Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
JCAP vs OMF vs SLM vs ENVA vs NAVI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
JCAP vs OMF vs SLM vs ENVA vs NAVI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $1.16B | $6.57B | $4.45B | $4.36B | $803M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $433M | $6.24B | $3.11B | $3.15B | $3.23B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $140M | $796M | $745M | $327M | $-60M |
| Gross Margin | 71.2% | 47.6% | 53.1% | 50.1% | 87.0% |
| Operating Margin | 50.8% | 16.0% | 31.9% | 23.5% | 77.1% |
| Forward P/E | 7.0x | 7.6x | 7.1x | 10.6x | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.19B | $22.69B | $5.86B | $4.56B | $45.71B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $36M | $914M | $4.24B | $72M | $2.10B |
JCAP vs OMF vs SLM vs ENVA vs NAVI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jefferson Capital, … (JCAP) | 100 | 108.2 | +8.2% |
| OneMain Holdings, I… (OMF) | 100 | 98.4 | -1.6% |
| SLM Corporation (SLM) | 100 | 68.5 | -31.5% |
| Enova International… (ENVA) | 100 | 156.8 | +56.8% |
| Navient Corporation (NAVI) | 100 | 60.6 | -39.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JCAP vs OMF vs SLM vs ENVA vs NAVI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JCAP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and value is your priority.
- 34.1% NII/revenue growth vs NAVI's -23.7%
- Lower P/E (7.0x vs 10.6x)
OMF is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 15.3% vs NAVI's 1.1%
SLM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 1.09, yield 15.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.09, current ratio 0.28x
- PEG 0.79 vs OMF's 1.94
- 15.0% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs JCAP's 3.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
ENVA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 18.6%, EPS growth 55.9%
- 20.6% 10Y total return vs SLM's 281.9%
- +84.1% vs NAVI's -29.2%
NAVI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 0.87, yield 7.5%, current ratio 0.41x
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs OMF's 0.3% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.87 vs ENVA's 1.48
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs OMF's 0.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.1% NII/revenue growth vs NAVI's -23.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 10.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs OMF's 0.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs ENVA's 1.48 | |
| Dividends | 15.0% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs JCAP's 3.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +84.1% vs NAVI's -29.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs OMF's 0.3% |
JCAP vs OMF vs SLM vs ENVA vs NAVI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
JCAP vs OMF vs SLM vs ENVA vs NAVI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NAVI leads in 2 of 6 categories
JCAP leads 1 • ENVA leads 1 • SLM leads 1 • OMF leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NAVI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OMF is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.2B annually — 14.4x JCAP's $433M. JCAP is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NAVI's -2.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $433M | $6.2B | $3.1B | $3.2B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $137M | $943M | $599M | $815M | $544M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $140M | $796M | $745M | $327M | -$60M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $265M | $3.2B | $646M | $1.9B | $323M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.2% | +47.6% | +53.1% | +50.1% | +87.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +50.8% | +16.0% | +31.9% | +23.5% | +77.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.3% | +12.5% | +24.0% | +9.8% | -2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +37.4% | +50.1% | +18.5% | +56.2% | +13.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +8.4% | +10.0% | +28.6% | +9.7% |
Valuation Metrics
NAVI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.5x trailing earnings, SLM trades at a 57% valuation discount to ENVA's 15.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SLM offers better value at 0.72x vs OMF's 2.18x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $6.6B | $4.5B | $4.4B | $803M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.3B | $28.4B | $6.1B | $8.9B | $44.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.03x | 8.55x | 6.49x | 15.10x | -10.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.04x | 7.62x | 7.13x | 10.64x | 11.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.18x | 0.72x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.22x | 22.01x | 6.10x | 11.33x | 17.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.69x | 1.05x | 1.43x | 1.38x | 0.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.04x | 1.97x | 1.90x | 3.45x | 0.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.18x | 2.10x | 7.74x | 2.46x | 1.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JCAP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JCAP delivers a 34.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $-2 for NAVI. SLM carries lower financial leverage with a 2.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NAVI's 19.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OMF scores 7/9 vs JCAP's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +34.9% | +23.6% | +31.0% | +24.9% | -2.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.1% | +2.9% | +2.5% | +5.2% | -0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.6% | +3.0% | +8.8% | +10.4% | +3.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.6% | +3.8% | +11.5% | +13.5% | +5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.12x | 6.67x | 2.39x | 3.41x | 19.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.2B | $21.8B | $1.6B | $4.5B | $43.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $36M | $914M | $4.2B | $72M | $2.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $22.7B | $5.9B | $4.6B | $45.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.00x | 0.57x | 0.70x | 79.01x | 0.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ENVA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ENVA five years ago would be worth $47,424 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,806 for NAVI. Over the past 12 months, ENVA leads with a +84.1% total return vs NAVI's -29.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ENVA at 59.7% vs NAVI's -11.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.6% | -17.3% | -17.5% | +8.0% | -31.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.5% | +20.5% | -28.1% | +84.1% | -29.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.5% | +88.5% | +62.1% | +307.6% | -29.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.5% | +39.9% | +21.6% | +374.2% | -31.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.5% | +190.4% | +281.9% | +2064.6% | +13.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.7% | +23.5% | +17.5% | +59.7% | -11.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ENVA and NAVI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NAVI is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENVA's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ENVA currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs NAVI's 53.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.19x | 1.28x | 1.09x | 1.48x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.80 | $71.93 | $34.97 | $176.68 | $16.07 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.98 | $45.78 | $17.77 | $89.00 | $7.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.9% | +78.0% | +64.3% | +99.0% | +53.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.8 | 45.0 | 53.2 | 65.3 | 50.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 302K | 1.4M | 3.8M | 224K | 914K |
Analyst Outlook
SLM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JCAP as "Buy", OMF as "Buy", SLM as "Buy", ENVA as "Buy", NAVI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 35.3% upside for JCAP (target: $27) vs 1.5% for NAVI (target: $9). For income investors, SLM offers the higher dividend yield at 15.04% vs JCAP's 3.10%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.00 | $68.29 | $29.50 | $199.50 | $8.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 31 | 25 | 10 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | +4.6% | +15.0% | — | +7.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.62 | $2.59 | $3.38 | — | $0.64 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.3% | +8.3% | +4.9% | +13.8% |
NAVI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). JCAP leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
JCAP vs OMF vs SLM vs ENVA vs NAVI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JCAP or OMF or SLM or ENVA or NAVI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Jefferson Capital, Inc.
Common Stock (JCAP) is the stronger pick with 34. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 7% for Navient Corporation (NAVI). SLM Corporation (SLM) offers the better valuation at 6. 5x trailing P/E (7. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Jefferson Capital, Inc. Common Stock (JCAP) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JCAP or OMF or SLM or ENVA or NAVI?
On trailing P/E, SLM Corporation (SLM) is the cheapest at 6.
5x versus Enova International, Inc. at 15. 1x. On forward P/E, Jefferson Capital, Inc. Common Stock is actually cheaper at 7. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SLM Corporation wins at 0. 79x versus OneMain Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 94x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JCAP or OMF or SLM or ENVA or NAVI?
Over the past 5 years, Enova International, Inc.
(ENVA) delivered a total return of +374. 2%, compared to -31. 9% for Navient Corporation (NAVI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENVA returned +20. 6% versus JCAP's +11. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JCAP or OMF or SLM or ENVA or NAVI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Navient Corporation (NAVI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
87β versus Enova International, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning ENVA is approximately 70% more volatile than NAVI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SLM Corporation (SLM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 19% for Navient Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JCAP or OMF or SLM or ENVA or NAVI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Jefferson Capital, Inc.
Common Stock (JCAP) is pulling ahead at 34. 1% versus -23. 7% for Navient Corporation (NAVI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Enova International, Inc. grew EPS 55. 9% year-over-year, compared to -168. 6% for Navient Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JCAP or OMF or SLM or ENVA or NAVI?
Jefferson Capital, Inc.
Common Stock (JCAP) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus -2. 5% for Navient Corporation — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NAVI leads at 77. 1% versus 16. 0% for OMF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NAVI leads at 87. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JCAP or OMF or SLM or ENVA or NAVI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, SLM Corporation (SLM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 79x versus OneMain Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 94x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Jefferson Capital, Inc. Common Stock (JCAP) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 11. 9x for Navient Corporation — 4. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JCAP: 35. 3% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — JCAP or OMF or SLM or ENVA or NAVI?
In this comparison, SLM (15.
0% yield), NAVI (7. 5% yield), OMF (4. 6% yield), JCAP (3. 1% yield) pay a dividend. ENVA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JCAP or OMF or SLM or ENVA or NAVI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Navient Corporation (NAVI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
87), 7. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NAVI: +13. 4%, ENVA: +20. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JCAP and OMF and SLM and ENVA and NAVI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: JCAP is a small-cap high-growth stock; OMF is a small-cap deep-value stock; SLM is a small-cap deep-value stock; ENVA is a small-cap high-growth stock; NAVI is a small-cap income-oriented stock. JCAP, OMF, SLM, NAVI pay a dividend while ENVA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.