Financial - Mortgages
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LDI vs ICE vs CME vs RKT vs HOOD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Financial - Mortgages
Financial - Capital Markets
LDI vs ICE vs CME vs RKT vs HOOD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Mortgages | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Financial - Mortgages | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $472M | $88.45B | $104.07B | $39.90B | $68.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.54B | $12.64B | $6.52B | $6.88B | $4.47B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-78M | $3.30B | $4.24B | $-68M | $1.90B |
| Gross Margin | 88.3% | 61.9% | 86.1% | 91.6% | 83.3% |
| Operating Margin | 13.2% | 38.7% | 64.9% | 8.7% | 46.8% |
| Forward P/E | 13.1x | 19.5x | 23.5x | 19.3x | 40.5x |
| Total Debt | $5.04B | $20.28B | $3.76B | $0.00 | $15.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $337M | $837M | $4.42B | $2.70B | $4.26B |
LDI vs ICE vs CME vs RKT vs HOOD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| loanDepot, Inc. (LDI) | 100 | 13.6 | -86.4% |
| Intercontinental Ex… (ICE) | 100 | 130.3 | +30.3% |
| CME Group Inc. (CME) | 100 | 135.2 | +35.2% |
| Rocket Companies, I… (RKT) | 100 | 82.0 | -18.0% |
| Robinhood Markets, … (HOOD) | 100 | 217.0 | +117.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LDI vs ICE vs CME vs RKT vs HOOD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LDI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (13.1x vs 19.3x)
ICE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.33, yield 1.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, Low D/E 69.9%, current ratio 1.02x
- Beta 0.33, yield 1.2%, current ratio 1.02x
- Beta 0.33 vs HOOD's 3.05, lower leverage
CME carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 284.9% 10Y total return vs HOOD's 119.1%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs RKT's 0.8% (lower = leaner)
- 3.8% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs ICE's 1.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs RKT's 0.8%
Among these 5 stocks, RKT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HOOD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 51.6%, EPS growth 31.4%
- PEG 0.16 vs ICE's 2.19
- 51.6% NII/revenue growth vs CME's 6.4%
- +52.6% vs ICE's -10.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.6% NII/revenue growth vs CME's 6.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.1x vs 19.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs RKT's 0.8% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs HOOD's 3.05, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs ICE's 1.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.6% vs ICE's -10.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs RKT's 0.8% |
LDI vs ICE vs CME vs RKT vs HOOD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LDI vs ICE vs CME vs RKT vs HOOD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CME leads in 2 of 6 categories
HOOD leads 2 • LDI leads 1 • ICE leads 0 • RKT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CME leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 8.2x LDI's $1.5B. CME is the more profitable business, keeping 62.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LDI's -4.1%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $12.6B | $6.5B | $6.9B | $4.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $64M | $6.5B | $4.7B | $639M | $2.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$78M | $3.3B | $4.2B | -$68M | $1.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$725M | $4.3B | $4.4B | -$4.1B | $2.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +88.3% | +61.9% | +86.1% | +91.6% | +83.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +38.7% | +64.9% | +8.7% | +46.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | +26.1% | +62.0% | -1.0% | +42.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -47.8% | +33.9% | +64.3% | -58.4% | +36.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -45.5% | +23.1% | +21.4% | -89.6% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
LDI leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.7x trailing earnings, CME trades at a 31% valuation discount to HOOD's 37.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HOOD offers better value at 0.14x vs ICE's 3.05x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $472M | $88.4B | $104.1B | $39.9B | $68.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.2B | $107.9B | $103.4B | $37.2B | $79.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.70x | 27.06x | 25.70x | -282.60x | 37.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.12x | 19.48x | 23.49x | 19.30x | 40.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.05x | 1.87x | — | 0.14x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.55x | 16.71x | 22.96x | 41.81x | 36.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.31x | 7.00x | 15.96x | 5.80x | 15.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.77x | 3.08x | 3.60x | 0.82x | 7.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 20.62x | 24.82x | — | 42.34x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HOOD leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HOOD delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-20 for LDI. CME carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LDI's 13.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs RKT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -19.6% | +11.6% | +15.3% | -0.6% | +21.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.2% | +2.3% | +2.2% | -0.2% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.7% | +7.5% | +10.2% | +2.0% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.2% | +9.5% | +3.6% | +1.6% | +24.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 13.05x | 0.70x | 0.13x | — | 1.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.7B | $19.4B | -$666M | -$2.7B | $11.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $337M | $837M | $4.4B | $2.7B | $4.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.0B | $20.3B | $3.8B | $0 | $15.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.10x | 6.53x | 41.55x | 0.43x | 97.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HOOD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HOOD five years ago would be worth $21,907 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,158 for LDI. Over the past 12 months, HOOD leads with a +52.6% total return vs ICE's -10.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HOOD at 104.6% vs LDI's -6.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.5% | -2.1% | +9.1% | -28.9% | -33.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.8% | -10.4% | +4.6% | +21.6% | +52.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.1% | +50.8% | +71.4% | +77.3% | +756.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.4% | +43.4% | +64.5% | -11.9% | +119.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.4% | +225.3% | +284.9% | -20.7% | +119.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.0% | +14.7% | +19.7% | +21.0% | +104.6% |
Risk & Volatility
CME leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CME is the less volatile stock with a -0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HOOD's 3.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CME currently trades 87.1% from its 52-week high vs LDI's 27.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.11x | 0.33x | -0.30x | 1.77x | 3.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.05 | $189.35 | $329.16 | $24.36 | $153.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.04 | $143.17 | $257.17 | $11.08 | $48.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.9% | +82.5% | +87.1% | +58.0% | +49.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.5 | 38.8 | 44.1 | 45.8 | 51.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 3.0M | 2.2M | 25.0M | 29.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ICE and CME each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LDI as "Hold", ICE as "Buy", CME as "Hold", RKT as "Hold", HOOD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 53.6% upside for HOOD (target: $117) vs 11.6% for CME (target: $320). For income investors, CME offers the higher dividend yield at 3.81% vs LDI's 0.83%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.08 | $195.71 | $320.25 | $21.63 | $117.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 36 | 35 | 25 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +1.2% | +3.8% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 14 | 6 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.01 | $1.93 | $10.92 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | +1.6% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +1.0% |
CME leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). HOOD leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
LDI vs ICE vs CME vs RKT vs HOOD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LDI or ICE or CME or RKT or HOOD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Robinhood Markets, Inc.
(HOOD) is the stronger pick with 51. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for CME Group Inc. (CME). CME Group Inc. (CME) offers the better valuation at 25. 7x trailing P/E (23. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LDI or ICE or CME or RKT or HOOD?
On trailing P/E, CME Group Inc.
(CME) is the cheapest at 25. 7x versus Robinhood Markets, Inc. at 37. 2x. On forward P/E, loanDepot, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Robinhood Markets, Inc. wins at 0. 16x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 2. 19x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LDI or ICE or CME or RKT or HOOD?
Over the past 5 years, Robinhood Markets, Inc.
(HOOD) delivered a total return of +119. 1%, compared to -88. 4% for loanDepot, Inc. (LDI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CME returned +284. 9% versus LDI's -89. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LDI or ICE or CME or RKT or HOOD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CME Group Inc.
(CME) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 30β versus Robinhood Markets, Inc. 's 3. 05β — meaning HOOD is approximately -1104% more volatile than CME relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CME Group Inc. (CME) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 13% for loanDepot, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LDI or ICE or CME or RKT or HOOD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Robinhood Markets, Inc.
(HOOD) is pulling ahead at 51. 6% versus 6. 4% for CME Group Inc. (CME). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: loanDepot, Inc. grew EPS 43. 4% year-over-year, compared to -123. 8% for Rocket Companies, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LDI or ICE or CME or RKT or HOOD?
CME Group Inc.
(CME) is the more profitable company, earning 62. 0% net margin versus -4. 1% for loanDepot, Inc. — meaning it keeps 62. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CME leads at 64. 9% versus 8. 7% for RKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RKT leads at 91. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LDI or ICE or CME or RKT or HOOD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 16x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 2. 19x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, loanDepot, Inc. (LDI) trades at 13. 1x forward P/E versus 40. 5x for Robinhood Markets, Inc. — 27. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOOD: 53. 6% to $117. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — LDI or ICE or CME or RKT or HOOD?
In this comparison, CME (3.
8% yield), ICE (1. 2% yield), LDI (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. RKT, HOOD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LDI or ICE or CME or RKT or HOOD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CME Group Inc.
(CME) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 30), 3. 8% yield, +284. 9% 10Y return). Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) carries a higher beta of 3. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CME: +284. 9%, HOOD: +119. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LDI and ICE and CME and RKT and HOOD?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LDI is a small-cap high-growth stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CME is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; RKT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HOOD is a mid-cap high-growth stock. LDI, ICE, CME pay a dividend while RKT, HOOD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.