Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NAVI vs PFSI vs SLM vs RKT vs TREE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NAVI
Navient Corporation

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$826M
5Y Perf.-3.3%
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

Financial - Mortgages

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.62B
5Y Perf.+68.2%
SLM
SLM Corporation

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.49B
5Y Perf.+196.6%
RKT
Rocket Companies, Inc.

Financial - Mortgages

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$39.90B
5Y Perf.-49.5%
TREE
LendingTree, Inc.

Financial - Conglomerates

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$552M
5Y Perf.-87.1%

NAVI vs PFSI vs SLM vs RKT vs TREE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NAVI logoNAVI
PFSI logoPFSI
SLM logoSLM
RKT logoRKT
TREE logoTREE
IndustryFinancial - Credit ServicesFinancial - MortgagesFinancial - Credit ServicesFinancial - MortgagesFinancial - Conglomerates
Market Cap$826M$4.62B$4.49B$39.90B$552M
Revenue (TTM)$3.23B$4.36B$3.11B$6.88B$1.12B
Net Income (TTM)$-60M$507M$745M$-68M$181M
Gross Margin87.0%91.4%53.1%91.6%94.3%
Operating Margin77.1%34.6%31.9%8.7%7.3%
Forward P/E12.3x7.2x7.3x19.3x7.1x
Total Debt$45.71B$23.06B$5.86B$0.00$435M
Cash & Equiv.$2.10B$302M$4.24B$2.70B$81M

NAVI vs PFSI vs SLM vs RKT vs TREELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NAVI
PFSI
SLM
RKT
TREE
StockAug 20May 26Return
Navient Corporation (NAVI)10096.7-3.3%
PennyMac Financial … (PFSI)100168.2+68.2%
SLM Corporation (SLM)100296.6+196.6%
Rocket Companies, I… (RKT)10050.5-49.5%
LendingTree, Inc. (TREE)10012.9-87.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NAVI vs PFSI vs SLM vs RKT vs TREE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NAVI leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. SLM and RKT also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NAVI
Navient Corporation
The Banking Pick

NAVI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.92, current ratio 0.41x
  • Beta 0.92, yield 7.2%, current ratio 0.41x
  • Lower P/E (12.3x vs 19.3x)
  • Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs TREE's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
The Banking Pick

PFSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 173.8%, EPS growth 59.2%
  • 6.0% 10Y total return vs SLM's 284.8%
  • 173.8% NII/revenue growth vs NAVI's -23.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
SLM
SLM Corporation
The Banking Pick

SLM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and bank quality.

  • Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 1.13, yield 14.9%
  • NIM 5.0% vs NAVI's 1.1%
  • 14.9% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs NAVI's 7.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and bank quality
RKT
Rocket Companies, Inc.
The Banking Pick

RKT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +21.6% vs SLM's -26.5%
Best for: momentum
TREE
LendingTree, Inc.
The Financial Play

Among these 5 stocks, TREE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPFSI logoPFSI173.8% NII/revenue growth vs NAVI's -23.7%
ValueNAVI logoNAVILower P/E (12.3x vs 19.3x)
Quality / MarginsNAVI logoNAVIEfficiency ratio 0.1% vs TREE's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyNAVI logoNAVIBeta 0.92 vs RKT's 1.77
DividendsSLM logoSLM14.9% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs NAVI's 7.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)RKT logoRKT+21.6% vs SLM's -26.5%
Efficiency (ROA)NAVI logoNAVIEfficiency ratio 0.1% vs TREE's 0.9%

NAVI vs PFSI vs SLM vs RKT vs TREE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NAVINavient Corporation
FY 2025
Federal Education Loans Segment
38.6%$51M
Other Operating Segment
35.6%$47M
Business Processing
17.4%$23M
Consumer Lending
8.3%$11M
PFSIPennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Mortgage banking Production
63.1%$1.3B
Mortgage banking Servicing
36.9%$737M
SLMSLM Corporation
FY 2013
Business Services
64.0%$710M
Core Earnings
26.1%$290M
Ffelp Loans
6.8%$76M
Consumer Lending
3.1%$34M
RKTRocket Companies, Inc.
FY 2025
Direct To Customer Segment
87.8%$4.8B
Partner Network Segment
12.2%$668M
TREELendingTree, Inc.
FY 2025
Other Products And Services
100.0%$310,000

NAVI vs PFSI vs SLM vs RKT vs TREE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNAVILAGGINGRKT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — NAVI and SLM each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

RKT is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.9B annually — 6.2x TREE's $1.1B. SLM is the more profitable business, keeping 24.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NAVI's -2.5%.

MetricNAVI logoNAVINavient Corporati…PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…SLM logoSLMSLM CorporationRKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…TREE logoTREELendingTree, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.2B$4.4B$3.1B$6.9B$1.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$544M$1.0B$599M$639M$120M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$60M$507M$745M-$68M$181M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$323M-$3.8B$646M-$4.1B$73M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+87.0%+91.4%+53.1%+91.6%+94.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+77.1%+34.6%+31.9%+8.7%+7.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-2.5%+11.5%+24.0%-1.0%+13.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+13.7%-32.4%+18.5%-58.4%+5.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.7%+7.7%+10.0%-89.6%+2.3%
Evenly matched — NAVI and SLM each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NAVI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 3.7x trailing earnings, TREE trades at a 61% valuation discount to PFSI's 9.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SLM's 6.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RKT's 41.8x.

MetricNAVI logoNAVINavient Corporati…PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…SLM logoSLMSLM CorporationRKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…TREE logoTREELendingTree, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$826M$4.6B$4.5B$39.9B$552M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$44.4B$27.4B$6.1B$37.2B$906M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-10.85x9.53x6.55x-282.60x3.69x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.29x7.17x7.29x19.30x7.11x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.73x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple17.81x18.11x6.14x41.81x8.73x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.26x1.06x1.44x5.80x0.49x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.36x1.11x1.91x0.82x1.95x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF1.87x7.80x9.09x
NAVI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TREE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

TREE delivers a 86.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $86 in annual profit, vs $-2 for NAVI. TREE carries lower financial leverage with a 1.52x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NAVI's 19.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLM scores 7/9 vs RKT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNAVI logoNAVINavient Corporati…PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…SLM logoSLMSLM CorporationRKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…TREE logoTREELendingTree, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.5%+12.0%+31.0%-0.6%+86.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-0.1%+1.8%+2.5%-0.2%+21.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.8%+4.4%+8.8%+2.0%+9.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.5%+10.4%+11.5%+1.6%+13.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–954726
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage19.05x5.35x2.39x1.52x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$43.6B$22.8B$1.6B-$2.7B$354M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2.1B$302M$4.2B$2.7B$81M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$45.7B$23.1B$5.9B$0$435M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.21x1.35x0.70x0.43x4.45x
TREE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — PFSI and TREE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PFSI five years ago would be worth $16,366 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,126 for TREE. Over the past 12 months, RKT leads with a +21.6% total return vs SLM's -26.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TREE at 28.5% vs NAVI's -10.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNAVI logoNAVINavient Corporati…PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…SLM logoSLMSLM CorporationRKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…TREE logoTREELendingTree, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-30.0%-32.4%-16.9%-28.9%-22.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-25.1%-8.0%-26.5%+21.6%+6.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-27.8%+59.2%+63.4%+77.3%+112.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-30.9%+63.7%+20.1%-11.9%-78.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+15.3%+603.4%+284.8%-20.7%-45.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-10.3%+16.8%+17.8%+21.0%+28.5%
Evenly matched — PFSI and TREE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NAVI and SLM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NAVI is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RKT's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLM currently trades 64.8% from its 52-week high vs TREE's 51.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNAVI logoNAVINavient Corporati…PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…SLM logoSLMSLM CorporationRKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…TREE logoTREELendingTree, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.92x0.93x1.13x1.77x1.55x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$16.07$160.36$34.97$24.36$77.35
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.80$82.67$17.77$11.08$32.65
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+54.7%+55.3%+64.8%+58.0%+51.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.540.451.645.839.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded923K604K3.9M25.0M326K
Evenly matched — NAVI and SLM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SLM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: NAVI as "Hold", PFSI as "Buy", SLM as "Buy", RKT as "Hold", TREE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 73.2% upside for TREE (target: $69) vs -1.4% for NAVI (target: $9). For income investors, SLM offers the higher dividend yield at 14.91% vs PFSI's 1.31%.

MetricNAVI logoNAVINavient Corporati…PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…SLM logoSLMSLM CorporationRKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…TREE logoTREELendingTree, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$8.67$143.00$29.50$21.63$69.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2420252523
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+7.2%+1.3%+14.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises12710
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.64$1.16$3.38
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+13.4%+0.1%+8.2%0.0%0.0%
SLM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NAVI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). TREE leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallNavient Corporation (NAVI)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NAVI vs PFSI vs SLM vs RKT vs TREE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NAVI or PFSI or SLM or RKT or TREE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

(PFSI) is the stronger pick with 173. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 7% for Navient Corporation (NAVI). LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) offers the better valuation at 3. 7x trailing P/E (7. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NAVI or PFSI or SLM or RKT or TREE?

On trailing P/E, LendingTree, Inc.

(TREE) is the cheapest at 3. 7x versus PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. at 9. 5x. On forward P/E, LendingTree, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NAVI or PFSI or SLM or RKT or TREE?

Over the past 5 years, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

(PFSI) delivered a total return of +63. 7%, compared to -78. 7% for LendingTree, Inc. (TREE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFSI returned +603. 4% versus TREE's -45. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NAVI or PFSI or SLM or RKT or TREE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Navient Corporation (NAVI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

92β versus Rocket Companies, Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning RKT is approximately 92% more volatile than NAVI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 152% versus 19% for Navient Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NAVI or PFSI or SLM or RKT or TREE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

(PFSI) is pulling ahead at 173. 8% versus -23. 7% for Navient Corporation (NAVI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LendingTree, Inc. grew EPS 443. 3% year-over-year, compared to -168. 6% for Navient Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NAVI or PFSI or SLM or RKT or TREE?

SLM Corporation (SLM) is the more profitable company, earning 24.

0% net margin versus -2. 5% for Navient Corporation — meaning it keeps 24. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NAVI leads at 77. 1% versus 7. 3% for TREE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TREE leads at 94. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NAVI or PFSI or SLM or RKT or TREE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, LendingTree, Inc.

(TREE) trades at 7. 1x forward P/E versus 19. 3x for Rocket Companies, Inc. — 12. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TREE: 73. 2% to $69. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NAVI or PFSI or SLM or RKT or TREE?

In this comparison, SLM (14.

9% yield), NAVI (7. 2% yield), PFSI (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. RKT, TREE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is NAVI or PFSI or SLM or RKT or TREE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

(PFSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 93), 1. 3% yield, +603. 4% 10Y return). Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFSI: +603. 4%, RKT: -20. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NAVI and PFSI and SLM and RKT and TREE?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NAVI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PFSI is a small-cap high-growth stock; SLM is a small-cap deep-value stock; RKT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TREE is a small-cap high-growth stock. NAVI, PFSI, SLM pay a dividend while RKT, TREE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

NAVI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 52%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PFSI

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 86%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SLM

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 14%
  • Dividend Yield > 5.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RKT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Gross Margin > 54%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TREE

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 12%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NAVI and PFSI and SLM and RKT and TREE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NAVI: -23.7% · PFSI: 173.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.