +21.8% | +5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.1% | -7.2% | +69.2% | +0.7% | -7.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.4% | +187.0% | +40.7% | +3.6% | -78.9% |
Valuation Metrics
WPP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.7x trailing earnings, WPP trades at a 84% valuation discount to CARS's 36.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WPP's 3.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than OMC's 10.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.9B | $226M | $23.9B | $666M | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.0B | $125M | $29.8B | $1.1B | $9.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.43x | -7.47x | -285.41x | 36.50x | 5.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.78x | — | 7.25x | 5.53x | 7.63x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 7.78x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.52x | — | 10.41x | 7.09x | 3.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.83x | 1.29x | 1.38x | 0.92x | 0.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.37x | 1.94x | 1.21x | 1.53x | 0.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.77x | — | 8.58x | 4.52x | 2.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IPG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WPP delivers a 17.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-16 for TRUE. TRUE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WPP's 1.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IPG scores 8/9 vs OMC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.6% | -16.3% | +0.7% | +5.7% | +17.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.2% | -12.5% | +0.2% | +2.5% | +2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.7% | -97.7% | +14.5% | +5.0% | +12.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.7% | -24.6% | +13.5% | +6.2% | +13.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.09x | 0.10x | 0.98x | 0.99x | 1.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.1B | -$101M | $5.9B | $412M | $3.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.2B | $112M | $6.9B | $56M | $2.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.3B | $11M | $12.8B | $468M | $6.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.90x | — | 2.51x | 3.76x | 2.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRUE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OMC five years ago would be worth $10,762 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,334 for WPP. Over the past 12 months, TRUE leads with a +75.2% total return vs WPP's -45.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRUE at -2.0% vs WPP's -22.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | +11.9% | -4.3% | -3.0% | -17.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -0.0% | +75.2% | +4.7% | +16.2% | -45.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.0% | -5.9% | -6.9% | -35.0% | -53.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.2% | -43.8% | +7.6% | -12.6% | -56.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.7% | -56.7% | +23.7% | -57.2% | -58.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.4% | -2.0% | -2.3% | -13.4% | -22.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRUE and OMC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OMC is the less volatile stock with a 0.58 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRUE's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRUE currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs WPP's 46.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 2.20x | 0.58x | 1.25x | 1.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.42 | $2.54 | $87.17 | $13.97 | $40.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.55 | $1.27 | $66.33 | $7.40 | $14.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.5% | +100.0% | +88.4% | +83.6% | +46.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.1 | 69.2 | 50.1 | 79.6 | 65.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 81.3M | 0 | 4.2M | 1.4M | 606K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IPG and WPP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IPG as "Hold", TRUE as "Hold", OMC as "Hold", CARS as "Buy", WPP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 48.8% upside for IPG (target: $37) vs 11.3% for CARS (target: $13). For income investors, WPP offers the higher dividend yield at 13.85% vs OMC's 3.48%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $36.57 | $3.35 | $93.67 | $13.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 34 | 23 | 34 | 16 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.4% | — | +3.5% | — | +13.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | — | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.31 | — | $2.68 | — | $1.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.6% | +8.9% | +3.0% | +13.0% | +2.7% |
WPP leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). IPG leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
IPG vs TRUE vs OMC vs CARS vs WPP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IPG or TRUE or OMC or CARS or WPP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TrueCar, Inc.
(TRUE) is the stronger pick with 10. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 8% for The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. (IPG). WPP plc (WPP) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E (7. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cars. com Inc. (CARS) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IPG or TRUE or OMC or CARS or WPP?
On trailing P/E, WPP plc (WPP) is the cheapest at 5.
7x versus Cars. com Inc. at 36. 5x. On forward P/E, Cars. com Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IPG or TRUE or OMC or CARS or WPP?
Over the past 5 years, Omnicom Group Inc.
(OMC) delivered a total return of +7. 6%, compared to -56. 7% for WPP plc (WPP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IPG returned +45. 7% versus WPP's -58. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IPG or TRUE or OMC or CARS or WPP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Omnicom Group Inc.
(OMC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 58β versus TrueCar, Inc. 's 2. 20β — meaning TRUE is approximately 279% more volatile than OMC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TrueCar, Inc. (TRUE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 170% for WPP plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IPG or TRUE or OMC or CARS or WPP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TrueCar, Inc.
(TRUE) is pulling ahead at 10. 6% versus -1. 8% for The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. (IPG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WPP plc grew EPS 390. 0% year-over-year, compared to -103. 6% for Omnicom Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OMC leads at 6. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IPG or TRUE or OMC or CARS or WPP?
The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.
(IPG) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 4% net margin versus -17. 7% for TrueCar, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OMC leads at 15. 0% versus -21. 2% for TRUE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRUE leads at 85. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IPG or TRUE or OMC or CARS or WPP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Cars.
com Inc. (CARS) trades at 5. 5x forward P/E versus 7. 8x for The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. — 2. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IPG: 48. 8% to $36. 57.
08Which pays a better dividend — IPG or TRUE or OMC or CARS or WPP?
In this comparison, WPP (13.
9% yield), IPG (5. 4% yield), OMC (3. 5% yield) pay a dividend. TRUE, CARS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IPG or TRUE or OMC or CARS or WPP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Omnicom Group Inc.
(OMC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 58), 3. 5% yield). TrueCar, Inc. (TRUE) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OMC: +23. 7%, TRUE: -56. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IPG and TRUE and OMC and CARS and WPP?
These companies operate in different sectors (IPG (Communication Services) and TRUE (Communication Services) and OMC (Communication Services) and CARS (Consumer Cyclical) and WPP (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IPG is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRUE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OMC is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CARS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WPP is a small-cap deep-value stock. IPG, OMC, WPP pay a dividend while TRUE, CARS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 34%
- Dividend Yield > 1.3%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.