Auto - Dealerships
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KAR vs COF vs ALLY vs TRU vs SYF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Consulting Services
Financial - Credit Services
KAR vs COF vs ALLY vs TRU vs SYF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Dealerships | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Consulting Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $2.91B | $117.30B | $13.65B | $13.89B | $25.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.93B | $69.25B | $12.15B | $4.73B | $19.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $178M | $2.45B | $852M | $705M | $3.60B |
| Gross Margin | 46.2% | 47.3% | 52.0% | 52.7% | 51.0% |
| Operating Margin | 10.2% | 3.3% | 8.6% | 18.1% | 24.2% |
| Forward P/E | 19.3x | 9.7x | 8.3x | 15.1x | 7.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.42B | $51.00B | $21.77B | $5.16B | $15.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $142M | $57.43B | $10.03B | $854M | $14.97B |
KAR vs COF vs ALLY vs TRU vs SYF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OPENLANE, Inc. (KAR) | 100 | 191.2 | +91.2% |
| Capital One Financi… (COF) | 100 | 287.5 | +187.5% |
| Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) | 100 | 226.1 | +126.1% |
| TransUnion (TRU) | 100 | 91.0 | -9.0% |
| Synchrony Financial (SYF) | 100 | 339.3 | +239.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KAR vs COF vs ALLY vs TRU vs SYF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KAR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 8.2%, EPS growth 264.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.93, Low D/E 92.6%, current ratio 1.16x
- Beta 0.93, yield 1.3%, current ratio 1.16x
- Beta 0.93 vs COF's 1.55
COF has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth and dividends.
- 28.4% NII/revenue growth vs ALLY's -25.7%
- 1.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs SYF's 1.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
ALLY is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 212.2% 10Y total return vs SYF's 173.4%
- +35.6% vs TRU's -16.2%
TRU is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 6.2% ROA vs COF's 0.4%, ROIC 7.3% vs 1.3%
SYF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.49, yield 1.6%
- PEG 0.24 vs TRU's 2.83
- NIM 15.5% vs ALLY's 2.7%
- Lower P/E (7.9x vs 15.1x), PEG 0.24 vs 2.83
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.4% NII/revenue growth vs ALLY's -25.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.9x vs 15.1x), PEG 0.24 vs 2.83 | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.6% margin vs COF's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.93 vs COF's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs SYF's 1.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.6% vs TRU's -16.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.2% ROA vs COF's 0.4%, ROIC 7.3% vs 1.3% |
KAR vs COF vs ALLY vs TRU vs SYF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KAR vs COF vs ALLY vs TRU vs SYF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SYF leads in 2 of 6 categories
KAR leads 0 • COF leads 0 • ALLY leads 0 • TRU leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SYF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COF is the larger business by revenue, generating $69.3B annually — 35.8x KAR's $1.9B. SYF is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COF's 3.5%. On growth, TRU holds the edge at +13.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $69.3B | $12.2B | $4.7B | $19.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $288M | $7.5B | $2.0B | $1.4B | $4.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $178M | $2.5B | $852M | $705M | $3.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $337M | $27.7B | -$295M | $697M | $9.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.2% | +47.3% | +52.0% | +52.7% | +51.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.2% | +3.3% | +8.6% | +18.1% | +24.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | +3.5% | +7.0% | +14.9% | +18.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.4% | +37.7% | — | +14.7% | +51.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.5% | — | — | +13.7% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +89.7% | +22.1% | +2.7% | +172.0% | +20.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SYF leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.9x trailing earnings, SYF trades at a 83% valuation discount to COF's 47.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYF offers better value at 0.24x vs TRU's 5.83x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.9B | $117.3B | $13.6B | $13.9B | $25.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.2B | $110.9B | $25.4B | $18.2B | $25.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.73x | 47.02x | 18.67x | 31.03x | 7.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.31x | 9.69x | 8.29x | 15.08x | 7.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 5.83x | 0.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.55x | 14.70x | 12.91x | 12.70x | 4.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.51x | 1.69x | 1.12x | 3.04x | 1.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.93x | 0.90x | 0.90x | 3.11x | 1.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.66x | 4.49x | — | 21.00x | 2.58x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — TRU and SYF each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYF delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $2 for COF. COF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.45x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALLY's 1.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KAR scores 8/9 vs ALLY's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.6% | +2.4% | +5.5% | +15.1% | +21.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | +0.4% | +0.4% | +6.2% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.9% | +1.3% | +2.2% | +7.3% | +10.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.4% | +1.4% | +3.0% | +8.6% | +12.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.93x | 0.45x | 1.40x | 1.13x | 0.91x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | -$6.4B | $11.7B | $4.3B | $209M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $142M | $57.4B | $10.0B | $854M | $15.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $51.0B | $21.8B | $5.2B | $15.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.09x | 0.14x | 0.22x | 3.61x | 1.13x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ALLY and SYF each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SYF five years ago would be worth $16,990 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,957 for TRU. Over the past 12 months, ALLY leads with a +35.6% total return vs TRU's -16.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SYF at 40.7% vs TRU's 4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.1% | -23.3% | -2.0% | -13.4% | -12.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +26.0% | +1.5% | +35.6% | -16.2% | +34.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +82.3% | +121.3% | +90.9% | +12.4% | +178.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +53.0% | +28.5% | -6.6% | -30.4% | +69.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.2% | +201.3% | +212.2% | +139.0% | +173.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.2% | +30.3% | +24.1% | +4.0% | +40.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KAR and ALLY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KAR is the less volatile stock with a 0.93 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COF's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALLY currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs TRU's 72.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 1.55x | 1.41x | 1.36x | 1.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.78 | $259.64 | $47.27 | $99.39 | $88.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.54 | $174.98 | $32.50 | $65.23 | $54.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.3% | +73.0% | +93.6% | +72.4% | +82.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.9 | 49.1 | 55.2 | 53.4 | 49.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 976K | 4.6M | 3.5M | 2.3M | 3.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — COF and SYF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KAR as "Buy", COF as "Buy", ALLY as "Buy", TRU as "Buy", SYF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 41.0% upside for COF (target: $267) vs 16.6% for KAR (target: $32). For income investors, COF offers the higher dividend yield at 1.72% vs TRU's 0.64%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $32.00 | $267.18 | $53.33 | $94.88 | $90.55 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 56 | 38 | 26 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.3% | +1.7% | — | +0.6% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.36 | $3.27 | — | $0.46 | $1.19 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +3.5% | 0.0% | +2.4% | +11.6% |
SYF leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 4 categories are tied.
KAR vs COF vs ALLY vs TRU vs SYF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KAR or COF or ALLY or TRU or SYF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) is the stronger pick with 28.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 7% for Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY). Synchrony Financial (SYF) offers the better valuation at 7. 9x trailing P/E (7. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate OPENLANE, Inc. (KAR) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KAR or COF or ALLY or TRU or SYF?
On trailing P/E, Synchrony Financial (SYF) is the cheapest at 7.
9x versus Capital One Financial Corporation at 47. 0x. On forward P/E, Synchrony Financial is actually cheaper at 7. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Synchrony Financial wins at 0. 24x versus TransUnion's 2. 83x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KAR or COF or ALLY or TRU or SYF?
Over the past 5 years, Synchrony Financial (SYF) delivered a total return of +69.
9%, compared to -30. 4% for TransUnion (TRU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALLY returned +212. 2% versus KAR's +99. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KAR or COF or ALLY or TRU or SYF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), OPENLANE, Inc.
(KAR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 93β versus Capital One Financial Corporation's 1. 55β — meaning COF is approximately 66% more volatile than KAR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 45% versus 140% for Ally Financial Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KAR or COF or ALLY or TRU or SYF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) is pulling ahead at 28.
4% versus -25. 7% for Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OPENLANE, Inc. grew EPS 264. 4% year-over-year, compared to -65. 2% for Capital One Financial Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, KAR leads at 8. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KAR or COF or ALLY or TRU or SYF?
Synchrony Financial (SYF) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
6% net margin versus 3. 5% for Capital One Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 18. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SYF leads at 24. 2% versus 3. 3% for COF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRU leads at 59. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KAR or COF or ALLY or TRU or SYF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Synchrony Financial (SYF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 24x versus TransUnion's 2. 83x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Synchrony Financial (SYF) trades at 7. 9x forward P/E versus 19. 3x for OPENLANE, Inc. — 11. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COF: 41. 0% to $267. 18.
08Which pays a better dividend — KAR or COF or ALLY or TRU or SYF?
In this comparison, COF (1.
7% yield), SYF (1. 6% yield), KAR (1. 3% yield), TRU (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. ALLY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KAR or COF or ALLY or TRU or SYF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, OPENLANE, Inc.
(KAR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 93), 1. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KAR: +99. 2%, ALLY: +212. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KAR and COF and ALLY and TRU and SYF?
These companies operate in different sectors (KAR (Consumer Cyclical) and COF (Financial Services) and ALLY (Financial Services) and TRU (Industrials) and SYF (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KAR is a small-cap deep-value stock; COF is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ALLY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TRU is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SYF is a mid-cap deep-value stock. KAR, COF, TRU, SYF pay a dividend while ALLY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.