Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KAR vs VRM vs CVNA vs KMX vs AN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KAR
OPENLANE, Inc.

Auto - Dealerships

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.91B
5Y Perf.+99.4%
VRM
Vroom, Inc.

Auto - Dealerships

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$65M
5Y Perf.-99.6%
CVNA
Carvana Co.

Auto - Dealerships

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$86.77B
5Y Perf.+178.0%
KMX
CarMax, Inc.

Auto - Dealerships

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.71B
5Y Perf.-51.8%
AN
AutoNation, Inc.

Auto - Dealerships

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$7.05B
5Y Perf.+419.3%

KAR vs VRM vs CVNA vs KMX vs AN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KAR logoKAR
VRM logoVRM
CVNA logoCVNA
KMX logoKMX
AN logoAN
IndustryAuto - DealershipsAuto - DealershipsAuto - DealershipsAuto - DealershipsAuto - Dealerships
Market Cap$2.91B$65M$86.77B$5.71B$7.05B
Revenue (TTM)$1.93B$3M$22.52B$27.38B$27.49B
Net Income (TTM)$178M$-78M$1.60B$458M$679M
Gross Margin46.2%-476.8%20.0%11.0%17.7%
Operating Margin10.2%-60.9%9.2%1.7%4.4%
Forward P/E19.3x51.4x14.8x9.7x
Total Debt$1.42B$752M$633M$19.43B$10.18B
Cash & Equiv.$142M$29M$2.33B$247M$59M

KAR vs VRM vs CVNA vs KMX vs ANLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KAR
VRM
CVNA
KMX
AN
StockJun 20Mar 26Return
OPENLANE, Inc. (KAR)100199.4+99.4%
Vroom, Inc. (VRM)1000.4-99.6%
Carvana Co. (CVNA)100278.0+178.0%
CarMax, Inc. (KMX)10048.2-51.8%
AutoNation, Inc. (AN)100519.3+419.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KAR vs VRM vs CVNA vs KMX vs AN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CVNA leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. OPENLANE, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. AN also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
KAR
OPENLANE, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

KAR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.98, Low D/E 92.6%, current ratio 1.16x
  • 9.2% margin vs VRM's -27.7%
  • 1.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
VRM
Vroom, Inc.
The Consumer Cyclical Pick

VRM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
CVNA
Carvana Co.
The Growth Play

CVNA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 48.6%, EPS growth 431.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.3%
  • 48.6% revenue growth vs VRM's -98.7%
  • +54.4% vs VRM's -52.3%
  • 13.8% ROA vs VRM's -7.9%, ROIC 34.3% vs -10.0%
Best for: growth exposure
KMX
CarMax, Inc.
The Value Angle

Among these 5 stocks, KMX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
AN
AutoNation, Inc.
The Income Pick

AN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.85
  • 324.6% 10Y total return vs CVNA's 35.1%
  • Beta 0.85, current ratio 0.84x
  • Lower P/E (9.7x vs 14.8x)
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCVNA logoCVNA48.6% revenue growth vs VRM's -98.7%
ValueAN logoANLower P/E (9.7x vs 14.8x)
Quality / MarginsKAR logoKAR9.2% margin vs VRM's -27.7%
Stability / SafetyAN logoANBeta 0.85 vs CVNA's 2.14
DividendsKAR logoKAR1.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CVNA logoCVNA+54.4% vs VRM's -52.3%
Efficiency (ROA)CVNA logoCVNA13.8% ROA vs VRM's -7.9%, ROIC 34.3% vs -10.0%

KAR vs VRM vs CVNA vs KMX vs AN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KAROPENLANE, Inc.
FY 2024
Marketplace
75.9%$1.4B
Finance
24.1%$431M
VRMVroom, Inc.
FY 2024
Wholesale Vehicle
74.2%$141M
Retail Vehicle
24.9%$47M
Product
0.9%$2M
CVNACarvana Co.
FY 2025
Used Vehicle Sales
89.3%$14.5B
Product and Service, Other
10.7%$1.7B
KMXCarMax, Inc.
FY 2025
Used Vehicles
82.1%$21.1B
Wholesale Vehicles
17.9%$4.6B
ANAutoNation, Inc.
FY 2025
New Vehicle
48.9%$13.5B
Used Vehicle
28.3%$7.8B
Parts and Service
17.5%$4.8B
Finance and Insurance, Net
5.3%$1.5B
Product and Service, Other
0.1%$16M

KAR vs VRM vs CVNA vs KMX vs AN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCVNALAGGINGKMX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KAR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

AN is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.5B annually — 9739.0x VRM's $3M. KAR is the more profitable business, keeping 9.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VRM's -27.7%. On growth, CVNA holds the edge at +52.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKAR logoKAROPENLANE, Inc.VRM logoVRMVroom, Inc.CVNA logoCVNACarvana Co.KMX logoKMXCarMax, Inc.AN logoANAutoNation, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.9B$3M$22.5B$27.4B$27.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$288M-$162M$2.3B$791M$1.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$178M-$78M$1.6B$458M$679M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$337M$25M$740M$1.9B-$104M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+46.2%-4.8%+20.0%+11.0%+17.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+10.2%-60.9%+9.2%+1.7%+4.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.2%-27.7%+7.1%+1.7%+2.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+17.4%+9.0%+3.3%+7.1%-0.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+0.5%-100.2%+52.0%-13.4%-2.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+89.7%+76.6%+11.9%-46.9%+33.0%
KAR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — KMX and AN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 12.0x trailing earnings, AN trades at a 75% valuation discount to CVNA's 47.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AN's 10.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CVNA's 39.5x.

MetricKAR logoKAROPENLANE, Inc.VRM logoVRMVroom, Inc.CVNA logoCVNACarvana Co.KMX logoKMXCarMax, Inc.AN logoANAutoNation, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$2.9B$65M$86.8B$5.7B$7.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.2B$788M$85.1B$24.9B$17.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS16.73x-0.14x47.36x12.43x12.05x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.19.31x51.40x14.81x9.70x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.38x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.55x39.46x22.61x10.83x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.51x5.58x4.27x0.20x0.26x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.93x21.36x1.00x3.34x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.66x97.60x36.48x
Evenly matched — KMX and AN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CVNA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

CVNA delivers a 45.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $-77 for VRM. CVNA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AN's 4.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KAR scores 8/9 vs AN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricKAR logoKAROPENLANE, Inc.VRM logoVRMVroom, Inc.CVNA logoCVNACarvana Co.KMX logoKMXCarMax, Inc.AN logoANAutoNation, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.6%-77.0%+45.9%+7.5%+28.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.8%-7.9%+13.8%+1.8%+4.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.9%-10.0%+34.3%+2.4%+8.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.4%-19.4%+20.0%+3.1%+17.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–985684
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.93x0.15x3.11x4.35x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.3B$723M-$1.7B$19.2B$10.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$142M$29M$2.3B$247M$59M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.4B$752M$633M$19.4B$10.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.09x-0.54x-0.68x3.08x4.53x
CVNA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CVNA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AN five years ago would be worth $19,409 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $39 for VRM. Over the past 12 months, CVNA leads with a +54.4% total return vs VRM's -52.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CVNA at 2.3% vs VRM's -44.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKAR logoKAROPENLANE, Inc.VRM logoVRMVroom, Inc.CVNA logoCVNACarvana Co.KMX logoKMXCarMax, Inc.AN logoANAutoNation, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-6.1%-40.2%-0.0%+1.6%-0.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+43.1%-52.3%+54.4%-39.4%+16.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+82.3%-82.7%+3441.8%-45.1%+52.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+61.6%-99.6%+61.5%-69.3%+94.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+99.2%-99.7%+3505.6%-22.1%+324.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+22.2%-44.2%+2.3%-18.1%+15.1%
CVNA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

AN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

AN is the less volatile stock with a 0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CVNA's 2.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AN currently trades 89.7% from its 52-week high vs VRM's 35.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKAR logoKAROPENLANE, Inc.VRM logoVRMVroom, Inc.CVNA logoCVNACarvana Co.KMX logoKMXCarMax, Inc.AN logoANAutoNation, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.98x1.85x2.14x1.32x0.85x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$31.78$34.99$486.89$71.99$228.92
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$19.02$9.04$255.79$30.26$174.34
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+86.3%+35.6%+82.2%+55.4%+89.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10040.933.657.447.553.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded976K15K2.7M3.2M412K
AN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — KMX and AN each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: KAR as "Buy", CVNA as "Hold", KMX as "Hold", AN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.9% upside for CVNA (target: $484) vs -5.3% for KMX (target: $38). KAR is the only dividend payer here at 1.30% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricKAR logoKAROPENLANE, Inc.VRM logoVRMVroom, Inc.CVNA logoCVNACarvana Co.KMX logoKMXCarMax, Inc.AN logoANAutoNation, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$32.00$484.00$37.78$248.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts18443534
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0011
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.36
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.6%0.0%0.0%+7.5%+11.2%
Evenly matched — KMX and AN each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CVNA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). KAR leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallCarvana Co. (CVNA)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KAR vs VRM vs CVNA vs KMX vs AN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KAR or VRM or CVNA or KMX or AN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Carvana Co.

(CVNA) is the stronger pick with 48. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -98. 7% for Vroom, Inc. (VRM). AutoNation, Inc. (AN) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate OPENLANE, Inc. (KAR) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — KAR or VRM or CVNA or KMX or AN?

On trailing P/E, AutoNation, Inc.

(AN) is the cheapest at 12. 0x versus Carvana Co. at 47. 4x. On forward P/E, AutoNation, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — KAR or VRM or CVNA or KMX or AN?

Over the past 5 years, AutoNation, Inc.

(AN) delivered a total return of +94. 1%, compared to -99. 6% for Vroom, Inc. (VRM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CVNA returned +35. 1% versus VRM's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — KAR or VRM or CVNA or KMX or AN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AutoNation, Inc.

(AN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 85β versus Carvana Co. 's 2. 14β — meaning CVNA is approximately 152% more volatile than AN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Carvana Co. (CVNA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 4% for AutoNation, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — KAR or VRM or CVNA or KMX or AN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Carvana Co.

(CVNA) is pulling ahead at 48. 6% versus -98. 7% for Vroom, Inc. (VRM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Carvana Co. grew EPS 431. 4% year-over-year, compared to 0. 7% for AutoNation, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CVNA leads at 14. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — KAR or VRM or CVNA or KMX or AN?

OPENLANE, Inc.

(KAR) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 2% net margin versus -1422. 3% for Vroom, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KAR leads at 10. 2% versus -1092. 2% for VRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VRM leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is KAR or VRM or CVNA or KMX or AN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, AutoNation, Inc.

(AN) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 51. 4x for Carvana Co. — 41. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVNA: 20. 9% to $484. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — KAR or VRM or CVNA or KMX or AN?

In this comparison, KAR (1.

3% yield) pays a dividend. VRM, CVNA, KMX, AN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is KAR or VRM or CVNA or KMX or AN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, OPENLANE, Inc.

(KAR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 98), 1. 3% yield). Carvana Co. (CVNA) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KAR: +99. 2%, CVNA: +35. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between KAR and VRM and CVNA and KMX and AN?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: KAR is a small-cap deep-value stock; VRM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CVNA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KMX is a small-cap deep-value stock; AN is a small-cap deep-value stock. KAR pays a dividend while VRM, CVNA, KMX, AN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

KAR

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

VRM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CVNA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 25%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KMX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform KAR and VRM and CVNA and KMX and AN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(KAR: 0.5% · VRM: -100.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.