Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NAVI vs PFSI vs SLM vs RKT vs TREE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Mortgages
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Mortgages
Financial - Conglomerates
NAVI vs PFSI vs SLM vs RKT vs TREE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Mortgages | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Mortgages | Financial - Conglomerates |
| Market Cap | $826M | $4.62B | $4.49B | $39.90B | $552M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.23B | $4.36B | $3.11B | $6.88B | $1.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-60M | $507M | $745M | $-68M | $181M |
| Gross Margin | 87.0% | 91.4% | 53.1% | 91.6% | 94.3% |
| Operating Margin | 77.1% | 34.6% | 31.9% | 8.7% | 7.3% |
| Forward P/E | 12.3x | 7.2x | 7.3x | 19.3x | 7.1x |
| Total Debt | $45.71B | $23.06B | $5.86B | $0.00 | $435M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.10B | $302M | $4.24B | $2.70B | $81M |
NAVI vs PFSI vs SLM vs RKT vs TREE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Navient Corporation (NAVI) | 100 | 96.7 | -3.3% |
| PennyMac Financial … (PFSI) | 100 | 168.2 | +68.2% |
| SLM Corporation (SLM) | 100 | 296.6 | +196.6% |
| Rocket Companies, I… (RKT) | 100 | 50.5 | -49.5% |
| LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) | 100 | 12.9 | -87.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NAVI vs PFSI vs SLM vs RKT vs TREE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NAVI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, current ratio 0.41x
- Beta 0.92, yield 7.2%, current ratio 0.41x
- Lower P/E (12.3x vs 19.3x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs TREE's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
PFSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 173.8%, EPS growth 59.2%
- 6.0% 10Y total return vs SLM's 284.8%
- 173.8% NII/revenue growth vs NAVI's -23.7%
SLM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 1.13, yield 14.9%
- NIM 5.0% vs NAVI's 1.1%
- 14.9% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs NAVI's 7.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
RKT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +21.6% vs SLM's -26.5%
Among these 5 stocks, TREE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 173.8% NII/revenue growth vs NAVI's -23.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.3x vs 19.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs TREE's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.92 vs RKT's 1.77 | |
| Dividends | 14.9% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs NAVI's 7.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.6% vs SLM's -26.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs TREE's 0.9% |
NAVI vs PFSI vs SLM vs RKT vs TREE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NAVI vs PFSI vs SLM vs RKT vs TREE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NAVI leads in 1 of 6 categories
TREE leads 1 • SLM leads 1 • PFSI leads 0 • RKT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NAVI and SLM each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RKT is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.9B annually — 6.2x TREE's $1.1B. SLM is the more profitable business, keeping 24.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NAVI's -2.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.2B | $4.4B | $3.1B | $6.9B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $544M | $1.0B | $599M | $639M | $120M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$60M | $507M | $745M | -$68M | $181M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $323M | -$3.8B | $646M | -$4.1B | $73M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.0% | +91.4% | +53.1% | +91.6% | +94.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +77.1% | +34.6% | +31.9% | +8.7% | +7.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +11.5% | +24.0% | -1.0% | +13.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.7% | -32.4% | +18.5% | -58.4% | +5.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.7% | +7.7% | +10.0% | -89.6% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
NAVI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.7x trailing earnings, TREE trades at a 61% valuation discount to PFSI's 9.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SLM's 6.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RKT's 41.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $826M | $4.6B | $4.5B | $39.9B | $552M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $44.4B | $27.4B | $6.1B | $37.2B | $906M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.85x | 9.53x | 6.55x | -282.60x | 3.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.29x | 7.17x | 7.29x | 19.30x | 7.11x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.73x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.81x | 18.11x | 6.14x | 41.81x | 8.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.26x | 1.06x | 1.44x | 5.80x | 0.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.36x | 1.11x | 1.91x | 0.82x | 1.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.87x | — | 7.80x | — | 9.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TREE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TREE delivers a 86.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $86 in annual profit, vs $-2 for NAVI. TREE carries lower financial leverage with a 1.52x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NAVI's 19.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLM scores 7/9 vs RKT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.5% | +12.0% | +31.0% | -0.6% | +86.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | +1.8% | +2.5% | -0.2% | +21.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.8% | +4.4% | +8.8% | +2.0% | +9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.5% | +10.4% | +11.5% | +1.6% | +13.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 19.05x | 5.35x | 2.39x | — | 1.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $43.6B | $22.8B | $1.6B | -$2.7B | $354M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.1B | $302M | $4.2B | $2.7B | $81M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $45.7B | $23.1B | $5.9B | $0 | $435M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.21x | 1.35x | 0.70x | 0.43x | 4.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PFSI and TREE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PFSI five years ago would be worth $16,366 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,126 for TREE. Over the past 12 months, RKT leads with a +21.6% total return vs SLM's -26.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TREE at 28.5% vs NAVI's -10.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -30.0% | -32.4% | -16.9% | -28.9% | -22.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.1% | -8.0% | -26.5% | +21.6% | +6.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.8% | +59.2% | +63.4% | +77.3% | +112.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.9% | +63.7% | +20.1% | -11.9% | -78.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.3% | +603.4% | +284.8% | -20.7% | -45.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.3% | +16.8% | +17.8% | +21.0% | +28.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NAVI and SLM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NAVI is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RKT's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLM currently trades 64.8% from its 52-week high vs TREE's 51.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 0.93x | 1.13x | 1.77x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.07 | $160.36 | $34.97 | $24.36 | $77.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.80 | $82.67 | $17.77 | $11.08 | $32.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.7% | +55.3% | +64.8% | +58.0% | +51.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.5 | 40.4 | 51.6 | 45.8 | 39.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 923K | 604K | 3.9M | 25.0M | 326K |
Analyst Outlook
SLM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NAVI as "Hold", PFSI as "Buy", SLM as "Buy", RKT as "Hold", TREE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 73.2% upside for TREE (target: $69) vs -1.4% for NAVI (target: $9). For income investors, SLM offers the higher dividend yield at 14.91% vs PFSI's 1.31%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.67 | $143.00 | $29.50 | $21.63 | $69.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 20 | 25 | 25 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.2% | +1.3% | +14.9% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.64 | $1.16 | $3.38 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +13.4% | +0.1% | +8.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NAVI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). TREE leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
NAVI vs PFSI vs SLM vs RKT vs TREE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NAVI or PFSI or SLM or RKT or TREE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is the stronger pick with 173. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 7% for Navient Corporation (NAVI). LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) offers the better valuation at 3. 7x trailing P/E (7. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NAVI or PFSI or SLM or RKT or TREE?
On trailing P/E, LendingTree, Inc.
(TREE) is the cheapest at 3. 7x versus PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. at 9. 5x. On forward P/E, LendingTree, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NAVI or PFSI or SLM or RKT or TREE?
Over the past 5 years, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) delivered a total return of +63. 7%, compared to -78. 7% for LendingTree, Inc. (TREE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFSI returned +603. 4% versus TREE's -45. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NAVI or PFSI or SLM or RKT or TREE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Navient Corporation (NAVI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
92β versus Rocket Companies, Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning RKT is approximately 92% more volatile than NAVI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 152% versus 19% for Navient Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NAVI or PFSI or SLM or RKT or TREE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is pulling ahead at 173. 8% versus -23. 7% for Navient Corporation (NAVI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LendingTree, Inc. grew EPS 443. 3% year-over-year, compared to -168. 6% for Navient Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NAVI or PFSI or SLM or RKT or TREE?
SLM Corporation (SLM) is the more profitable company, earning 24.
0% net margin versus -2. 5% for Navient Corporation — meaning it keeps 24. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NAVI leads at 77. 1% versus 7. 3% for TREE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TREE leads at 94. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NAVI or PFSI or SLM or RKT or TREE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, LendingTree, Inc.
(TREE) trades at 7. 1x forward P/E versus 19. 3x for Rocket Companies, Inc. — 12. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TREE: 73. 2% to $69. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NAVI or PFSI or SLM or RKT or TREE?
In this comparison, SLM (14.
9% yield), NAVI (7. 2% yield), PFSI (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. RKT, TREE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NAVI or PFSI or SLM or RKT or TREE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 93), 1. 3% yield, +603. 4% 10Y return). Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFSI: +603. 4%, RKT: -20. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NAVI and PFSI and SLM and RKT and TREE?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NAVI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PFSI is a small-cap high-growth stock; SLM is a small-cap deep-value stock; RKT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TREE is a small-cap high-growth stock. NAVI, PFSI, SLM pay a dividend while RKT, TREE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.