Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LC vs SOFI vs UPST vs PFSI vs ATLC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Mortgages
Financial - Credit Services
LC vs SOFI vs UPST vs PFSI vs ATLC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Mortgages | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $1.92B | $20.40B | $2.78B | $4.62B | $1.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.33B | $4.77B | $1.08B | $4.36B | $704M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $136M | $481M | $49M | $507M | $133M |
| Gross Margin | 64.7% | 75.1% | 95.2% | 91.4% | 56.3% |
| Operating Margin | 25.0% | 11.0% | 5.1% | 34.6% | 22.7% |
| Forward P/E | 9.6x | 26.5x | 14.7x | 7.2x | 8.7x |
| Total Debt | $16M | $1.82B | $1.85B | $23.06B | $6.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $918M | $4.93B | $657M | $302M | $621M |
LC vs SOFI vs UPST vs PFSI vs ATLC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LendingClub Corpora… (LC) | 100 | 158.0 | +58.0% |
| SoFi Technologies, … (SOFI) | 100 | 128.6 | +28.6% |
| Upstart Holdings, I… (UPST) | 100 | 71.2 | -28.8% |
| PennyMac Financial … (PFSI) | 100 | 135.1 | +35.1% |
| Atlanticus Holdings… (ATLC) | 100 | 318.1 | +218.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LC vs SOFI vs UPST vs PFSI vs ATLC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.36, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 466.38x
- +62.4% vs UPST's -37.6%
SOFI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, UPST doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PFSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.93, yield 1.3%
- Rev growth 173.8%, EPS growth 59.2%
- Beta 0.93, yield 1.3%, current ratio 0.04x
- 173.8% NII/revenue growth vs LC's 15.0%
ATLC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 25.1% 10Y total return vs PFSI's 6.0%
- PEG 1.01 vs UPST's 1.02
- NIM 14.5% vs SOFI's 4.4%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs UPST's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 173.8% NII/revenue growth vs LC's 15.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.2x vs 14.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs UPST's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.93 vs UPST's 2.96 | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs ATLC's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.4% vs UPST's -37.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs UPST's 0.9% |
LC vs SOFI vs UPST vs PFSI vs ATLC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LC vs SOFI vs UPST vs PFSI vs ATLC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ATLC leads in 2 of 6 categories
PFSI leads 2 • LC leads 1 • SOFI leads 0 • UPST leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATLC leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SOFI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.8B annually — 6.8x ATLC's $704M. ATLC is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UPST's 5.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $4.8B | $1.1B | $4.4B | $704M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $287M | $760M | $68M | $1.0B | $124M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $136M | $481M | $49M | $507M | $133M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2.9B | -$2.6B | -$146M | -$3.8B | $788M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.7% | +75.1% | +95.2% | +91.4% | +56.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.0% | +11.0% | +5.1% | +34.6% | +22.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.2% | +10.1% | +5.0% | +11.5% | +17.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | -83.5% | -15.4% | -32.4% | +89.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.2% | -56.7% | -169.2% | +7.7% | +49.7% |
Valuation Metrics
PFSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, PFSI trades at a 85% valuation discount to UPST's 64.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ATLC offers better value at 1.53x vs UPST's 4.49x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.9B | $20.4B | $2.8B | $4.6B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $17.3B | $4.0B | $27.4B | $7.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.51x | 41.03x | 64.44x | 9.53x | 13.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.56x | 26.45x | 14.69x | 7.17x | 8.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 4.49x | — | 1.53x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.57x | 22.75x | 50.13x | 18.11x | 41.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.44x | 4.28x | 2.58x | 1.06x | 1.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.32x | 1.91x | 3.90x | 1.11x | 2.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 1.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ATLC delivers a 21.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $6 for SOFI. LC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATLC's 10.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LC scores 6/9 vs ATLC's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.5% | +5.9% | +6.6% | +12.0% | +21.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +1.1% | +1.7% | +1.8% | +2.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.3% | +3.6% | +1.7% | +4.4% | +2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.3% | +1.2% | +2.4% | +10.4% | +3.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.17x | 2.32x | 5.35x | 10.84x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$902M | -$3.1B | $1.2B | $22.8B | $5.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $918M | $4.9B | $657M | $302M | $621M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16M | $1.8B | $1.9B | $23.1B | $6.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.67x | 0.45x | 1.66x | 1.35x | 0.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ATLC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ATLC five years ago would be worth $22,886 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,022 for UPST. Over the past 12 months, LC leads with a +62.4% total return vs UPST's -37.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SOFI at 43.0% vs PFSI's 16.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.7% | -41.7% | -36.7% | -32.4% | +18.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +62.4% | +23.0% | -37.6% | -8.0% | +45.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +142.9% | +192.5% | +116.7% | +59.2% | +179.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.1% | -3.1% | -69.8% | +63.7% | +128.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.7% | +52.7% | -1.6% | +603.4% | +2511.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.4% | +43.0% | +29.4% | +16.8% | +40.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PFSI and ATLC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PFSI is the less volatile stock with a 0.93 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UPST's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ATLC currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs UPST's 33.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.36x | 2.54x | 2.96x | 0.93x | 1.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.67 | $32.73 | $87.30 | $160.36 | $80.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.70 | $12.56 | $23.96 | $82.67 | $45.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.0% | +48.9% | +33.2% | +55.3% | +97.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.4 | 41.9 | 42.7 | 40.4 | 66.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 65.8M | 4.8M | 604K | 66K |
Analyst Outlook
PFSI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LC as "Buy", SOFI as "Hold", UPST as "Buy", PFSI as "Buy", ATLC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.3% upside for PFSI (target: $143) vs -10.6% for ATLC (target: $70). For income investors, PFSI offers the higher dividend yield at 1.31% vs ATLC's 0.83%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.75 | $20.89 | $45.17 | $143.00 | $70.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 27 | 22 | 20 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.3% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.16 | $0.65 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +6.0% |
ATLC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). PFSI leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
LC vs SOFI vs UPST vs PFSI vs ATLC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LC or SOFI or UPST or PFSI or ATLC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is the stronger pick with 173. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 0% for LendingClub Corporation (LC). PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (7. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LendingClub Corporation (LC) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LC or SOFI or UPST or PFSI or ATLC?
On trailing P/E, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is the cheapest at 9. 5x versus Upstart Holdings, Inc. at 64. 4x. On forward P/E, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Atlanticus Holdings Corporation wins at 1. 01x versus Upstart Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 02x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LC or SOFI or UPST or PFSI or ATLC?
Over the past 5 years, Atlanticus Holdings Corporation (ATLC) delivered a total return of +128.
9%, compared to -69. 8% for Upstart Holdings, Inc. (UPST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ATLC returned +25. 1% versus LC's -27. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LC or SOFI or UPST or PFSI or ATLC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 93β versus Upstart Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 96β — meaning UPST is approximately 218% more volatile than PFSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LendingClub Corporation (LC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 11% for Atlanticus Holdings Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LC or SOFI or UPST or PFSI or ATLC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is pulling ahead at 173. 8% versus 15. 0% for LendingClub Corporation (LC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LendingClub Corporation grew EPS 155. 6% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for SoFi Technologies, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LC or SOFI or UPST or PFSI or ATLC?
Atlanticus Holdings Corporation (ATLC) is the more profitable company, earning 17.
3% net margin versus 5. 0% for Upstart Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PFSI leads at 34. 6% versus 5. 1% for UPST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UPST leads at 95. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LC or SOFI or UPST or PFSI or ATLC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Atlanticus Holdings Corporation (ATLC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 01x versus Upstart Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 02x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) trades at 7. 2x forward P/E versus 26. 5x for SoFi Technologies, Inc. — 19. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PFSI: 61. 3% to $143. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LC or SOFI or UPST or PFSI or ATLC?
In this comparison, PFSI (1.
3% yield), ATLC (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. LC, SOFI, UPST do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LC or SOFI or UPST or PFSI or ATLC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 93), 1. 3% yield, +603. 4% 10Y return). LendingClub Corporation (LC) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFSI: +603. 4%, LC: -27. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LC and SOFI and UPST and PFSI and ATLC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LC is a small-cap deep-value stock; SOFI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; UPST is a small-cap high-growth stock; PFSI is a small-cap high-growth stock; ATLC is a small-cap high-growth stock. PFSI, ATLC pay a dividend while LC, SOFI, UPST do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.