Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MGIC vs PCTY vs NOW vs MNDY vs CRM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
MGIC vs PCTY vs NOW vs MNDY vs CRM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $853M | $6.04B | $94.48B | $3.72B | $174.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $603M | $1.73B | $13.96B | $1.23B | $41.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $40M | $258M | $1.76B | $119M | $7.46B |
| Gross Margin | 28.0% | 69.3% | 76.6% | 89.2% | 77.7% |
| Operating Margin | 10.8% | 21.3% | 13.4% | -0.1% | 21.5% |
| Forward P/E | 15.0x | 14.3x | 21.9x | 17.9x | 15.4x |
| Total Debt | $86M | $218M | $3.20B | $312M | $6.74B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $113M | $398M | $3.73B | $1.50B | $7.33B |
MGIC vs PCTY vs NOW vs MNDY vs CRM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Magic Software Ente… (MGIC) | 100 | 107.1 | +7.1% |
| Paylocity Holding C… (PCTY) | 100 | 55.8 | -44.2% |
| ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) | 100 | 19.7 | -80.3% |
| monday.com Ltd. (MNDY) | 100 | 32.5 | -67.5% |
| Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) | 100 | 79.7 | -20.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MGIC vs PCTY vs NOW vs MNDY vs CRM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MGIC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and defensive.
- 222.0% 10Y total return vs PCTY's 223.7%
- Beta 1.44, yield 1.2%, current ratio 1.62x
- 1.2% yield, vs CRM's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
- +23.7% vs NOW's -90.6%
PCTY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 17.7%, current ratio 1.14x
- Lower P/E (14.3x vs 15.4x), PEG 0.51 vs 1.26
- Beta 0.39 vs MGIC's 1.44, lower leverage
NOW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.32 vs CRM's 1.26
- 7.5% ROA vs PCTY's 4.9%, ROIC 12.4% vs 26.2%
MNDY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 26.7%, EPS growth 261.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.4%
- 26.7% revenue growth vs MGIC's 3.3%
CRM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 0.9%
- 18.0% margin vs MGIC's 6.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.7% revenue growth vs MGIC's 3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.3x vs 15.4x), PEG 0.51 vs 1.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.0% margin vs MGIC's 6.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs MGIC's 1.44, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, vs CRM's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.7% vs NOW's -90.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs PCTY's 4.9%, ROIC 12.4% vs 26.2% |
MGIC vs PCTY vs NOW vs MNDY vs CRM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MGIC vs PCTY vs NOW vs MNDY vs CRM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MGIC leads in 2 of 6 categories
PCTY leads 1 • NOW leads 0 • MNDY leads 0 • CRM leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MNDY and CRM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRM is the larger business by revenue, generating $41.5B annually — 68.8x MGIC's $603M. CRM is the more profitable business, keeping 18.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MGIC's 6.6%. On growth, MNDY holds the edge at +24.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $603M | $1.7B | $14.0B | $1.2B | $41.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $87M | $394M | $2.7B | $12M | $11.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $40M | $258M | $1.8B | $119M | $7.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $64M | $470M | $4.6B | $321M | $14.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.0% | +69.3% | +76.6% | +89.2% | +77.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +21.3% | +13.4% | -0.1% | +21.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | +14.9% | +12.6% | +9.6% | +18.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +27.2% | +33.2% | +26.0% | +34.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.1% | +10.5% | +22.1% | +24.6% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.6% | +26.7% | +2.3% | +2.3% | +18.3% |
Valuation Metrics
MGIC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.2x trailing earnings, MGIC trades at a 58% valuation discount to NOW's 54.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NOW offers better value at 0.79x vs CRM's 1.91x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $853M | $6.0B | $94.5B | $3.7B | $174.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $827M | $5.9B | $94.0B | $2.5B | $174.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.17x | 27.61x | 54.60x | 32.17x | 23.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.98x | 14.29x | 21.94x | 17.93x | 15.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.98x | 0.98x | 0.79x | — | 1.91x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.07x | 14.51x | 36.67x | 209.33x | 19.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.54x | 3.78x | 7.12x | 3.02x | 4.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.83x | 5.09x | 7.36x | 3.07x | 2.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.64x | 17.61x | 20.65x | 11.86x | 12.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PCTY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PCTY delivers a 22.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $10 for MNDY. CRM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGIC's 0.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCTY scores 8/9 vs NOW's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.4% | +22.4% | +15.0% | +9.5% | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.4% | +4.9% | +7.5% | +5.6% | +6.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.2% | +26.2% | +12.4% | -2.4% | +10.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.3% | +23.3% | +13.2% | -0.1% | +11.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 0.18x | 0.25x | 0.25x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$27M | -$180M | -$523M | -$1.2B | -$590M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $113M | $398M | $3.7B | $1.5B | $7.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $86M | $218M | $3.2B | $312M | $6.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.90x | 23.29x | 185.08x | — | 44.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MGIC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MGIC five years ago would be worth $12,306 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,953 for NOW. Over the past 12 months, MGIC leads with a +23.7% total return vs NOW's -90.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MGIC at 10.9% vs NOW's -40.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -33.3% | -23.8% | -38.2% | -49.7% | -28.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.7% | -42.7% | -90.6% | -74.4% | -34.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.5% | -36.1% | -79.2% | -42.1% | -6.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.1% | -31.8% | -80.5% | -59.7% | -13.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +222.0% | +223.7% | +35.2% | -59.7% | +148.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.9% | -13.8% | -40.8% | -16.7% | -2.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MGIC and PCTY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PCTY is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MGIC's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MGIC currently trades 62.1% from its 52-week high vs NOW's 8.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.44x | 0.39x | 1.39x | 1.09x | 0.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.00 | $201.97 | $1057.39 | $316.98 | $296.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.31 | $92.99 | $81.24 | $57.50 | $163.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.1% | +54.9% | +8.6% | +22.7% | +61.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 30.7 | 55.2 | 48.0 | 59.7 | 53.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 46K | 736K | 21.1M | 1.5M | 12.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MGIC and CRM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MGIC as "Buy", PCTY as "Buy", NOW as "Buy", MNDY as "Buy", CRM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 84.5% upside for MNDY (target: $133) vs 6.4% for MGIC (target: $19). For income investors, MGIC offers the higher dividend yield at 1.17% vs CRM's 0.91%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.50 | $147.73 | $154.08 | $133.00 | $287.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 41 | 68 | 25 | 97 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | — | — | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | — | — | — | $1.66 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.5% | +1.9% | +3.6% | +7.2% |
MGIC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). PCTY leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
MGIC vs PCTY vs NOW vs MNDY vs CRM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MGIC or PCTY or NOW or MNDY or CRM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, monday.
com Ltd. (MNDY) is the stronger pick with 26. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. (MGIC). Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. (MGIC) offers the better valuation at 23. 2x trailing P/E (15. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. (MGIC) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MGIC or PCTY or NOW or MNDY or CRM?
On trailing P/E, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
(MGIC) is the cheapest at 23. 2x versus ServiceNow, Inc. at 54. 6x. On forward P/E, Paylocity Holding Corporation is actually cheaper at 14. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ServiceNow, Inc. wins at 0. 32x versus Salesforce, Inc. 's 1. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MGIC or PCTY or NOW or MNDY or CRM?
Over the past 5 years, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
(MGIC) delivered a total return of +23. 1%, compared to -80. 5% for ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PCTY returned +223. 7% versus MNDY's -59. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MGIC or PCTY or NOW or MNDY or CRM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
39β versus Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. 's 1. 44β — meaning MGIC is approximately 268% more volatile than PCTY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 29% for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MGIC or PCTY or NOW or MNDY or CRM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), monday.
com Ltd. (MNDY) is pulling ahead at 26. 7% versus 3. 3% for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. (MGIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: monday. com Ltd. grew EPS 261. 3% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNDY leads at 33. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MGIC or PCTY or NOW or MNDY or CRM?
Salesforce, Inc.
(CRM) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 0% net margin versus 6. 7% for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. — meaning it keeps 18. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRM leads at 21. 5% versus -0. 1% for MNDY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNDY leads at 89. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MGIC or PCTY or NOW or MNDY or CRM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus Salesforce, Inc. 's 1. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) trades at 14. 3x forward P/E versus 21. 9x for ServiceNow, Inc. — 7. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MNDY: 84. 5% to $133. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MGIC or PCTY or NOW or MNDY or CRM?
In this comparison, MGIC (1.
2% yield), CRM (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. PCTY, NOW, MNDY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MGIC or PCTY or NOW or MNDY or CRM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Salesforce, Inc.
(CRM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 0. 9% yield, +148. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CRM: +148. 6%, NOW: +35. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MGIC and PCTY and NOW and MNDY and CRM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MGIC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PCTY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NOW is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MNDY is a small-cap high-growth stock; CRM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MGIC, CRM pay a dividend while PCTY, NOW, MNDY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.