Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MAX vs QNST vs RAMP vs ACMR vs TPVG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Advertising Agencies
Software - Infrastructure
Semiconductors
Asset Management
MAX vs QNST vs RAMP vs ACMR vs TPVG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Advertising Agencies | Software - Infrastructure | Semiconductors | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $521M | $788M | $1.90B | $3.50B | $222M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.16B | $1.11B | $796M | $901M | $97M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $39M | $62M | $69M | $94M | $49M |
| Gross Margin | 14.9% | 10.0% | 70.4% | 44.4% | 83.5% |
| Operating Margin | 8.7% | 1.3% | 7.1% | 12.1% | 77.9% |
| Forward P/E | 8.5x | 10.2x | 12.8x | 27.8x | 6.0x |
| Total Debt | $155M | $10M | $36M | $303M | $469M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $47M | $101M | $413M | $766M | $20M |
MAX vs QNST vs RAMP vs ACMR vs TPVG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MediaAlpha, Inc. (MAX) | 100 | 26.5 | -73.5% |
| QuinStreet, Inc. (QNST) | 100 | 81.3 | -18.7% |
| LiveRamp Holdings, … (RAMP) | 100 | 44.5 | -55.5% |
| ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) | 100 | 236.1 | +136.1% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 52.8 | -47.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MAX vs QNST vs RAMP vs ACMR vs TPVG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MAX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.01
QNST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 78.3%, EPS growth 114.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.4%
- 78.3% revenue growth vs RAMP's 13.0%
- 14.0% ROA vs ACMR's 3.9%, ROIC 2.8% vs 7.0%
RAMP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 2.65x
- Beta 0.97, current ratio 2.65x
ACMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 27.2% 10Y total return vs QNST's 306.8%
- PEG 0.78 vs TPVG's 5.96
- Better valuation composite
- 0.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
TPVG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and stability.
- 50.6% margin vs MAX's 3.4%
- Beta 0.83 vs ACMR's 3.24
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 78.3% revenue growth vs RAMP's 13.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.6% margin vs MAX's 3.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs ACMR's 3.24 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +167.9% vs QNST's -25.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.0% ROA vs ACMR's 3.9%, ROIC 2.8% vs 7.0% |
MAX vs QNST vs RAMP vs ACMR vs TPVG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MAX vs QNST vs RAMP vs ACMR vs TPVG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACMR leads in 2 of 6 categories
TPVG leads 1 • MAX leads 1 • QNST leads 1 • RAMP leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAX is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 11.9x TPVG's $97M. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MAX's 3.4%. On growth, MAX holds the edge at +17.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $1.1B | $796M | $901M | $97M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $103M | $37M | $71M | $126M | $76M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $39M | $62M | $69M | $94M | $49M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $40M | $93M | $169M | -$69M | $37M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +10.0% | +70.4% | +44.4% | +83.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.7% | +1.3% | +7.1% | +12.1% | +77.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +5.6% | +8.6% | +10.4% | +50.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +8.4% | +21.3% | -7.6% | -58.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.3% | +1.9% | +8.6% | +9.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.0% | +32.6% | +2.6% | -76.1% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
MAX leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.5x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 97% valuation discount to QNST's 171.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ACMR offers better value at 1.09x vs TPVG's 4.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $521M | $788M | $1.9B | $3.5B | $222M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $630M | $697M | $1.5B | $3.0B | $671M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.23x | 171.38x | -2488.43x | 38.54x | 4.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.50x | 10.20x | 12.83x | 27.77x | 6.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.09x | 4.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.73x | 22.72x | 67.39x | 24.12x | 8.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.47x | 0.72x | 2.55x | 3.88x | 2.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 3.30x | 2.14x | 1.84x | 0.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.99x | 9.51x | 12.29x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
QNST leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QNST delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $6 for ACMR. RAMP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TPVG's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QNST scores 8/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +24.4% | +7.1% | +6.1% | +14.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.3% | +14.0% | +5.7% | +3.9% | +6.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +77.1% | +2.8% | +0.7% | +7.0% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +42.8% | +2.4% | +0.5% | +6.6% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.04x | 0.04x | 0.16x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $108M | -$91M | -$377M | -$463M | $449M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $47M | $101M | $413M | $766M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $155M | $10M | $36M | $303M | $469M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.99x | 51.94x | 31.98x | 20.44x | 2.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACMR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACMR five years ago would be worth $21,205 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,263 for MAX. Over the past 12 months, ACMR leads with a +167.9% total return vs QNST's -25.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACMR at 71.5% vs TPVG's -1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.9% | -1.8% | +9.8% | +17.6% | -14.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.6% | -25.2% | +12.1% | +167.9% | +9.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +57.8% | +70.8% | +26.5% | +404.3% | -4.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.4% | -30.9% | -37.0% | +112.0% | -23.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.3% | +306.8% | +34.8% | +2723.5% | +87.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.4% | +19.5% | +8.2% | +71.5% | -1.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RAMP and TPVG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TPVG is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACMR's 3.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RAMP currently trades 85.5% from its 52-week high vs MAX's 68.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 1.23x | 0.97x | 3.24x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.87 | $19.03 | $35.20 | $71.65 | $7.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.14 | $10.29 | $21.71 | $19.10 | $4.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.2% | +72.7% | +85.5% | +73.7% | +72.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.7 | 51.9 | 63.6 | 53.1 | 60.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 714K | 670K | 685K | 1.1M | 491K |
Analyst Outlook
ACMR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MAX as "Buy", QNST as "Buy", RAMP as "Buy", ACMR as "Buy", TPVG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 63.3% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs -24.2% for ACMR (target: $40). ACMR is the only dividend payer here at 0.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.25 | $15.00 | $44.00 | $40.00 | $8.95 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 13 | 12 | 10 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.11 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.1% | 0.0% | +5.3% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
ACMR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). TPVG leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
MAX vs QNST vs RAMP vs ACMR vs TPVG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MAX or QNST or RAMP or ACMR or TPVG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, QuinStreet, Inc.
(QNST) is the stronger pick with 78. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 13. 0% for LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (RAMP). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 5x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MediaAlpha, Inc. (MAX) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MAX or QNST or RAMP or ACMR or TPVG?
On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 5x versus QuinStreet, Inc. at 171. 4x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ACM Research, Inc. wins at 0. 78x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 5. 96x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MAX or QNST or RAMP or ACMR or TPVG?
Over the past 5 years, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) delivered a total return of +112. 0%, compared to -77. 4% for MediaAlpha, Inc. (MAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +28. 6% versus MAX's -71. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MAX or QNST or RAMP or ACMR or TPVG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus ACM Research, Inc. 's 3. 24β — meaning ACMR is approximately 289% more volatile than TPVG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (RAMP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 133% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MAX or QNST or RAMP or ACMR or TPVG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), QuinStreet, Inc.
(QNST) is pulling ahead at 78. 3% versus 13. 0% for LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (RAMP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: QuinStreet, Inc. grew EPS 114. 2% year-over-year, compared to -107. 1% for LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MAX leads at 34. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MAX or QNST or RAMP or ACMR or TPVG?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus -0. 1% for LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus 0. 6% for QNST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPVG leads at 83. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MAX or QNST or RAMP or ACMR or TPVG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 78x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 5. 96x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 27. 8x for ACM Research, Inc. — 21. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 63. 3% to $8. 95.
08Which pays a better dividend — MAX or QNST or RAMP or ACMR or TPVG?
In this comparison, ACMR (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. MAX, QNST, RAMP, TPVG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MAX or QNST or RAMP or ACMR or TPVG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83)). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) carries a higher beta of 3. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TPVG: +87. 8%, ACMR: +28. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MAX and QNST and RAMP and ACMR and TPVG?
These companies operate in different sectors (MAX (Communication Services) and QNST (Communication Services) and RAMP (Technology) and ACMR (Technology) and TPVG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MAX is a small-cap high-growth stock; QNST is a small-cap high-growth stock; RAMP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.