Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MITK vs ALKT vs INTU vs IDAI vs NCNO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
MITK vs ALKT vs INTU vs IDAI vs NCNO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $696M | $1.87B | $113.54B | $3M | $2.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $190M | $472M | $20.12B | $4M | $586M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $17M | $-50M | $4.34B | $-12M | $-22M |
| Gross Margin | 88.0% | 57.4% | 81.2% | 60.0% | 60.1% |
| Operating Margin | 14.5% | -9.3% | 27.1% | -183.3% | -0.8% |
| Forward P/E | 13.4x | 21.7x | 17.5x | — | 19.6x |
| Total Debt | $155M | $354M | $6.64B | $4M | $237M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $154M | $63M | $2.88B | $3M | $121M |
MITK vs ALKT vs INTU vs IDAI vs NCNO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitek Systems, Inc. (MITK) | 100 | 94.8 | -5.2% |
| Alkami Technology, … (ALKT) | 100 | 36.5 | -63.5% |
| Intuit Inc. (INTU) | 100 | 98.7 | -1.3% |
| T Stamp Inc. (IDAI) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| nCino, Inc. (NCNO) | 100 | 27.2 | -72.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MITK vs ALKT vs INTU vs IDAI vs NCNO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MITK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (13.4x vs 19.6x)
- +81.6% vs ALKT's -37.8%
ALKT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 32.9%, EPS growth -12.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.5%
- 32.9% revenue growth vs IDAI's -32.4%
INTU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 1.0%
- 326.4% 10Y total return vs MITK's 88.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 33.7%, current ratio 1.36x
- PEG 1.20 vs MITK's 12.32
IDAI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, NCNO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.9% revenue growth vs IDAI's -32.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.4x vs 19.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.6% margin vs IDAI's -316.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs IDAI's 1.99, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield; 14-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +81.6% vs ALKT's -37.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.7% ROA vs IDAI's -105.4%, ROIC 16.5% vs -219.6% |
MITK vs ALKT vs INTU vs IDAI vs NCNO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MITK vs ALKT vs INTU vs IDAI vs NCNO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INTU leads in 3 of 6 categories
MITK leads 1 • ALKT leads 0 • IDAI leads 0 • NCNO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INTU leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INTU is the larger business by revenue, generating $20.1B annually — 5397.5x IDAI's $4M. INTU is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IDAI's -3.2%. On growth, IDAI holds the edge at +70.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $190M | $472M | $20.1B | $4M | $586M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $39M | -$12M | $5.9B | -$6M | $27M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $17M | -$50M | $4.3B | -$12M | -$22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $45M | $44M | $6.8B | -$8M | $60M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +88.0% | +57.4% | +81.2% | +60.0% | +60.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.5% | -9.3% | +27.1% | -183.3% | -0.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.7% | -10.6% | +21.6% | -3.2% | -3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.5% | +9.4% | +34.0% | -2.2% | +10.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.6% | +28.9% | +17.4% | +70.7% | +9.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | -22.7% | +47.9% | +32.1% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MITK and INTU and IDAI each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.8x trailing earnings, INTU trades at a 63% valuation discount to MITK's 80.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), INTU offers better value at 2.04x vs MITK's 74.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $696M | $1.9B | $113.5B | $3M | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $697M | $2.2B | $117.3B | $4M | $2.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 80.84x | -37.89x | 29.76x | -0.22x | -53.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.39x | 21.69x | 17.52x | — | 19.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 74.36x | — | 2.04x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.62x | — | 20.46x | — | 121.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.87x | 4.20x | 6.03x | 0.89x | 3.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.00x | 5.00x | 5.84x | 0.86x | 1.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.85x | 45.09x | 18.67x | — | 39.45x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INTU leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INTU delivers a 22.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-190 for IDAI. NCNO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IDAI's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INTU scores 9/9 vs IDAI's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.0% | -14.0% | +22.8% | -189.5% | -2.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.9% | -5.9% | +12.7% | -105.4% | -1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.9% | -8.6% | +16.5% | -2.2% | -1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.4% | -9.3% | +19.2% | -194.9% | -1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.65x | 0.98x | 0.34x | 1.30x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | $290M | $3.8B | $1M | $116M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $154M | $63M | $2.9B | $3M | $121M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $155M | $354M | $6.6B | $4M | $237M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.05x | -3.73x | 428.27x | -22.08x | -0.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MITK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INTU five years ago would be worth $10,587 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $95 for IDAI. Over the past 12 months, MITK leads with a +81.6% total return vs ALKT's -37.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MITK at 19.1% vs IDAI's -50.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +54.1% | -23.1% | -35.0% | -38.4% | -27.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +81.6% | -37.8% | -35.8% | +20.9% | -22.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.8% | +41.1% | -1.9% | -87.5% | -21.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.0% | -54.9% | +5.9% | -99.1% | -68.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.0% | -59.5% | +326.4% | +102.4% | -80.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.1% | +12.2% | -0.6% | -50.0% | -7.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MITK and INTU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INTU is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IDAI's 1.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MITK currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs IDAI's 47.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.42x | 1.30x | 0.61x | 1.99x | 1.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.78 | $31.66 | $813.70 | $5.28 | $33.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.38 | $14.11 | $342.11 | $1.80 | $13.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.3% | +55.1% | +50.0% | +47.2% | +52.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.4 | 50.9 | 44.8 | 49.1 | 50.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 873K | 1.9M | 3.5M | 43K | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
INTU leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MITK as "Buy", ALKT as "Buy", INTU as "Buy", NCNO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 81.8% upside for NCNO (target: $32) vs 4.2% for MITK (target: $16). INTU is the only dividend payer here at 1.03% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.00 | $22.00 | $666.75 | — | $32.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 12 | 43 | — | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.0% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 14 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $4.20 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | 0.0% | +2.4% | +2.1% | 0.0% |
INTU leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MITK leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
MITK vs ALKT vs INTU vs IDAI vs NCNO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MITK or ALKT or INTU or IDAI or NCNO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is the stronger pick with 32. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -32. 4% for T Stamp Inc. (IDAI). Intuit Inc. (INTU) offers the better valuation at 29. 8x trailing P/E (17. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mitek Systems, Inc. (MITK) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MITK or ALKT or INTU or IDAI or NCNO?
On trailing P/E, Intuit Inc.
(INTU) is the cheapest at 29. 8x versus Mitek Systems, Inc. at 80. 8x. On forward P/E, Mitek Systems, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Intuit Inc. wins at 1. 20x versus Mitek Systems, Inc. 's 12. 32x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MITK or ALKT or INTU or IDAI or NCNO?
Over the past 5 years, Intuit Inc.
(INTU) delivered a total return of +5. 9%, compared to -99. 1% for T Stamp Inc. (IDAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INTU returned +326. 4% versus NCNO's -80. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MITK or ALKT or INTU or IDAI or NCNO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intuit Inc.
(INTU) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus T Stamp Inc. 's 1. 99β — meaning IDAI is approximately 227% more volatile than INTU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, nCino, Inc. (NCNO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 130% for T Stamp Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MITK or ALKT or INTU or IDAI or NCNO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is pulling ahead at 32. 9% versus -32. 4% for T Stamp Inc. (IDAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mitek Systems, Inc. grew EPS 175. 0% year-over-year, compared to -12. 2% for Alkami Technology, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALKT leads at 29. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MITK or ALKT or INTU or IDAI or NCNO?
Intuit Inc.
(INTU) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 5% net margin versus -344. 1% for T Stamp Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INTU leads at 26. 1% versus -303. 9% for IDAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MITK leads at 85. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MITK or ALKT or INTU or IDAI or NCNO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Intuit Inc. (INTU) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 20x versus Mitek Systems, Inc. 's 12. 32x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Mitek Systems, Inc. (MITK) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 21. 7x for Alkami Technology, Inc. — 8. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NCNO: 81. 8% to $32. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — MITK or ALKT or INTU or IDAI or NCNO?
In this comparison, INTU (1.
0% yield) pays a dividend. MITK, ALKT, IDAI, NCNO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MITK or ALKT or INTU or IDAI or NCNO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intuit Inc.
(INTU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 61), 1. 0% yield, +326. 4% 10Y return). T Stamp Inc. (IDAI) carries a higher beta of 1. 99 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INTU: +326. 4%, IDAI: +102. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MITK and ALKT and INTU and IDAI and NCNO?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MITK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALKT is a small-cap high-growth stock; INTU is a mid-cap high-growth stock; IDAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NCNO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. INTU pays a dividend while MITK, ALKT, IDAI, NCNO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.