Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NEOG vs IDXX vs BCAL vs QDEL vs NVAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Banks - Regional
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Biotechnology
NEOG vs IDXX vs BCAL vs QDEL vs NVAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Banks - Regional | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $2.01B | $45.45B | $613M | $733M | $1.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $880M | $4.45B | $233M | $2.66B | $596M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-603M | $1.10B | $63M | $-1.21B | $-88M |
| Gross Margin | 38.0% | 62.1% | 79.4% | 56.6% | 84.6% |
| Operating Margin | -2.0% | 31.6% | 37.8% | -37.0% | -11.2% |
| Forward P/E | 25.9x | 39.5x | 11.4x | 6.4x | 3.6x |
| Total Debt | $913M | $1.08B | $72M | $2.80B | $249M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $129M | $180M | $52M | $170M | $241M |
NEOG vs IDXX vs BCAL vs QDEL vs NVAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neogen Corporation (NEOG) | 100 | 26.0 | -74.0% |
| IDEXX Laboratories,… (IDXX) | 100 | 185.2 | +85.2% |
| Southern California… (BCAL) | 100 | 217.9 | +117.9% |
| QuidelOrtho Corpora… (QDEL) | 100 | 6.2 | -93.8% |
| Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) | 100 | 20.0 | -80.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NEOG vs IDXX vs BCAL vs QDEL vs NVAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NEOG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 1.83, current ratio 3.32x
- +56.0% vs QDEL's -58.3%
IDXX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs BCAL's 133.6%
- 32.6% ROA vs QDEL's -20.7%, ROIC 42.5% vs -13.6%
BCAL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 0.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 12.4%, current ratio 0.24x
- PEG 0.36 vs IDXX's 2.76
- Better valuation composite
Among these 5 stocks, QDEL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NVAX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 64.7%, EPS growth 306.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -11.1%
- 64.7% revenue growth vs NEOG's -3.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 64.7% revenue growth vs NEOG's -3.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.1% margin vs NEOG's -68.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs QDEL's 2.59, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +56.0% vs QDEL's -58.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.6% ROA vs QDEL's -20.7%, ROIC 42.5% vs -13.6% |
NEOG vs IDXX vs BCAL vs QDEL vs NVAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NEOG vs IDXX vs BCAL vs QDEL vs NVAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BCAL leads in 3 of 6 categories
QDEL leads 1 • IDXX leads 1 • NEOG leads 0 • NVAX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BCAL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IDXX is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 19.1x BCAL's $233M. BCAL is the more profitable business, keeping 27.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NEOG's -68.5%. On growth, IDXX holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $880M | $4.4B | $233M | $2.7B | $596M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $100M | $1.5B | $92M | -$649M | -$47M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$603M | $1.1B | $63M | -$1.2B | -$88M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $17M | $845M | $57M | -$75M | -$96M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.0% | +62.1% | +79.4% | +56.6% | +84.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | +31.6% | +37.8% | -37.0% | -11.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -68.5% | +24.6% | +27.1% | -45.6% | -14.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +19.0% | +24.4% | -2.8% | -16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.8% | +14.3% | — | -10.5% | -79.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +96.5% | +16.6% | -2.0% | -6.1% | -102.0% |
Valuation Metrics
QDEL leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.6x trailing earnings, NVAX trades at a 92% valuation discount to IDXX's 43.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BCAL offers better value at 0.31x vs IDXX's 3.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $45.4B | $613M | $733M | $1.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $46.3B | $633M | $3.4B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.84x | 43.75x | 9.88x | -0.65x | 3.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.87x | 39.45x | 11.42x | 6.45x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.06x | 0.31x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.70x | 31.60x | 7.19x | — | 2.56x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.25x | 10.56x | 2.63x | 0.27x | 1.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.97x | 28.75x | 1.08x | 0.38x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 43.14x | 10.77x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
IDXX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IDXX delivers a 70.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $71 in annual profit, vs $-56 for QDEL. BCAL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QDEL's 1.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IDXX scores 7/9 vs NEOG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -28.6% | +70.9% | +11.4% | -56.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -17.9% | +32.6% | +1.6% | -20.7% | -7.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.2% | +42.5% | +10.6% | -13.6% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.2% | +61.4% | +5.0% | -18.0% | +100.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | 0.67x | 0.12x | 1.46x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $784M | $897M | $20M | $2.6B | $8M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $129M | $180M | $52M | $170M | $241M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $913M | $1.1B | $72M | $2.8B | $249M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.33x | 35.55x | 1.55x | -5.18x | -5.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BCAL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BCAL five years ago would be worth $14,274 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $524 for NVAX. Over the past 12 months, NEOG leads with a +56.0% total return vs QDEL's -58.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BCAL at 13.9% vs QDEL's -50.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.1% | -14.6% | +3.3% | -62.6% | +29.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +56.0% | +17.6% | +32.9% | -58.3% | +55.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.1% | +17.9% | +47.7% | -87.8% | +23.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.6% | +5.1% | +42.7% | -91.1% | -94.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.8% | +556.2% | +133.6% | -34.9% | -90.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.6% | +5.6% | +13.9% | -50.4% | +7.4% |
Risk & Volatility
BCAL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BCAL is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than QDEL's 2.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BCAL currently trades 93.2% from its 52-week high vs QDEL's 27.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.83x | 1.35x | 0.90x | 2.59x | 2.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.43 | $769.98 | $20.47 | $38.99 | $11.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.53 | $471.74 | $14.07 | $10.22 | $5.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.9% | +74.3% | +93.2% | +27.6% | +77.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.2 | 52.1 | 62.0 | 35.2 | 64.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 533K | 189K | 2.2M | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BCAL and NVAX each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NEOG as "Hold", IDXX as "Buy", BCAL as "Buy", QDEL as "Buy", NVAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 95.0% upside for NVAX (target: $18) vs 15.4% for BCAL (target: $22). BCAL is the only dividend payer here at 0.52% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.00 | $773.13 | $22.00 | $17.00 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 22 | 3 | 15 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.5% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.10 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.7% | +1.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
BCAL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). QDEL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
NEOG vs IDXX vs BCAL vs QDEL vs NVAX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NEOG or IDXX or BCAL or QDEL or NVAX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the stronger pick with 64. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for Neogen Corporation (NEOG). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) offers the better valuation at 3. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. (IDXX) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NEOG or IDXX or BCAL or QDEL or NVAX?
On trailing P/E, Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the cheapest at 3. 6x versus IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. at 43. 7x. On forward P/E, QuidelOrtho Corporation is actually cheaper at 6. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Southern California Bancorp wins at 0. 36x versus IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. 's 2. 76x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NEOG or IDXX or BCAL or QDEL or NVAX?
Over the past 5 years, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) delivered a total return of +42.
7%, compared to -94. 8% for Novavax, Inc. (NVAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IDXX returned +556. 2% versus NVAX's -90. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NEOG or IDXX or BCAL or QDEL or NVAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
90β versus QuidelOrtho Corporation's 2. 59β — meaning QDEL is approximately 189% more volatile than BCAL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 146% for QuidelOrtho Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NEOG or IDXX or BCAL or QDEL or NVAX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is pulling ahead at 64. 7% versus -3. 2% for Neogen Corporation (NEOG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Southern California Bancorp grew EPS 777. 3% year-over-year, compared to -114. 6% for Neogen Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NEOG leads at 19. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NEOG or IDXX or BCAL or QDEL or NVAX?
Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 2% net margin versus -122. 1% for Neogen Corporation — meaning it keeps 39. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVAX leads at 50. 1% versus -33. 7% for QDEL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVAX leads at 93. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NEOG or IDXX or BCAL or QDEL or NVAX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 36x versus IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. 's 2. 76x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, QuidelOrtho Corporation (QDEL) trades at 6. 4x forward P/E versus 39. 5x for IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. — 33. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVAX: 95. 0% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NEOG or IDXX or BCAL or QDEL or NVAX?
In this comparison, BCAL (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. NEOG, IDXX, QDEL, NVAX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NEOG or IDXX or BCAL or QDEL or NVAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
90), 0. 5% yield, +133. 6% 10Y return). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BCAL: +133. 6%, NVAX: -90. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NEOG and IDXX and BCAL and QDEL and NVAX?
These companies operate in different sectors (NEOG (Healthcare) and IDXX (Healthcare) and BCAL (Financial Services) and QDEL (Healthcare) and NVAX (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NEOG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IDXX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BCAL is a small-cap high-growth stock; QDEL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVAX is a small-cap high-growth stock. BCAL pays a dividend while NEOG, IDXX, QDEL, NVAX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.