Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
JKHY vs NTRS vs NDAQ vs STT vs ICE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Asset Management
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
JKHY vs NTRS vs NDAQ vs STT vs ICE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Asset Management | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Asset Management | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| Market Cap | $10.57B | $29.66B | $50.59B | $41.99B | $88.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.52B | $14.30B | $8.22B | $21.97B | $12.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $519M | $1.74B | $1.91B | $2.98B | $3.30B |
| Gross Margin | 44.1% | 56.5% | 47.9% | 58.5% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 26.0% | 16.3% | 28.4% | 15.5% | 38.7% |
| Forward P/E | 21.8x | 14.8x | 22.6x | 12.0x | 19.5x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $16.43B | $9.93B | $36.79B | $20.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $102M | $61.13B | $814M | $116.10B | $837M |
JKHY vs NTRS vs NDAQ vs STT vs ICE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY) | 100 | 80.7 | -19.3% |
| Northern Trust Corp… (NTRS) | 100 | 202.5 | +102.5% |
| Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) | 100 | 225.4 | +125.4% |
| State Street Corpor… (STT) | 100 | 244.1 | +144.1% |
| Intercontinental Ex… (ICE) | 100 | 160.6 | +60.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JKHY vs NTRS vs NDAQ vs STT vs ICE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JKHY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 32 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 1.5%
- Beta 0.28, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.27x
- Beta 0.28 vs STT's 1.19
- 17.0% ROA vs STT's 0.8%, ROIC 21.0% vs 4.6%
NTRS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for bank quality.
- NIM 1.4% vs STT's 0.8%
- +66.6% vs JKHY's -13.6%
NDAQ is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 347.6% 10Y total return vs STT's 186.8%
STT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 19.6%, EPS growth 47.1%
- PEG 1.36 vs ICE's 2.19
- 19.6% NII/revenue growth vs NTRS's -9.9%
- Lower P/E (12.0x vs 19.5x), PEG 1.36 vs 2.19
ICE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, Low D/E 69.9%, current ratio 1.02x
- 26.1% margin vs NTRS's 12.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.6% NII/revenue growth vs NTRS's -9.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.0x vs 19.5x), PEG 1.36 vs 2.19 | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.1% margin vs NTRS's 12.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs STT's 1.19 | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +66.6% vs JKHY's -13.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.0% ROA vs STT's 0.8%, ROIC 21.0% vs 4.6% |
JKHY vs NTRS vs NDAQ vs STT vs ICE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JKHY vs NTRS vs NDAQ vs STT vs ICE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ICE leads in 1 of 6 categories
STT leads 1 • JKHY leads 1 • NTRS leads 1 • NDAQ leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STT is the larger business by revenue, generating $22.0B annually — 8.7x JKHY's $2.5B. ICE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTRS's 12.1%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.5B | $14.3B | $8.2B | $22.0B | $12.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $810M | $3.2B | $3.1B | $4.3B | $6.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $519M | $1.7B | $1.9B | $3.0B | $3.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $728M | $4.7B | $2.0B | -$6.1B | $4.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.1% | +56.5% | +47.9% | +58.5% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.0% | +16.3% | +28.4% | +15.5% | +38.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.6% | +12.1% | +21.8% | +12.2% | +26.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +28.9% | +38.2% | +24.2% | -64.3% | +33.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.7% | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.5% | +7.1% | +33.8% | +23.0% | +23.1% |
Valuation Metrics
STT leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.1x trailing earnings, STT trades at a 37% valuation discount to NDAQ's 28.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NTRS offers better value at 1.86x vs ICE's 3.05x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.6B | $29.7B | $50.6B | $42.0B | $88.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.5B | -$15.0B | $59.7B | -$37.3B | $107.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.40x | 18.31x | 28.80x | 18.12x | 27.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.79x | 14.80x | 22.65x | 11.99x | 19.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.32x | 1.86x | 2.70x | 2.05x | 3.05x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.53x | -4.68x | 20.14x | -9.33x | 16.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.45x | 2.07x | 6.16x | 1.91x | 7.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.01x | 2.33x | 4.19x | 1.78x | 3.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.97x | 5.43x | 25.44x | — | 20.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $11 for STT. ICE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.70x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STT's 1.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NDAQ scores 9/9 vs STT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.0% | +13.4% | +15.9% | +10.8% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +17.0% | +1.0% | +6.4% | +0.8% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.0% | +6.0% | +8.1% | +4.6% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +22.7% | +9.0% | +10.2% | +4.6% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 4 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.27x | 0.81x | 1.45x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$102M | -$44.7B | $9.1B | -$79.3B | $19.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $102M | $61.1B | $814M | $116.1B | $837M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $16.4B | $9.9B | $36.8B | $20.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 122.37x | 0.38x | 14.11x | 0.42x | 6.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTRS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STT five years ago would be worth $18,620 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,029 for JKHY. Over the past 12 months, NTRS leads with a +66.6% total return vs JKHY's -13.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTRS at 32.3% vs JKHY's -0.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.8% | +15.5% | -7.6% | +16.6% | -2.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.6% | +66.6% | +14.6% | +66.2% | -10.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.0% | +131.7% | +67.4% | +128.4% | +50.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.3% | +46.7% | +70.4% | +86.2% | +43.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +94.9% | +170.2% | +347.6% | +186.8% | +225.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.3% | +32.3% | +18.7% | +31.7% | +14.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JKHY and STT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JKHY is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STT's 1.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STT currently trades 95.3% from its 52-week high vs JKHY's 75.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.28x | 1.14x | 0.78x | 1.19x | 0.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $193.39 | $173.19 | $101.79 | $156.18 | $189.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $141.81 | $97.00 | $77.09 | $90.94 | $143.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.5% | +92.4% | +87.4% | +95.3% | +82.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 28.2 | 59.4 | 52.6 | 63.9 | 38.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 902K | 1.1M | 3.3M | 2.0M | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JKHY and STT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JKHY as "Buy", NTRS as "Hold", NDAQ as "Buy", STT as "Buy", ICE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.5% upside for JKHY (target: $204) vs -3.9% for NTRS (target: $154). For income investors, STT offers the higher dividend yield at 2.30% vs NDAQ's 1.17%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $203.75 | $153.75 | $114.60 | $160.44 | $195.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | +2.0% | +1.2% | +2.3% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 32 | 1 | 13 | 3 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.25 | $3.14 | $1.04 | $3.42 | $1.93 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +4.3% | +1.2% | +6.9% | +1.6% |
ICE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). STT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
JKHY vs NTRS vs NDAQ vs STT vs ICE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JKHY or NTRS or NDAQ or STT or ICE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, State Street Corporation (STT) is the stronger pick with 19.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). State Street Corporation (STT) offers the better valuation at 18. 1x trailing P/E (12. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (JKHY) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JKHY or NTRS or NDAQ or STT or ICE?
On trailing P/E, State Street Corporation (STT) is the cheapest at 18.
1x versus Nasdaq, Inc. at 28. 8x. On forward P/E, State Street Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: State Street Corporation wins at 1. 36x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 2. 19x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JKHY or NTRS or NDAQ or STT or ICE?
Over the past 5 years, State Street Corporation (STT) delivered a total return of +86.
2%, compared to +0. 3% for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (JKHY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NDAQ returned +347. 6% versus JKHY's +94. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JKHY or NTRS or NDAQ or STT or ICE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus State Street Corporation's 1. 19β — meaning STT is approximately 319% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 70% versus 145% for State Street Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JKHY or NTRS or NDAQ or STT or ICE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), State Street Corporation (STT) is pulling ahead at 19.
6% versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nasdaq, Inc. grew EPS 60. 1% year-over-year, compared to -10. 5% for Northern Trust Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JKHY or NTRS or NDAQ or STT or ICE?
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus 12. 1% for Northern Trust Corporation — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 15. 5% for STT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ICE leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JKHY or NTRS or NDAQ or STT or ICE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, State Street Corporation (STT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 36x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 2. 19x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, State Street Corporation (STT) trades at 12. 0x forward P/E versus 22. 6x for Nasdaq, Inc. — 10. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JKHY: 39. 5% to $203. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — JKHY or NTRS or NDAQ or STT or ICE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
State Street Corporation (STT) offers the highest yield at 2. 3%, versus 1. 2% for Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ).
09Is JKHY or NTRS or NDAQ or STT or ICE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), 1. 2% yield, +225. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +225. 3%, STT: +186. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JKHY and NTRS and NDAQ and STT and ICE?
These companies operate in different sectors (JKHY (Technology) and NTRS (Financial Services) and NDAQ (Financial Services) and STT (Financial Services) and ICE (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: JKHY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NTRS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NDAQ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; STT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.